User talk:Aschroet

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Aschroet!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Aschroet!
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Blick auf Solsdorf.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blick auf Solsdorf.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 19:59, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Wehrkirche st crucis espenfeld.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Wehrkirche st crucis espenfeld.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 20:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Blick auf Großhettstedt.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blick auf Großhettstedt.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 20:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Alteburg-Turm bei Arnstadt.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Alteburg-Turm bei Arnstadt.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 20:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Blick auf Heilsberg, Remda-Teichel.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blick auf Heilsberg, Remda-Teichel.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 20:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Senfmühle in Kleinhettstedt.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Senfmühle in Kleinhettstedt.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 20:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Karl Günter Denkmal auf dem Langen Berg.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Karl Günter Denkmal auf dem Langen Berg.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 20:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Blick auf Böhlscheiben.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blick auf Böhlscheiben.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 20:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Blick auf Kleinbreitenbach.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blick auf Kleinbreitenbach.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 20:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Blick auf Paulinzella.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blick auf Paulinzella.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 20:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Blick auf Gossel.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blick auf Gossel.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 20:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Steinkreuze bei Gossel.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Steinkreuze bei Gossel.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Steinkreuze bei Gossel.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 20:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Blick auf Storchsdorf.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blick auf Storchsdorf.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 20:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:In Solsdorf.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:In Solsdorf.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 20:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Wehrkirche st crucis espenfeld.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wehrkirche st crucis espenfeld.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Túrelio (talk) 08:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

"für die Nutzung in Wikipedia freigegeben" reicht leider nicht. Entweder CC-BY o.ä. oder es muss hier gelöscht werden. --Túrelio (talk) 08:54, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Der Urheber gibt das alle seine Fotos zu nicht-kommerziellen Weiterverwendung frei, will sich aber nicht selbst um das hochladen der Bilder kümmern. Die Frage ist, wie ich dieses privat abgesprochene tatsächlich belegen kann, damit es rechtlich einwandfrei ist und die Bilder in die Commons geladen hochgeladen werden können.
"nicht-kommerziellen" - damit ist die Sache im Prinzip schon erledigt ;-), da NC-lizensiertes Material auf Commons nicht zulässig ist. D.h., wenn du den Photographen dazu bewegen kannst, das/die Foto/s unter einer reguären freien Lizenz (die auch kommerz. Nutzung elaubt), wie z.B. CC-BY-SA 3.0, freizugeben, dann findest du hier eine Anleitung für dich als Fremd-Hochlader; andernfalls solltest du selbst einen LA stellen, damit dein Konto nicht mit copyvio-Logs belastet wird. --Túrelio (talk) 09:27, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Ich denke, dass der Urheber die Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber) an das ORTS schicken wird. Allerdings wird das einige Zeit noch dauern. Kann ich bis dahin die Bilder mit subst:OP, um das Löschen zu verhindern? Schränkt eigentlich das Hochladen derselben Fotos, in diesem Fall auf Panoramio, die Lizensierung ein? --Aschroet (talk) 10:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Ja, du solltest unbedingt OTRS-pending setzen und im Feld Other_version das Link auf Panoramio eintragen, damit nicht später jemand zufällig das Bild auf Panoramio entdeckt und dann eine URV vermutet. Die Lizensierung wird nicht eingeschränkt, weil der Urheber seine Werke unter beliebigen, auch sich widersprechenden Lizenzen veröffentlichen kann. --Túrelio (talk) 10:41, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Danke für deine Hilfe.
Scheinbar hat es mit der Einverständniserklärung einen Tag zu lange gedauert. Die Bilder wurden gelöscht. Lässt sich das umkehren oder muss man erneut hochladen? --Arnd (talk) 16:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Welche von der Erklärung abgedeckten Dateien sind denn schon/noch gelöscht? --Túrelio (talk) 17:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Die Bilder sind alle hier auf der Diskussionsseite, z.B. Steinkreuze bei Gossel.jpg, was dem freigegebene Bild [1] entspricht. --Arnd (talk) 17:59, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Steinkreuze bei Gossel.jpg ist entlöscht. Falls du die OTRS-Ticket-Nr. hast, dann setze sie dort ein und entferne gleichzeitig das no-permission-template. --Túrelio (talk) 19:28, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

File renames[edit]

Hi, I see you revert all my declines. But you haven't elaborated, is this for stylistic reasons? Or is it for actual template usage which will not work with upper case extensions? Liamdavies (talk) 14:54, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Didn't you told me "feel free to revert"? But true, the rename tool did not accept my request, so i made it manually. ;-) Btw, soon this manual renaming marathon is completed. --Arnd (talk) 15:01, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Yes, but I also said I would decline unless there was a valid template or systemic reason to rename. Yet again, is this stylistic or will the file not work in template usage with the uppercase extension? Liamdavies (talk) 15:07, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
The file name of a figure is determined by file name of containing magazine page. In the short term these coupling is used in serveral ways. But today, it is also working due to repeating information in templates. --Arnd (talk) 15:17, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
OK, that still doesn't answer my question, will the templates work with an uppercase extension? Liamdavies (talk) 15:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
All works fine. It would only make my life easier. --Arnd (talk) 16:34, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Stolpersteine in Gera[edit]

Danke für deine Ergänzungen! Die übrigen Steine standen zwar noch auf meiner To-do-List, aber du bist mir zuvorgekommen ;) --slg (talk) 11:07, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


Ellrich[edit]

Hallo Aschroet, das hättest du nun aber auch wirklich selbst machen können. --Markscheider (talk) 11:12, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Das ist meine Arbeitsliste: Category:Needing transcription, die ich nach und nach abarbeite. Inzwischen bin nicht faul: Special:Contributions/Aschroet. Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 12:00, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Ich wollte Dich nicht als faul bezeichnen, ich wußte ja nicht, daß es eine größere Arbeit ist. Ich habe nur in dieser einen Datei den Baustein gesehen. --Markscheider (talk) 12:43, 4 August 2014 (UTC)


File:Chorfenster von St. Michael in Jena.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Chorfenster von St. Michael in Jena.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wdwd (talk) 18:48, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Die Gartenlaube (1899) b 0163 1.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Die Gartenlaube (1899) b 0163 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:38, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | svenska | українська | +/−


Hello Aschroet,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Die Gartenlaube (1899) b 0163 1.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Green Giant (talk) 23:49, 10 November 2014 (UTC)


"Danke"[edit]

Vielen Dank! Jetzt weis ich wenigstens, warum ich Texte in meinen Bilder nicht abgetippen und in die Bildbeschreibung aufgenehmen werde.--störfix (talk) 13:09, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Störfix, natürlich musst du nichts. Was meine Änderungen an deinen Bildern betrifft, so ist mir bewusst, dass ich dich damit kurzfristig ärgere, aber langfristig werden nur Bilder mit einer Vorlage durch Commons:Structured data erfasst und damit auch auffindbar sein. All' meine Bearbeitungen, ob Verschiebungen von Wiki auf Commons, Inschriftenerfassung oder auch das Hinzufügen der Vorlage werden unter diesem Gesichtspunkt gemacht. Deswegen bitte ich dich, einfach ein paar Tage beide Augen zuzudrücken. Danke und viele Grüße, --Arnd (talk) 15:25, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Natürlich muss ich nix, genauso wenig du wie die Änderungen machen musst, insbesondere auch noch solchen pille-palle [2]. Ab er seis drum. Meine nächste Fototour nach Ostthüringen wird halt entfallen. Sollns anderen machen. --störfix (talk) 15:49, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Störfix, ich schätze deine Bilder sehr und wäre traurig, wenn du keine mehr in TH machen würdest. Aber das Wiki-Prinzip beinhaltet eben auch, dass man gemeinsam an Texten, Bilder u. a. arbeitet. Meine Änderungen sind im Sinne der Community und der Nutzer. Sie werten deine Bilder auf, was eigentlich in deinem Interesse sein müsste. Außerdem gehe ich davon aus, dass es auf ihnen keine größeren Botläufe mehr geben wird, da sie Daten nun im "richtigen" Format sind. Wie du gesehen hast, gab es das ein oder andere Problem bei der Übertragen, weil mein kleines Programm eben genau die Schwierigkeiten hatte, die ein unstrukturiertes Hinterlegen von Metadaten mit sich bringt. Deshalb jetzt diese großen Änderungen, damit das später, wenn alles auf Wikidata übertragen wurde, nicht mehr nötig ist. Viele Grüße, --Arnd (talk) 18:35, 30 November 2014 (UTC)


Category:Khatchkars in Odessa[edit]

Hallo! Today I have visited the Surb Gregor church. I had no chance to visit it before because of very hard weather - we had storm with a lot of snow! I asked a guy in the church about the dedication of the khatchkars and he explained all. Now I have arranged the images. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 15:48, 31 December 2014 (UTC)


File:Wenatchee, WA - Old Post Office Annex 02.jpg and others[edit]

Please, this has come up before: I am entitled to place clearly as a source "Photo by Joe Mabel" rather that {{own}}. I do not want any confusion over the name under which I am to be attributed ("Joe Mabel" vs. my Commons account "jmabel"). - Jmabel ! talk 16:50, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

ok. --Arnd (talk) 07:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

template:Merge to[edit]

I was wandering about your edits to template:Merge to in Template:Gesprochener Artikel‎ - they create a red link for me. So I check how they work when user language is set to German and it works. It seems to me that template:Merge template is broken and the links either work in English or in German version, but not in both. --Jarekt (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

@Jarekt: seems so. The discussion page of Merge template even tell "DO NOT USE". If we are not able to solve the problem you could revert my changes. --Arnd (talk) 14:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)


Auflösung der Fotos vom Bahnhof Pößneck[edit]

Hey Arnd, danke für die Fotos vom Pößnecker Bahnhof! Ich wollte dich nur mal darauf hinweisen dass sie in einer winzigen Auflösung sind (640x480 Pixel). Falls du also größere Dateien hast und es nur ein Versehen war kannst du sie ja vielleicht noch drüber laden, falls du nur die kleinen Dateien hast ist es auch kein Problem, deine anderen Dateien sind ja alle deutlich größer. Viele Grüße, Philipp --Indeedous (talk) 11:09, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Grüß dich Philipp, diese Photos habe ich tatsächlich nicht größer. --Arnd (talk) 11:35, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Meiningen02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Meiningen02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kramer96 (talk) 13:31, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Map of EastLink.png und File:Map of Dingley Freeway.png[edit]

Hallo Aschroet. Deine Korrekturversuche waren leider auch beim zweiten Mal nicht erfolgreicher … --Leyo 10:49, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

@Leyo: Bei meinen Massenbearbeitungen kommt das leider vor. Da beide Files noch nicht manuell repariert worden sind, kommt wird das wohl ab und zu vorkommen. --Arnd (talk) 11:47, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Wenn du diese Dateibeschreibungsseiten händisch (aber nicht alibimässig) korrigieren würdest, wäre diese „Gefahr“ gebannt … --Leyo 14:29, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Stolperstein-Nachschub in Jena und Gera[edit]

Hey hey, wie heute morgen der Zeitung zu entnehmen war und auch auf der Stolpersteine-Homepage zu finden ist, werden am 19. März in Jena und Gera wieder neue Stolpersteine verlegt. Falls du also zufällig Zeit hast, wär das ja vielleicht etwas für dich, ich bin leider nicht da. Wenn nicht gebe ich mir Mühe, die Steine bald nachzuliefern. Ab April ist bei mir alles wieder ein bisschen entspannter und es kommen hoffentlich wieder mehr Fotos. Viele Grüße --Indeedous (talk) 16:48, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

inschriften...[edit]

Hallo Arndt, falls du zeit und lust, hab ich hier ein paar datei für, deren inschriften abgetippt werden müssen. ich bin zu faul. tut mir leid.

es sind sogar zwei kyrillische inschriften dabei

  • Zwinger minenfrei.JPG
  • Altmarkt dresden gedenkstätte opferwk2 2.JPG
  • Kathedrale minenfrei.JPG
  • Zwinger tafel wiederaufbau teil1.JPG
  • Zwinger tafel wiederaufbau teil2.JPG
  • Fürstenzug gedenktafel aufbau.JPG

es sind perlen dabei :-)

viele grüße --Z thomas 17:28, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Danke, ich muss sehen, wann ich das mal machen kann. Gibt so viel zu tun. Schönen Sonntag.. --Arnd (talk) 09:06, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Khatchkar in Krakow, 9 Kopernika street,Poland.jpg[edit]

Hi, Is good? :)Zetpe0202 (talk) 10:09, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

@Zetpe0202: yes. So the Khatchkar is in the backyard of the church? --Arnd (talk) 13:56, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Yes. This is Saint Nicholas church.Zetpe0202 (talk) 15:10, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. --Arnd (talk) 16:53, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

ArndBot[edit]

Hi, I blocked your bot because it doing hunderts of ! unpatrolled edits. See COM:BOT. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Ok, i requested the Bot. The already performed edits can be seen as a proof of concept. --Arnd (talk) 12:49, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Perfect :-). Best --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:51, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
@Steinsplitter: I do not know how long it takes to get the Bot status. May i meanwhile use my personal account to do these automated edits? --Arnd (talk) 18:38, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Du sprichst ja deutsch :-D / Ich denke ja, da sind die Edits fein autopatrollt. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Die Frage ist nur, ob ich überhaupt einen Bot brauche? Eigentlich kann ich ja alles über meinen normalen Account abhandeln. Ich dachte nur, dass es sauberer wäre stattdessen einen Bot user für solche Massenedits zu haben. Allerdings scheint es ja da so zu sein, dass der eher für geplante Tasks gedacht ist - bei mir allerdings ergeben sich die Aufgaben während der Bearbeitungen.. --Arnd (talk) 20:26, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


Frage[edit]

Was bewirkt "Transcribe here"? --CTHOE (talk) 18:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Dass es in einer Kategorie landet, die sagt, dass es im Bild eine Inschrift gibt, die man übertragen müsste/könnte. --Arnd (talk) 21:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

A pleasurable moment?[edit]

Hello dear Arnd, it is a very nice time to have you here and thank you so much for providing me your Wiki pages.

I usually upload photos to Wikimedia and sometimes I edit the articles, besides. :) Milad Mosapoor (talk) 17:37, 27 April 2015 (GMT)
Hello dear Milad, you are welcome. Just to let you know some details about what i am doing. I am currently compiling a list of Armenian genocide memorials in dewiki, see here. When finished i will translate it to English as well. For the list i want to have a little series pictures of the monuments showing the details such as for example Category:Memorials to the Armenian Genocide in Stuttgart and also the exact Geolocation so that others may find it. Since i am not able to go to all these places. I am looking for local Wikipedians that support me. If you are willing to do i would be very thankful. It is not urgent but as i said any support appreciated. --Arnd (talk) 16:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Position of a photo in Marseille[edit]

You asked me where Monument aux morts arméniens-Marseille-les Borels is located. I don't have exact coords of it. It seems to be something as 43.3665284 N, 5.3630482 W. The armenian church is near to the great arch bridge Viaduc des Aygalades, at its eastern end ; access from croosing roads "Chemin de Saint-Antoine à Saint-Joseph", "Vallon ds Tuves", "Boulevard du Bosphore", via alley "Traverse de l'église". All that between Saint-Antoine and Borels quarters, in 15th arrondissement of Marseille. Can you do with that? Truly yours, Fr.Latreille (talk) 14:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Falsches Datum[edit]

Hallo Arnd,danke Dir für den Hinweis,habe die entsprechenden Daten nachgetragen.Die Exif`s kann man nicht ändern?Eine Datei ist allerdings nicht von mir (Schillinger-Bach).Wünsche Dir noch ein schönes WE.Viele Grüße--NoRud (talk) 09:56, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Was meinst Du mit:Wie sind die Dateien entstanden?Über Panoramio lade ich keine Bilder hoch.VG--NoRud (talk) 06:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)


Frage[edit]

Hallo, Arnd! Wo finde ich das Formular, das ich jemandem zumailen kann, in dem er seine Zustimmung zur Veröffentlichung eines seiner Fotos geben kann? --CTHOE (talk) 12:30, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Meinst du das hier? --Arnd (talk) 16:35, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Ja, danke! --CTHOE (talk) 12:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Aschroet/Uploads/Thuringia[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Aschroet/Uploads/Thuringia, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of 1500 files per gallery, while your gallery had 1630 images.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:26, 4 July 2015 (UTC))

Special:RecentChangesLinked/Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter[edit]

Hallo Aschroet. Bei drei Dateien ist dir ein Syntaxfehler unterlaufen. --Leyo 15:35, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Ist ja ne gute Quote. Danke. --Arnd (talk) 16:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ --Arnd (talk) 16:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Danke. --Leyo 21:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Die Gartenlaube (1894) b 052.jpg[edit]

This and other files have some strange broken captions which use nonexisting templates. your recent edit seem to be the culprit. can you fix them? --Jarekt (talk) 16:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi Jarekt, thank you for beeing patient. The problem is, that i do not have any idea how to find the broking ones because i made thousands of changes which mostly should be fine. --82.113.121.28 16:30, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
The ones I noticed were also File:Die Gartenlaube (1879) b 153.jpg and File:Die Gartenlaube (1881) b 409.jpg. --Jarekt (talk) 17:30, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Also:

Templates[edit]

Thanks for the follow-up. I did over 500 of those & apparently messed up a few. - Jmabel ! talk 16:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you.

Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hi Aschroet, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | 中文(臺灣) | +/−

café --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)


Gebrauch von Template:DehioBezold[edit]

Hallo, ist Dir aufgefallen, dass Du mit dieser Vorlage alle Dateienbeschreibungen zerstört hast? Kannst Du das bitte wieder richten? -- MaxxL - talk 22:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Guten Morgen MaxxL, danke für den Hinweis. Zerstört habe ich die Beschreibungen nicht, da sie bisher auch nur unstrukturiert im Wikitext vorlagen. Wie auch schon von mir geplant, habe sie jetzt in die Vorlage übernommen - zumindest soweit ich das überblicken kann. Hast du eventuell einen Überblick, ob es in diesem Bereich noch weitere Templates gibt, die nicht auf {{Information}} basieren aber eigentlich genau solche Information darstellen? Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 05:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Es ist sehr erfreulich, dass Du Dich einer besseren Beschreibung und Verwendung von Infoboxen angenommen hast. Nur hast Du leider bisher sehr sporadisch die bisherigen Beschreibung in die Vorlage ins Feld "Description" manuell übernommen. Hier bei ist es gemäß der Richtlinie Commons:Localization jedoch auch noch erforderlich, jeweils die Sprachvorlage wie {{en}} zu nutzen. Auch sollte der Lizenzbaustein nicht im Feld "Permission" in der Beschreibung, sondern separat unter der Überschrift "int:license-header" erscheinen. Ich hoffe Du kannst diese Änderungen berücksichtigen. -- MaxxL - talk 09:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi MaxxL, ich habe die Beschreibungen übernommen, wie sie waren. Wenn die Sprachvorlage schon drin war, ist sie auch jetzt drin. Wenn nicht dann nicht. Ich mache das quasi-automatisiert, weshalb das manuelle Hinzufügen von Informationen schwierig ist. Außerdem ist es nicht meine Motivation Dige zu ergänzen sondern nur Vorhandenes zu strukturieren. Für den Lizenzbaustein gibt es keine generelle Festlegung. --Arnd (talk) 09:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Wenn man eine Vorlage einbaut, sollte man sich auch die Mühe machen, die Beschreibung mit "Description" und mit der Sprachenvorlage ergänzen. Solche hässliche Reste außerhalb der Infobox sollte man wirklich nicht stehen lassen. Was soll die Infobox, wenn wesentliche Teile nicht übernommen sind?
Selbstverständlich ergibt sich aus der Richtlinie Commons:Localization die Verpflichtung, die Lizenzbausteine außerhalb der Beschreibung unter der Überschrift "int:license-header" zu führen. Sollte das nicht so gemacht werden, kann die Lokalisierung nicht erfolgen. -- MaxxL - talk 10:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
MaxxL, bitte nenne mir einen konkreten Fall, der dir missfällt? --Arnd (talk) 10:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Nimm dieses Beispiel - es fehlt die Sprachenvorlage, der Lizenzbaustein steht an der falschen Stelle. - MaxxL - talk 10:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Die Vorlage hast Du zwischenzeitlich geändert. Dank dafür. Wenn die letzten Dateien mit Sprachvorlagen und Beschreibungen an der richtigen Stelle stehen, hast Du eine sehr gute Verbesserung erreicht. - MaxxL - talk 10:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Adding date[edit]

Hello.

Here date was not given but if you/bot could note, there is template Wikiexpedition 2010. Therefore maybe it would be better and possible insert year? Or contact author, some of us can indicate month. Ciacho5 (talk) 13:40, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Ciacho5, thank you for being patient. However, when doing mass edits such special cases cannot be considered. So its up to the human users to correct this information. --Arnd (talk) 14:38, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


Happy new year[edit]

Dear Aschroet HAPPY NEW YEAR, and I wish you all the best )))----6AND5 (talk) 22:10, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you 6AND5, the same to you. I hope that the next year will be even better than this one... --Arnd (talk) 22:27, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Help decide the future of Wikimania[edit]

Wikimania logo with text.svg

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently running a consultation on the value and planning process of Wikimania, and is open until 18 January 2016. The goals are to (1) build a shared understanding of the value of Wikimania to help guide conference planning and evaluation, and (2) gather broad community input on what new form(s) Wikimania could take (starting in 2018).

After reviewing the consultation, we'd like to hear your feedback on on this survey.

In addition, feel free to share any personal experiences you have had at at a Wikimedia movement conference, including Wikimania. We plan to compile and share back outcomes from this consultation in February.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF) (talk), from Community Resources 22:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Kategorien der Gartenlaube-Bilder[edit]

Hallo Aschroet, du hattest heute die Gartenlaube-Kategorien einiger Bilder entfernt mit dem Bearbeitungshinweis category already added by the template - aber bei Bildern wie File:Die Gartenlaube (1885) b 425 2.jpg wird die Kategorie doch gar nicht vom Template eingesetzt ?! -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 19:20, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. War eine Massenbearbeitung weil ein Nutzer die Kategorie hinzugefügt hat. Hoffe ich habe jetzt alles wieder repariert. Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 19:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

You are removing license templates from files[edit]

FYI. See here, here and bunch of other files. --Jarekt (talk) 13:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Sorry Jarekt and thank you for being patient. These things happened during the addition of language templates to files of user Sveter. While doing it i also wanted to move the lincense template to the permission parameter of the information template. I tried to find other file to repair but did not succeed. Obvioulsly, you restored the licenses already. Next time i will be more careful. --Arnd (talk) 13:15, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
I monitor Category:Media without a license: needs history check and often I see "lost" licenses from edits where someone tries to move license from subsection to "Permission" field of Information template or the other way around. Both placements are acceptable by the community and moving them seems unnecessary and can cause friction with users that like it in the alternative placement. --Jarekt (talk) 13:22, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
I understood. --Arnd (talk) 13:32, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Towards a New Wikimania results[edit]

Wikimania logo with text.svg

Last December, I invited you to share your views on the value of Wikimedia conferences and the planning process of Wikimania. We have completed analysis of these results and have prepared this report summarizing your feedback and important changes for Wikimania starting in 2018 as an experiment. Feedback and comments are welcome at the discussion page. Thank you so much for your participation. I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, 22:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

File(s) appeared in Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter[edit]

Hello Aschroet, it seems that your latest changes or uploads of the file(s) Douglas Hamiltom, Douglas Hamilton, Ermita de Sant Pere Sacama.JPG, Her Royal Highness pop group.jpg broke a template. This assumption has been made because the file(s) appeared in the maintenance Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter. To fix this issue please check this category for further information. If the file(s) is/are not contained in the maintenance category anymore someone else already did the work and you can ignore this message. Thank you for your cooperation. --ArndBot (talk) 19:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Löschantrag von [[3]][edit]

Hallo Arnd, hast Du diese Nachricht weitergeleitet? Gibt es nähere Informationen um welche Dateien es sich handelt? Wenn ich etwas löschen soll müsste ich schon wissen welche. Wer hat sich da beschwert? Viele Grüße Chris--NoRud (talk) 14:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Chris, ich habe die Nachricht nur ans Ende deiner Diskussionsseite verschoben. Wer das ist und welche Bilder er meint, weiß ich auch nicht. Antworte doch einfach auf deiner Seite. Dann wird er sicher reagieren. Einen schönen Abend, --Arnd (talk) 16:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Photos of Armenian Genocide memorial[edit]

Hello Aschroet,

A while ago you have requested photos of Armenian Genocide memorial dedicated to 1915. Maybe the photo in the right side can help you. -- Geagea (talk) 02:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi geagea, it can help indeed. Thank you very much. Have a nice Sunday. --Arnd (talk) 07:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Kategorien[edit]

Danke, dass Du die von mir erstellten Kategorien etwas aufräumst. Tut mir leid, dass ich so viel Arbeit verursacht habe. --Code (talk) 10:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Nichts zu danken. Solltest du noch Lust haben Kategorien anzulegen, so habe ich zwei Suchen [4] und [5], die nach längerem Warten noch potentiell anzulegende Kategorien beinhalten. ;-) Ansonsten viel Spaß noch... --Arnd (talk) 11:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Ok, danke für den Hinweis. Mein Verständnis des Kategoriensystems ist bislang eher so rudimentär, aber ich hoffe auf learning by doing. --Code (talk) 12:36, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Minolta_X-370_(6062649872).jpg[edit]

Hallo Aschroet, gab es einen bestimmten Grund, dass du den ursprünglichen Eintrag des FR-bots hier gelöscht und den Bot erneut hast laufen lassen? [6] --Túrelio (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Entschuldige Túrelio, war ein Fehler. --Arnd (talk) 05:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Kein Problem. Zum Glück ist es mir ja aufgefallen; sonst wäre das Bild jetzt weg, weil auf Flickr die Lizenz geändert wurde. --Túrelio (talk) 06:10, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Lepsius Grabplatte[edit]

Meran Ev. Friedhof Johannes Lepsius Grabplatte.jpg

Hoffe das passt so. LG --ManfredK (talk) 11:33, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Hallo ManfredK, das ging aber sehr sehr schnell. Vielen lieben Dank dafür. Kannst du eventuell noch möglichst GPS-Koordinaten des Grabes zu bestimmen? --Arnd (talk) 12:50, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Hättest du das mal eher gesagt...., die GPS-Daten kommen nicht ganz so schnell... LG --ManfredK (talk) 13:05, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
ManfredK, ich hatte daran gedacht, diese per GoogleMaps zu bestimmen. Auf einen Millimeter kommt es ja nicht an. --Arnd (talk) 13:10, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Auf ein paar Meter 46.665594 11.147684, ist nicht zu übersehen, ist ein kleiner Friedhof. LG --ManfredK (talk) 13:42, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
ManfredK, vielen Dank nochmal. --Arnd (talk) 15:52, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Gerne, ich sollte mir das vllt. angewöhnen, die Koordinaten mit zu erfassen. LG --ManfredK (talk) 19:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Für mich gehören die Koordinaten genauso zu einem Foto wie der Zeitstempel. Das ermöglicht auch in Jahren noch eine räumlich-zeitliche Einordnung. Im besten Fall erledigt das der Fotoapparat gleich mit. --Arnd (talk) 20:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Max von Oppenheim.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Max von Oppenheim.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan2 (talk) 12:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

EXIF-Datum deiner Fotos[edit]

Hallo, ich weiß nicht, ob es dir schon aufgefallen ist, aber bei deinen jüngsten Fotos aus Jena (zur Khachkhar-Einweihung und der Feier im Rathaussaal) stimmt das Datum in den EXIF-Daten offensichtlich nicht. 2017 haben wir noch nicht ;) – auch wenn es zu spät sein dürfte, das in den Bildern selbst zu korrigieren, könnte es zumindest für dich (von jemandem, der selbst weiß, wie ärgerlich das sein kann) ein Hinweis sein, die Einstellungen deiner Kamera zu ändern. --slg (talk) 12:25, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Steffen, danke für den Hinweis. Das hätte ich nie bemerkt. Mal sehen, ob ich jemanden finde, der das per Bot irgendwie korrigieren kann. Will aber erst noch die anderen hochladen. --Arnd (talk) 12:42, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Погруддя В'ячеславу Чорноволу в Тисмениці.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Погруддя В'ячеславу Чорноволу в Тисмениці.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Andriy.v (talk) 17:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Пам'ятний камінь на честь 850-річчя Тисмениці.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Пам'ятний камінь на честь 850-річчя Тисмениці.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Andriy.v (talk) 17:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Пам'ятник борцям за волю України.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Пам'ятник борцям за волю України.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Andriy.v (talk) 19:02, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

"add missing heading from Exif data"[edit]

Hallo Aschroet, das ist beim Bildersortieren echt hilfreich, was dein Bot da macht. wollt ich nur Mal loswerden, danke! Holger1959 (talk) 21:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Bitte Holger1959. Warum beim Sortieren? Was ich mich übrigens frage, ist, warum z. B. bei GoogleMaps aber auch anderen Seiten nicht ein kleiner Pfeil (o. ä.) in dieser Richtung angezeigt wird. Damit würde man sofort sehen, in welche Richtung das fotografierte Objekt liegt. --Arnd (talk) 04:17, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Das sortieren meinte ich wegen der ganzen Naturfotos ua. von WLE, wo's oft um die Zuordnung bestimmter Bereiche in Bildern zu Schutzgebieten geht oder zB auch von Bergen im Hintergrund. Wenn man dann gleich weiß in welche Richtung man guckt …das machts einfacher. Holger1959 (talk) 04:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Голованівська районна державна адміністрація.jpg[edit]

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | português | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Голованівська районна державна адміністрація.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 18:06, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Wahlwerbung Innsbruck.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wahlwerbung Innsbruck.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

darkweasel94 10:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Botfehler! => [7][edit]

Ost bitte übersetzen in East. ist das oft passiert? Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 12:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Nightflyer, ich hatte eine Menge "brasilianische" Dateien gefunden, wo "O" Westen bedeutet.[8] Ich gehe davon aus, dass nicht viele "deutsche" Dateien falsch umbenannt wurden. Trotzdem werde ich diese Art der unklaren Anpassungen nicht mehr automatisiert machen. --Arnd (talk) 07:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Bitte um Inscription[edit]

Guten Abend, Arnd! Könntest du eventuell nach dem TchilinghiryanGrabmal ebenso perfekt auch die Inschrift bei File:Grabstein JohannAlbHeinr Reimarus Hamburg-Ohlsdorf3.jpg einsetzen? Sie muss wohl lauten:
Joh: Alb: Hinr: / Reimarus / Dr: der Arzeneygelahrtheit / Professor der Naturgeschichte / Geb: 1729 d: 11: Nov: / Gest: 1814 d: 6: Jun: / ______ / Wir fühlen wahrlich schon die Flügel / In dieser Raupenhülle stecken / die hier zerfällt!
Bei meinem ersten Recherche-Besuch hatte ich den Stein, bedeckt mit frischem Rasenschnitt u. Moos, für eine übriggebliebene Gehwegplatte gehalten, zu Hause fiel dann der Groschen. Bei einem weiteren Besuch legte ich mit Hilfe von Handfeger, Zahnbürste, Nagelfeile und Haushaltspapier die Schrift einigermaßen frei. Diese wurde möglicherweise von unserem Vorfahren Sebastian Vitus Schlupf eingraviert, der mit Reimarus über die Patriotische Ges. bekannt war. Also vielen Dank im voraus und herzl. Grüße, --Vitavia (talk) 17:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Vitavia, erledigt. Dein Text hatte keinen Fehler. --Arnd (talk) 17:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Habe "es" besichtigt und könnte vor Freude im Quadrat springen - hab' Dank und sei gegrüßt! --Vitavia (talk) 18:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

coordinate[edit]

Gutes Frage. Ich weiss nichts. Das ist schon sehr alt Bild (sechs jahre alt). Zwiadowca 21 22:16, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

PS. Du has falsche Unterschrift.

Entfernen der Cat > Category:Photographs by HOWI aus meinen Bildvorlagem[edit]

Hallo Thüringer,die von mir praktizierten Ahgaben finden sich tausendfach auch bei andereb Usern im > der Category:Photographers on Wikimedia Commons. Was also solldas?

Es ist außerdem schlechter Stil, Änderungen (noch nict mal administrativ !) ohne jede Begründung oder Info auf der Disk, in den Beiträgen anderer User vorzunehmen. Spar dir gefölligst dein (cleanup) und schreib lieber mal ein paae Artikel in deinem Umfeld (das was du auf dem Sektor in acht Jahren gebracht hast ist därftig).

Sollte eine zufriedenstellende Erklärung, bitte in deiner Muttersprache, ausbleiben, werde ich dieÄnderungen zurücksetzen und schließe eine VM zu deinem Vorgehen nicht aus.--HOWI (talk) 07:27, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Tach HOWI, worum geht es genau? Schick mir mal eine von dir beanstandete Änderung. So sind denn falsch ist, können wir sie gern zurücksetzen. Was die Vorgehensweise angeht (bezieht sich nicht auf dich): Hier auf Commons gibt es auf Grund der blöden Idee die Metadaten als freien Wikitext zu realiseren sehr viel Müll, der einer Reinigung bedarf. Wegen der Menge der Dateien und der geringen Menge an Leuten, die aktiv an den Metadaten arbeiten, kann man nur nach dem "Sei mutig"-Motto vorgehen. Dass sich dabei auch Fehler einschleichen, ist mir bewußt - kann es aber auch nicht vermeiden. Mit Rücksetzungen habe ich generell kein Problem, so sie denn gerechfertigt sind. Ich hoffe, dass diese ganze Problematik ein Ende findet, wenn Structured data für Commons kommt. Bis dahin ist noch einiges zu tun; leider auch mit ein paar Kollateralschäden.
Mich hier direkt anzugreifen und mir noch vorzuschlagen, was ich zu tun und zu lassen habe, finde ich unfair und werde das nicht weiter kommentieren. Grüße, --Arnd (talk) 07:46, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Complex licensing[edit]

Are you sure of this change? Seems to me to be less clear than what I originally had. - Jmabel ! talk 14:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

True, just revert it. --Arnd (talk) 14:08, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Category[edit]

"PLEASE DON'T CATEGORIZE THIS IMAGE AS SOME WILL BE DELETED - I'D RATHER YOU DIDN'T WASTE YOUR TIME CATEGORIZING SOMETHING THAT COULD END UP DELETED, THANKS" was created for a damn reason,
Picture this - You spend 20-40 minutes of your life categorizing an image .... 2/3 days later I come along and have the image deleted .... That would've been 20-40 of your minutes life just wasted ..... To be blunt you'd probably think "Why the fuck did I just bother"? .... So this category was created to stop that scenario and to stop peoples time being wasted .... So I would ask you to kindly stop removing it, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 16:33, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Davey2010, sorry these deletions were a collateral damage during my category cleanup. No need to be agressive. Regards, --Arnd (talk) 06:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Aschroet, So why didn't you revert ?, I apologize for being aggressive but you're not the first person to remove it hence why I was angry, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 16:02, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Davey2010, i am not able to revert it because i ediTed thousands of files. But as i remember there very only a very few with this category. --Arnd (talk) 04:21, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Aschroet, You just said "sorry these deletions were a collateral damage during my category cleanup" ... So if you knew removing these was "collateral damage" then you should have reverted regardless of how many files you've edited, Anywho no harm done :), I would ask infuture tho that if you come across categories like this that you read it first instead of assuming the worst :), Thanks and have a great week, –Davey2010Talk 15:44, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Vielen Dank![edit]

Ich hatte gestern Abend mit dem commonist eine Menge von Bilder aus Hollenthon hochgeladen. Dabei hatte ich die location vorbereitet, um danach die genauen Koordinaten einzutragen. Vielen Dank, dass Sie mir diese gelöscht haben, diese müssen mega störend gewesen sein. Es macht Spaß, doppelt zu arbeiten und es ist auch viel einfacher, wenn man nicht nur die Koordinaten selbst, sondern auch die Vorlage dazu neu einfügen muss. Schönes Wochenende --Steindy (talk) 23:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A.Savin 16:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Category Kriegerdenkmal[edit]

Hallo Arnd,zu"Category Kriegerdenkmal"habe den Begriff"Gefallenendenkmal"von der Denkmalliste übernommen(und für Commonscat verwendet).Lösch was Du für richtig hältst.VG--NoRud (talk) 07:52, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Korrekturbedarf: Inschrift File:Gravestone Amsinck family Hamburg-Ohlsdorf3.jpg[edit]

Guten Tag, Arnd! Könntest du gelegentlich noch mal wieder ...., habe bis eben - vergleichend - alles (Un)mögliche versucht, doch es will partout nicht gelingen! Über ein Template, welches mir nachhaltig Sicherheit geben könnte, wäre ich froh. Vielen Dank im voraus!--Vitavia (talk) 09:26, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für die rasche Erledigung! Habe die korrekte Passage mit Erfolg in die beiden vorherigen Files übertragen und auch in mein privates Wikipedia-Handbuch übernommen. Gruß, --Vitavia (talk) 14:57, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
bitte. --Arnd (talk) 18:00, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Frage[edit]

Hallo, Arnd! Kann ein Bot alle Dateien, die ich hochgeladen habe, mit der Category "Photos by CTHOE" versehen, wobei diese Cat. verborgen, also in der jeweiligen Dateibeschreibung unten nur klein dargestellt wird? Wenn ja: An wen müsste ich meine Bitte wenden? Ich wünsche dir noch ein häbbi wiekend! --CTHOE (talk) 20:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi Claus, bin zur Zeit beruflich und privat etwas eingespannt. Kannst du gut Englisch? Wenn ja, kann man hier eine Anfrage machen: Commons:Bots/Requests. Wenn nein, dann melde dich und ich übernehme das. Grüße, --Arnd (talk) 20:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you![edit]

Erdbeerteller01.jpg The strawberry fruit (which is not actually a berry) is widely appreciated for its characteristic aroma, bright red color, juicy texture, and sweetness.

Für deine unermüdliche Arbeit. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 18:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Black % by U.S. state 1900.svg[edit]

There's absolutely no requirement of any kind that blank fields in an "Information" template must be removed... AnonMoos (talk) 17:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Category:Files moved from de.wikipedia to Commons requiring review - No timestamp given[edit]

Hi Aschroet. In dieser Kategorie hat es mehrere Uploads von dir. Magst du dich selbst drum kümmern? --Leyo 08:58, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Leyo, was ist mit dem fehlenden Timestamp gemeint - scheinbar nicht das Datum. --Arnd (talk) 14:27, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Korrekt ausgefüllt: {{BotMoveToCommons|de.wikipedia|year=2016|month=December|day=22}}
Inkorrekt ausgefüllt: {{BotMoveToCommons|de.wikipedia|2016|December|22}}
Aber eigentlich bezog ich mich auf die Tatsache, dass du diese Vorlage bei deinen Uploads nicht entfernt hattest. --Leyo 14:53, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Leyo. Komisch, ich verschiebe die Dateien immer mit CommonsHelper. Warum der das Template nicht richtig befüllt... Werde aber bei kommenden Uploads drauf acht es zu entfernen. Danke für den Hinweis. --Arnd (talk) 16:55, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Du hast übrigens noch nicht alle deiner Uploads in dieser Kategorie erwischt. --Leyo 08:53, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Laut File:Nordbad Erfurt.jpg besteht das Problem noch immer. Magst du dich drum kümmern? --Leyo 10:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi Leyo, habe ein Ticket angeleget: https://bitbucket.org/magnusmanske/commonshelper/issues/16/wrong-usage-of-botmovetocommons-template. Aber Magnus hat sicher Wichtigeres zu tun. Deshalb habe ich auch noch bei Magog nachgefragt: User_talk:Magog_the_Ogre#Improvement_for_OgreBot_2.27s_.22clean_up_of_new_upload.22. --Arnd (talk) 11:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Special:Diff/213312876[edit]

I'm here to inform you a bot edit (User:OgreBot 2) requested by you broke the permission field in File:Notepad++ GUI with MediaWiki source code (cropped).png with said diff. I've fixed this with Special:Diff/233885573. 84.251.84.243 15:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Ping @Magog the Ogre:. 84.251.84.243 15:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Noted. I'll take a look at this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:19, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
This is fixed. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Re: Wrong location[edit]

Sure, thanks for letting me know. I forgot that Vicuna doesn't handle such errors. Nemo 12:47, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes, they're from the camera GPS (when it has not "warmed up" yet). Nemo 14:30, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Yes sorry, I'm still uploading some files and I hope to be done by this morning, then I'll clean up. --Nemo 07:19, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Klammer[edit]

Wieso entfernst du denn hier die Klammer? In Klammer gesetzte Jahreszahlen geben an, dass das Erscheinungsjahr nicht im Buch zu finden ist, sondern ermittelt wurde. Es gibt Beiträge von dir, die mich echt nur nerven! --Paulis (talk) 18:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Paulis, das ist kein allgemeiner Syntax und auch nicht bei Template:Information beschrieben. --Arnd (talk) 18:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Es handelt sich um eine gängige Beschreibung eines Buches, welchem das Erscheinungsjahr fehlt. Wieso kategorisierst du nicht mal die Bilder der Gartenlaube, die du ganz dringend in die Kat der zu kategorisierenden Bilder einsortierst? Oder lade doch paar ausgeschnittene Bilder der GL hoch, das wäre wenigstens sinnvoll. --Paulis (talk) 19:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

nachputzen[edit]

Hallo Arndt, danke für das berichtigen meiner syntaxbilder. du kannst doch gleich die inschriften entziffern und beschreiben :-) ich hab tatsächlich bei diesem foto an dich denken müssen :-) viele grüße aus dresden --Z thomas 05:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Thomas, nichts zu danken. Ehrlich gesagt träume ich davon, dass die Inschriftenerfassung mal semi-automatisiert mit Hilfe einer OCR-Software funktioniert. Dann müsste man nur noch kurz drüberlesen, ob es passt und fertig. Die Tipperei ist ja nicht mehr zeitgemäß ;-) Planst du bei der WikiCon dabei zu sein? --Arnd (talk) 05:31, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
ja zur wikicon, von dresden und thüringen aus, ist das ja ein katzensprung
vielleicht kann man die inschriftenerfassung über de:Wikipedia:Technische Wünsche anstoßen. gruß --Z thomas 05:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Sehr schön. Was die Erfassung betrifft, so sind die Alorithmen/Programm derzeit noch nicht sehr zuverlässig. Ich denke, in ein paar Jahren wird die Sache schon leichter. --Arnd (talk) 05:59, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Vorlagen bei Hochladen von Fotos[edit]

Danke für den Hinweis, werde ich beherzigen. --Barghaan (talk) 18:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Aschroet/Uploads/Thuringia[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Aschroet/Uploads/Thuringia, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 37805 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:25, 23 April 2017 (UTC))

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Aschroet/Uploads/Thuringia[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Aschroet/Uploads/Thuringia, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 39436 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:26, 24 April 2017 (UTC))

Your VFC installation method is deprecated[edit]

Hello Aschroet, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Edit request - Iso standard[edit]

Aloha! Die Daten sind doch ok? Wie sollen die denn aussehen? LG, --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:29, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

aha, die ersten die ich mir angesehen habe sind ok, einige sind nicht ok. Mache mich gleich mal dran. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:31, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Jetzt hab' ich's kapiert, OgreBot ist mir in die Parade gefahren. m(
✓ Done --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:10, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:Files moved from de.wikipedia to Commons requiring review[edit]

Hi Aschroet. Von den 2017 transferierten Dateien stammen mehr als die Hälfte von dir. Magst du die Bausteine nicht selbst entfernen? --Leyo 12:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi Leyo, ich hoffe, ich habe sie alle erwischt. --Arnd (talk) 07:40, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Danke. Leider noch nicht ganz: Suche doch mal im VFC nach insource:/BotMoveToCommons\|de.wikipedia\|2017/ und filtere nach Uploader. ;-) --Leyo 07:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Leyo, jetzt aber. --Arnd (talk) 08:11, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Quaker star.png[edit]

We had a large discussion last year about the dots in the source field and we came to the agreement that they would not be remove, only replaced by something more suitable if desired. All those files have been checked and for copyright reasons no more source information is needed, e.g. because the source is somewhere else on the page. No need to throw them back in the already severely backlogged Category:Images without source. I am reverting these edits. It's hard enough to handle this huge backlog without such actions. Jcb (talk) 09:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Jcb, did not know about it. Thanks for being patient. However, wouldn't it be more appropriate to have a tiny template for this case, saying that the source is mentioned somewhere else. This way we are able to distinguish between theses cases and uploads where the usere just add a dot to avoid trouble. --Arnd (talk) 09:47, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Since last September I always do such a thing, that was also part of the agreement. Jcb (talk) 09:49, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
These dots are nonsense. They need to be replaced by something more useful such as {{unknown|source}} or similar. --Leyo 12:26, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Broken oggs[edit]

Hello

Thaks for mentioning the mistake, it has been corrected

Marcel coenders (talk) 14:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Thames barges[edit]

Thanks for your corrections. I am trying to make the upload wizard work, but it really is still in alpha - and then reverting to Commonist in frustration. If only it came with a preview, a lot of errors could be stopped before they happened.

Massenänderung[edit]

Hallo!

So richtig kann ich nicht erkennen, was du eigentlich ändern wolltest, aber du hast zwei meiner Dateien (File:Leuna, Leuna-Werke -- 1980.jpg, File:Halle (Saale), Fahnenmonument -- 1980.jpg) - sagen wir mal - lädiert. Der Wiki-Syntax war hinüber, Beschreibungstexte entfernt. Ich habe mir mal erlaubt, das in diesen beiden Fällen wieder zu reparieren. Aber vielleicht hinterfragst du deine Aktion noch einmal und schaust, ob auch andere unerwünschte Änderungen erfolgt sind.

Viele Grüße --XRay talk 05:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

XRay, danke, dass du es bemerkt und zurückgesetzt hast. Ich wollte Reste der Vorlage {{Check categories}} entfernen,[9] weil eine Unmenge von Nutzern damals diese nur teilweise entfernt hatten.[10] Ich denke, bei der Mehrheit der Bearbeitungen passt das. Trotzdem schaue ich mir die letzten Änderungen noch einmal an, ob da nicht ähnliche Fälle wie deiner versehentlich dabei waren. --Arnd (talk) 05:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Cigarette vending machine Golmsdorf.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Cigarette vending machine Golmsdorf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 13:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

VisualFileChange-Änderung[edit]

Hallo Aschroet,
diese Bearbeitung ist etwas missglückt. Statt dem Datum im Datumsfeld wurde der Beschreibungstext geändert. Ich gehe davon aus, dass dies ein Ausnahmefall war und deine Änderungen im Allgemeinen passen. Danke für deinen Einsatz. Beste Grüße. --Zaccarias (talk) 19:08, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Zaccarias, danke fürs Aufpassen. Ein paar Kollateralschäden sind leider ab und zu dabei. Ich denke aber doch, dass die Quali der Metadaten insgesamt erhöht wird. --Arnd (talk) 20:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Bot Kennzeichnung[edit]

Hallo Aschroet, wieso werden deine Änderungen mit dem User:ArndBot nihct als Bot gekennzeichnet, denn so füllt das die BEO Liste gewaltsam auf :-( -lg K@rl (talk) 15:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Es gibt nen js-hack für, den solltest du verwenden ;) --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:19, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
das habe ich jetzt eingesetzt - bekam allerdings eine Meldung auf meine DS und bekomme seither Meldungen, mit denen ich gar nichts anfange :-( --K@rl (talk) 16:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Ich habe es wieder reverted, nachdem Commons unhandlebar wurde --K@rl (talk) 16:23, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Ich habe keine Ahnung, warum der Bot nicht gekennzeichnet ist. Ist schon anderen aufgefallen. --Arnd (talk) 17:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Weil VFC keinen &bot=1 ans API weitergiebt, daher der js-hack. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

ArndBot[edit]

Hallo Aschroet, der von dir betriebene ArndBot verändert z.T. den Eintrag unter Datum der Dateibeschreibung mMn nicht ganz korrekt. Korrekt ist die Anpassung der Formatierung, z.B. statt 7.8.2007 jetzt 2007-8-7 (besser wäre noch 2007-08-07). Nicht korrekt ist aber, dass der Bot Hochladedatum vermerkt, wenn es sich auch um das Aufnahmedatum handelt. Das Hochladedatum ist bereits an anderer Stelle (Datum der ältesten Version) vermerkt, ein zusätzlicher Eintrag ist somit redundant. Manchmal lade ich eben die Dateien bereits am Aufnahmetag hoch. Der Parameter Datum ist das Aufnahmedatum, und das trage ich eigentlich immer richtig ein. Das mit Hochladedatum zu überschreiben, verdeckt die Information zum Aufnahmedatum und unterstellt gleichzeitig einen fehlerhaften Eintrag. Bitte diese Fehlfunktion des ArndBot sofort einstellen. Gruß --Rufus46 (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Rufus46, der Bot läuft gerade nicht. Zeig mir bitte mal ein Beispiel für eine falsche Änderung. --Arnd (talk) 09:29, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
[11]
Hallo Rufus46, der von dir beanstandete Botlauf prüft ob das Datum im Parameter (unter der Annahme dass es in der Reihenfolge Tag - Monat - Jahr angegeben ist) entweder mit dem intern gespeicherten Exif-Aufnahmedatum oder mit dem Hochladedatum übereinstimmt. Je nachdem wird dann um das richtig formatierte Datum noch die entsprechende Vorlage gesetzt, die anzeigt, ob es sich um das Exif oder Aufnahmedatum handelt. Da bei deinem Foto keine Exif-Daten enthalten sind, kann der Bot nur einen Abgleich mit dem Hochladedatum machen, was dann zu dem genannten Ergebnis führt. Diesen Abgleich mache ich übrigens deshalb, weil nicht klar ist, ob das im falschen Format angegebene Datum im Parameter nicht auch in der Reihenfolge Monat - Tag - Jahr angegeben ist. Ich sehe also keinen Fehler in dem Botlauf. Allerdings kann ich gern die Vorlage aus deinen Fotos wieder entfernen, wenn du sicher bist, dass es sich für alle um das Aufnahmedatum handelt. Ansonsten steht dir natürlich frei dies für die betroffenen Fotos händisch zu machen. Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 09:53, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Hallo, mMn sollte der Bot nur die Datumformatierung korrigieren (s.o.), aber nicht Mutmaßungen anstellen, ob das Aufnahmedatum richtig eingetragen wurde. Ich habe über 30.000 Dateien hochgeladen und keine Lust, dies für jede Datei nochmal zu überprüfen. Wir sollten einfach davon ausgehen, dass ich unter Datum das Aufnahmedatum richtig eingetragen habe. Grüße --Rufus46 (talk) 10:04, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Hallo Rufus46, der Bot hat tatsächlich neben der Formatkorektur eine neue Annahme hinzugefügt, welche für die Mehrheit der bearbeiteten Fotos korrekt ist. Das sieht man daran, dass wenn vorhanden das Exif-Datum älter ist. Auch ist es wahrscheinlicher, dass jemand nach dem Aufnahmetag erst hochlädt. Natürlich gibt es Fehler, wie in deinem Fall, aber insgesamt hat sich die Datenqualität erhöht. Übrigens habe ich 24 Bilder von dir gefunden, aus denen ich das Template entfernt habe. --Arnd (talk) 13:46, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Hallo Aschroet, danke fürs Korrigieren! Grüße --Rufus46 (talk) 18:10, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Edit conflict[edit]

Hi. Please be more careful when making edits like this.   — Jeff G. ツ 08:58, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Jeff, thanks for being patient. Actually, i am not aware of this edit. Don't know how it happended. --Arnd (talk) 10:51, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Structured Commons newsletter, October 25, 2017[edit]

Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!

Community updates
Things to do / input and feedback requests
Presentations / Press / Events
Audience at Structured Commons design discussion, Wikimania 2017
Team updates
The Structured Commons team at Wikimania 2017

Two new people have been hired for the Structured Data on Commons team. We are now complete! :-)

  • Ramsey Isler is the new Product Manager of the Multimedia team.
  • Pamela Drouin was hired as User Interface Designer. She works at the Multimedia team as well, and her work will focus on the Structured Commons project.
Partners and allies
  • We are still welcoming (more) staff from GLAMs (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) to become part of our long-term focus group (phabricator task T174134). You will be kept in the loop of the project, and receive regular small surveys and requests for feedback. Get in touch with Sandra if you're interested - your input in helping to shape this project is highly valued!
Research

Design research is ongoing.

  • Jonathan Morgan and Niharika Ved have held interviews with various GLAM staff about their batch upload workflows and will finish and report on these in this quarter. (phabricator task T159495)
  • At this moment, there is also an online survey for GLAM staff, Wikimedians in Residence, and GLAM volunteers who upload media collections to Wikimedia Commons. The results will be used to understand how we can improve this experience. (phabricator task T175188)
  • Upcoming: interviews with Wikimedia volunteers who curate media on Commons (including tool developers), talking about activities and workflows. (phabricator task T175185)
Development

In Autumn 2017, the Structured Commons development team works on the following major tasks (see also the quarterly goals for the team):

  • Getting Multi-Content Revisions sufficiently ready, so that the Multimedia and Search Platform teams can start using it to test and prototype things.
  • Determine metrics and metrics baseline for Commons (phabricator task T174519).
  • The multimedia team at WMF is gaining expertise in Wikibase, and unblocking further development for Structured Commons, by completing the MediaInfo extension for Wikibase.
Stay up to date!

Warmly, your community liaison, SandraF (WMF) (talk)

Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 14:26, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #284[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #285[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #286[edit]

My watchlist[edit]

You just did thousands of edits on my files like that [12]. Yes there was (through an error) a double "Country=xxx" tag, but this was not critical at all, merely a duplicate in the source text without any influence on the appearance of the description page. Actually not worthy discussing, but the problem is: you did all the edits without bot flag, and without even marking them as minor corrections. The result is, that my watchlist is now hopelessly overflooded and I cannot see any other recent changes except by you, even if I set the maximal displayed number of 1,000 changes. Therefore, you did not help in any way, but did a damage to me, because you actually abused the VFC tool to easily raise your own editcount and I cannot sufficiently monitoring my watchlist because of that. With that said, I'm tempted to report the issue on COM:ANU, but would like you to comment on it here first. Thanks --A.Savin 14:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello A.Savin, i am doing a lot of semi-automatic cleanup tasks here. For convenience i sometimes use VFC with my normal account even for a large number of edits. This time i browsed through Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls where i found your files and immediately cleaned them up. I know that it breakes some rules. And if this is really an issue for you to report it, please do. I am not here to always follow all rules but to improve the quality of metadata even if i from time to time break rules. PS: You watchlist will be ok after a time. Regards, --Arnd (talk) 15:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
OK, then here: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Aschroet. --A.Savin 16:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #287[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #287 Global message delivery/Targets/Wikidata

November 2017[edit]

I blocked your account since you seem to be using an unflagged bot. Please register the bot and get the flag first.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

I have unblocked you. I don't see how our policies allow to use the block button in this stage. Please first try to come to an agreement by normal talking. Also VFC is not a bot and no botflag is needed to use it. Jcb (talk) 16:27, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #288[edit]

email[edit]

Arnd, According to Commons notifications you send me an email. However I do not receive any emails from you. Can you send it again, or write here or on my talk page? --Jarekt (talk) 15:46, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Jarekt, thank you for asking. I asked you to help me with an issue. Since i was blocked i wrote via mail. Seems to be solved for now. --Arnd (talk) 16:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Ah, yes the speed of edits by some of the tools is a blessing for some and a curse for others. --Jarekt (talk) 16:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #289[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #290[edit]

Structured Commons newsletter, December 13, 2017[edit]

Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!

Community updates
Things to do / input and feedback requests
A multi-licensed image on Wikimedia Commons, with a custom {{EthnologyItemMHNT}} Information template. Do you also know media files on Commons that will be interesting or challenging to model with structured data? Add them to the Interesting Commons files page.
Presentations / Press / Events
Presentation about Structured Commons and Wikidata, at WikimediaCon in Berlin.
  • Sandra presented the plans for Structured Commons during WikidataCon in Berlin, on October 29. The presentation focused on collaboration between the Wikidata and Commons communities. You can see the full video here.
Partners and allies
  • We are still welcoming (more) staff from GLAMs (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) to become part of our long-term focus group (phabricator task T174134). You will be kept in the loop of the project, and receive regular small surveys and requests for feedback. Get in touch with Sandra if you're interested - your input in helping to shape this project is highly valued!
Research
  • Research findings from interviews and surveys of GLAM project participants are being published to the research page. Check back over the next few weeks as additional details (notes, quotes, charts, blog posts, and slide decks) will be added to or linked from that page.
Development
  • The Structured Commons team has written and submitted a report about the first nine months of work on the project to its funders, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. The 53-page report, published on November 1, is available on Wikimedia Commons.
  • The team has started working on designs for changes to the upload wizard (T182019).
  • We started preliminary work to prototype changes for file info pages.
  • Work on the MediaInfo extension is ongoing (T176012).
  • The team is continuing its work on baseline metrics on Commons, in order to be able to measure the effectiveness of structured data on Commons. (T174519)
  • Upcoming: in the first half of 2018, the first prototypes and design sketches for file pages, the UploadWizard, and for search will be published for discussion and feedback!
Stay up to date!

Warmly, your community liaison, SandraF (WMF) (talk)

Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 16:32, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Your bot edits[edit]

Hi, you are urgently requested to respond to this discussion. Over 24 hours have passed since it was raised and you didn't respond sofar, although the contested edit pattern still continues in high speed. Jcb (talk) 17:57, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #291[edit]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Aschroet/Uploads/Thuringia[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Aschroet/Uploads/Thuringia, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 17480 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC))

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Aschroet/Uploads/Thuringia[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Aschroet/Uploads/Thuringia, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 11159 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC))

Wikidata weekly summary #292[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #293[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #294[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #295[edit]

Defaultsort[edit]

Dear Aschroet, Thanks for your active editing. One remark: when making new categories, could you add a DEFAULTSORT line, as I now added to Category:Johanna Quaas ? In that way, all categories are alphabetised in the right way. Otherwise, these categories get messy. Best regards, Vysotsky (talk) 23:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

ok Vysotsky, i will try. But couldn't this be done by a bot? --Arnd (talk) 18:01, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
(talk page stalker)@Aschroet: That would require a complexity probably beyond reasonable expertise. Basic rules are that names are sorted on DEFAULTSORT:surname, given name, churches should be (but rarely are) by DEFAULTSORT:dedication, location (but omitting the "St" or "Saint" otherwise they'd all appear under "S"!). Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:22, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #296[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #297[edit]


File:Kunstverein in Hamburg.jpg[edit]

Hallo Aschroet, ich vermute, dass das Kunst-"Plakat" rechts im Vordergrund sich dort nur temporär befindet, in Zusammenhang mit einer konkreten Ausstellung. (dann würde es nämlich nicht der Panoramafreiheit unterliegen) Oder hast du andere Information? --Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Túrelio, ich denke mal, dass es sich um eine Werbung von Fritz Cola handelt. --Arnd (talk) 20:01, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Ah, o.k. Kannte ich bisher nicht. Aber egal. Es ist m.E. kreativ genug, um einen urheberrechtl. Schutz anzunehmen. Die entscheidende Frage ist also, ist es dort bleibend angebracht, was nicht zwangsläufig "ewig" bedeuten muss, aber jedenfalls für die gesamte "Lebensdauer". Andernfalls würde ich dir empfehlen entweder selbst einen SLA zu stellen oder, wenn du lieber noch mehr Input/Meinungen dazu haben möchtest, einen normalen LA, der ja auch auf Behalten enden kann. Eine andere Alternative wäre, das Werbeplakat zu "zensieren" (z.B. durch einschwärzen). --Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Habe kein Problem mit einer Löschung. --Arnd (talk) 21:33, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #298[edit]

Day/date categorys[edit]

If you wish your files to be included only date taken on category I will remove your files from UK date taken on category that I had placed them in, to avoid over categorisation as it seems pointless to include your files in both. Is this agreeable to you. Kolforn (talk) 15:44, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Says a lot about you! and your bad attitude!, when you can not even bother to communicate with me when I have made an effort to communicate with you and understand your request. Dont bother communicating from now on, Good evening!!! Kolforn (talk) 19:52, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Kolforn, sorry but i did not get your offer. Futhermore, the photos are not mine. --Arnd (talk) 20:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #299[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #300[edit]

Timezones in Information Template[edit]

Hi Aschroet; {{ISOdate}} (used by {{tl|Information) does not handle timezones properly.[13] The rendered text deletes the timezone. I use UTC for nearly all my images (more than 6600). However, my timezone is -07 or -08. When the timezone is given, please use {{DTZ}}. The discussion at Template_talk:ISOdate#Formatting_of_timezones and Template_talk:ISOdate#Timezone is helpful and you can discuss the issue there, if you wish. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:14, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your patience, Walter Siegmund. I could easily add {{DTZ}} to all dates ending with Z. Would that be correct? --15:53, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Yes. Please add {{DTZ}} to ISO dates ending in Z, +hh or -hh. Thank you. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Bot[edit]

If you have a bot account available to you, please use it when editing at high rates such as with VFC. Editing at speeds of over 100+ edits per minute should be limited to bot accounts when possible. ~riley (talk) 02:39, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

~riley, understood. --Arnd (talk) 18:30, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
I promise I am not trying to be a pain in the butt and bug you, but I also recommend archiving this. Many networks struggle to load talk pages of more than 100 threads. No reply needed, something to consider. All the best! :) ~riley (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #301[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #302[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #303[edit]

Datumskorrekturen per VisualFileChange[edit]

Hallo Arnd,
auf meiner Beobachtungsliste ist mir aufgefallen, dass mehrere deiner Korrekturen offenbar schiefgelaufen sind.

Ich vermute mal, dass noch weitere Fehler passiert sind. Wärst du so nett, das zu überprüfen und die Fehler zu beheben? Vielen Dank. --Zaccarias (talk) 18:42, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Zaccarias, durch meine Umbenennung sind einige falsche Benutzungen von {{date}} offensichtlich geworden. Im Unterschied zu {{other date}} gibt es dafür allerdings keine Wartungskategorie. Ich hatte gehofft, dass jemand bei Gelegenheit dann die Category:Pages using Complex date template with incorrect parameter aufräumt. --Arnd (talk) 19:07, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Danke für den Hinweis. Vielleicht kann ich ja mal etwas mithelfen. Ich habe leider schon sehr viele Baustellen. Bekanntlich gibt es genug Arbeit hier. --Zaccarias (talk) 19:25, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Zaccarias, kannst die Kategorie ja gerne mal durchgehen bei Gelegenheit. Sollte recht schnell gehen. Ich konzentriere mich meist auf Massenbearbeitungen. Es ist aber auf jeden Fall gut, wenn andere aufmerksam sind. Es kann immer mal was schieflaufen. Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 19:29, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #304[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #305[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #306[edit]

Structured Data on Commons Newsletter - Spring 2018[edit]

Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter and contribute to the next issue. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!

Community updates
  • Our dedicated IRC channel: wikimedia-commons-sd webchat
  • Several Commons community members are working on ways to integrate Wikidata in Wikimedia Commons. While this is not full-fledged structured data yet, this work helps to prepare for future conversion of data, and helps to understand how Wikidata and Commons can work better together.
Things to do / input and feedback requests
Discussions held
Events
Partners and allies
  • We are still welcoming (more) staff from GLAMs (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) to become part of our long-term focus group (phabricator task T174134). You will be kept in the loop of the project, and receive regular small surveys and requests for feedback. Get in touch with Sandra if you're interested - your input in helping to shape this project is highly valued!
Research
Development
  • Prototypes will be available for Multilingual Captions soon.
Stay up to date!

-- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 19:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #307[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #308[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #309[edit]

Multilingual captions testing is available[edit]

Greetings,

The early prototype for multilingual caption support is available for testing. More information on how to sign up to test is on Commons. Thanks, happy editing to you. - Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:05, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:Railway stations served by South West Trains[edit]

Hi there, I see you've edited Category:Railway stations served by South West Trains, and I'm wondering if you would get involved in renaming the category in light of SWT being replaced by SWR? Cheers Margery Armitage (talk) 10:09, 29 April 2018 (UTC) Margery Armitage (talk) 10:09, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #310[edit]