User talk:Bahnfrend

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bahnfrend!

TUSC token 3721ce4fd00d7357e0e670f14f2dbfad[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−


Hello, Bahnfrend!
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:46, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Alpha Millennium departs Port Hedland, 2012 (1).JPG[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:55, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Rooey II, 2012.JPG[edit]

Hi Bahnfrend, could you add the name of the sculpture to the description. --Túrelio (talk) 15:27, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

File:MV Sydney 2000, Sydney Cove, 2013.JPG[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:55, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

File:YarraTramsLogoNew.svg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:YarraTramsLogoNew.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 15:36, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bhopal Shatabdi Express, New Delhi, 2008 (4).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bhopal Shatabdi Express, New Delhi, 2008 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Not perfect, but I like it.--ArildV 16:22, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Z3.215 + B2.2028 swanston.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Z3.215 + B2.2028 swanston.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Force Traveller Kuoni ambulance, 2008.JPG[edit]

Hi, I've uploaded a brightened version; if you don't like it please revert to original version. Cheers, --P e z i (talk) 20:50, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Force Traveller Kuoni ambulance, 2008.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Force Traveller Kuoni ambulance, 2008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

File source is not properly indicated: File:Rrsimpson.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rrsimpson.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Rrsimpson.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

-- TLSuda (talk) 01:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Regent Street Bus Cavalcade[edit]

Hello Bahnfrend. I just noticed your photo of Q1 trolleybus - very nice. Did you happen to take any more images of that event? Ultra7 (talk) 18:14, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for uploading what you had. I was just concerned you might have taken more but hadn't uploaded them yet for lack of time or info. After a walk like that though, I can fully understand why you didn't - I hope you all had fun anyway, definitely one of those happy coincidences (especially if you like buses and/or have kids to occupy). Ultra7 (talk) 18:04, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

NR18 + IP East Perth, 2014.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NR18 + IP East Perth, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --P e z i 00:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

NR18 + IP Stratton, 2014.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NR18 + IP Stratton, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Re 460 058-1 + IC 2000 St. Gallen, 2014 (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Re 460 058-1 + IC 2000 St. Gallen, 2014 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Re 460 058-1 + IC 2000 St. Gallen, 2014 (5).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Re 460 058-1 + IC 2000 St. Gallen, 2014 (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.endlich mal "bunte" Bahnbilder ;) --Ralf Roletschek 12:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

RNV 3288 Theodor-Heuss-Brücke, 2014.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RNV 3288 Theodor-Heuss-Brücke, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, but yet tilted slightly cw. --Cccefalon 13:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done Tilt fixed -- Bahnfrend 15:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Very good photo with a blemish: Unfortunately, the target screen is unreadable by the short exposure time. --Steindy 20:34, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Yes, but still quality good enough for QI. --Cccefalon 22:06, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The destination screen may have been changing to a different message at the time I took the photo. -- Bahnfrend 01:02, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
FC 2 test, surfers paradise boulevard, March 2014.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FC 2 test, surfers paradise boulevard, March 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Halavar 12:32, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

B 2727 + train, B Midi-Zuid, 2014 (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B 2727 + train, B Midi-Zuid, 2014 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Background a little bit noisy. --XRay 08:49, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
B 2727, B Midi-Zuid, 2014.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B 2727, B Midi-Zuid, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 08:51, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

D1.3509 swanston, 2014.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D1.3509 swanston, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
C.3008 collins, 2014.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! C.3008 collins, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gordon Street, Kondinin, 2014(1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gordon Street, Kondinin, 2014(1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Frankies' Diner, Trayning, 2014.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frankies' Diner, Trayning, 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Zcebeci 16:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Roche Street, Kalannie, 2014(2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roche Street, Kalannie, 2014(2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good for me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Sports[edit]

Hello, Bahnfrend! Please join the WikiProject Sports. Good luck! --NaBUru38 (talk) 22:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Crop Photos[edit]

Hello! I really liked your photographs a lot! I have a suggestion - It would be great if you crop some photos and upload it separately. Like this photo, we can take the wicket keeper, Swapnil Patil or the fielder and so on. It would be great and help Wikipedia in these articles a lot. I don't know if I can do this, you being copyright holder. Please think on this. Thanks!--Kashish Arora (talk) 06:56, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Category: Overseas Passenger Terminal[edit]

Please see Category talk:Overseas Passenger Terminal#Contents. Mitch Ames (talk) 01:15, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Australia photo requests[edit]

I have some photo requests for Australia. What region do you live in? WhisperToMe (talk) 09:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Ok! I have photo requests for Perth and Melbourne! First I'll list Perth:

Then, if/when you visit, Melbourne:

  • The Japanese School of Melbourne (メルボルン日本人学校), 6 ELLINGTON STREET CAULFIELD SOUTH VIC.3162
  • Caulfield Junior College (has French section): 186 Balaclava Rd, Caulfield North VIC 3161, Australia
  • Deutsche Schule Melbourne: 96 Barkly Street (corner Dean Street) North Fitzroy, VIC 3068, AUSTRALIA
  • Jetstar Airways headquarters: 473 Bourke St, Melbourne Vic 3000
  • Oakleigh South Primary School (site of the Japanese Saturday school) - Riley Street, Oakleigh South VIC3167
  • Former campuses of the Melbourne Japanese weekend school:
    • Brighton Grammar School,90 Outer Crescent,BRIGHTON,Victoria 3079 AUSTRALIA
    • Kilvington Girls' Grammar School (Melway:P68E7) 2 Leila Road, Ormond, Vic 3204
    • Sandringham East Primary School, 9 Holloway Rd. Sandringham, Vic 3191 (Melway P77 A-11),AUSTRALIA

Thanks in advance! WhisperToMe (talk) 19:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you so much! I really appreciate it! WhisperToMe (talk) 14:47, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Do you know if the Japanese cultural center (described in http://www.perthwalkabout.com/Arts-Culture/hyogo-prefectural.html) is in a building separate from the Japanese school? I know they are on the same property but I am not sure if they share the same building? I didn't know about the center's existence until now. It's cool that Perth has it! WhisperToMe (talk) 17:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Those are excellent photos! I'll add one to the article on Japanese Australians WhisperToMe (talk) 07:16, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:610_mm_track_gauge_locomotives[edit]

Category discussion warning

610 mm track gauge locomotives has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Andy Dingley (talk) 11:44, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

wasnt sure[edit]

how to alert you to item on aust noticeboard on wp en... tried fb.. and have left msg there JarrahTree (talk) 01:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dawn Princess, Fremantle, 2016 (04).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dawn Princess, Fremantle, 2016 (04).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 07:07, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Sun Princess, Fremantle, 2016 (08).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sun Princess, Fremantle, 2016 (08).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --C messier 08:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Radiance of the Seas, Fremantle, 2015 (03).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radiance of the Seas, Fremantle, 2015 (03).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Some chroma noise, probably slight motion blur, but still acceptable for QI --Smial 12:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
SuperStar Virgo, Fremantle, 2015 (02).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SuperStar Virgo, Fremantle, 2015 (02).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 10:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fishing boats, Probolinggo, 2016 (02).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fishing boats, Probolinggo, 2016 (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 15:02, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Shagang Haili at Port Hedland, 2012.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shagang Haili at Port Hedland, 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK. --A.Savin 16:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pacific Eden, Fremantle, 2015 (02).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pacific Eden, Fremantle, 2015 (02).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Emerald Princess, Fremantle, 2016 (06).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emerald Princess, Fremantle, 2016 (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 15:51, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

gutentag=[edit]

I thought I had got the IMO stuff as I had at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Port_of_Albany_early_evening_April_2016.jpg - but hey

- ?? so senility on my part, ?? or demented... JarrahTree (talk) 13:11, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

thanks for your your reassurance - now you say that, I should have taken more shots.. the thing was I couldnt find evidence of the name change.. JarrahTree (talk) 14:11, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

sheesh[edit]

dont tell me there is a january 2017 in freo cat? gotta re do all my mass of items of today :) JarrahTree (talk) 14:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HMS_St_George_and_HMS_Juno_in_Albany_Harbour_1901.jpg to be coarse about it the bugger at the back looks like neither the names the local albanians call them - the one a the right could be either of the named ones - any thoughts? JarrahTree (talk) 15:03, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

you're on[edit]

please take a look at my recent edits and the new set of items at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Duplicate - the german photos of part of a building seem to me to be the same - no machine readable for either - it seems one version is not better than the other - any concuring on that? JarrahTree (talk) 12:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

oops - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stra%C3%9Fenseite_32.jpg - is designated as duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:W%C3%BCrzburg-Altstadt-Sanderstra%C3%9Fe_7-Stra%C3%9Fenseite_32.jpg

And as I check them as dupes, the dupe tag/ aspect says that opne has to go, and, when I look - they seem exactly the same - because of my zilch in the language, I wondered if anything on either of the images suggest to you there is anything between the descrips that might offer clues as to how the dupes happened, or not... JarrahTree (talk) 13:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Bugger I think I have been deleting the ones with the good titles JarrahTree (talk) 13:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

But I think the full detail is in the category anyways JarrahTree (talk) 13:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your responding and checking, appreciated to have another set of eyes on it - cheers JarrahTree (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

hmm[edit]

stuck with this one - File:HMS St George and HMS Juno in Albany Harbour 1901.jpg have checked the net and the mix doesnt seem right - hope you might have some suggestions... cheers JarrahTree (talk) 14:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for that - as I suspected - a very deceptive title and description - the one on the right we agree - and the funnels and colour you are right - nothing like dicky sources ... JarrahTree (talk) 14:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Have a look at my edits[edit]

I have created a few extra categories for when we upload photos from the trip - hope they make sense! JarrahTree (talk) 10:56, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

so...[edit]

been doing the nullarbor then eh? cannot believe my crossing dates on commons go back to 2008! (In reality they go back to 1970s but thats another story....) JarrahTree (talk) 09:12, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Passenger ships in Wilhelmshaven[edit]

Moin Bahnfrend, du hast diese Kategorie angelegt und einige Segelschiffe dahin verschoben. Erlaube mir den Hinweis, dass diese recats nicht korrekt sind. Die Mir ist gemäß Russian Maritime Register of Shipping ein Sailing/Training ship und kein Passenger ship. Vor diesem Hintergrund werde ich die recats rückgängig machen. Beste Grüße --Ein Dahmer (talk) 19:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

NR45 + NR10 + Ghan Alice Springs, 2015 (02).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NR45 + NR10 + Ghan Alice Springs, 2015 (02).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:16, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

NR110 + train Yunta, 2017 (02).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NR110 + train Yunta, 2017 (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 19:10, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

New empty categories[edit]

Hello, Bahnfrend. I noticed that you created quite a few categories, including Category:2011 in water transport by country, Category:1927 in rail transport by country, and similar ones, and that many of them are empty. On Commons, we are asked to create categories only when there is something to put into them. Do you have something to put into all these categories? If not, then they can be deleted for now. --Auntof6 (talk) 13:38, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Actually the new categories are not really empty. They're populated with sub-categories that are operated by templates, and unfortunately the templates take a little while to update themselves. If you wait a few days, the templates should all have updated, and from then onwards, the new categories will then be automatically populated, in some cases with quite a lot of sub-categories. Bahnfrend (talk) 13:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
OK, thanks. I will check again in a few days. By the way, I moved your reply here to keep the conversation thread together. If you have another reply, you can leave it here and I will see it. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 14:00, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
I've just checked and the templates are still not working yet. I've encountered this problem before - they're sometimes really slow to update the way they operate, and I suspect that it's a bug in the Commons software (there isn't a similar problem on English Wikipedia). As I'm only an editor, not a Wikimedia employee, there isn't really anything I can do about the problem, other than encourage people to be patient - the templates will update automatically in the end. Bahnfrend (talk) 06:49, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:Aircraft by year of photographing[edit]

What is your intention for this new category? There is already the category Category:Aircraft by year which seems to do the same thing, but captures all media. Josh (talk) 16:41, 27 September 2017 (UTC)


International trucks[edit]

There is a discussion on this page whether images should be categorised as International trucks or International Harvester trucks.   Not many wikipedia contributors have contributed to the discussion or voted with their preference, but you have contributed to material on International Harvester.   I would be grateful, if you have the time, if you would share your own opinion on the page name.  And thank you. Eddaido (talk) 00:30, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Overcategorising[edit]

You seem to be quite a serial over-categoriser and I'm not quite sure fo the purpose of some of your new categories. For example, what is the purpose of Category:Oil tankers by country of location‎ and how is it different from Category:Oil tankers by country? Unless you're planning to create Category:Oil tankers by country of origin‎ or something similar (for example), then creating these additional layers simply makes it harder to navigate through the category system. Sionk (talk) 21:43, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

It is far better to create categories that actually have content (more than one or two items) rather than unnecessary additional steps. The purpose of categorisation is to be a finding aid, not to have small numbers of items buried deep in a category chain. Sionk (talk) 18:29, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop creating stupid unnecessary categories such as "Police of Foo" since for example Tasmania Police isn't known as Police of Tasmania. Police of Foo may work in the US where there is a large number of police agencies and departments but in Australia, really? Also redirect template is for redirecting. So just stop creating a mess. Bidgee (talk) 20:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)


Category:Ships in Milford Haven[edit]

Category discussion warning

Ships in Milford Haven has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--Sionk (talk) 20:25, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

tried messaging recently[edit]

trust all is well - keep in contact !! JarrahTree (talk) 05:40, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Please consider adding iw-links here on Commons[edit]

Dear Bahnrend,

Thanks for creating new categories here on Commons as you did recently for Category:Ashleigh Gardner. It would be great if you could as well add the interwiki-link to the corresponding page on en-wikipedia by clicking here on commons in the sidebar menu under 'In Wikipedia' on 'Add links' and then putting in the appearing pop-up box the link to the corresponding article on en-wikipedia. This will add a link to commons to all language versions of the corresponding article on en-wikipedia. Moreover this will avoid the corresponding article to be included in the maintenance category en:Category:Commons category template with no category set.

Many thanks if you could consider to do so, indeed this would reduce my efforts on adding these iw links later through patrolling the pages listed on the pre-mentioned category on en-wikipedia. I would like to thank you for all the great work you are realizing on en-wikipedia and here on commons.

If you have any further questions on this do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards and already now my very best wishes for you for the New Year.Robby (talk) 14:48, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Awesome pic[edit]

Thanks for taking that photo of the Sea Princess sailing under the Sydney Harbour Bridge - I loved it.--Commander Keane (talk) 07:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:Apartment_hotels[edit]

Category discussion warning

Apartment hotels has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 12:53, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

California Highway, Fremantle, 2018 (09).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! California Highway, Fremantle, 2018 (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:06, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Public Art - Copyright?[edit]

As discussed can you provide some clarification as to whether Freedom of Panorama applies to cases such as this Commons:Deletion requests/File:Howard Lane artworks1.jpg. Dan arndt (talk) 05:22, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Copyright[edit]

Guten Morgen, Bahnfrend!

Betreffs Deines Edits: Verstehe ich das richtig, dass Fotos und Logos der Regierung Osttimors gemeinfrei sind? Schönen Gruß, --JPF (talk) 05:51, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Soweit ich weiß, sind Fotos von Gebäuden oder Skulpturen usw., die der Regierung von Osttimor gehören, in Ordnung. Es gibt jedoch ein Gesetz, das die Ost-Timor-Flagge schützt - aber ich bin mir nicht sicher, wie dieser Schutz aussieht - ich bin gerade in Ost-Timor und die Internetverbindung ist zu langsam, um es heute herauszufinden ... Bahnfrend (talk) 13:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Indian Pacific at Cook[edit]

Hey look, we took the same photo! :-)

Sam Wilson ( TalkContribs ) … 01:22, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Café Sperl, front, 2006.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Café Sperl, front, 2006.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:28, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Stirling Terrace, Toodyay, 2013 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stirling Terrace, Toodyay, 2013 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality photo. --Acabashi 10:26, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Christ Church, Jerusalem, 2019 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christ Church, Jerusalem, 2019 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 14:47, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

OSY 8082, Vasilissis Amalias Avenue, 2019 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! OSY 8082, Vasilissis Amalias Avenue, 2019 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:18, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
TLV from LY542, 2019 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TLV from LY542, 2019 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:18, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

St David's Anglican Church, Morawa, 2018 (03).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St David's Anglican Church, Morawa, 2018 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:40, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
St Paul's Lutheran Church, Morawa, 2018 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Paul's Lutheran Church, Morawa, 2018 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:40, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
The Majestic, Singapore, 2018 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Majestic, Singapore, 2018 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:40, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Cristo Rei beach, Dili, 2018 (04).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cristo Rei beach, Dili, 2018 (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:40, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

National Anzac Centre, 2018 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! National Anzac Centre, 2018 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Procuradoria Geral da República (East Timor) (building), 2018 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Procuradoria Geral da República (East Timor) (building), 2018 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 04:18, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Berlin Nakroma, Dili, 2018 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Nakroma, Dili, 2018 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 04:18, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Dog Rock, 2019 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dog Rock, 2019 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 04:18, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Holy Cross Catholic Church, Morawa, 2018 (04).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross Catholic Church, Morawa, 2018 (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 12:03, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Peter Carnley, Perth, 2019 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peter Carnley, Perth, 2019 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Kay Goldsworthy, Perth, 2019 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kay Goldsworthy, Perth, 2019 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Portrait in the darkish style of old oil paintings. --Axel Tschentscher 08:28, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Picture of Amelia Kerr & Belinda Clark[edit]

Can you please provide some images of these two players from Australia, Amelia Kerr & Belinda Clark? Will be thankful to you. Drat8sub (talk) 01:26, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Sailing yachts of Germany[edit]

Please realise that the sailing yachts of Germany in many cases (yacht, that means that you can sleep on board) are travelling internationally. So they are not alway IN Germany. Difference in categories IN and OF. So the sailing yachts of Germany are not always sailboats in Germany. --Stunteltje (talk) 07:28, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Mrcl lxmna (talk) 06:55, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Mrcl lxmna (talk) 12:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Mrcl lxmna (talk) 06:59, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Hansa Drakenburg, Fremantle, 2020 (01).jpg[edit]

Looking at the background of File:Hansa Drakenburg, Fremantle, 2020 (01).jpg, looks like the Modi R. What do you think? Calistemon (talk) 05:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Agreed. The same ship is also in the background of File:Hansa Drakenburg, Fremantle, 2020 (02).jpg - Bahnfrend (talk) 05:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

sunday 15th[edit]

was hoping i might get there, unable to do so... have sent an emile as well, trust all is well JarrahTree (talk) 05:43, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

gesundheit! YGM - and it is not to do with the suez canal!! JarrahTree (talk) 10:18, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Hitching Post outside National Bank in Wagin[edit]

Hi Bahnfred, a bit of an unusual request here. Two of your images, File:National Australia Bank building, Wagin, 2018 (02).jpg and File:National Australia Bank building, Wagin, 2018 (01).jpg show a little white post on the footpath. Turns out the little post is quite unique, a bit of a last of its kind in Wagin, and state heritage listed, see here and here. You wouldn't have a close up of that post or an image where you could extract a good enough image? I would use the image for an upcoming List of State Register of Heritage Places in the Shire of Wagin article. Calistemon (talk) 11:33, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

No worries, I have used one of your two images that show the post for now. It is arguably the smallest state heritage listed item that I have come across, this little post! I can see how its significance can easily be missed. If you get a picture one day, let me know or just add it to the article. If, on the way, you can fill any gaps on en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Western Australia/State Register of Heritage Places requiring photos/Country WA‎, that would also be appreciated. And, finally, the reason there aren't as many gaps as they could be is down to a handful of dedicated photographers like yourself who's work helped to fill these gaps. Calistemon (talk) 13:04, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
I managed to get a few images of the post while passing through Wagin on the way to a camping trip to Katanning, but feel free to add to the collection of images if you are happen to get there one day. Calistemon (talk) 05:04, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#East_Timor_and_FOP[edit]

Fyi, your edit to Category:Buildings in East Timor is currently a subject of this discussion thread, do you have time to leave an input? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:15, 10 April 2021 (UTC)