User talk:Averater

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

File:ObjectTreeView.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:ObjectTreeView.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Palosirkka (talk) 22:49, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

File:ObjectInspector.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:ObjectInspector.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Palosirkka (talk) 22:49, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

File:SelectDirectoryNew.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:SelectDirectoryNew.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Palosirkka (talk) 22:49, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

File:SelectDirectoryOld.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:SelectDirectoryOld.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Palosirkka (talk) 22:49, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

File:CodeTemplates.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:CodeTemplates.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Palosirkka (talk) 22:49, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Highlighter2.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Highlighter2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Palosirkka (talk) 22:49, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Yatzy-protokoll.png[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Yatzy-protokoll.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 10:37, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing. I have not found any proper licence for it as it was uploaded originally by another user. But I have changed the page using the file to use another properly licensed file so it can now be deleted even if it would have some proper licence or not. - Averater (talk) 11:58, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Averater,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Romain Puértolas[edit]

Thank you for uploading pictures of Romain Puértolas! Grijz (talk) 19:17, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome. - Averater (talk) 14:53, 16 October 2014 (UTC)


File:Unidentified plant on Malta.jpg[edit]

This is Agave americana, a plant widely naturalized in the Mediterranean. Please, please, please for all your Malta images describe and categorize WHERE in Malta you took the image! -- Ies (talk) 16:58, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! All my photos have GPS coordinates but of course I could try to find appropiate location categories. Do you have a root category for "photos taken in ..."? Regards Averater (talk) 17:52, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Nevermind about the root category, found it. But for a lot of photos it will be a guesswork to find the right one as I have no idea where the borders between different districts are. - Averater (talk) 18:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
The areas and boundaries of the different Maltese municipalities are visible with Google maps. If you prefer the "Earth" view, change to the classic Google maps where the boundaries are also visible. Please don't hesitate to ask me if in any doubt!
As I see you've been on the Blue Grotto tour. The first time we tried this tour we unfortunately had bad weather and the storm was too heavy for the boats. It was very nice the second time, however :-) Ies (talk) 11:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)


File:Unidentified flower on Malta 03.jpg[edit]

Hi Averater, this looks much like Arisarum vulgare to me. Also compare to [1]. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 12:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! - Averater (talk) 14:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paphiopedilum exul GotBot 2015 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paphiopedilum exul GotBot 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Epidendrum pseudoepidendrum GotBot 2015 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Epidendrum pseudoepidendrum GotBot 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bulbophyllum falcatum GotBot 2015 006.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bulbophyllum falcatum GotBot 2015 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bulbophyllum falcatum GotBot 2015 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bulbophyllum falcatum GotBot 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dendrobium plumpstomense[edit]

Hallo Averater, could you please check in your records the name Dendrobium plumpstomense? I can not find this name. Your picture is very similar with Dendrobium nobile.
(By the way, I did'nt forget the spelling of P.'Maudiae') Best greetings. Orchi (talk) 17:04, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

It was a very old specimen with a very old sign... I'll ask the staff at Gothenburg Botanical Garden later this week if they have more information on it. Because you are right in that it probably isn't a correct name and that Dendrobium nobile is indeed very similar. Do you know if there are any other species that are similar to consider if I take a closer look? Regards Averater (talk) 18:05, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
....then let us wait and ask the staff. The name shows not a result in KEW, MBG etc. and not even in google. Greetings. Orchi (talk) 19:51, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
I've now been back at the garden. It had another sign also that had some more information. It is a cultivar (Dendrobium 'Plumptonense'), very similar to D. nobilis but with somewhat bigger flowers and with more yellow than nobilis. They were right next to each other so it was easy to compare them. That name does give some hits on google and here is some more information I found: "Dendrobium plumptonense (D. Cybele nobilior X D. nobile nobilius). — A richly-coloured hybrid, approaching the latter parent in colour. Exhibited by Messrs. Mansell & Hatcher." and "W. R. Lee, Esq., Heywood (gr. Mr. Woodhouse), was awarded a First class Certificate for Dendrobium X plumptonense, a hybrid between D. Cybele nobilior x D. nobile nobilius, a fine bold flower of pleasing colour." source --Averater (talk) 15:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
....many thanks for your effort. I suggest to write the category according to your style (Dendrobium 'Plumptonense') with classifying in the cultivars. Waiting for further fine orchid pictures of you and with best greetings. Orchi (talk) 15:28, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your compliments, most appreciated. I have a few more I took today to upload. Good to know about the naming, did you get any clarification as to how to name the categories? With or without apostrophes? --Averater (talk) 20:28, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
The "International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants" says ( I read it in the German WP): Not in italics, with an apostrophe and beginning with a capital letter. E.g. Paphiopedilum 'Maudiae' or Clematis alpina 'Ruby' (sample of enWP) Greetings Orchi (talk) 21:17, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Seems good. Then maybe we should rename a few categories now? The italics bit might be hard but tha apostophes shouldn't be a problem. Do you think we should leave redirects or not? --Averater (talk) 21:57, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
...I made a sample of Category:Paphiopedilum 'Maudiae'. I think, redirects without apostophes are senseful. Orchi (talk) 15:22, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Looks good! --Averater (talk) 15:58, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

User:Averaterbot[edit]

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! One question: I got permission to use AWB for my test edits, does this mean that I automatically keep that permission? --Averater (talk) 14:55, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
I think you could continue, but I didn't notice special right for AWB. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. --Averater (talk) 16:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Adonis volgensis[edit]

Post moved to User talk:Roferbia#Adonis v/wolgensis --Averater (talk) 05:59, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

POTY barnstar.svg

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Averater,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Cotoneaster conspicuus 01[edit]

Thank you for taking and uploading this photo! I see that it is listed under a 'Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported' license, I hope that means you don't mind me using a section of it for work (non commercial) to use in a survey looking at which plants people in the UK are growing for pollinators in their gardens. Feel free to send me a message if it is a problem!

Hello. No problem at all. As long as I'm attributed (Either as Gustav Svensson (preferred) or as Averater) and the License (CC BY-SA 3.0) is there it is fine. Glad my photos are used! --Averater (talk) 13:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC)