User talk:Asybaris01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Asybaris01!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Contents

Help[edit]

Sorry, I can't see exactly what you need, please tell me how I can help you. Regards,--SanchoPanzaXXI (talk) 16:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Asybaris01!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:38, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Please delete[edit]

this and this and this. Arrow direction is wrong. Thanks.Asybaris01 (talk) 16:14, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello. I am neither the creator of the files (who might ask for the deletion) nor an administrator (who could actually delete them), so I am not the good person to help you. At least I can tell you the way to follow.
As you happen to be the creator of the files, just add this tag on your file : {{speedydelete|Arrow direction is wrong}}. An administrator will see it and delete it afterwards, or contact you to know more.
Regards, Bruno (talk) 16:26, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: Migration map[edit]

Yes, MediaWiki is really a scrap when rendering text. The solution I found is to copy those texts, transform them into paths as you did which will serve for the display and hide the original texts in a layer bellow the map. This way you keep a clean display as well as the power of the SVG format for easy translation with the hidden labels. The file size will be a bit heavier but I think it's a small counterpart. Sting (talk) 20:16, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Josephinische[edit]

Ok! Your work is very good. Euere Werk ist sehr gut. By Pe-Jo (talk) 11:01, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi, can you copy your great imagemap from ro.wp to a gallery here on Commons, Josephinische Landaufnahme? Thats really good work and very interesting. --Martin H. (talk) 12:19, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Thank you. You have a very interesting work. Where can I find maps from "Gros Honter comitat" (XI-XX) in Slovakia ? Pe-Jo (talk) 13:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you from your answerPe-Jo (talk) 12:12, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. The Map "Gros Honter County....." is super. I´m from "Palatst" (on map)- Plášťovce...Pe-Jo (talk) 08:01, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Graphic Lab[edit]

This notice is to inform you that the formal Commons:Graphic Lab School/Images to improve page has been split into three workshops (as in the English Wikipedia): Illustration workshop, Map workshop, and Photography workshop. You have received this message because you have the {{User Wikigraphist}} userbox, or because you are an active participant of the Graphic Lab. If you would like to continue to request or improve, you may do so in your preferred workshop. Note that the formal page should not receive further requests and current discussions should be closed soon. Thank you, and happy holidays! ZooFari 00:56, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Categorization[edit]

Thank you for uploading old Josephinische Landaufnahme maps into Wikimedia Commons. However, you placed these maps into wrong categories such are "Maps of geographical regions of Serbia" or "Maps of ethnic groups in Romania". Currently, I am removing these files from these categories, leaving them only in "Josephinische Landaufnahme" category, which is a subcategory of several other categories. You should be careful with categorization, especially if you upload so many new files into wrong categories because other users then would spend much of free time trying to clean these categories from files that do not belong there. There are separate categories for all kinds of maps here: "modern maps", "historical maps", "old maps", "ethnic maps", etc, etc, and maps that you uploaded are clearly "old maps", not "maps of modern geographical regions" or "maps of ethnic groups". In the future, if you want to upload more old maps of this kind, please create a separate category for them (like "Josephinische Landaufnahme" category) and then make this category to be a subcategory of categories "Old maps of Serbia", "Old maps of Romania", etc, but please do not include these files into unrelated categories. PANONIAN (talk) 15:09, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Stema Brasovului[edit]

Pai nu zice in descriere? De pe un poster local. Reproduceri cu acest steag se gasesc prin cateva locuri in Brasov. Daca intrebi de originile sale, a fost pictat in 1600, fiind unul dintre steagurile cucerite de Mihai Viteazul in lupta de la Guraslau si trimise imparatului Rudolf II. Toate acestea au fost pictate. --Alex:D (talk) 21:37, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Protopopul_greco-catolic_Valeriu_Florianu_-_Racovita_Sibiu.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Protopopul_greco-catolic_Valeriu_Florianu_-_Racovita_Sibiu.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 08:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Samuil_micu_(1).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Samuil_micu_(1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mihai Andrei (talk) 16:26, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Harti[edit]

Da, harta aia chiar e comunista la modul cel mai serios. Poti sa pui linistit si un portret de-al lui Ceasca intr-un colt undeva :)

Eu intetionez sa ma apuc sa lucrez la un atlas istoric al Romaniei, dar totul inca este in faza de proiect, de strangere de fonduri, de gasit colaboratori etc. Ma gandeam sa folosesc hartile iozefine care acopera principalele orase ale Transilvaniei, Banatului si Partiumului (Alba Iulia, Sibiu, Brasov, Cluj, Oradea, Arad si Timisoara) ca sa fac cu ajutorul Inkscape niste harti-anexe ale acestor orase in sec. 18. Vad ca totul e in domeniul public, deci nu vor fi probleme cu licenta. Oricum meriti felicitari pentru toata munca pe care ai depus-o cu hartile iozefine!

Am sa incerc si eu sa mai imbunatatesc harta Daciei, sper sa am timp sa termin saptamana asta.

Ceau

Andrein (User talk:Andrein) 18:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Salut Ovidiu,

Well, totul e inca in faza de proiect. Doar ca mai multi istorici cu care am vorbit (la Sibiu si Cluj) au zis ca e nevoie acuta de un atlas istoric al Romaniei reactualizat in conformitate cu toate materialele care au aparut dupa 1989. Deci trebuie neaparat ca niste teme ceva mai controversate sa fie tratate intr-un astfel de atlas: continuitatea daco-romana (care se pare ca a fost limitata doar la zona muntilor Apuseni si la extremitatea sudica a Banatului), Imperiul Roman si apoi Imperiul Roman de Rasarit in perioda cat au fost conduse de imparati latinofoni din zona Balcanilor (cca. 250-600), apoi vlahiile balcanice si colonizarile cu romani pe granita Transilvaniei in sec. 12-14 (in zona Severin, Hateg, Fagaras, Nasaud, Maramures), Transnistria in perioda 1924-1944, rezistenta anticomunista din anii '50-'60 etc. etc.

Eu sper sa termin atlasul pana la anul pe vremea asta, oricum pana atunci am sa-ti trimit si cateva mostre de harti aflate inca in lucru, numai sa-mi dai o adresa de mail.

Andrein (User talk:Andrein) 19:38, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Adrian_Paunescu.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Adrian_Paunescu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ionutzmovie (talk) 17:49, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Harta Transilvaniei[edit]

Imi pare rau ca a durat atat, dar uite ca am gasit niste timp sa ma ocup de harta reliefului Transilvaniei. Am pus o varianta png aici: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Transilvania_relief.png

Chestia e ca din cauza marimii fisierului mi s-a blocat Inkscape de cateva ori. Sunt aproape sigur ca o varianta vectoriala ar crea probleme destul de serioase de vizualizare in media wiki asa ca nici nu prea ar avea rost sa incarc si un svg. Sper ca te descuri cu png-ul, daca nu am sa incerc sa-ti trimit svg-ul prin transfer.ro

Andrein (User talk:Andrein) 02:50, 20 Nov. 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Mircea_Vulcanescu.svg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mircea_Vulcanescu.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mircea_Vulcanescu.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--  Docu  at 20:44, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Harta Tinutului Secuiesc[edit]

Asybaris, daca ti se pare ceva in neregula la harta aia, mai bine scrie pe pagina de discutie a imaginii inainte sa faci tu modificari fara sa ma intrebi si pe mine. Si in orice caz autonomie, indiferent de criteriile pe baza carora se face, nu este egal cu separare de Romania. Sunt de acord cu tine ca trebuie puse sursele hartii, uite-le aici pe pagina web a Consiliului National Secuiesc daca vrei sa citesti: http://www.sznt.ro/ro/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&catid=10%3Astatutum&id=15%3Astatutul-de-autonomie-al-inutului-secuiesc&Itemid=14&lang=ro

Am sa pun sursele si pe pagina hartii. In final pot sa-ti mai spun ca mie mi-e indiferent daca se va face sau nu o regiune autonoma secuiasca. Pur si simplu am vrut sa fac o harta informativa cu propunerea venita din partea CNS-ului.

Salut si Sarbatori fericite!

Andrein (User talk:Andrein) 12:30, 23 Dec. 2010 (UTC)

Teide 3D[edit]

Hi I seen you have created a topographical picture of Mount Fuji in 3D, could you make a 3D Teide? Thank you very much.--79.145.13.56 18:51, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

I will try depending on the time available. Asybaris01 (talk) 08:31, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Thank you very much.--79.148.28.237 12:25, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Done, version 1, here.Asybaris01 (talk) 15:38, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Please, I need to know how you did this, if you don't mind. Thank you--Il Qathar (talk) 14:44, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

POTY votes[edit]

Remember that you can vote only once in the final round; I saw you voted for more than one image in the final round: I suggest you to remove all your votes and leave just one, otherwise none of your votes will be counted. Have a nice day, --Broc (talk) 21:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Grindul_&_Caraorman_place_seen_from_space.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Grindul_&_Caraorman_place_seen_from_space.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 13:40, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Death Valley 3D views.jpg[edit]

Only making a screenshot is not enough creativity for new copyright. Therefore I changed the license. If you think I made a mistake, please complain.

Thanks. -- RE rillke questions? 18:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Fagaras Mountains 3D maps[edit]

Hi,
I've transferred your 3D images and animated images gallery from page File:Muntii Fagarasului, harta turistica si a reliefului.jpg to page Munţii Făgăraş. It should have a wider audience there, and be less annoying when you access to the map page.
Great work on this map, by the way ! :)
Zeugma fr (talk) 16:58, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

?[edit]

What happened to GIF file, Varful Suru, that does not work the others, when minimized ? Asybaris01 (d) 26 juillet 2011 à 19:37 (CEST)

I don't know, i'm not a guru of mediawiki code... :) maybe the problem is related to the current Thumbnail generation problem (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28613) but i have no other idea... regards, Zeugma fr (talk) 10:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
hello, there is a discussion about this subject on the french village pump for commons. Seems ther is something related to uncompressed image size : uncompressed image must be less than 22 Mpixels.
best regards, Zeugma fr (talk) 10:16, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Prelucrare 3D pentru Colun, Sibiu.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Prelucrare 3D pentru Colun, Sibiu.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 07:45, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello! Please givea more specific source for the NASA-satellite image. Thank you. --High Contrast (talk) 07:46, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Prelucrare 3D pentru Sarulesti - Sat, Calarasi.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Prelucrare 3D pentru Sarulesti - Sat, Calarasi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 15:19, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

World Imagery[edit]

What do you mean with "World Imagery", this source is unclear. If you mean ArcGIS then the texture of your files is not free by default but most likely unfree (=Commons:Project scope#Required licensing terms is not fulfilled) and not ok to upload here. Only those portions of World Imagery created by NASA is public domain, the rest isnt. You have to provide verifiable evidence that the portions you use are created by NASA. --Martin H. (talk) 15:34, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

In general the main portion of your files is satellite imagery, provide sources for that. The information related to the data sources is of secondary interest, the satellite pictures you use are not your own work and no verifiable source is provided that it is free. --Martin H. (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

I mean, if I license for Global Mapper that automatically extracts texture World Imagery can not use it? It is a mistake somewhere. ~ ~ ~ ~

I answered at my talkpage. --Martin H. (talk) 15:50, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
I answered again there, you should nominate all your files for deletion, you are using unfree textures. --Martin H. (talk) 16:04, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

and a lot more need a verificable source. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:08, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

3D Maps for Romanian Counties[edit]

Not sure if you seen this message. en:User talk:Asybaris01#3D Maps for Romanian Counties, but maybe here on commons is the best place to discuss. Any thoughts? --Codrin.B (talk) 16:12, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Dacia[edit]

Roman bust of a Dacian tarabostes, Hermitage, St Petersburg, Russia - 20070614.jpg
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Dacia as a sister project to WP:DACIA English and WP:DACIA română to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to ancient Dacia. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

... and happy holidays! --Codrin.B (talk) 23:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Bucur_Gheorghe_-_Director_al_scolii_din_Racovita,_Sibiu.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bucur_Gheorghe_-_Director_al_scolii_din_Racovita,_Sibiu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Razvan Socol (talk) 10:04, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Frincu_Gavrila_-_Director_al_scolii_din_Racovita,_Sibiu.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Frincu_Gavrila_-_Director_al_scolii_din_Racovita,_Sibiu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Razvan Socol (talk) 10:04, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Salut, Asybaris! Cele două imagini de mai sus sunt scanate dintr-o carte, deci nu pot fi marcate cu tag-ul {{PD-self}}, deoarece acesta este aplicabil doar când autorul imaginilor este persoana care le încarcă la Commons. Dacă autorul fotografiilor sau deținătorul drepturilor de autor este de acord cu eliberarea acestora în domeniul public, trebuie transmisă dovada eliberării către Commons:OTRS. Razvan Socol (talk) 10:08, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
După câte înțeleg, ticketul #2007100310004441 se referă doar la textele al căror autor este Cornel Lupea. Drepturile de autor ale fotografiilor sunt deținute de către autorii acestora. Totuși, o să îl întreb și pe User:AdiJapan ce părere are el. Razvan Socol (talk) 10:14, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Textul declarației primite la OTRS spune așa:
Subsemnata [...] permit Fundației Wikimedia să publice această lucrare (sau fragmente din ea) [...] sub licența GNU [...].'
Eu din asta înțeleg că putem copia și republica orice parte a lucrării, inclusiv fotografiile. Este posibil ca fotografiile să aibă altă situație a drepturilor de autor, de exemplu dacă din descrierea lor se poate deduce că sînt mai vechi decît restul cărții (caz în care drepturile de autor expiră mai devreme) sau dacă sînt însoțite de detalii explicite privind drepturi de autor separate (caz în care permisiunea trebuie cerută separat, posibil altcuiva). Altfel cred că trebuie tratate identic cu textul.
Dar nu sînt avocat, așa că mă pot înșela. — AdiJapan 14:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Romania[edit]

Flag map of Romania.svg
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 15:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Harta Raionului Slobozia si a Raionului Dubasari[edit]

Salut! Legat de harta Raionului Slobozia am o mica observatie. Orasul Dnestovsc si satul Cremenciuc apartin administrativ de orasul Tiraspol si deci nu fac parte din Raionul Slobozia. Cel putin aceasta este organizarea administrativ-teritoriala in vigoare in PMR. Pervomaisc e considerat oras de Tiraspol si sat de Chisinau. Totusi din harta rezulta ca e vorba de impartirea administrativ-teritoariala din PMR caci Chisinaul recunoste doar UTASN, fara alte subdiviziuni administrative. Poata gasesti o solutie ca sa reiasa si din harta acest lucru. In raionul Dubasari, Mahala, Roghi si jumatate din Corjova sunt in prezent controlate de transnistrieni chiar daca formal din punctul de vedere al Chisinaului ele fac parte din raionul Dubasari al Republicii Moldova In rest, felicitari pt harti! Colinspancev (talk) 14:31, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Aici se gaseste legea de organizare administrativa a PMR: http://www.justice.idknet.com/web.nsf/767eb8a58ad76a2bc22574d5002acf15/9337cde2f7970907c2257520002d5855!OpenDocument
O sursa buna o reprezinta si datele recensamantului PMR: http://pop-stat.mashke.org/pmr-ethnic-loc2004.htm
Dupa cum se vede in Roghi recensamantul a fost organizat de PMR. Din discutiile personale cu oameni din Republica Moldova acestia mi-au confirmat ca Mahala si Corjova azi sunt incluse in orasul Dubasari desi in 2004 autoritatile legale ale Rep Moldova au reusit sa intre in aceste 2 sate pentru a strange datele pentru recensamant. Asta nu inseamna ca harta ta nu e corecta. Ea respecta impartirea oficiala a Rep Moldova. Am vrut doar sa fac o precizare pe care eu am considerat-o necesara. In legatura cu orasul Tiraspol cred ca orasul propriu-zis e mai mic decat pe harta. Reprezentarea orasului Tiraspol corespunde cu tot teritoriul aflat sub administrarea sa care insa cuprinde si teren agricol sau teren viran si dupa parerea mea nu ar trebui inclus in teritoriul propriu-zis al orasului Tiraspol. Ca o ultima observatie, azi Tiraspolul Nou e unit cu Tiraspolul intr-o singura unitate administrativa. Tiraspolul Nou exista azi ca un oras distinct doar formal in organizarea administrativa a Chisinaului. Legat de intinderea Tiraspolului Nou aici nici mie nu mi-e clar. Harta de pe wikimapia nu corespunde cu delimitarile administrative ale Rep Moldova care insa oricum in Transnistria sunt doar formale. Te rog sa nu te supere observatiile mele, situatia din Transnistria e extrem de complicata si m-am lovit si eu de aceste probleme, fiind o tema care ma intereseaza in mod deosebit. In rest hartile sunt excelente si inca odata felicitari pt ceea ce ai realizat! Colinspancev (talk) 17:30, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Tiraspolul este ok. El nu apartine de raionul slobozia, deci....... trebuie reprezentat cu tot cu terenul agricol aferent lui. Siteul ala nu e bun...... ptr mine...... nu cunosc rusa.... sunt afon la limba lui lenin.Asybaris01 (talk) 18:45, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Mi-ai cerut o sursa credibila. Legea de organizare a PMR de pe site-ul Ministerului de justitie a PMR e cea mai buna sursa. Nici eu nu stiu rusa dar cu google translate iese ceva inteligibil. Si datele recensamantului din PMR au fost publicate pe aceeasi structura administrativa. Pe de alta parte intre orasul Tiraspol (cu rosu pe harta) si municipalitatea Tiraspol (nu stiu daca traducerea e cea mai buna) exista o mica diferenta. Colinspancev (talk) 19:27, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Ok, sunt de acord cu tine. Tu spui multe aici, as vrea ... tehnic... spune ce anume sa fac. Adica, vrei colorat in rosu ceva anume, vrei contur undeva anume, vrei granita mai la dreapta, mai la stanga, etc. Imi este greu sa decid sa fac ceva din multitudinea de probleme cu care ai venit. Spun asta deoarece pe ro.wikipedia.org nu ma ajuta nimeni cu toate ca am anuntat la cafenea si esti sungurul care a avut o reactie mai competenta. Ideea este sa iasa ceva bun. Daca voi termina actiunea cu hartile la Moldova, nu cred ca va mai fi cineva sa faca ceva unitar pentru o lunga perioada de acum incolo. Asybaris01 (talk) 20:52, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
In regula, o sa revin cu o propunere concreta in cateva zile. Scrie-mi doar pe e-mail colinspancev@yahoo.com ca sa pot sa-ti trimit o varianta asa cum as vedea-o eu. Numai bine! Colinspancev (talk) 15:50, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Reconstituire pentru biserica fortificata din Hosman.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Reconstituire pentru biserica fortificata din Hosman.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 20:31, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Colaj prezentare Racovita, Sibiu.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Colaj prezentare Racovita, Sibiu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 14:22, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Aconcagua 3D.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aconcagua 3D.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 13:51, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Harta pentru Raionul Chilia Noua.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


File:Harta de localizare Chilia Noua.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


File:Harta pentru Raionul Chilia Noua.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


Please answer these questions[edit]

1) Hi Asybaris01, are you Valeriu Pantazi? Otherwise, you need to provide permission from him for File:Inima pasarii de dimineata, Valeriu Pantazi 1991.jpg, File:Gala concert I, Valeriu Pantazi 1991.jpg, File:Usa gandului dimineata, Valeriu Pantazi 1991.jpg, File:Legatura cerului cu pamantul, Valeriu Pantazi 1992.jpg, etc. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

I have permission. I'm the photographer, so are my copyrights. Valeriu Pantazi is my friend, I get from him a ticket
OTRS Wikimedia

The permission to use this work has been archived in the Wikimedia OTRS system. Full documentation is available only to OTRS volunteers as 2013030810004693 ticket #2013030810004693. If you wish to reuse this work elsewhere, please read the instructions at COM:REUSE. If you are a Commons user and wish to confirm the permission, please leave a note at the OTRS noticeboard.

Ticket link: https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber= 2013030810004693

for 5 personal photos for example. All is ok. Asybaris01 (talk) 10:07, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

2) When died the painter of File:Ioan Voda cel Viteaz.jpg, Valentin Tanase, die? --Túrelio (talk) 09:11, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Paintings by Valentin Tanase and Gheorghe Pantelie images are photographed by me at a painting exhibition Asybaris01 (talk) 10:07, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
As you still did not answer, I assume that Valentin Tanase is still living, right? --Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Yes. Asybaris01 (talk) 10:28, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
O.k., then you need a formal OTRS permission from him, similar as with Valeriu Pantazi. --Túrelio (talk) 10:33, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Valentin Tanase I do not know him personally. I made photos at an exhibition of paintings. The copyright of the photos are not mine? Why is it necessary to have obtained his permission? I'm not running to get permission, delete them.Asybaris01 (talk) 11:01, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
See Commons:CB#2D art (paintings etc.). When you take a photo of something that is a work of art in itself and is still copyrighted (creator not dead since > 70 years), you always need first to get permission from the artist. Otherwise you cannot distribute your own photo, because it violates the copyright of the original artist. See also: Commons:Derivative works. --Túrelio (talk) 11:04, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
I have tagged the Tanase-paintings now for speedy deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 20:56, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Ok.Asybaris01 (talk) 20:58, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Carl Dorschlag, Altarul bisericii evanghelice din Ulia.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Carl Dorschlag, Altarul bisericii evanghelice din Ulia.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

Cwbm (commons) (talk) 14:18, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Carl Dorschlag.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Carl Dorschlag.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

Cwbm (commons) (talk) 14:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Carl Dörschlag 1.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Carl Dörschlag 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

Cwbm (commons) (talk) 14:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Prelucrare 3D pentru Cisnadioara, Sibiu.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Prelucrare 3D pentru Cisnadioara, Sibiu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:45, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Prelucrare 3D pentru Greblesti, Valcea - Amplasare geografica.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Prelucrare 3D pentru Greblesti, Valcea - Amplasare geografica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:46, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Asybaris01. thanks for tagging duplicate files for speedy deletion. But could you please use the {{Duplicate}} template next time? It makes things easier for the deleting admin as that template activates a special duplicate file deletion tool which takes care of a few extra tasks, such as file replacement. --Dschwen (talk) 20:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

OK.Asybaris01 (talk) 20:58, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Leon Lichtblau.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Leon Lichtblau.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the file because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the file, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the file itself. Please update the file description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you.


English | മലയാളം | Русский | Svenska | +/−

Senator2029Talk 14:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Biserica din Racovita, Dambovita (1).jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Biserica din Racovita, Dambovita (1).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:03, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Categoriile Bucșani şi Racoviţa, Dâmbovița[edit]

Salutare! Am observat că ai creat categorii pentru localităţile Bucșani şi Racoviţa din judeţul Dâmboviţa. Doar că le-ai categorisit greşit, punându-le în categoria Cities and towns in Dâmbovița County. Bucşani este comună, iar Racoviţa este sat din cadrul comunei amintite, prin urmare ar fi trebuit să se găsească în categoriile: Communes in Dâmboviţa County, respectiv Villages in Dâmboviţa County, categorii existente. Au fost mutate în categoriile corespunzătoare. De asemenea, este indicat să se folosească caracterele ș, respectiv ț pentru categoriile de pe commons care conţin denumiri proprii româneşti. Mult succes în continuare! Musichistory2009

Părere[edit]

Salut. Ați făcut o treabă bună cu toate aceste hărți de localizare pentru Moldova. Dacă îmi permiteți, o părere punctuală despre unele imagini. Cred că fișierele File:Harta de localizare Moldova Cahul.jpg și File:Harta de localizare Moldova Dubasari local.jpg le-ați saturat prea mult. Acum am impresia că le văd într-un ziar alb-negru)) Penultimile versiuni arătau aproape ok, doar porțiunile cu culori foarte aprinse trebuiau retușate un pic. Părerea mea.--XXN (talk) 11:48, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Vintila Dongoroz.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vintila Dongoroz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

//  Gikü  said  done  Friday, 19 December 2014 16:17 (UTC) 16:17, 19 December 2014 (UTC)