User talk:Ardfern

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.



Incorrect claims of own work[edit]

Hi. I just stumbled across File:Alfred Hopkinson.jpg, which you uploaded and licensed as your own work despite it being published 127 years ago. While you can claim some derivative effort for scanning the file, we need to have the original copyright holder's licence as well. In this case the author is apparently unknown, so I have used {{Unknown|author}}{{PD-Scan|1=PD-old-assumed}}{{PD-US-expired}} as the image was published over 120 years ago. Taking a quick look at some of your other recent uploads I notice that you have made the same claim of authorship for files created before your lifetime. Would you mind going back to your previous uploads and setting the correct author and licence? Thanks. From Hill To Shore (talk) 20:12, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Wasn't trying to claim as my own work, hence the addition of the source, just wasn't aware of all the licensing stuff you have supplied above. Have never seen it before on such files, but will implement, may take some time to go back over the numerous such files I have added. Ardfern (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for agreeing to review your uploads. As a general tip, the standard creative commons licences insert the words, "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license." You also left your name in the "author" field. If you didn't create the image and are not claiming copyright, you need to double check which licence tag should be added. See Commons:Licensing for a general guide but if you are unsure then you can ask for advice on specific files at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. From Hill To Shore (talk) 14:22, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi again. I was just wondering about how you are getting on. Do you need any assistance or advice with converting your old uploads? From Hill To Shore (talk) 00:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Can you please respond to say if you are making progress? From Hill To Shore (talk) 22:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello again. It has been a third of a year since you agreed to fix this but since then you have ignored my requests for an update. Can you please advise on what action you are taking to resolve this?
If you are not willing to talk to me, I'll have to bring this up at the user problems board and ask another editor to get involved. From Hill To Shore (talk) 14:40, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Its not that I am not willing to talk to you, but I have a lot of other Wikimedia work on which currently takes precedence. I have amended some files as requested and will get on to the others when time allows. 25 amended recently. Ardfern (talk) 22:51, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the update. An acknowledgement that you were actually doing something was all that I was after. While you may have other things you are working on that you consider important, the correct licensing of files is a cornerstone of the project, so it is vital that these are fixed. If you are continuing to make progress with corrections, then that is fine. The problem with the licenses not being fixed is that the images may be reused outside of Wikimedia (such as in a book) and you are credited as the creator, leading to confusion of the licensing for years to come. From Hill To Shore (talk) 11:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Got it. Thanks for the lesson. I understand Ardfern (talk) 13:51, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

OE-LZD[edit]

Hello Ardfern, why this? This source clearly lists N677AC in the history of the airframe. --GeXeS (talk) 06:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

The convention is that we leave out registrations of leasing companies (unless of course there is actually a file/photo). Planespotters.net requested we do so as they are just about the only source listing these and we were not listing Planespotters as a source (there is also some controversy about whether they are even a reliable source). Hope this clarifies. Ardfern (talk) 12:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
I see, thank you. Yes, it kind of makes sense. --GeXeS (talk) 13:35, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Current and former fleet[edit]

Hi Ardfern,

I found categories about current and former fleet. I thought that it's mistake and just delete some, but found that you create these categories.
I think, that over time this information will become outdated if no one controls it... So, as my opinion - much better to simply keep a history of a particular aircraft on a page with its category. Is there some consensus about categories of aircrafts? Or why did you do that? --DS28 (talk) 06:53, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

There was discussion about this in 2018 and I have been creating these since then (now 514 airlines). They were created so that you could see what was in service and not, rather than just lists of all aircraft where you could not differentiate and were therefore not very useful. Myself and quite a few others update it all the time. Difficulty of maintenance is not a reason not to provide something actually useful. If you have deleted any could you restore them please. Ardfern (talk) 13:11, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi again. I found you changed categories inside Category:Aircraft of Air Canada Rouge. I thought we found desicion, how to use current fleet category: You create category "AirlineName current fleet‎" and all other inside it. Category "Aircraft of AirlineName by type‎" don't used for categories about current/former fleet. Am I wrong? --DS28 (talk) 10:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
I changed the cats because what you had done did not make any sense. What is the decision you refer to? I am not aware of it and would have opposed it if it led to the changes you made. Ardfern (talk) 12:34, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
I added some points on the Village Pump. I can't see how you think we had found a decision, just putting something up on Village Pump does not constitute a decision. Would still like to understand your point re Aircraft by Airline Name by type. Ardfern (talk) 16:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
We spoke at COM:AN, and you didn't answer to my comment - so I thought you agree, that's my mistake. --DS28 (talk) 00:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

New aircrafts spotted at CGN[edit]

Good morning Ardfern, if you have time I would be happy if you could add descriptions and better categories for

Thanks a lot for your help. Raymond 08:38, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Raymond, all done Ardfern (talk) 11:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you very much! Raymond 12:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Ashton upon Mersey[edit]

The name of the settlement and its ward is "Ashton upon Mersey" not "Ashton on Mersey" so I'm wandering why you moved it? Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:37, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Ashton on Mersey widely used on large number of sources I consulted, including maps, particularly on the Metropolitan Borough of Trafford website itself where it is listed as a ward named Ashton on Mersey. Hard to believe they got it wrong. Ardfern (talk) 12:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
In a Google search for Ashton on Mersey ward all the results show "upon" (example). Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Newcastle Pride 2015, Newcastle upon Tyne, July 2015 (20).JPG[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Newcastle Pride 2015, Newcastle upon Tyne, July 2015 (20).JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−

Vera (talk) 16:18, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:45, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Image of OO-DPN in 2004[edit]

Good morning Ardfern, I found in my image archive previously unpublished File:DHL - Boeing 757-236(SF) - OO-DPN - Cologne Bonn Airport-3219561.jpg. Do you have some information to create Category:OO-DPN (aircraft) properly? Raymond 08:03, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Raymond, job done, all info added Ardfern (talk) 11:08, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Deansgate, City of Manchester, May 2020 (03).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Deansgate, City of Manchester, May 2020 (03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 11:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Deansgate, City of Manchester, May 2020 (04).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Deansgate, City of Manchester, May 2020 (04).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 11:07, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Exchange Street, Manchester, May 2020 (03).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Exchange Street, Manchester, May 2020 (03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 11:07, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Regent Square, Ordsall, April 2020 (05).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Regent Square, Ordsall, April 2020 (05).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 11:08, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Lithuanian National Drama Theatre, Vilnius, April 2015 (02).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Lithuanian National Drama Theatre, Vilnius, April 2015 (02).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.140.37.65 11:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Lithuanian National Drama Theatre, Vilnius, April 2015 (01).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Lithuanian National Drama Theatre, Vilnius, April 2015 (01).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.140.37.65 11:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Surnames_in_Afghanistan[edit]

Category discussion warning

Surnames in Afghanistan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 18:47, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Manchester templates[edit]

Hi. I noticed that you changed {{Manchesteryear}} in early April before changing some of the associated categories over the following months. You then appear to have moved on to other things, which has left most of the navigation templates and categories broken. To correct this, I have reverted the template to the previous version and placed your new code in {{CityOfManchesteryear}}. I note that your new code places a category of "Greater Manchester [by year]," which will only work back to the creation of Greater Manchester in the 1970s. If you want to return to converting the categories from the mid-1970s you can use the new template. The conversion does leave a residual problem in that there are many subcategories that you have left unconverted and there are images and subcategories for the wider Manchester area sitting in the City of Manchester categories. Out of curiosity, did you get consensus for such a drastic change before starting implementation? If not, I'd advise starting a discussion in future as others could help out with the transfer once the structure of the templates and categories are agreed. From Hill To Shore (talk) 11:11, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

When I started adding files to Manchester cats I found great confusion and little consistency between City of Manchester and Manchester cats. I merely tried to improve the situation by bringing some consistency. I did not see it as a drastic change nor one needing discussion. In my experience discussion has never ever resulted in getting others to help. Onwards. Ardfern (talk) 13:57, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
1975-1995 City of Manchester cats and files amended Ardfern (talk) 18:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Really Good, Trafalgar Square, London, October 2016 (01).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Really Good, Trafalgar Square, London, October 2016 (01).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Really Good, Trafalgar Square, London, October 2016 (02).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Really Good, Trafalgar Square, London, October 2016 (02).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Really Good, Trafalgar Square, London, October 2016 (03).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Really Good, Trafalgar Square, London, October 2016 (03).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Really Good, Trafalgar Square, London, October 2016 (04).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Really Good, Trafalgar Square, London, October 2016 (04).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Really Good, Trafalgar Square, London, October 2016 (05).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Really Good, Trafalgar Square, London, October 2016 (05).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Oldham[edit]

Apart that I don't understand that move, you did it wrong. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 09:26, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Did not do it wrong, was making it consistent with all the other Metropolitan Boroughs of Greater Manchester. Your reversion makes it inconsistent once again. You clearly do not see the difference between Oldham and the Metropolitan Borough of Oldham. Ardfern (talk) 12:45, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:43, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Pubs_in_Dublin[edit]

Category discussion warning

Pubs in Dublin has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 06:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Fokker_aircraft_of_Vayudoot[edit]

Category discussion warning

Fokker aircraft of Vayudoot has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 08:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

New redirects for airports[edit]

Good evening. You might be interested in that I have installed some redirects for easier finding of airports with strange names and to facilitate future categorizing.

Examples:

Regards --Uli Elch (talk) 18:34, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Good thinking Ardfern (talk) 18:37, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 01:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Unicredit Tower, Milan, May 2018 (01).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Unicredit Tower, Milan, May 2018 (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

A7-APH[edit]

Hello! Where did you get this information? I have only found the delivery month... --GeXeS (talk) 22:12, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

[1], [2]] and [3]] has first flight as 6 December 2016 ie built in 2016. [4]] shows date of manufacture as 2016 Ardfern (talk) 22:23, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, didn't know about PlaneLogger and AirFleets. --GeXeS (talk) 09:15, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Stevenson Square, Manchester, November 2020 (10).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Stevenson Square, Manchester, November 2020 (10).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:49, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Provincetown, October 2004 (04).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Provincetown, October 2004 (04).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:37, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Craigavon_Borough_Council[edit]

Category discussion warning

Craigavon Borough Council has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ricky81682 (talk) 10:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:Venezolana[edit]

Category discussion warning

Venezolana has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 12:44, 23 April 2021 (UTC)