User talk:Ashton 29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ashton 29!

-- 03:09, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Blocked[edit]

Blocked Indefinitely
This user has been blocked indefinitely. See block log.

বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Zazaki | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Kurdî | Македонски | മലയാളം | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Sicilianu | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bidgee (talk) 05:44, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Unblock request[edit]

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.

Request reason: "I was unblocked on Wikipedia in January 2014. I would like to request to be unlocked here also as I have no interest in breaching any of the rules. I am fully committed to being a constructive member of the Wiki community and I believe this includes Wikimedia Commons. If unblocked, I will only upload content that falls within to the accepted CreativeCommons group and some of my own work once I take photos."
Decline reason: "No reply on questions below. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:43, 4 September 2014 (UTC)"

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | +/−

Is your upload restriction on English Wikipedia finished, if not, it could be seen that you want to bypass the restriction. I have no objections of the unblock but only if Ashton has no restrictions (regarding uploads on en Wiki) and agrees to use one account only, only upload "free-use" content (must not flickr wash) and abides by Commons policies and guidelines. Bidgee (talk) 04:46, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
The upload restriction could be "appealed" at WP:AN "no earlier than 07/08/2014", which has passed. I lodged an appeal there but they said to take it here, to Commons. I agree to follow those rules. Ashton 29 (talk) 01:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Do you have a link to your enwiki appeal? Bidgee (talk) 10:46, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Most recent one is here. Ashton 29 (talk) 00:52, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Well it has been archived. You didn't make yourself very clear, you need to request on English Wikipedia to have your English Wikipedia unblock conditions to be amended by appealing the upload restrictions. Once you've done that, you'll likely have unblock conditions placed on you (such as no copyright violations, flickrwashing, socking ect) but you wouldn't be restricted to requesting files to be uploaded (like you have been on En Wiki). Bidgee (talk) 10:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
I've placed a request on the AN/B. Bidgee (talk) 11:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Unblock request[edit]

Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "I am currently blocked from uploading files which was apart of my unblock appeal on Wikipedia from January 2014. I was allowed to edit on English Wikipedia, however if I want to upload files I have to use the Files for upload process as a condition of my unblock. Considering I have edited on Wikipedia for a year now, following the rules and editing without any disruptions or issues, I would like my unblock request from Commons to be looked into. The only mishaps I've had since my unblock was the accidental tagging of files with CC-BY 3.0 instead of the correct 2.0 license, which I corrected as soon as it was pointed out to me. I've always stated that my intentions on Wikipedia are good and I have no interest in breaking the rules or causing any kind of disturbance. Ashton 29 (talk) 00:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)"
Unblock reason: "See below the conditions." Taivo (talk) 11:49, 19 January 2015 (UTC)"

This template should be archived normally.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | 中文(简体)‎ | +/−

Unblock[edit]

Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "I have had my unblock restrictions on Wikipedia lifted as of 13 January 2014, so now I'd like to request to be unblocked on here so I can use the photo upload process.Ashton 29"
Unblock reason: "I freed you on these conditions:
  • Must only use a single account (Ashton 29) on Commons
  • Must not deliberately upload any photographs that violates copyright (eg. claiming own work on a photograph taken by someone else or upload a Flickr photograph that has obvious doubt) [added "deliberately", since good faith violations are something all editors do] Taivo (talk) 13:35, 17 January 2015 (UTC)"

This template should be archived normally.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | 中文(简体)‎ | +/−

File:Holiday time in Burleigh Heads.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Holiday time in Burleigh Heads.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Flickr uploads[edit]

Please upload the highest resolution available at Flickr. I fixed this one File:The Melbourne skyline.png but you should also just upload in the original format not change for jpg to png unless there is some specific technical reason for doing so. Ww2censor (talk) 09:03, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Melbourne infobox montage 2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Melbourne infobox montage 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 21:27, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Melbourne infobox montage.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Melbourne infobox montage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 21:28, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Morning light, The Grampians.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Morning light, The Grampians.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dtra82 (talk) 00:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Traditional terrace house in Sydney.jpg[edit]

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | português | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Traditional terrace house in Sydney.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request. Ww2censor (talk) 21:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Sydney terrace house detail.jpg[edit]

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | português | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Sydney terrace house detail.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request. Ww2censor (talk) 21:55, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:FullSizeRender-2.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:FullSizeRender-2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Secondarywaltz (talk) 03:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)