User talk:AzaToth/Archives/2011/October

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

filename

Dear Aza ... the name is easy to be located, represents the characteristics of the engine, all files that have carry the nomination.

GMD - General Motors Diesel (manufacturer)

B12 - Model Locomotive

FTC - Ferrovia Tereza Cristina

SALV - Society Friends of the Steam Locomotive

ABPF - Brazilian Association of Railway Preservation

6001 - Locomotive Number

no more Meloaraujo (talk) 00:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, AzaToth/Archives/2011!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:40, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:Dr Riji nair.JPG

Hello AzaToth, the image is taken by myself and needs no extra permission. Regards--Fotokannan (talk) 17:03, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

It applies to you as well, as the declared author is not certain you. AzaToth 17:05, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
One doubt here is that, Where does the author gives the permission for this work? I think it is his own work and published under CC-SA.--Rameshng (talk) 17:20, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Deletion requests

I am rather concerned about your nominating images for deletion on the basis of "yet another penis". That is really not a reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Was a misunderstanding from my part, I thought all images of genitalia by newly created accounts should be listed for discussion. AzaToth 21:35, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

File:2011 Battle of Sirte

Hello!

I really don`t understand what is wrong with that file. I`ve made that map. My sources are shown in the description page. Whats wrong? --Ave César Filito (talk) 15:42, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

There are no problem with the file in it self, only that it can't be copyrighted as the "file is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship" (see Template:PD-ineligible). AzaToth 15:44, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Now I understand. But, how can I change that? --Ave César Filito (talk) 15:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

2011 Libyan Civil War

Hello, I got something about licenses, but I don't understant what I did wrong. I just updated the map and I kept the same license as before!--Vectrex

The map is in my opinion below the threshold of originality (no disrespect), and should be marked with {{pd-ineligible}} or similar. AzaToth 16:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Sara Paxton

Hey ! In Picasa there wrote that the license of this photo is free (Creative Commons). See here, in the right. If it false, it is not me who is at fault but the person who posted this photo on picasa. Cordially, Cl;nintendods (talk) 18:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

No problem, it can be difficult to see if an image has been license washed or not. It could be that the actual image is available under an cc-by license, and also licensed via getty images; It's difficult to know without contacting the author of the image. AzaToth 18:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. The photo will be removed or not ? Cordially, Cl;nintendods (talk) 19:48, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
It's good, I did not say anything, lol. XD Cordially, see you soon ! Cl;nintendods (talk) 16:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:To many sleepless nights.jpg‎

In particular File:To many sleepless nights.jpg‎ should be renamed, but I do not know the scientific name. You quote a policy that doesn't prohibit me from filing non-final rename requests, and this one in particular goes under "change meaningless bio-names into binomial scientific names". The template {{rename}} gives an usable notice to help with defining a good rename for uncertain request, it's clearly not an "invalid request" AzaToth 11:44, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi AzaToth !
I agree that this file's name should be improved but please understand that we, filemovers, have to follow the guidelines.
First of all, you didn't mention a legitimate reason to rename this file as required by the guidelines. Since you weren't the original uploader, I tried to find for you a suitable reason according to our criteria but I failed, sorry.
Please feel free to try again, this time with an expressed acceptable reason and if possible with a more relevant name. I'm not the only one who processes these requests.
Best, Papatt (talk) 12:16, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Well, I was using the rename feature of the Gadget, and it doesn't allow you to add an reason. :( AzaToth 12:31, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
The best then is to edit your request(s) by adding the specified reason according to the template's syntax and criteria (few matching words may be enough).
I didn't find the link to your Gadget but be sure a report of this lack will be appreciated by both renaming requesters-to-be and filemovers if dealt with.
Best, Papatt (talk) 13:21, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Snowy Åreskutan Ski lift.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Snowy Åreskutan Ski lift.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Snowy Åreskutan Ski lift.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

I didn't know that type of licenses was allowed. I have a question, which types will be likely approved with problems? >.<

It's not simple to understand all the different types of licenses and permissions. You can read about licenses at Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses AzaToth 19:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Jay2kx (talk) 19:49, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Jerzy Vetulani

Hellow, You nominated my photograph of Jerzy Vetulani for deletion. On my discussion page I have a message which say that the file dosen't have required data about licensing. Well, I am author of that picture and I am the copyright holder.

How am I supposed to prove it? Francesco 13 (talk) 20:19, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

You need to contact the OTRS team as instructed in the message. AzaToth 20:28, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Fair use for "Ethnic Udi.jpg"

Though this image is subject to copyright, its use is covered by the U.S. fair use laws because:

  1. It is of much lower resolution (and size) than the original (copies made from it will be of very inferior quality).
  2. The photo is only being used for informational purposes.

Sorry, I did not know there was a possible copyright problem. But I hope the Fair Use for informational purposes can maintain the file in wikipedia/wikicommons.

Commons:Licensing

Additionally I have checked the Commons:Licensing for Azerbaijan, and I have found that there it is NO copyright in this country for photos related to works of folklore (according to to the Copyright law of 1996). Since the image to be deleted shows a girl singing with a typical local instrument, I think we are dealing with local Udi "folklore" and should not be erased. Sincerely, --70Tav (talk) 18:20, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Double Checking

Before I try to upload, these images ([1]) are safe right? Since I see the (by-sa) licenses. Jay2kx (talk) 18:58, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

It's difficult to say, as it could be that the author of the blog doesn't have permission to use the images in the first place even, or that it's only the text content of the blog that is under cc-by. AzaToth 19:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

I was wondering the same thing. Haha. Thanks. Jay2kx (talk) 20:05, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

File:FXC.gif

Hi, please don't nominate for speedy deletion if {{PD-textlogo}} clearly applies. Jcb (talk) 20:12, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

I felt the animation could imply copyrightabillity. AzaToth 20:52, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
That might be, although I don't think so in this case. Feel free to start a regular deletion request (the 'nominate for deletion' link from the menu). Speedy deletion is only possible in clear cases. In case of any doubt a regular DR is more appropriate. Jcb (talk) 21:10, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Prof.Pasyechnikova.N.V..jpg

Why was this marked as lacking permission? I have an email from the uploader in ticket 2011101310020281 asserting permission for the file they uploaded. But that's not any better than what the uploader asserted when they uploaded the file. Do you wish me to disregard it? Who are you looking for to provide the permission? – Adrignola talk 22:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

I marked it as lacking permission as I found the image out in the wild, but in lower resolution, for example http://europa-centre.com/30_11/754-institut-sveta.html - perhaps I marked the image with the wrong template. AzaToth 22:35, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Sources provided for the image File:Hazara people.jpg

Please check the source of the image and if its ok can you remove the tag please. Hazara-Birar (talk) 21:58, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

They are ok :) AzaToth 22:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Watermarked images

Hello. I am aware that most of the images I just uploaded have watermarks. No other version is available and the author specifically asked for me to keep the watermarks. Is that okay? --SlipknotRlZZ (talk) 23:55, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

WikiDefender Barnstar.png The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thank you AzaToth for marking possible copyright violations like file:PMDD.jpg

Groetjes Neozoon (talk) 23:58, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

AzaToth/Archives/2011/October

Svg spam

Dear AzaToth, I'm not sure what tool you're using, but it's spamming my talk page with svg messages. Multichill (talk) 07:29, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear AzaToth/Archives/2011,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:29, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Károly Klimó

Already sent a license from Károly Klimó.--User:Pataki Mártaforrás 15:37, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

That sounds perfect! It's up to OTRS to assess the validity of that request now. AzaToth 15:39, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Shu Qi

I replied. You should have contact me first, nomination stupid a little bit. Hope you will close it by yourself and patiently wait for your apologize --Алый Король (talk) 18:21, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

File:The Great Mother.png

As indicated, I transfered the file with a bot from en.WP. I saw you also contacted the original uploader. thanks. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 22:00, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Yea, I felt it was best to notify all relevant parties. AzaToth 22:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Lubangasmall.jpg

Well, to make things clear, the real fact is that I LIED! However there should be an option indicating that a work published by an international agency/organisation is free. If I am wrong tell me.--The Theosophist (talk) 14:18, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Copyvio tagging

Appreciated :) --Herby talk thyme 15:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

C´mon!

I need all those images for my work. I think you are investigating. I think what you do only harm to the site. Please, think about it. I apologize if my English is not understood, I'm not very good at it --Maximolinagomez (talk) 17:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC)Maxi.Molina-Gómez

It is not relevant for Commons if you need the files for your work. The only thing that is relevant is if the files are free or not and if they are usable or not. I checked some of the files and if you can forward a permission from the photographer /creator / copyright holder it would help a lot. --MGA73 (talk) 17:29, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

File:GR10.jpg

Hello, you have deleted the file GR10.jpg while it was from free source and I precised them, I don't understand why ? Falcoperegrinus (talk) 18:56, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

I marked it for speedy deletion as the source uses google maps, please talk to the deleting admin if you want it restored. AzaToth 20:36, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Rechenberger Bierdeckel 450 Jahre.jpg

Hallo, vlt. erst einmal die Lizenzbausteine lesen vorm Handeln....... mfg -- SpaceJ (talk) 01:08, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Min tyska är lite väl icke-existerande för att jag skall kunna förstå vad du försöker säga mig. AzaToth 01:14, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Och för mig är det min svenska och engelska;-) På licensblocket är varumärkesskydd, läs först och sedan göra en strykning begäran.-- SpaceJ (talk) 01:36, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Lubangasmall.jpg

I have asked you something, scroll up and tell me.--The Theosophist (talk) 16:11, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Ah, sorry, missed that :) Well, it's an difficult question; Just because an image has been created by an international organization doesn't make that image free for reuse, the image must follow the policy specified here. AzaToth 00:28, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

United Kingdom

Something else, why in the options there are all the US licences but not the UK?--The Theosophist (talk) 20:47, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

It's because it's the WMF who has designed the wizard. AzaToth 21:03, 24 October 2011 (UTC)


File:Mickey Mouse - Come on Gang, All Out for Uncle Sam.svg

You might want to make the stars be more like stars... AnonMoos (talk) 02:14, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

United Kingdom

So, can you tell what I must select for two images I want to upload, published by the UK government?--The Theosophist (talk) 15:24, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Loading image

Hello, Aza Toth. I uploaded the files listed below but you said that I did not put the license. But I 's I put it.


[2] [3] [4] [5]

It's lacking permission, as I'm not convinced you are the original author of the artworks (looks like it's been photographed from behind a plastic surface). AzaToth 13:07, 25 October 2011 (UTC)


I assure you that this photo the 'I made it. But I have an idea: you eliminate these images that I uploaded and I put my picture on the link below.

[6] (This site has the creative commons) --Andrea 45 (talk) 13:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Singer Lorena Pinot in Guatemala.jpg We already sent the email communication granting permission

File:Singer Lorena Pinot in Guatemala.jpg

We already sent the email communication granting permission To: permissions-commonswikimedia.org I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the work. File:Singer Lorena Pinot in Guatemala.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Singer_Lorena_Pinot_in_Guatemala.jpg File:Lorena Pinot.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lorena_Pinot.jpg I agree to publish that work under the free license CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution v1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product, and to modify it according to their needs, as long as they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I am aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.


10/25/2011, Miami, Florida, USA, Kike San Martin, photographer.

Kike San Martin Photography Inc. (305) 499-9896 6956 NW 51st St. Miami, FL 33166 www.kikesanmartin.com Thank you!

--Misty2011 17:40, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Please stop deleting OUR OWN IMAGES

Dear AzaToth,

Several images that we have created and OWN THE COPYRIGHT to are being deleted - if you had investigated further you would have found this message I left on Courcelles' Talk page (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Courcelles), who deleted the original images:

"Hi,

I uploaded several images to a page. We are the creator of the images, but you deleted them a few days ago.

I did try to grant permission, but I admit that I find the Wikipedia permissions process EXTREMELY confusing. I granted permission, yet afterwards it was showing me a red box saying that permission had been granted but there was some other problem I did not understand. I'm sorry but I was very confused. Please let me know what we have to do to give you permission to use the images.

I'm uploading new (different) images to the page and going through the file uploading process very carefully (one by one), and I am selecting the "This is my own work" option at the end. I hope this is enough to grant Wikipedia permission to use the images. If not, please tag the images (don't delete them as we can give you permission! We created and own all rights to the images!) and then let us know (here on your talk page, I will keep an eye on it) the necessary steps to give you permission to have them on your website.

Thank you very much and sorry for any trouble.

Sincerely,

pdbox"

Right after I left that message on their page, I sent an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org granting Wikipedia permission to use the images. THIS IS RIDICULOUS that after doing exactly what Wikipedia wants the images are still deleted! I also can't get in contact with Courcelles since it seems they do not have time to investigate whether the images were wrongly deleted or not? How are we supposed to prove we own the images when we can't get in contact with anyone? This is very frustrating and confusing.

WHAT MORE DO WE NEED TO DO TO SHOW YOU WE HAVE THE PERMISSIONS?!

Please let us know, we followed all the instructions we found on the website, what more do you want!!

I would link you the files, but they have already been deleted and so do not exist! (the original filenames are in the email I sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, seems that didn't help at all!). How can we even ASK for permission and PROVE our ownership if you DELETE the images less than 24 hours after we upload them? I bet no one even read our email we sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org!

Here are the 4 deleted files in case it is helpful after all, and they can be magically restored somehow: [1] [2] [3] [4]

Here are the 3 remaining files on the page that will probably be deleted because no one read our email to you: [5] [6] [7]

Please AzaToth let us know what we need to do, we are new users of Wikipedia and have spent a lot of time trying to learn the website, but we think the image permissions process is very unfriendly to new users. We tried all options we could find and despite our best efforts our work was deleted. We need those images up as soon as possible and when we try to prove our ownership to the user who first deleted the images we get a "sorry I'm busy and don't have time to investigate" message - this is not acceptable! If someone doesn't have time to check to see if they deleted images in error or not they shouldn't delete them in the first place.

Please let us know what to do to prove our ownership and grant you permission and we will do it.

Thank you for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by pdbox (talk • contribs)

You'll have to contact OTRS. AzaToth 17:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
How do I do that? I thought Wikipedia said we could either contact OTRS or email permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.
That's the same thing (P.S. please sign using ~~~~. AzaToth 17:21, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Then you can see in my messages I sent the email a day ago ... how long will it take to get the images restored? Pdbox (talk) 17:57, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
I can't as I'm not an OTRS handler. AzaToth 18:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Can you please refer me to one? Pdbox (talk) 18:30, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Please refer to Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. AzaToth 19:25, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
THANK YOU so much! Pdbox (talk) 19:34, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

United Kingdom

I have asked you something else. Scroll up again and tell me.--The Theosophist (talk) 20:33, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

You better ask on the village pump, and stop try to order me to answer. AzaToth 21:09, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Could you update the animated Libyan Tripolitania Front map?

I really appreciate the work you put into making an animated map of the Tripolitania Front during the Libyan Civil War back in August. Most of the articles and common maps about the subject matter are relatively static and don't do justice to this mobile and rapidly changing conflict in the way an animation like this can. Now that the war has ended, do you think you can update the map through the war's culmination, and maybe create one for the Gulf of Sidra Front? Thanks. 173.70.82.26 15:31, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Re:Lizenzierung und Genehmigung File:Niederkappel Pfarrkirche - Deckengemälde 4a Martyrium Andreas.jpg

The given license is valid according to Austrian FOP, which includes also the publicly accessible interiors of buildings, and the photo need not have been taken from a public place (c.f. Hundertwasserentscheidung). -- Xenophon (talk) 00:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

If you don´t react to my answer, I am going to remove the image permission tag tomorrow -- Xenophon (talk) 12:16, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Historias de la primera vez.jpg

La imagen es una captura de pantalla del canal de YOTUBE en 0:38. no es de facebook.--Antoniairiarte (talk) 02:11, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

No need to notify me everywhere. AzaToth 02:12, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Pense que me habia confundido de usuario cuando escribi anteriormente. La imagen es del canal de youtube de la "HIsotiras de la primera vez" no es la misma imagen que se encuentra en facebook.

File:Luis Moisset de Espanés,3.jpg

Re: File:Luis Moisset de Espanés,3.jpg and File:Luis Moisset de Espanés, 1.jpg. Dr. Luis Moisset de Espanés supplied these images to be used on the Es:Wikipedia page: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Moisset_de_Espan%C3%A9s. Is there a problem? Do you need something else? --Polinizador (talk) 02:29, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

We need permission that the "Luis Moisset de Espanés archives" has released these images under given license. instructions are given in the notice you've received. AzaToth 02:30, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, AzaToth/Archives/2011!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:20, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Regarding all your panorama requests

Thank you for trying, it is greatly appreciated. But I don't think that removing the requests is going to solve the problem. Maybe some other user will come along in time? The images were specifically shot in that way in order to be stitched as a panorama.... Gryffindor (talk) 00:52, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Sadly the source images have been mostly of too low quality and too limited view to be possible to make a working stitching of it. AzaToth 01:07, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Theexquisiteposter.jpg out of process note ;-)

Hallo AzaToth, please tell me if you do not agree with https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Theexquisiteposter.jpg&action=history But I guess you do - therefore not directly converted to DR. Although we maybe should delete all two files by this user for out of scope Facebook style advert and help enwp cleaning up a bit. ;) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:45, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Note: Discussed in IRC. Thank you for your help! :) --Saibo (Δ) 14:38, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Can you explain it?

[7] - Why do you destroy Czech description and category name? --Dezidor (talk) 09:14, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Clearly a technical problem. I just wanted to comment on the pr remove: if the stitching is impossible of these images (yes, they have very tiny overlapping and different lighting), the related images should be kept in the other version field in a different way as the person who watches those three images can put them together in brain. ;) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 14:42, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, was a character set error in the script I was running. Wont happen again. AzaToth 18:29, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Magna_carta_1297.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Magna_carta_1297.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:26, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for looking up on my uploads, but please, couldn't you find anything better?`AzaToth 19:31, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
One wonders when the Buddha statue was made and when the sculptor died. I also think that File:Gare de l'Est Paris 2007p1-restitch.jpg would be considered a problem. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:45, 31 October 2011 (UTC)