User talk:BarnCas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Gallery
Reminder Licenses & Copyright

Happy New Year ![edit]

Feu d'artifice - 328.jpg
Tous mes vœux pour 2016 !!!.
--LW² \m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 18:00, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Avec un peu de retard car je ne me connecte pas trop souvent en ce moment : merci et tout pareil, amigo mio Clin
BarnCas (talk) 21:19, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Hi BarnCas, Bit random but I wanted to say thanks so much for noticing the wrong cat at File:Aspirateur de feuilles.jpg and File:Aspirateur de feuilles (2).jpg and for changing it, I knew it was that model but I somehow put the wrong one in .... I have no idea! Face-grin.svg, Anyway thanks again, –Davey2010Talk 04:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

My pleasure. Once I identified the door shape and details of a Master II in Aspirateur de feuilles (2).jpg, I remembered that the first picture stayed a while without real identification, stuck in the generic Trafic category. So thanks to you to have added that second picture Clin
BarnCas (talk) 12:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Oh wow so we both identified it the exact same way .... Wow :), Haha no worries I just wished I'd put the correct cat in the first place, Anyway thanks again :) –Davey2010Talk 16:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Trucs de fin damnée ;)[edit]

Ça va, je ne t'ai pas filé trop de travail avec toutes ces images brésiliennes ? Bon réveillon lol lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 01:59, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

¡Hola amigo!
Toujours plus fort : à force de me connecter "en morse", voici la réponse avec trois mois de décalage. Remettre les choses à faire au (sur)lendemain n'est jamais une bonne idée lol
T'inquiète, pour le boulot : je sais que si ce ne sont pas les Iveco brésiliens, ce seront les Sprinters teutons, ou tout autre utilitaire au choix... J'ai l'habitude, et n'est-ce pas ce qu'on appelle la complémentarité ? Clin
Au plaisir de te recroiser au cours d'un de ces boulots communs.
BarnCas (talk) 23:12, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Désolé de t'avoir sorti de ton hibernation... Mais, bon, ça y est, c'est le printemps, tu peux sortir de ta tanière et retrouver la Wikicivilisation Face-smile.svg.
À cet été, alors ? lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 00:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Avec ton rythme de stackhanoviste, je peux rester dans ma tanière sans craindre que la moyenne des contributions à Commons ne chute violemment lol
Ceci dit, cher ami, pense à faire une pause de temps à autres : tu avais mis ta réponse à la suite de tes vœux 2016, ce que d'aucuns pourraient prendre pour le début (ou la suite) d'une grosse fatigue Clin
@diou - BarnCas (talk) 23:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Ce doit être le cap des 100.000 contrib's qui fait cet effet lol.
J'avais lu les diff' de ta réponse et j'ai bêtement cliqué sur la 1° discut' qui passait...
Bonne semaine Face-smile.svg. --lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 22:21, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Objectively[edit]

  • On 25 August 2017 a mistake in the name of "International" was shown to me. Since then I have tried to correct this one mistake.
I have driven International trucks, used their state registration cards, insurance cards, read their operators manuals, and talked with others who did the same. Of course this would be OR in an article, but we are on a talk page. I can post the truth and you can call me a liar.
Anyone close to International trucks can walk right up to a ratty S truck in a parking lot and look at it. Of course you don't have to, and you can't use it in an article, but you can use it as background. If you can't/won't do that you could at least read sources objectively.
I keep providing sources for using the name "International" and nobody provides any source disputing it. Of course not. Even if someone could come up with a single source disputing it the number of supporting sources should overwhelm it anyway.
People have used their own opinions with no sources to oppose something which has been overwhelming sourced. Some have edited these articles (I have, too). I think some people are too close and can have an ingrained opinion that they can/will not look at objectively.
I believe people are standing in the way of correcting Wikipedia for their own personal reasons. People who are objective can look at and discuss evidence. And if you are only subjective should you be editing an encyclopedia?
Feel free to call me a liar who is only trying to help my ego. But when this move request fails Wikipedia will still be presenting incorrect information across the board and some people did nothing to correct it, not even consider it honestly. Sammy D III (talk) 12:22, 4 October 2017 (UTC)