User talk:Archaeodontosaurus/jusqu'à fin 2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Tenebrio molitor MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tenebrio molitor (Darkling Beetle).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Graphium cloanthus MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graphium cloanthus MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.


Promotion tardive[edit]

Salut.
Presque un an après, en faisant mon petit ménage, j'ai retrouvé ceci qui dans un premier temps avait été rejeté, puis que tu avais amendé, mais qui n'avait pas été évalué depuis tes modifications. Je vient de la reproposer, et la voici promue "Image de Qualité". Rendons donc à Archaeodontosaurus ce qui lui appartient: cette promotion t'est, pour partie, due.
Bien à toi, --Jebulon (talk) 13:38, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

C'est curieux comme on se souviens de certaines photo. Celle là je m'en souviens.. un an déja... Tu faisais déjà aussi de bonnes photos. L'abandon de ton filtre polarisant devrait te permettre de retrouver les couleurs naturelles et faciles à travailler... Si je peux me permette... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Tu ne PEUX pas te permettre. Tu DOIS te permettre !--Jebulon (talk) 17:14, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Why I removed the taxonavigation from gallery pages[edit]

The taxonavigation template is made for categories only, it does not work correctly on gallery pages. You have to write the taxonavigation manually if you want to have it on the gallery page. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 15:36, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Aigle d'Australie MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aigle d'Australie MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Set Promotion[edit]

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Phalera bucephala (Buff-tip).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Phalera bucephala (Buff-tip).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

-- George Chernilevsky talk 16:14, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Troides oblongomaculatus (Oblong-spotted Birdwing) Imago.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Troides oblongomaculatus (Oblong-spotted Birdwing) Imago.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

--Ikar.us (talk) 10:33, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Copris lunaris. MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Copris lunaris, Female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Discription for VI[edit]

Hi Archaeodontosaurus,

do you also think the description of this VIC Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Kraków:_House_under_the_globe is insufficient? Greetings --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:54, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

  • Sorry I can not see any case that comes along. In this case, personally I find the caption is sufficient even if it is minimal. If you could add the first sentence of the Description of the monument, which gives the name of architetectes and the role of the building, which is in the article Polish I think it would be useful. You also show your faireplay from ws who often said things useful and wise, but in a way, rough. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:36, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
    • For me it seems to be s.th.personal from ws. I am wondering why he did not mentioned this point at this VIC Commons:Valued image candidates/Chiesa San Zulian.jpg although the description complexity is nearly the same. But I will add the sentence concerning the monument. Thank you for your opinion. --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:40, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
      • I am very happy with this discussion, with w.s. We begin to find healthy relationships and useful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:55, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

taxonomie commoniste[edit]

Bonjour, En attendant les changements mediawiki qui permettraient de mieux gérer les images d'objets de musée sur Commons, j'essaie de bidouiller un peu les informations ses espèces biologiques sur Commons. Je vois que pas mal d'information sont données dans les catégories, mais ce n'est pas très très standardisé et je pense qu'un bot pourrait améliorer d'importantes améliorations en important des données depuis Wikipedia ou Wikispecies. Pour y voir un peu plus clair j'ai essayé un modèle {{taxon}} similaire à {{creator}}, que l'on peut coller dans les catégories et les fichiers (voir taxon:Gorilla beringei, Category:Gorilla beringei et File:Gorilla Eating.jpg).

En essayant de l'utiliser j'ai vu Category:Caligo teucer et remarqué que les photos étaient celles d'une sous-espèce (caligo teucer semicaerulea) mais que celle-ci n'avait pas le droit à sa sous catégorie. C'est juste par manque de temps ou bien il il a été décidé d'éviter les catégories trop précises ?--Zolo (talk) 21:43, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Je vais aller regarder ton {{taxon}}. Tu as remarqué qu'il existait des sous espèces. Il y a plus complexe encore avec les sous-genre. Par example Graphium (Arisbe) illyris hamatus charmant papillon du genre Graphium, sous genre Arisbe, espèce illyris et sous espèce hamatus. Le consensus qui ce dégage, pour l’instant, est de créer les noms d'article dans les WP et les category dans COMMONS en ne retenant que le genre et l'espèce ici Graphium illyris. Ajoute que beaucoup d'espèces ou de genres sont souvent versé sous le nom de synonyme et tu comprends, le quasi chaos dont nous essayons de sortir. Wikispecies devrait être La référence mais il y a aussi des erreur. Bref nous faisons tout çà "à la main" et c'est long. Le bizarre c'est qu'on ne se décourage pas... :)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Ok merci pour ces précisions. Je dois dire que vu de l'extérieur, les noms de rang comme ordre, genre, sous-genre paraissent être une source de complications alors qu'il semblerait si logique de presque tout appeler "clade" ou "taxon". Enfin bon si c'est comme ça qu'on fait il n'y a pas le chois.--Zolo (talk) 08:07, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
L'idée c'est d'avoir quelque chose comme ça (pour les détails il reste pas mal de choses à règler. Ca simplifierait certaines choses, à commencer par le code des descriptions d'image mais si les sous espèces n'ont pas de page, c'est un peu moins évident à faire.--Zolo (talk) 08:44, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Ah au fait que voulait dire "(TL)" après Pérou dans la description. Je n'ai pas trouvé la signification.--Zolo (talk) 09:00, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Bien observé. Il faudrait garder le pays aussi. (TL) désigne la localité type (Type Locality); à savoir la région de référence de la sous espèce. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:35, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

J'ai remis le pays et ajouté le nom de la localité type dans le menu déroulant. Ca va comme ça ?
Pas tout à fait. Car ce n'est pas le lieu pour dire quelle est de façon générale la localité type mais le papillon de la photo est de la localité type ce qui confère à la photo une valeur suplémentaire. C'est donc dans "Localité et après Pérou qu'il faut mettre (TL). --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:47, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
J'avais vu une section "type locality" pour un gorille sur Wikispecies donc je me suis dit que ça valait la peine de le mettre sur la page du taxon plutôt que seulement sur l'image. Pour éviter les répétitions, la localité type subit le même sort que la biographie et les cartes: elle n'est plus visible que dans l'espace de nom taxon (mais bien sûr quand on le rajoute dans le fichier comme ici). Ca pourrait libérer un peu de place pour d'autres choses dans l'infobox. Au fait si on ajoute une section de liens vers les bases de données, on peut l'appeller "autorité" ? c'est juste parce que c'est le mot utilisé pour les {{creator}} et ça éviterait d'avoir à faire deux fois toutes les traductions.--Zolo (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
en fait on s’embête pour peu de chose, c'est assez rare d'avoir un (TL) pour un insecte, le mieux est de le laisser dans la case provenance après le pays. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Oui c'est juste que l'idéal serait de pouvoir utiliser le modèle sur toutes les catégories et le maxiumum de fichiers, donc autant que ce soit bien.--Zolo (talk) 07:49, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Bonjour. Je suis votre discussion, et je mets donc mon grain de sel: n'oubliez pas d'éviter de bâtir une usine à gaz. Songez que c'est destiné à être utilisé par des crétins dans mon genre. le maître-mot doit être: 'User fairy'...--Jebulon (talk) 09:35, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Bonjour. Oui il y a vraiment beacoup de modèle sur Commons et ce n'est pas possible de tous bien les connaitre. Ce que je voulais faire était de cacher tout la complexité à l'intérieur du modèle de manière à ne presque pas avoir besoin de Wikisyntaxe sur les pages "taxons" et dans les fichiers. Pour la plupart des paramètres un mot suffit, ce qui rend la page un peu longue et imporessionante mais en fait je crois que c'est assez simple, ou en tout cas aussi facile à comprendre que le système actuel . Les partie "do-not-modifies" peut être remplie automatiquement et le seul paramètre un peu compliqué est "taxonavigation" qui existe déjà semble assez difficile à vraiment simplifier pour l'instant. Sous la photo du papillon il y a aussi {{different views of the same specimen}} et {{RelativeLocation}} mais je les ai rajoutés pour avoir de meilleurs traductions, ce n'est pas directement lié au problème taxon.--Zolo (talk) 10:07, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Pour les descriptions d'image, je pense que c'est vraiment simple: il suffit d'écrire : {{Bio Photo|taxon=Grosse Bébête}}. Si on veut internationaliser "mâle", "larve" ou "crâne", on peut ajouter quelques paramètres mais c'est totalement optionnel. On peut aussi utiliser directement {{:Taxon:Gross bébète}} si on préfère.--Zolo (talk) 10:14, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Pour être franc Jebulon a raison ce n'est pas si simple et surtout je ne peux pas m'investir dans de nouveau formulaire. Pour la préhistoire j'ai déjà essuyer l’incompréhension du conservateur, point qui pour l'instant n'est pas encore réglé. Pour l'instant nous allons rester sur la charte graphique qui est celle qui a été arrêtée pour l'entomologie et l'ornithologie. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
La charte graphique prévoit de mettre le nom au dessus de l'infobox comme ça ? C'est assez joli, mais j'ai peu qu'avoir une partie de l'infobox en dehors{{information}} finisse par poser certains problèmes pour la maintenance (sans compter que les tables HMTL ce n'est pas si simple non plus ;) ). Désolé pour les problèmes avec la préhistoire. Cela dit j'étais le premier à reconnaitre ça pouvait soulever des difficultés alors qu'ici je ne vois pas: les pages taxons devraient pouvoir être créées par des bots et on peut faire des descriptions de fichier plus courtes pour obtenir les mêmes informations - avec nettement plus de traductions ajoutées automatiquement.--Zolo (talk) 17:26, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Bon, vu que l'iédée n'a pas l'air d'intéresser grand monde, je vais l'abandonner pour l'instant. Je pense que ça pourrait marcher, mais en fait il n'y a pas tellement d'inconvénient à attendre que la structure de Commons soit un peu plus adapté pour faire ce gendre de choses.--Zolo (talk) 13:38, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Copyright[edit]

Bonjour, tu as peux être, voir surement, des lumière sur mon problème du jour. J'ai fais un article dans WP sur Jacques Perrin de Brichambaut. Je voudrais l'illustrer d'une photo. Son fils m'a donné une photo. Comment dois-je faire pour la licence? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour ! Je pense qu'il te faudra demander puis renvoyer une permission OTRS, telle que décrite sur cette page. Attention, le photographe détient des droits d'auteur, il te faut donc connaître l'auteur de la photo, et aussi la source (si l'image a déjà été publiée ailleurs). Si c'est le fils qui a pris son père en photo, tu es dans le cas "Je ne suis pas l'auteur de l'image que je souhaite importer, mais j'ai reçu l'autorisation de son auteur", et c'est lui qui devra t'envoyer une déclaration de consentement, que tu auras à retransmettre à l'adresse indiquée. Il devra te préciser la ou les licences choisies (sur ton conseil, il pourrait choisir une license cc-by-sa-3.0 par exemple). Il faut qu'il ait conscience et accepte que cette image placée sous licence libre pourrait être réutilisée en dehors de Commons ou de Wikipédia, voire faire l'objet de travaux dérivés, y compris pour un usage commercial. Les admin User:Bapti ou User:~Pyb sont membres de l'équipe qui traite les demandes OTRS, ils pourront mieux te renseigner si nécessaire. --Myrabella (talk) 21:11, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Bravo. Je le savais. Que tu savais tout! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Bonjour. Je m'immisce. Etant moi-même en butte, actuellement, à cette imbécile bureaucratie d'OTRS, je ne saurais trop te conseiller de demander à ton interlocuteur d'envoyer LUI-MÊME le formulaire de déclaration de consentement, sinon "ils" te suspecteront d'avoir commis un faux, ce qu'ils ont fait avec moi. Il ne faut pas que le formulaire d'autorisation passe par toi. Ce n'est pas clair dans la page de présentation: on le suggère alors que c'est en fait obligatoire. Bref, finalement, je recommande hautement de se tenir aussi loin que possible d'OTRS qui n'est qu'un organe obtus et inutile. Il existe depuis quatre ans sur 'Commons' une mauvaise photo de même sujet que celui pour lequel j'ai eu le malheur d'être légaliste, et on risque de détruire ma bonne image, alors que la mauvaise n'est pas embêtée. Quand je dis ça, on me rétorque : Hey, c'est un wiki, mon pote ! . No comment... J'ai donc recontacté le titulaire du droit d'auteur pour le remercier de m'avoir donné son autorisation, mais que ce n'était pas suffisant, et qu'il fallait qu'il recommence lui- même le processus... C'est très agréable...--Jebulon (talk) 19:37, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Merci je sentais bien que l'affaire est aussi facile que de passer un contrôle douanier aux USA, c'est pour çà que je ne me presse pas...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Petit problème[edit]

Salut! J'ai un petit problème, j'espère que tu pourras me donner un avis... Il y a quelques mois, une de mes photos est passée comme VI. J'ai contribué il y a quelques instants une autre image du même paquebot, vaut-elle la peine d'un MVR? Ah, et si tu as un commentaire quel qu'il soit sur la seconde vue, je voudrais bien le lire. :-) Salutations, Grand-Duc (talk) 13:57, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

L’affaire est délicate. Je ne suis pas très versé dans les navires. Dans l’absolu il n’y a pas de problème pour que tu puisses faire un SET, incluant tes deux images, de ¾ face (déjà promue) et le profil (que tu viens de faire). La luminosité qui t’a été imposée par les circonstances ne donne pas une bonne idée des couleurs vives de ce navire et, dans la category, une photo est très bonne pour çà. Les mettre toutes en concurrence risque de la faire émerger. Une autre possibilité, à mon sens consensuelle, consisterai à l’inclure dans le SET. Merci de m'avoir posé la question... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:59, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Graphium illyris MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Graphium illyris .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Pyropteron chrysidiforme MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pyropteron chrysidiforme (Fiery Clearwing) Male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Melolontha melolontha global MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Melolontha melolontha (Common Cockchafer) - male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Heron crabier MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ardeola ralloides (Squacco Heron), Egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Promoted manually -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:21, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Chiesa San Zulian.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Zulian (Venice) Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Nacré de l'orcette MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boloria freija (Freija Fritillary).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Arctia villica Global.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arctia villica (Cream-spot Tiger) .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Aigle d'Australie MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aquila audax (Wedge-tailed Eagle), egg. .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Stromatolithe Paléoarchéen - MNHT.PAL.2009.10.1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paleoarchean (Stromatolite fossil).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Mycetozoa identifcation[edit]

Salut, mon ami !
Help me with identification please File:Lycogala epidendrum 2011 G1 scale.jpg. Lycogala terrestre or Lycogala epidendrum ? -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:10, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Papillon feuille MHNT.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Papillon feuille MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Papillon feuille MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Maman de Louise Bourgeois - Bilbao.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maman de Louise Bourgeois - Bilbao.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Adelpha epione agilla MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adelpha epione agilla MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Atrophaneura aristolochiae goniopeltis MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atrophaneura aristolochiae male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Re: Oportunidade perdida[edit]

Thanks. All the places have something special. Galicia is peculiar. More than 40% of the place-names or places of Spain are in Galicia: There is much to see, but it is necessary to have luck with the climate, in Bilbao also. if you think to come to Santiago de Compostela, you can send a message to me. The language can be a problem (I can understand if the people is not English and/or speak slowly, but I speak very bad), but, if I am free, I can teach some sites to you. I wish that the next vacations are happy for you--Miguel Bugallo 10:38, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Es muy amable de tu parte. No voy a olvidar. Sólo pasé 48 horas en Bilbao y llueve todo el tiempo. Para el idioma, creo recordar lo suficiente de mi español ... Me pregunto por qué me molestan en hablar con usted en Inglés. Atentamente.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:52, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pyrrhogyra neaerea hypsenor MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyrrhogyra neaerea hypsenor MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chiesa Santa Maria Maddalena.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa Santa Maria Maddalena.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Héron garde-bœufs MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bubulcus ibis Egg of Cattle Egret.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Pterophorus pentadactyla MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pterophorus pentadactyla (White Plume Moth).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Eunica mygdonia MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eunica mygdonia, Male specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Bena bicolorana MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bena bicolorana (Scarce Silver-lines).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Rhyparia purpurata MHNT global.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhyparia purpurata (Purple Tiger).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

QI promotion[edit]

Bonjour vieux camarade.
Merci pour mon vieux râteau. Je ne sais pas comment ça s'appelle. Tu le sais, toi ?
Tu te fais rare, j'espère que tout va bien...
Je suis de près ton combat pour la défense de l'oophilie différenciée, car j'aime bien tes oeufs (et tes papillons aussi).--Jebulon (talk) 08:45, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Je suis toujours là, mais peu actif sur QI, j'essai d'animer VI. Phoebus m'accapare mais je crois que je vais être secondé par des Wikipediens toulousains. Ta herse est très bonne; je ne connais pas ce modèle qui doit être référencé dans les vieux catalogues de Manufrance. Dans un premier temps j'ai cru que tu expérimentais un nouveau dispositif anti-émeute... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:45, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Je fais pô dans le maintien d' l'ordre, je fais dans comme à Lyon. Mais en mieux.--Jebulon (talk) 10:12, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

VI - Sanary-sur-Mer[edit]

Merci pour tes conseils! Je les ai écoutés;) Tobi 87 -- (talk)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Charaxes kheili MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charaxes kheili MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Papillon guyanais en FP[edit]

Bonsoir mon camarade.

Quel magnifique et étonnant spécimen ! Bravo et merci pour la magie de tes propositions, c'est toujours un régal.
Il sera bien sûr promu.
Pour celui-ci, je m'interroge quand même sur la netteté. Je sais bien que c'est de la assez haute résolution, mais je trouve quand même qu'il y a du flou, particulièrement pour celui-ci.
Qu'en dis-tu ?--Jebulon (talk) 16:05, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Je pense que tu as une bonne vue. Ce cousin des punaises est très petit et je peux m’en sortir de deux façons. Soit ave un Focus staking soit en prenant un 105mm Et jouant sur la grandeur du capteur de l’appareil (24mega). La série de punaise que j’ai fais ce jour là est avec cette technique. La première technique est la meilleure, mais elle suppose un trépied parfait ce que je n’avais pas ce jour là.
Le Wow n’est donc pas dans la technique photographique, mais dans la bestiole qui des couleurs vives et un nez retroussé très bizarre qui la rend sympathique...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Chiesa Santa Maria Maddalena.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria Maddalena (Venice) Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Delias descombesi MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delias descombesi MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bilbao - La Salve Bridge.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao - La Salve Bridge.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

FP Promotion[edit]

Odontoptera carrenoi MHNT global.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Odontoptera carrenoi MHNT global.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Odontoptera carrenoi MHNT global.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Volucella zonaria MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Volucella zonaria (Hornet mimic hoverfly), female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

VI egg[edit]

Bonjour Didier!
You can nominate only egg of Egretta garzetta. Set was not so good.
Très amical, -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour Georges
Thank you for your message. As you know "W.S.", is opposed to images of eggs and this systematically. He asked me to make SET with the bird and egg. A spirit of conciliation I'm doing. It's not a good way and I'm not sad that it did not work. So I will have two positive votes for eggs. The "oology project" walking on, very well, and is well received in all the WIKI. "Merci de ton soutien, très amicalement..."--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:54, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

W.S. is only one person, not all Commons. The result (consensus with promotion or decline) depends on community instead of a single person. -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
But someone who brings us a lot, even if the shape of its intervention is sometimes offensive. I want to stay patient. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:18, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Pescheria Venezia.jpg[edit]

Hello,

Could you please add the correct category in Commons:Valued images/Recently promoted for your image? Best regards, Yann (talk) 13:55, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Palmiste africain MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palmiste africain MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Titanus giganteus MHNT dos.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Titanus giganteus MHNT dos.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Titanus giganteus MHNT vol.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Titanus giganteus MHNT vol.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

T'es tra ?[edit]

Bravo pour la mise en scène et en éclairage de ton grand tétra, c'est superbe. Il y a un petit problème de masque au niveau du pouce du pied droit. Amitiés --Jebulon (talk) 08:08, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Zut ! Bien vu je le corrige ce soir. J'ai passé 3 jours a faire "l'ombre" je commence à comprendre comment il faut faire, mais c'est long et je ne le ferai pas tout les jours...

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Colin de Virginie MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Colinus virginianus (Northern Bobwhite), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Adelpha epione agilla MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adelpha epione, Male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Blaberus giganteus MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blaberus giganteus, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Charaxes distanti MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charaxes distanti, Male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Grand Tétra MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Tétra MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Charaxes solon jordani MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charaxes solon jordani MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Oeuf[edit]

Faucon peut-être, mais vraie réussite.
Gerfaut sûrement, mais qualité vraie !
Magnifique à regarder en détail.--Jebulon (talk) 17:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Merci de ces encouragement pour l'oologie, discipline que je ne connaissais pas il y a 6 mois. J'essai de rendre hommage à des gens qui ont consacré leur vie à étudier les oeufs... Wikipedia mène à tout! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Caligo teucer semicaerulea MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caligo teucer (Teucer Giant Owl), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Faucon gerfaut MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faucon gerfaut MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gypaète barbu MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gypaète barbu MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Faucon kobez MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faucon kobez MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Chiesa San Marcuola.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Marcuola (Venice), exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Catonephele acontius MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Catonephele acontius, female..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Prepona laertes laertes MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prepona laertes, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fidicina mannifera MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fidicina mannifera MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Polygonia faunus MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polygonia faunus (Green Comma), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Tétras lyre MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lyrurus tetrix (Black Grouse), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ganga unibande MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ganga unibande MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Flatolystra verrucosa MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flatolystra verrucosa MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Graphium cloanthus MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Graphium cloanthus, male..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Crane déformé 1905 MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crane déformé 1905 MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Hemikyptha marginata MHNT dos.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hemikyptha marginata MHNT dos.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Syrrhapte paradoxal MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Syrrhapte paradoxal MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

FP Promotion[edit]

Hemikypta marginata MHNT vol perspective.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hemikypta marginata MHNT vol perspective.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hemikypta marginata MHNT vol perspective.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Merci ![edit]

Bonjour ArchaeoD., Merci pour avoir distingué mon Orchis pourpre en VI (en la nominant, je pensais qu'elle être mise en compétition avec une image de Hans) ! J'en suis contente, car elle n'avait pas été très facile à voir et à photographier, cachée dans un sous-bois sans trop de lumière... Bien à toi, --Myrabella (talk) 12:15, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

J'ai la chance d'habiter à la campagne et, dans les champs qui m'entourent il y a des orchidées fr:Orchis bouffon. j'ai beaucoup de mal à aller sur le terrain il y a du vent, la lumière bouge... Bref je sais ce que s'est de faire des orchidées in vivo... tu devrais venir plus souvent dans VI... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Phoebis philea philea MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phoebis philea philea MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Porphyromma speciosa MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porphyromma speciosa MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Lagopede d'Ecosse MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lagopus lagopus scoticus (Red Grouse), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Polyura narcaeus MHNT global.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polyura narcaeus, male..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Pycina zamba MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pycina zamba, male..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Pintade de Numidie MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Numida meleagris (Helmeted Guineafowl), eggs .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Charaxes kheili MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charaxes kheili, male..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Manchot Adélie MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pygoscelis adeliae, ( Adélie Penguin), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Lagopède Alpin MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lagopus muta (Rock Ptarmigan), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Pseudopanthera macularia MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudopanthera macularia (Speckled Yellow), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.


Erreur ?[edit]

Salut.

En faisant un peu de ménage, je m'aperçois que j'ai peut-être commis une erreur à propos de cette image. Un certain User:Accipiter, d'outre-Rhin, a modifié, sans autre signalement auprès de moi, l'identification (et la catégorie), indiquant qu'il ne s'agissait pas d'un bison européen (Bison bonasus), mais plutôt d'un buffle d'Afrique (Syncerus caffer). Si je me suis trompé, c'est grave pour la crédibilité du bazar (même si je crois bien avoir fait en ce cas comme je fais toujours: photographier le cartel), d'autant que la photo a été distinguée comme image de valeur d'un crâne de bison européen...(ça, on rectifiera en temps utile, de même qu'il faudra renommer le fichier)
Peux-tu soumettre le cas à un sachant du Muséum de Toulouse ? De mon côté, j'irai vérifier dans la galerie d'anatomie comparée si l'erreur est juste, et est de mon fait. Si tu n'as pas de mes nouvelles, préviens les secours, c'est que je me serai pendu de déshonneur au balcon de ladite galerie. Je te lègue ma carte de la Société des Amis du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (entrée gratos dans toutes les collections, quand même...)
Merci !--Jebulon (talk) 16:22, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Je ne connais pas bien le bison même européen. Mais le buffle oui car j'ai un crâne dans mon bureau. Hélas notre ami à raison s'est un crâne de buffle caffre. Les cornes ne sont pas très développées se qui peut entretenir une certaine confusion mais la bosse frontale avec ces rugosités est très typique. Je pense que tu n'y es pour rien et que l'étiquetage est parfois défaillant, même au MNHT. J'espère que dans un moment d’égarement se n'est pas moi qui est promu en VI sinon nous nous pendons de concert... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:44, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Merci de ta prompte réponse. Il faut donc vite la dé-labelliser en VI (et dans les archives !), comment fait-on, s'agissant d'une erreur matérielle essentielle ?--Jebulon (talk) 17:48, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • D'abord il n'y a pas d'urgence, ce n'est pas contagieux. Je pense que La bonne fée Myrabella doit savoir, c'est elle qu'il faut interroger pour la procédure. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:03, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

File:JosephHuddartZh.jpeg[edit]

Merci pour votre soutien à Commons:Valued image candidates/File:JosephHuddartZh.jpeg. Pensez-vous que cette image être de la niveau de une image remarquable ? --Xijky (talk) 20:42, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Gélinotte des bois MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tetrastes bonasia (Hazel Grouse), eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Vautour africain MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vautour africain MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Chiesa di San Giovanni Grisostomo.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Giovanni Grisostomo (Venice), exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Delias descombesi MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Delias descombesi, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Set Promotion[edit]

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Heliconius melpomene penelope.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Heliconius melpomene penelope.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

-- George Chernilevsky talk 10:43, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Gorfou doré MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eudyptes chrysolophus (Goldschopfpinguin), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Noctua jantina MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Noctua janthina, (Lesser Broad-bordered Yellow Underwing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Palais Bembo.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Bembo (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Fulmar antarctique MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fulmarus glacialoides, (Southern Fulmar) egg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

VI question[edit]

I'd like to make a VI candidate of this set. How do you think, is it worth doing? Do I need to make a gallery of those images? Thank you for the advice.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your trust. For me a SET must be a maximum of 4 images. But being a naturalist, and not an architect, I am not very competent to advise you. user:Slaunger who created the label VI, should be. Best regard --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:33, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Aphrissa statira statira MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aphrissa statira (Statira Sulphur), female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Aigle fascié MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aquila spilogaster (African Hawk-Eagle), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Aracynthus sanguineus MHNT dos vol.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aracynthus sanguineus MHNT dos vol.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Ca'Loredan Venice.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ca'Loredan Venice.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

OMMATOPTERA PICTIFOLIA MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! OMMATOPTERA PICTIFOLIA MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

VI ?[edit]

Je vois que t'as vu que chui rev'nu !--Jebulon (talk) 19:06, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Tu es toujours le bienvenu!--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:19, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dorisiana bicolor MHNT vol.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dorisiana bicolor MHNT vol.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Senecio viravira en VI[edit]

En application des règles, ceci est pour t'informer, mon cher, que j'ai changé le scope en rajoutant "leaves". Pour l'autre plante (paspalum), j'ai la photo de la plaque, mais elle ne prouve rien, hélas. Je n'ai pas le temps (ni l'envie) de solliciter un herbologue au JdP, mais j'ai posé la question à l'atelier d'identification de wp. Je crois que je ne me suis pas trompé, mais que je suis tombé pendant la courte période d'inflorescence de la bestiole, qui peut-être n'a pas encore été photographiée... On va savoir. Si ça se trouve, je suis un grand précurseur.--Jebulon (talk) 20:43, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ariasa colombiae MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ariasa colombiae MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Acontia (Emmelia) trabealis MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Emmelia trabealis, (Spotted Sulphur).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Pigeon colombin MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Columba oenas (Stock Dove), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Euphaedra (Xypetana) xypete MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euphaedra (Xypetana) xypete, Female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Lophura diardi MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lophura diardi (Siamese Fireback), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Aigle fascié MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aigle fascié MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Set Promotion[edit]

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Phyllacanthus imperialis (Pencil urchins).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Phyllacanthus imperialis (Pencil urchins).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

-- George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Boucher de Perthes de données[edit]

Je suis enthousiasmé par ton dernier (?) caillou, historique à plusieurs titres, de Boucher de Perthes - Lartet. C'est tout à fait remarquable, très intéressant et émouvant, j'ai passé de longues minutes à lire plusieurs articles liés les uns aux autres, et j'ai appris beaucoup de choses, ça m'a mené jusqu'à Darwin, (sujet d'une émission de télé sur Arte hier soir, vue avec mon fils de 9 ans que le voyage du Beagle a passionné), via Charles Lyell, ami commun des deux. La boucle était bouclée. Bravo et merci encore pour tout ton travail si minutieux et si passionnant, au profit de tous. Tu nous offres des richesses incomparables.

Peut-être auras-tu été autrement occupé qu'à "Commons" aujourd'hui à Toulouse, mais (détail) il faut quand même que tu revoies la description en français de ta photo, il y a une interruption que tu n'as sûrement pas souhaitée.

Amitiés.--Jebulon (talk) 11:35, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

PS, laisse tomber, c'est corrigé !

Merci pour tes encouragements. Puisque tu es maintenant bien au point il faut corriger deux points qui n'apparaissent pas encore à leur juste place dans les articles que tu as pu lire. Si Boucher de Perthes est celui qui a eu la vision de l'homme fossile, il ne l'a pas prouvé. Car les bifaces et les ossements n'étaient pas sur le même site bien qu'ils aient été sur le même étage. Celui qui a prouvé le lien est Noulet qui lui a trouvé les bifaces et les ossements d'éléphants dans le même "trou" en 1853, deux ans avant que Darwin ne publie. L'émission d'hier soir sur Darwin est un peu truquée. Elle laisse penser que Darwin à vu émerger la théorie de l'évolution au fur et à mesure de son voyage. Rien n'est plus faux. En 1805 Jean Baptiste Lamarck a décrit, sans aucune preuve que son intuition, la théorie de l'évolution. Le génie c'est lui. Darwin n'a jamais caché qu'il avait lu Larmack. Son mérite est d'avoir prouvé que Lamarck avait vu Juste. Quant à l'age de la terre qui ne cadrait pas avec les 4000ans des theologiens, la preuve scientifique avait été faite par Buffon dans sa forge près d'un siècle auparavant. Bref je ne rate jamais une occasion de rabaisser Darwin et de promouvoir Mr de Lamarck, dont le buste bienveillant me regarde...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:11, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Oui, j'avais bien compris tout ça, y compris le rôle de Noulet évoqué dans l'article de WP, lequel est désormais mieux illustré ;). Quant à Lamarck, il n'est pas très loin de moi non plus. Sur le socle de cette statue, il est bien écrit que la théorie de l'évolution, c'est lui. Mais mon petit garçon a été fort intéressé, et n'empêche que ton biface, c'est quelque chose, moi je te le dis !--Jebulon (talk) 16:49, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Ca'Loredan Venice.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Loredan (Venice), Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Dynastes hercules ecuatorianus MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dynastes hercules (Hercules beetle), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Melete leucadia MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melete leucadia MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Biface de Boucher de Perthes MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biface de Boucher de Perthes MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Archaeoprepona amphimachus MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Archaeoprepona amphimachus MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quercus suber JPG1.jpg[edit]

Bonjour Archaeodontosaurus,

Merci pour tes bons conseils. Puis-je te demander ce qu’est “ VI” et quel serait le meilleur moyen pour parvenir à “sortir” le tronc avec GIMP.

Amicalement

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 09:17, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Eupatorus gracilicornis Vol.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatorus gracilicornis Vol.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Aphrissa fluminensis MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aphrissa fluminensis (Rio de Janeiro Sulphur), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Municipio Mestre.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Podestarile (Mestre) Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Perdrix rouge MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alectoris rufa ( Red-legged Partridge), Eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Museum Toulouse[edit]

Bonjour Didier I am working on this page.See [1] Do you have a contact in the museum? I look for your photos every week.Superbe! Best regards Robert akaNotafly (talk) 11:41, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Eupatorus gracilicornis global.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatorus gracilicornis global.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Muséum de Toulouse[edit]

Bonjour Didier et merci bien. I have done some work on the page-(translation and notably Ornithology). Now I need details of the collections and collectors in the other sections starting with entomology and botany.In the meantime I will write an account of the galleries. My e-mail is robertnash1945@yahoo.co.uk PS Are the figures for ornithology correct? Best regards from Irland Robert aka Notafly (talk) 13:18, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Goliathus goliatus vol.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goliathus goliatus vol.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Perdrix rouge MHNT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perdrix rouge MHNT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Palazzo Cavalli.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Cavalli.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Coq de Sonnerat MHNT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gallus sonneratii (Grey Junglefowl), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Aracynthus sanguineus MHNT dos global.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aracynthus sanguineus, female..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Some Danish Christmas sweets for you![edit]

Havregrynskugler, a Danish christmas sweet with oatmeal as its main ingredient.

Dear Archaeodontosaurus,

Here are some christmas sweets for you, which my daughter and I just made. You will find the recipe in the file page. They are easy to make and they taste in my opinion very good. Seasonal greetings from Denmark, --Slaunger (talk) 15:07, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Goliathus goliatus dos.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goliathus goliatus dos.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Alba Iulia National Museum of the Union 2011 - Rider from Lupu Dacian Silver Hoard.JPG[edit]

Hi! Thanks for the feedback. The category I suggested for the valued image was Category:Dacian mythology, which I though was narrow enough. The category Category:Dacian culture is indeed much broader, but I wasn't suggesting it. Regarding the size, I am still looking for that information, as I don't have it. I added the weight though. Thanks and happy holidays! --Codrin.B (talk) 18:39, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

I also found the diameter and added it.--Codrin.B (talk) 20:48, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
For Alba Iulia National Museum of the Union 2011 - Rider from Lupu Dacian Silver Hoard.JPG.
Should know what this object. By putting the name in the scope, several other objects of the Dacian culture to be promoted by the label VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:05, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi again. I moved the conversation here so it is in one place. I am sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by you last comment. If it's ok with you, write me in French and I will respond in English. A tout alors. --Codrin.B (talk) 02:44, 27 December 2011 (UTC)


  • C’est très simple. Vous avez un très beau musée et un très beau sujet : la culture dacienne.
  • Si on donne le label à cette photographie en disant quelle représente la mythologie dacienne ou la culture dacienne à elle seule, on ne pourra plus le donner pour d’autre objet.
  • Si on écrit « bouclier dacien » ou «  plaque en argent de pectoral dacien », ou « épée dacienne » on va pouvoir avoir plusieurs images promues.
  • La culture dacienne mérite plus qu’une seule image promue.


- It's very simple. You have a beautiful museum and a beautiful subject: Dacian culture. - If the label is given to the photograph, saying what is mythology or Dacian Dacian culture alone can no longer be given to the other object. -If you write "shield Dacian" or "silver plate of pectoral Dacian" or "Dacian sword" we will be able to have multiple images promoted. - The Dacian culture deserves more than a single image promoted.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
For : Helmet of Cotofenesti, it would be useful to a SET of 3 to 4 images.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

I see! I didn't know that a label for a category once given, it cannot be claimed by another object. What if we add even better pictures in a category in the future? Can't they "dethrone" the older images from VI or equally get a VI designation? I narrowed the scope from Dacian mythology to Dacian hoard of Lupu. I believe this is as narrow you can go. Please let me know if it makes sense. I will add more images for the Helmet of Cotofenesti. Thanks a lot for all the suggestions. Merci beacoup! --Codrin.B (talk) 18:15, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Goliathus goliatus ventre.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goliathus goliatus ventre.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Re:QI : Castelmagno-Santuario.jpg[edit]

Sistemata. È sufficiente? --Marco 11:28, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Metilia brunnerii MHNT male vol.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metilia brunnerii MHNT male vol.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.