User talk:Baykedevries

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Baykedevries!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Hervormde Kerk Boombergum.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hervormde Kerk Boombergum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pompidom (talk) 15:17, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Beste Bayke. Zoals je in bovenstaand sjabloon kunt lezen, heb ik dit bestand genomineerd voor verwijdering, omdat het leeg is. Hopelijk heb je ergens nog het origineel staan, dat over het bestaande bestand heen gekopieerd kan worden, zodat we weer een mooie afbeelding zien. Groet, Pompidom (talk) 15:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Contact svp[edit]

Beste Bayke,

Je hebt de eer aan kop te gaan met de meeste uploads tot op heden in Nederland. Ik zie dat je foto's van veel Friese rijksmonumenten hebt geüpload. Dat is geweldig, onder andere omdat Friesland wat achter loopt t.ov. andere provincies met dekking van foto's.

Ik benader de pers voor Wiki Loves Monuments en nu wilde ik je vragen of ik jouw naam en contactgegevens zou mogen doorgeven aan het Friesch Dagblad of de Leeuwarder Courant zodat zij een leuk stuk kunnen wijden aan Wiki Loves Monuments met een duidelijke link naar de regio in jouw persoon.

Kun je me laten weten of je daar voor voelt? Je kunt me een mailtje sturen op els@wikimedia.nl

Ik hoor graag van je.

Groet,

Els Arends

Categorieen[edit]

Beste Bayke, Zou je zo vriendelijk willen zijn om geen foto's meer te voorzien van de categorie:rijksmonumenten? Dit is een hoofdcategorie, foto's horen terecht te komen in een subcategorie:Rijksmonumenten in naam gemeente. Anders zouden er nu 63.000 foto's in dezelfde categorie zitten en dat maakt het lastig om een foto te zoeken in die categorie. Als je nu mee wilt werken om je eigen foto's weer te verplaatsen naar de juiste subcategorie, zou dat zeer welkom zijn. Dank voor je medewerking. Picasdre (talk) 05:40, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

@Picasdre. Dit label wordt automatisch door het wikilovesmonuments upload formulier toegevoegd en om eerlijk te zijn zou ik niet weten hoe ik deze moet verwijderen. En wat mij betreft is dit label ook geen probleem, er zijn tenslotte ook een dikke 60 duizend rijksmonumenten.

Delete.JPG[edit]

Should File:Delete.JPG be deleted from Wikimedia Commons? Platonides (talk) 17:34, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

@Platonides; Yes please. And why is there no delete button to delete ones own uploads? Very annoying!



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Baykedevries,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 21:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Midstraat 10.JPG[edit]

Hoi Bayke. Ik heb bovengenoemde bestand genomineerd voor hernoeming, omdat je waarschijnlijk bij het fotograferen van de afbeelding op het verkeerde been bent gezet. Dit is niet Midstraat 10, maar als ik het goed zie Douwe Egberts Plein 10 in Joure. Midstraat 10 is in ieder geval het voormalige gemeentehuis in Joure, en dat had je niet gefotografeerd, want dat is 50 meter verderop gelegen. Groet, Pompidom (talk) 11:35, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sint Michaëlkerk Harlingen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sint Michaëlkerk Harlingen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Industrie- en poldermolen de rat.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Industrie- en poldermolen de rat.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Baykedevries,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Baykedevries,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Category:Pontjes[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Pontjes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bolstenen huisje Harstewei 12 Sumarreheide 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolstenen huisje Harstewei 12 Sumarreheide 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oude boerderij uit 1667.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oude boerderij uit 1667.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

De Molen van Noordhorn. Gr..JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Molen van Noordhorn. Gr..JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 19:41, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Newborn sheep on Dutch sea dike.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Newborn sheep on Dutch sea dike.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Blankenham, Kanon en kruithuisje.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blankenham, Kanon en kruithuisje.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.