User talk:Arxivist

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive
Archive:

«Вікі любить Землю» 2021 в Україні пройде з 1 по 30 червня[edit]

Wle-Ukraine-2021.png

Доброго дня!

Ви брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні раніше, тож приносимо вам важливу новину — цього року конкурс відбудеться протягом червня.

Як і в попередні роки, долучитися до змагання можуть усі охочі — як професійні фотографи, так і аматори. Головне, щоб ви любили Землю і розділяли ідею конкурсу — представити природно-заповідні території України за допомогою світлин під вільними ліцензіями. У Вікіпедії та Вікісховищі конкурсні фото будуть доступні тисячам людей.

Загальний формат конкурсу буде таким же, як у минулі роки. Протягом травня ми опублікуємо детальні умови та можливості для участі у спеціальних номінацій. Стежте за новинами проєкту у Фейсбуці, Інстаграмі або у блозі. Також ключова інформація буде з'являтися на сторінці у Вікісховищі.

Під час зйомок у заповідних територіях просимо дотримуватися правил їх відвідування і встановлених карантинних обмежень. Найважливіші правила ми зібрали тут.

Сподіваємося на вашу участь у червні! --AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) (обговорення) 13:30, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Еміль Золя. Обіт помершой. 1899.pdf[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Еміль Золя. Обіт помершой. 1899.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Madvin (talk) 18:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

«Вікі любить Землю» 2021 проходить до 30 червня: Долучайтеся![edit]

WLE Austria Logo (no text).svg

Вітаємо!

До кінця червня триває щорічний конкурс «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні. Його метою є зібрати якомога більшу базу фотографій пам'яток природи України; для переможців передбачені цінні призи у різних номінаціях. Ви брали участь у конкурсі в минулі роки — можливо, вам було б цікаво долучитися і зараз.

Корисні посилання

Більше інформації — на сайті конкурсу та у соцмережах (ФейсбукІнстаграмТелеграм). Якщо у вас є запитання, можете писати на wle@wikimedia.org.ua --AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) (обговорення) 15:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Українське мовознавство[edit]

Hi, I think that your assumption about CC-BY 4.0 license applied to all volumes of the magazine is risky. I checked the site carefully and I found that

  • The CC-BY license is granted only by authors who submitted their work recently (the CC-BY requirement was absent in the May 2019 page version
  • The earliest archived version containing the CC-BY requirement is from December 2019.
  • Due to editorial process it is unlikely that pre-2020 volumes contain articles that authors granted the CC-BY license
  • There is no information that the volumes themselves are under CC-compatible license. This means that we have no evidence that editorial notes, covers, etc. (all content that is copyrighted by the published, not by the authors) are not under any CC-license. And even the articles need not to be as the CC-license granted by authors is without the -SA- part.
  • Personally, I doubt that the 1975 authors have ever granted a CC-license. They may have transferred their copyright to the publisher, but we have no evidence for this. And no evidence that the publisher granted a CC-license for the early works.

The volumes are in Open Access, anybody can read and download them for free, but this is like Fair Use rather. IMO, only the 2020+ volumes content (articles only) can be considered CC-BY.

I do not intend to take any steps basing on this, but I am just warning you about possible problems in future, as per policy, it is up to the uploader to provide an evidence of free license. Pinging also @Mahnka: who may be interested in this. Ankry (talk) 19:08, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi, @Ankry:! Thank you. I think this is too bureaucratic an approach. The institution is the assignee and the publisher. They have every right to do so. --Arxivist (talk) 19:32, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyrigt law requires bureaucratic procedures per se. (1) They have every right does not mean that they did exploit the right (eg. publish under any free license; no evidence for this). (2) Whether they have right to do so depends on wording of their contract(s) with authors. Do you know the contracts from 1970s? In copyright, nothing can be presumed if not granted explicitly by law or in a written contract. Ankry (talk) 20:05, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: I know that. But do you know what communism and state property and legal succession are after that in Ukraine? I know. It is their right (the institution) --Arxivist (talk) 20:10, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Yefet Evgeny Borisovich.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Yefet Evgeny Borisovich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 12:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Кивлицький Євген Олександрович.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Кивлицький Євген Олександрович.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 07:14, 16 June 2021 (UTC)