User talk:Archaeodontosaurus/Première année

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Archaeodontosaurus!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

categories en Anglais

Bonjour, bienvenue sur Commons. Merci de noter que les catégories doivent etre an Anglais, par exemple Copper plutot que Cuivre. Bien à vous, Frédéric (talk) 12:32, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Fasciolaria tulipaProfils.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fasciolaria tulipaProfils.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion

MurexPectenGlobal.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image file:MurexPectenGlobal.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/file:MurexPectenGlobal.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 23:06, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Cypraecassis rufaGlobal.png
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cypraecassis rufaGlobal.png, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Feijoa sellowiana .jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feijoa sellowiana .jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Dardanus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dardanus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

HexaplexcichoreumProfils.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HexaplexcichoreumProfils.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Image need title changing

Hello, this image is a shell of Cassis cornuta Linnaeus, 1758.

Cassis cornuta shell.jpg

. The title needs to be changed. Thanks very much, 24.215.213.21 18:13, 24 October 2009 (UTC) (User:Invertzoo on the English Wikipedia.)

Quality Image Promotion

HeulanditeLonavala.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HeulanditeLonavala.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Spondylus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spondylus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

ActinolitePortugual.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ActinolitePortugual.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Calcite-Maroc-UV.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calcite-Maroc-UV.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Murier.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murier.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

RagondinCrâne.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RagondinCrâne.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

GorillaSkull.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GorillaSkull.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

QI votes

Bonjour, Didier Descouens!

Me plaisent vos travaux. C'est les photos excellentes.

Une petite précision pour les QI candidats:

/Promotion | - Incorrectement (le robot QICbot ne peut pas travailler cela).

/Promotion| - Correctement

Respectueusement, -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:01, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

VautourCrane2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VautourCrane2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

VI corrigé

Bonjour, Didier Descouens!

J'ai corrigé votre nomination. Une principale erreur est Espace typographique au début du nom. En supplément j'ai corrigé la présentation.

Utilisez cela comme l'exemple pour vos nominations ultérieures.

|scope=''[[:Category:Hexaplex cichoreum|Hexaplex cichoreum]]'' (Endive murex)
|usedin=[[:en:Hexaplex]], [[:en:Hexaplex cichoreum]], [[:fr:Hexaplex cichoreum]]

Devant la nomination et avant le vote il est nécessaire d'étudier six critères. Commons:Critères des images de valeur

Si vous faites la nomination de la photo du studio, indiquez sur cela évidemment. Dans les autres cas il faut indiquer absolument les coordonnées géographiques.

Il ne m'est pas difficile de corriger votre nomination. J'aussi faisais plus tôt les erreurs, et ils étaient corrigés par les utilisateurs expérimentés.


P.S. Je ne connais pas la langue française. J'utilise pour le virement le site www.translate.ru. Comment vous estimez la qualité de la traduction ?

Respectueusement -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Phyllacanthus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phyllacanthus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Limules.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Limules.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Rhodonite Australie.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodonite Australie.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rhodonite.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodonite.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Etrilledos.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Etrilledos.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Napa Valley

Hello. Thank you for voting on my image. I added alternative here. May I please ask you to take a look at it, if you have a time? Best regards.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:10, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

HexaplexcichoreumProfils.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hexaplex cichoreum (Endive murex).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

PhlogopiteMonteSommaIII.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PhlogopiteMonteSommaIII.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

SideriteBresil2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SideriteBresil2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Cobaltosmithsonite.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cobaltosmithsonite.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Soufre&gypse sicile.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soufre&gypse sicile.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

FluoriteValzergueFillonjaune.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FluoriteValzergueFillonjaune.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Commons:Valued image candidates/Ettringite.jpg

Bonjour DD (si vous me permettez cette familiarité, aussitôt suivie du tutoiement, si vous n'y voyiez pas d'inconvénient :-),
En réponse à ta perplexité, "le domaine n'est pas une simple description de votre image. Il définit plutôt un champ générique ou une catégorie dont l'image est l'exemple de plus grande valeur." Ceci est expliqué plus en détail sur la page en français Commons:Domaine des images de valeur.
Merci d'avoir ainsi rectifié le "scope" de l'image nominée ; tu pourrais également lier ce domaine à la catégorie Commons correspondante, en intégrant le lien ainsi :
|scope=[[:Category:Ettringite|Ettringite]] (✓ Done par Eusebius entre-temps :-)
Les éventuels évaluateurs pourront ainsi comparer l'image nominée avec les autres images de la catégorie, pour décider si effectivement, l'image nominée est celle ayant la plus grande valeur dans le domaine proposé.
Merci de ta participation aux « Images de Valeur » ; par ailleurs, n'hésite pas à donner ton avis sur les autres images nominées, en vérifiant qu'elles respectent bien les 6 critères demandés. En effet, nous manquons cruellement d'évaluateurs-naturalistes en ce moment ! En restant à ton écoute, et bien amicalement, --Myrabella (talk) 13:44, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Bonjour, Archaeodontosaurus. Voilà déjà quelque temps que je voulais te le dire : je suis très contente que tu sois devenu un contributeur régulier aux VI, tant comme nominateur que comme évaluateur. Et je suis contente aussi que la langue ne soit pas une telle barrière, après tout. Le projet VI ne peut que bénéficier de tes apports. Bien amicalement, --Myrabella (talk) 09:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

FP candidate

Bonjour, Didier!

Cette photo File:Apophyllitestilbite.jpg bon pour la nomination Featured picture candidate.
Je soutiendrai.
Respectueusement, --George Chernilevsky talk 15:22, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Apophyllitestilbite.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apophyllitestilbite.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Ettringite.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ettringite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Roses des Sables Tunisie.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Desert rose.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion

Apophyllitestilbite.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Apophyllitestilbite.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Apophyllitestilbite.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 08:02, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Celestine-Valguarnera.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Celestine-Valguarnera.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

JamesoniteAnita.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
jamesonite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Annabergite-Siderite- Grece-1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Annabergite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Bonjour de France

(J’ai vu que tu utilisais mes photographies en minéralogie. C’est un honneur pour moi et je t’en remercie. Bon souvenir de France, Bien amicalement)
Ich sah, dass ihr meine Fotos in der Mineralogie. Es ist eine Ehre für mich, und ich danke Ihnen. Gute Erinnerungen an Frankreich, Mit freundlichen Grüßen http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Archaeodontosaurus Archaeodontosaurus 12:42, 29. Nov. 2009 (CET) :Hallo Archaeodontosaurus, (Deine Bilder sind wirklich sehr schön und ich hoffe, es kommen noch viele. Vielen Dank für Deine Mühe. Beste Grüße aus Deutschland) :Tes images sont vraiment très belles et moi espèrent, encore beaucoup viennent. Merci beaucoup pour ton effort. Les meilleures salutations d'Allemagne -- Ra'ike Disk. LKU WPMin 15:20, 29. Nov. 2009 (CET) :Tes images sont superb. Merci beaucoup! – Klasse Bilder, ich bin begeisert. :-) -- Schwalbe Disk. 21:34, 29. Nov. 2009 (CET)

Geotags

Merci pour l'explication, qui me convainc, sur ma page de discussion. Cordialement, --Cayambe (talk) 11:49, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Emeraude Musso.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emeraude Musso.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Soufresicile2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soufresicile2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your vote on my nomination

Hello, thank you for voting on my nomination. I uploaded a new (improved IMO) version over old file. I know it is a very bad practice to do it during FPC process and I am sorry about this. May I please ask you to review the image one more time and to change your vote, if you believe my changes were bad. Thank you for your time.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:08, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Trémolite-Barège.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trémolite-Barège.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Soufresicile2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sulfur.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

GalèneJoplinII.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GalèneJoplinII.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Crapaud : un beau male!

Salut ! Merci pour tes encouragements et de ton soutien, j'avais lancé le truc un peu juste "pour voir", car je trouvais cette photo réussie (même si j'ai pas un super matos Mort de rire). Coââ que soit le résultat, je ne me formaliserai pas ! Cordialement, Totodu74 (talk) 20:32, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

ChalcanthitefranceII.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ChalcanthitefranceII.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Brazilianite-monocristal.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
brazilianite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Tremolite Campolungo.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tremolite Campolungo.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

The Stone Barnstar

Barnstar stone.png The Stone Barnstar for science about minerals
La récompense de la science sur les minéraux. Les photos faites par vous est excellent et très nécessaire.
--George Chernilevsky talk 13:32, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

:)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! --George Chernilevsky talk

Quality Image Promotion

Anatase Oisans.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anatase Oisans.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Francevillite.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Francevillite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Fauvette à tête noire

Bonjour et merci pour l'encouragement. Je vais en effet placer prochainement cette image sur la liste des candidats Images de valeur. Bonne et heureuse année 2010, avec, je l'espère, beaucoup d'autres images naturalistes, de minéraux notamment. --Cayambe (talk) 16:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

HemimorphiteMexiqueFrome11.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemimorphite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Dolomite-Magnésite- Navarre.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dolomite-Magnésite- Navarre.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Dioptasetsumeb5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dioptasetsumeb5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Kutnohorite.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kutnohorite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

VI

Bonjour, Didier!

1. Essayez changer le domaine |scope=[[Carcharodontosaurus]], tooth

2. J'ai essayé faire la photo avec le fond noir. C'est votre conseil. Ici le premier résultat File:Cymatium_lotorium_2010_G1.jpg

3.File:Carcharodontosaurus saharicus Dent.jpg bon pour QI.


Respectueusement, George

--George Chernilevsky talk 11:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)


Cette nomination sur votre proposition:
Commons:Valued image candidates/Limnodromus scolopaceus.jpg
Respectueusement, --George Chernilevsky talk 15:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Carcharodontosaurus saharicus DentII.jpg

Yaurait pas une ligne verticale bizarre, sur toute la hauteur de l'image, à peu près au niveau du milieu de la vue de profil ? --Eusebius (talk) 15:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Barite FRIZINGTON.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barite FRIZINGTON.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Freibergite

Bonjour, Didier!
J'ai ajouté la description russe et a corrigé le format.
Un tel format est traduit automatiquement dans de diverses langues.

  • |Source={{own}} Cela a l'air ainsi :Own work
  • |Date=2009-04-27

Date=YYYY-MM-DD

Respectueusement, George Chernilevsky talk 12:50, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

MurexPecten.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:MurexPecten.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:MurexPecten.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 16:02, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

I have placed copy of this promotion on your page. J'ai placé la copie de cette promotion sur ta page
--George Chernilevsky talk 16:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Carcharodontosaurus saharicus DentIII.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carcharodontosaurus saharicus DentIII.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Barite Sardaigne.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barite Sardaigne.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Freibergite.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Freibergite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Cimetière de Nice

Bonjour, oui, j'avais visité les cimetières (catho et juif) de Nice en 2008, mais sans prendre de photos. Il est vrai qu'il y a des tombes intéressantes... et qu'on a une vue superbe sur la ville. Donc si tu retournes à Nice, n'hésite pas à placer tes photos sur Commons. Il y a beaucoup de place ici :-) Cordialement, Claude / --Cayambe (talk) 10:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Gluck2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gluck2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Byssolite France.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Byssolite France.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Copper

Bonjour Didier!

File:Cu-Scheibe.JPG se trouve déjà au domaine Copper.

Tentez d'échanger scope = Copper extraction ou crystals of native copper ou native copper

Bien amicalement --George Chernilevsky talk 16:26, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Cuprite.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
cuprite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

CalciteTarn.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CalciteTarn.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Natroliteinde1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natroliteinde1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Cuivre Michigan.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
native copper.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

L'Iris Daum.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L'Iris Daum.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Skuttérudite.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skuttérudite.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bonjour

Bonjour Archaeodontosaurus,

Thank you for your French messages on my talk page. I have already studied the first one in great detail several times yesterday evening (and I am still trying to decrypt it), and I have done a one-time read-through of the second message. Let's make an experiment. Right now, I have not started my French classes (first lesson is this evening), and I've never learned any French in school. Later today (before my first class) I will try to write down my understanding of the messages on my talk page (without cheating with autotranslators, dictionaries, etc.) and post them, and then you can evaluate which level of Frech I should put on my user page in my babel box. My guess is that it is either fr-0 or fr-1 Smile.

Med venlig hilsen --Slaunger (talk) 07:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Selpologne.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Selpologne.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bonsoir

Bonsoir Archaeodontosaurus,

Mercí for showing me that article regarding the English museums. I had to cheat and use an autotranslator to understand the article you linked to. The initiative to let amateur photographers take images and license them freely this way on Commons is truly great.

I think we had a mutual misunderstading/confusion in one of our earlier communications. I wrote about visiting a nice place in French terrritory. With nice I meant pleasant (plaisir?), not the village Nice Smile. Actually, I was referring to Guadeloupe as the (hopefully) pleasant place.

I had my premier French lesson hier. I really find the prenounciation rules confusing and with no obvious relation between the letters used in the words and how they are pronounced. But the spoken language is beautiful (as long as I keep my bouche closed, that is). Danes are typically not very articulate in their spoken language. In addition, we are not particularly expressive in the gestures used while speaking. So, I've tried hard to learn myself to say "C'est trop cher!" with great passion while waving le bras and rolling my yeux.

Counting is a bit hard (difficile) as well, especially realising, that, e.g., 97 is pronounced 4*20+17 (quattre-vingt dix-sept). Counting in Danish is even worse though.

Cordialement, --Slaunger (talk) 22:48, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Zoïsite.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zoïsite.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Aragonite

Bonjour, Je me suis permis de modifier ta photo d'une fistuleuse que je trouve particulièrement intéressante,bravo pour ce premier pas vers la minéralogie qui est très prometteur. Clin --Archaeodontosaurus (d) 07:50, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Laquelle ? --ComputerHotline (d) 12:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Apatite Canada.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Apatite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Kunzite Nouristan.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunzite Nouristan.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

MarcassiteII.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MarcassiteII.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Village Gran Roque

Bonjour Didier, je t'ai répondu sur ma page de discussion. A suivre :-) --Myrabella (talk) 17:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Didier, Je t'en prie, n'hésite pas à évaluer aussi les images de paysages, bâtiments et monuments, même si c'est parfois plus compliqué que les sujets de sciences naturelles. Certes, il faut vérifier la notoriété du domaine proposé (quelle chance vous avez, vous experts en plantes et animaux, dont le domaine peut être défini au niveau de l'espèce, et pour lesquels il existe une classification hiérarchique rigoureuse !) et souvent faire un peu de ménage pour ranger les images relevant du domaine dans les bonnes catégories Commons. Cela demande plus de boulot pour les évaluateurs, un peu d'apprentissage aussi, mais pour les candidats, c'est toujours bien de recevoir plus d'un avis, surtout quand l'évaluation n'est pas évidente ! Bien amicalement --Myrabella (talk) 11:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
J'appuie dans le même sens ! Le but des VIs c'est de devenir, disons, comme la banque de photos d'une grosse encyclopédie. Il faut de tout, dont des paysages, des villes, des illustrations de concepts abstraits, etc. Et tout le monde est expert pour juger de cela. --Berru (talk) 22:16, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Merci de vos encouragements je suivrais vos conseils --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:44, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Zoïsite.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anyolite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Zoïsite (Tanzanite).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tanazanite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

DanburiteMexique.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DanburiteMexique.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Alligator Crâne et Mandibule.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alligator Crâne et Mandibule.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Les félicitations

Je vous souhaite bon anniversaire!

Je vous souhaite bon anniversaire!
Je vous souhaite du bonheur, la santé et de grands succès créateurs!
Aujourd'hui je lève la coupe du vin rouge pour votre fête!

Votre ami --George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Merci Georges. Tu es un véritable ami. Cet après midi nous avions une réunion entre WIKIMEDIA-France et la Ville de TOULOUSE. Nous avons conclu un protocole d’accord entre les archives de la ville et surtout le muséum d’Histoire naturelle. Pour la premier fois des wikipédiens vont pouvoir faire des photographies des pièces qui ne sont pas exposées et les verser directement dans COMMONS. Nous avons choisi le thème de la préhistoire, car les collections à Toulouse sont très riches. Pendant la réunion chacun a dit pourquoi il collaborait avec WIKIPEDIA. Quand çà a été mon tour j’ai dis le bonheur que j’ai d’avoir pu échanger des idées avec des personnes que je n’aurais jamais pu rencontrer sans cela, des français bien sûr, un danois, un luxembourgeois, et surtout un ami en Ukraine qui me fais regretter de ne pas parler le Russe. Je qui est amusant c’est qu’en rentrant j’avais ton message. WIKIPEDIA est une belle aventure. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:22, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Parfaitement! Wikipedia est une belle aventure. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Paris, le 1er décembre 2009

Le bruit de ma photo place de la Concorde :-) Je dois dire que je suis d'accord avec le rejet (même si cela fait toujours un petit peu mal..)
En effet, il pleuvait ce jour-là sur Paris... Quel hasard ! Il est bien possible que nous nous sommes croisés sur la place de la Concorde ce jour-là. Ce sera pour un autre jour, peut-être. Amicalement, Claude --Cayambe (talk) 21:45, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Chamosite-Klementite.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chamosite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Stannite2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
stannite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Reconfirm votes at Commons:Valued image candidates/Adonis-microcarpa001.jpg

Adonis-microcarpa001.jpg

User:Lycaon changed the scope by adding the English popular name. Please reconfirm your votes at Commons:Valued image candidates/Adonis-microcarpa001.jpg. MathKnight 15:43, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Zinnwaldite2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zinnwaldite2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Semseyit

Bonjour, Didier!
Que vous pensez sur cela: File:Semseyit_-_Kisbanya,_Karpathen.jpg?
La photo à titre du concurrent? La réponse pouvez écrire ici et en français.
Respectueusement --George Chernilevsky talk 13:19, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Bonsoir Georges,
La semseyite est une espèce minérale qui n’est pas esthétique. J’ai passé une partie de mon dimanche a casser des échantillons pour essayer de trouver des cristaux qui soient typiques de cette espèce. Mais sans succés.
J’ai versé un autre photographie de semseyite dans COMMONS.
La photographie de la pièce du Musée de Bonn est difficile a prendre comme référence. La base est une sidérite sur laquelle il y a des cristaux de semseyite et de fizelyite j’ai annoté la photographie pour plus de compréhension. J’ai aussi rajouté sur cette photographie la localité car je la connais mais il manquera la dimension de la pièce qui doit normalement toujours être donné.
La photo que j’ai versé montre mieux les cristaux de semseytite sans aucune autre association possible en dehors du quartz qui est bien visible et annoté. Pour le moment la plus didactique est Semseyite2.JPG.
Bien amicalement. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:17, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Bien amicalement. Smile --George Chernilevsky talk 18:22, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Château d'eau Laganne.JPG

Bonsoir Didier, oui, je suis d'accord qu'il faut encourager Laurent. En général, la composition et les couleurs de ses photos sont bonnes, il apprendra ce qu'il faut pour faire accepter ses images ici... comme nous l'avons fait et continuons de le faire :-).
Claude

Quality Image Promotion

Daum Nature Bougeoir.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daum Nature Bougeoir.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Epidote Oisans.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Epidote Oisans.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Semseyite2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Semseyite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Bournonite 2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bournonite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Pyriteespagne.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyriteespagne.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

scope toujours

Bonjour, Il y a dans VI des portraits qui ne font par référence à un scope mais directement à un article ; peut-on demander aux auteurs de mieux définir le scope ou y a-t-il une dérogation particulière ? Merci de tes lumières. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:05, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

"Liens dans le domaine
Vous êtes invités à ajouter des liens pertinents dans le domaine, de la manière suivante :
  • Essayez de vous limiter à un lien par domaine, si possible. Seule la partie la plus spécifique du domaine devrait être liée ;
  • S'il existe une galerie correspondante sur Commons, pointez vers elle ;
  • Sinon, s'il existe un article sur la Wikipédia en anglais, pointez vers lui ;
  • Sinon, abstenez-vous d'inclure un lien ;"

Donc en l'absence de galerie ou de catégorie Commons (au passage, ces dernières ne sont pas mentionnées dans la page en français alors qu'elles le sont en anglais, c'est un oubli à corriger), il est tout à fait possible de pointer vers un article (celui en anglais selon ces recommandations). Mais s'il existe une galerie ou une catégorie Commons, nous pouvons effectivement inciter les nominateurs à faire un lien vers celle-ci. Pour ma part, lorsque les deux existent, je trouve la catégorie préférable à la galerie qui, en général, n'est pas à jour et qui présente rarement les meilleures images de la catégorie. Amicalement, --Myrabella (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Merci voila un point d'éclairci; bien amicalement--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:19, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Béryl Rouge.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Red beryl.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Cookeite.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cookeite.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Bixbyite.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bixbyite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

MVR

Bonjour Didier, Me permettras-tu une remarque sur tes interventions sur la MVR (Most valued review) relative à Qaqortoq ? Ce n'est pas un "set" mais une "évaluation d'images en compétition". Des images concurrentes sont présentées, et il est demandé de désigner la plus valable d'entre elles. Or tu soutiens chacune des deux... ce qui est un peu curieux ! (et ce qui en l'état se traduirait par un match nul ; aucune des images ne l'emporterait et n'aurait le lable VI). Amitiés, --Myrabella (talk) 11:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Tennantite2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tennantite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Merci, Docteur Lézard-aux-vieilles-dents !!

Bonjour, de retour de vacances, je vois un message de vous, et aussi qu'une de mes photos a été promue ! Je suis plein de fierté et de reconnaissance, étant tout à fait nouveau sur le site, et parfaitement "amateur" (ou dilettante, ou béotien) en fait de photographie. Merci aussi pour les remarques, je vais tenter désormais de géocoder (et avant, de comprendre comment on fait...), et d'angliciser, même si je suis un francophone militant et que ça m'agace d'avoir à passer sous fourches caudines des Anglo-saxons !! Félicitations aussi pour vos images, si fréquemment promues. ça relativise ma performance !! --Jebulon (talk) 17:41, 6 March 2010 (UTC)


Barbadine ?

Bonjour et encore merci. Les jugements et commentaires d'un maître me font honneur ! Je croyais qu'il fallait plutôt essayer de faire entrer les photos dans des catégories en anglais ? Etant voisin du JdP, j'y vais souvent, j'ai des dizaines de fichiers de photos de roses, par exemple, mais je ne sais pas si ça a vraiment de l'intérêt d'en rajouter ici. Pour les noms latins, jusqu'à présent je ne prenais de photos que pour moi, pas pour Commons. Je n'éprouvais donc pas le besoin de "classer" ou de nommer. Mais ça va changer ! Pouvez-vous aussi commenter mon dahlia ? Je n'ai toujours pas compris le géocodage, ça me parait trop compliqué. Quant aux images de valeur... Je n'ai pas osé jusqu'à présent... Je vais essayer. Je ne sais pas non plus comment insérer une photo dans Wikipédia. Je remarque aussi qu'il existe parfois des articles bien construits d'une part, et des catégories de médias correspondantes très riches dans Commons, mais parfois sans liens entre les deux (le petit bandeau avec le logo de wikimedia commons). C'est dommage et j'aimerais bien apprendre à faire ça. Il faut aussi que j'intègre mieux la syntaxe, notamment pour aller à la ligne ! Vos minéraux me fascinent et sont très réussis, très intéressants et plus accessibles qu'au JdP, justement ! Bien cordialement à vous --Jebulon (talk) 18:07, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Images de valeur

Bon, je renonce à proposer ma passiflore. Mon anglais n'est pas assez bon pour la deuxième page, je ne comprends rien ! Pourquoi diable la procédure n'est-t-elle pas la même que pour les "images de qualité" ? Croyez-vous pouvoir m'aider ? --Jebulon (talk) 18:32, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Axinite-Oisan.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ferro-axinite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Scolécite.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scolécite.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Piémontite.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Piemontite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Anatase Oisans.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anatase.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

scope ?

Bonsoir sauropode, (oui, je sais, la catégorisation est trop large, mais c'est plus court à écrire !) V'la t'y pas que George d'Ukraine me demande un truc à propos du scope de ma passiflore candidate pour VI. Grâce à Myrabella, j'ai saisi la demande, mais je ne sais pas comment la satisfaire. Je leur ai demandé à tous deux de m'aider, peux-tu aussi m'apporter tes lumières ? (le son dans la vraie vie, la lumière dans Commons, tu es un homme complet !)... Passiflora, ça ferait un joli nom de personnage d'opéra italien, non ? Bien cordialement --Jebulon (talk) 01:11, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

C'est fait pour les deux demandes... tu récolte beaucoup ces temps-ci, félicitations, voilà une entrée remarquée... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:01, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Il faut dire aussi que j'importe beaucoup, mais c'est vrai, je suis flatté... Et pourtant je trouve mes photos bien médiocres par rapport à celles des autres, d'autant qu'elles ont toutes été prises avant que je connaisse Commons et ses règles sévères, et même si J'aimerais bien que ma "passiflora" soit élue VI. Quant à la fenêtre de la mosquée, je ne sais pas. La flemme, probablement. Et je l'aime bien comme ça, aussi. Et puis ça fait beaucoup à apprendre en peu de temps, je n'ai même pas encore bien assimilé la simple syntaxe, alors installer un logiciel pour redresser des perspectives...En tous cas, comme tu peux le voir, je suis bien mordu et passionné ! Grâce à toi, notamment --Jebulon (talk) 15:06, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Du coup, j'ai mis mon drapeau du Luxembourg, on verra bien !--Jebulon (talk) 18:52, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

illustration

Bonjour, Didier!

En Ukraine établir le monument de la brigade légère (les ennemis anciens): File:British_1854-1856_2009_G1.jpg.

Ajoutez s'il vous plaît cette illustration aux articles :

Bien amicalement --George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

C’est fait Georges, Avec plaisir, je suis à ta disposition. Amicalement--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:53, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Covellite-USA.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Covellite-USA.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Photo éducation aux Indes

Répondu ! --Myrabella (talk) 15:01, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Images, vignettes

Bonjour Archaeo. C'est vrai que je m'amuse beaucoup à proposer des images. je suis un "amateur", et je n'ai pas de domaine de prédilection. Je m'efforce d'aimer ce qui est beau. Donc j'écume mes anciennes photos pour voir s'il ne s'en trouverait pas qui pourraient plaire, ou qui seraient originales, ou qui pourraient servir (après tout, c'est ça le but). Merci pour les vignettes, je voulais justement te demander comment faire (l'intitulé de ma photo était d'ailleurs un "appel du pied" à ce sujet). J'ai vu que mon Panthéon penche (il penche un peu dans la réalité), mais je ne sais pas comment redresser, je n'ai jamais essayé, ça viendra, j'ai vu qu'il y avait un logiciel. Très sympa, tout ça. J'ai demandé des explications à ceux qui ont rejeté mes photos, tous m'ont répondu fort rapidement et fort aimablement, avec beaucoup de patience et de gentillesse. Leurs arguments sont toujours pertinents et convaincants jusqu'à présent. Tu auras peut-être vu que je me suis attelé aussi aux VI. George Chernilevski a soutenu ma fleur. Et toi ? Vas-tu t'atteler au classement des photos de minéralogie ? Merci de ton message.--Jebulon (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Haüyne.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haüyne.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

TopazeRose2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TopazeRose2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Powellite2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Powellite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

News ?

Hello Archaeodontosaurus. No news, good news ? J'espère ! Voici un mois désormais que j'ai intégré le système, et je n'oublie pas le charmant accueil que tu m'as réservé à mon arrivée. J'ai beaucoup progressé depuis, au moins dans la compréhension du langage et de la syntaxe, j'arrive même désormais à mettre des liens vers des articles ou d'autres photos jusque dans les notes des images. Je m'amuse aussi beaucoup à correspondre avec le monde entier, un néo-zélandais, et maintenant un taïwanais critique. Très intéressant. C'est un peu grâce à toi, merci donc à nouveau. Il me reste à avoir à la fois un meilleur oeil, et surtout une meilleure technique, on va essayer, mais j'ai vraiment été beaucoup distingué, malgré ma médiocrité. Je suis un peu fâché avec les VI et les VIC, mais ça n'est pas grave, j'y reviendrai quand j'aurai mieux compris. Toujours de bravos pour toi et tes "pierres", c'est un enchantement quasi quotidien. Amicalement. --Jebulon (talk) 13:48, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

re. Merci de ta réponse. Plusieurs choses à te dire. La première et la plus importante, ce qui conditionne tout le reste : jusqu'à présent, je n'ai pas publié une seule photo prise dans l'idée de la verser dans "Commons". Je ne publie que des anciennes photos, prises avant que je ne découvre wikipedia et consorts autrement que comme utilisateur. Donc aucune n'est vraiment destinée à "Commons", ce qui fait qu'aucune n'a l'"oeil" attendu dans "Commons", sauf fortuitement. D'où aussi le fait que je publie beaucoup, car il s'agit d'anciens fichiers, de mon stock en quelque sorte. Pour comprendre mon état d'esprit, il faut comprendre ça. Peu à peu ça va changer, et mes prochaines photos, peut être, présenteront des cathédrales vues droite, de face, avec une perspective corrigée, alors que jusqu'à présent, plus la vue était "baroque" ou "originale", mieux j'aimais. J'ai discuté de ça avec l'aimable Myrabella, j'ai compris. Va voir sa page de discussion à ce sujet. J'ai en ce moment un débat avec elle sur ma "résistance" à la façon de fonctionner des VIC, et notamment sur l'agacement sans borne que suscitent en moi les débats byzantins (et à mon sens injustes, essentiellement quant à la clarté de la règle du jeu) sur les "scopes", "domaines", "catégories" et autres "topics", où l'on fait subir les derniers outrages aux diptères au détriment des nominateurs (et en les humiliant un peu au passage aussi). Bon, c'est une question de calage, Ce n'est pas grave, ça viendra. Mais j'ai été de tellement mauvaise humeur que j'ai retiré toutes mes candidatures, y compris celles en passe d'aboutir (ça aurait été incohérent sinon. Puisque je n'adhère pas au système, je m'en extrais). Si je suis le seul à avoir ainsi manifesté, je sais que je ne suis pas le seul à penser ainsi. C'est devenu tellement compliqué, qu'on voit vraiment beaucoup d'images aux catégories intouchables et in-retoquables parce que scientifiquement classées (Linné, Buffon...minéraux Smile ) au détriment d'autres choses, toujours sujets à discussions sans fin. Ce qu'il y a de bien, c'est que tout m'intéresse, et que je ne m'arrête pas à une spécialité. ça fait peut-être amateur, mais ça me permet de corriger en ce moment un article de Wikipedia sur la République d'Autriche entre 1918 et l'Anschluss, suite à un livre que je suis en train de lire. Enfin, si je viens de retirer mes fleurs, ce n'est pas parce que, Ô scandale, aucune d'elle ne supporte d'insecte et que c'est la mode ici (ça, c'est typique de mon mauvais esprit), c'est tout simplement que, pour belles qu'elles soient, elles ne "meetent" pas les "criteria" (résolution trop basse, pas assez de pixels) Carschten a raison. C'est dommage, j'en ai un paquet, vu ma proximité avec la roseraie du Jardin des Plantes. On reverra ça en mai prochain, j'en referai de nouvelles. Voilà les infos. J'espère te retrouver bientôt. Si tu évalues une de mes photos, n'hésite pas à prendre le temps de m'en parler chez moi !--Jebulon (talk) 18:21, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

AdulaireSuisse2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adularia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

LegranditeMexique.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Legrandite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Hippos

Bonjour Archaeodontosaurus, Je ne sais pas si tu t'y connais un brin en hippopotames ;-), mais puis-je te demander de jeter un coup d'oeil sur cette VIC ? Déjà pour l'ID (je suppose qu'il s'agit de l'espèce la plus commune d'hippo, qu'en penses-tu ?) et aussi peut-être pour savoir laquelle des deux images pourrait être VI. Je trouve en fait que l'image nominée est un peu plus illustrative que celle que j'ai trouvée car on y voit bien l'engagement des deux animaux, mais comme je ne m'y connais pas en bêbêtes petites ou grosses... --Myrabella (talk) 18:53, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Protocole

Bonjour Archaeodontosaurus,
Merci beaucoup de tes avis précieux. En ce qui concerne le protocole, c'est une magnifique nouvelle, et cela va être très bénéfique à Commons et aux Wikipediae. Je te souhaite donc un après-midi fructueux ! Amicalement, --Myrabella (talk) 10:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Bois de renne

Bonjour Archaeodontodaurus,
Magnifique ! Tes deux photos sont distinguées une heure à peine après que tu les aies proposées ! C'est la marque d'un Maître ! Au fait, question de base, mais je ne suis qu'un amateur : comme fait-on pour mettre sur la même image plusieurs vues d'un même objet ? Bon. Les détails de l'usure de l'outil sont fascinants, et tu as magnifiquement su les saisir. Je suppose que tout cela résulte de tes démarches évoquées ci-desus. C'est tant mieux, tout le monde en profite ! Merci.--Jebulon (talk) 17:28, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

  • re-moi. Nous nous sommes permis, à plusieurs, de donner un nom plus anglais à tes descriptions. Manifestement, nos amis anglo-saxons ne comprenaient pas l'utilisation du mot "wood", -bois-, pour une corne de renne. Faux ami ! On a rectifié. Bien à toi , --Jebulon (talk) 10:24, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
    • Tous mes voeux t'accompagnent, ArchaeodontoGastonPhoebus ! En tous cas ça commence bien ! ----Jebulon (talk) 11:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Nickelskutterudite.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nickel-skutterudite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

QI candidate

C'est encore moi. j'ai proposé deux vues en gros plan d'une médaille d'honneur de la police française (et revers), elles sont en "consensual review", mais ne suscitent aucun commentaire, ni pour ni contre. Comme c'est la première fois que je m'essaie à ce type de travail, j'aimerais bien une opinion éclairée, un soutien ou un rejet. Je me soumets à ton jugement. Pourrais-tu me donner ton avis de spécialiste stp ? Merci.--Jebulon (talk) 17:23, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Phoebus en Beta-Test

Bonjour Archaeodontosaurus, Quelle belles premières images ! Ce beta-test s'annonce bien. Me permettras-tu une petite question ? Les indications descriptives seront-elles un peu plus étoffées par la suite (par exemple type d'outil, voire lieu du gisement ?) Et j'imagine qu'il y aura aussi un gros travail de catégorisation à faire. Si tu as besoin, n'hésite pas à requérir de l'aide (Category:Magdalenian existe, c'est déjà ça :-). Il y a longtemps, j'ai eu la chance de visiter la grotte de Niaux, un souvenir inoubliable. Merci de nous faire partager ces trésors. Amicalement, --Myrabella (talk) 22:00, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Très bonne remarque, je n'ai mis qu'une légend minmiale, nous avons deux universitaires en préhistoire qui vont reprendre les légendes, ce sera plus simple pour eux de reprendre les photos déja sur Commons. La troisiéme étape sera la labelisation muséum. Nous avons la chance que l'un d'entre eux est... Wikipédien de haut niveau, ce qui devrait nous faciliter la tache. Pour l'outil en question il nous sert que de tes car son origine est perdu, les vestige d'étiquette mentionnent "ariège" il est probalblemet du Mas d'Azil ou de... Niaux.

Archiver les discussions

Puis que je t'ai au bou du fil : comment archiver les discutions? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour Didier, Pour ma part, j'archive à la main :

  • La première fois, insérer le modèle Archive box en haut de la page de discussion courante. La syntaxe générale de ce modèle est : {{Archive box|[[/nom de l'archive]]}} ; on peut paramétrer la largeur.

Exemple :

{{Archive box|box-width=10em|[[/Archives/Printemps 2010]]}} donne la petite boîte d'archivage ci-contre.

  • Cliquer sur le lien rouge : cela amène sur une sous-page utilisateur à créer, de type User talk:nom_utilisateur/nom_de_l'archive.

Dans l'exemple, si tu cliques sur le lien rouge de la boîte d'archive ci-contre, tu arrives sur une nouvelle page vierge User talk:Archaeodontosaurus/Archives/Printemps 2010

  • En haut de cette nouvelle page, insérer le modèle {{talkarchive}} : il permet d'afficher un bandeau avertissant le lecteur qu'il s'agit d'une page d'archive à ne pas éditer.
  • Copier-coller les discussions à archiver dans cette nouvelle page, la sauvegarder.
  • Effacer les discussions à présent archivées de la page de discussion courante, la sauvegarder. Et voilà la manip !

Si ta page de discussion se remplit très vite et que tu dois la vider souvent, tu peux aussi en automatiser l'archivage, en utilisant le robot MiszaBot.
--Myrabella (talk) 19:50, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

OkeniteI.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Okenite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Boisderenne.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boisderenne.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Technique Photo

Bonjour Archaeodontosaurus ! Juste un petit mot pour te remercier de tes tuyaux sur la technique photo. Je ne sais pas si je vais acquérir les spots, mais j'ai déjà une petit rampe de LEDS qui pourrait faire l'affaire. Je m'attelle à des essais dès que possible, tu verras les résultats. Naturellement, si ça ne marche pas, je dirai que c'est de ta faute, comme convenu Smile. Tant que j'y suis, je te signale que ton blason occitan des Comtes de Toulouse est mal placé sur ta page Utilisateur, on ne le voit pas bien, il chevauche d'autres trucs. Et merci d'avoir demandé à Myrabella comment faire pour archiver, j'allais lui poser la question ! Bien à toi ! (c'est quoi, ton prochain exploit photographique ? je guette tes productions avec toujours autant d'impatience !) ----Jebulon (talk) 14:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Boisrenne1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boisrenne1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.