User talk:Beyond My Ken

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Between My Ken)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

IRT Substations[edit]

The description you added to the Category:IRT Substation 14 claims that the Category:IRT Substation 17 is the only one of the original substations that are still operational. What about Category:IRT Substation 18 in the South Bronx? ----DanTD (talk) 21:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I took the description from the source cited (Gothamist) Is substation 18 online? Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm having trouble finding anything online which says whether substation 18 is in use or not. The nearest I came is this, which only says it was in use as of 1978. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, they still have those high voltage signs and decals on the door. That doesn't convince me the place is dormant. ----DanTD (talk) 01:45, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe this issue should be brought to the attention of Gothamist, ----DanTD (talk) 01:50, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Beyond My Ken

I've done some moderate improvements (rotating a few degrees to get a horizontal line, some adjustments on colour and contrast) on your image. Hope it's okay for you. Regards --Alabasterstein (talk) 06:19, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks better, thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandria[edit]

I noticed you took a lot of good photos in Alexandria. Did you happen to get one of this building? It wasn't on my list and I just happened to take a quick photo of it, but I was hoping for a more direct angle (or a closeup of the cupola with its mannequin). If not, no worries. I'll try to visit Old Town again at some point. APK (talk) 08:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry, I didn't get that far up Washington. I wish I had, it's an interesting building. Maybe next time. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thank you. APK (talk)
File:ABBA - TopPop 1974 5.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.78.190.35 03:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn (talk) 09:56, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:James Allsup on air.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Music Box Theatre has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Geo Swan (talk) 02:37, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should you really be doing that? They're part of a series and you've destroyed all trace of the order in which they were taken which was sort of preserved in Category:Images from Wikis Take Manhattan by Naked Pictures of Bea Arthur. And while most of the WTM images are really poor quality in terms of subject isolation, fourteen years later, they're kind of an historic record of the early days of Wikicommons. If you really feel the need to move them, please do not delete the redirects. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 13:25, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:59, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirects restored. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:Cloud_Gate_(subject_to_deletion) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:56, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want to harm Commons? Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:15, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Deep Creek river - runs past Deep Creek Hot Springs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- FlightTime (open channel) 21:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kurt-godel1 crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Artem.G (talk) 11:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 14:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

102 Prince Street and 4 Bond Street and 113 E 38th Street[edit]

Hallo Ken, I am trying to get a better shot of 102 Prince Street and 4 Bond Street and 113 East 38th Street for the respective articles "Ghost" and "First Wives Club" and "Sliver". Whenever you have a chance do you think you could please get some more detailed photos of those buildings, especially in angle from screen shots from the films but from a distance, so it becomes better recognisable? These are the views ghost136.jpg (565×318) (onthesetofnewyork.com) and thefirstwivesclub26.jpg (565×312) (onthesetofnewyork.com). For Morgan Court on 113 E 38th Street a view as can be seen in the movie poster would be great. Thank you for your help. Gryffindor (talk) 12:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Butt-in from a talkpage watcher. I sometimes visit these parts of town, but the links are not working for me nor have I seen any of the views you're asking for. It might help if you could indicate the desired POV using Template:Coord or other method. Jim.henderson (talk) 10:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm on vacation right now. I'll be back in a week, but then plunge right into a patch of work, so I probably can't do anything for a bit -- but I'll try. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Genericusername57 (talk) 23:56, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ephemeral New York used your picture[edit]

This page provides an attribution via link, which I suspect satisfies the license, but I thought you might want to know about it. ̴̴ Jim.henderson (talk) 20:32, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. The attribution seems fine to me. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hard category redirects[edit]

Hi. I see that you have had a practice of hard category redirects on top of {{Category redirect}}. These double-ups do cause issues, and it is not a common practice, so it would be great if we could stop doing that. Though I would also like to understand why you believe it is necessary to be doing something additional to the accepted and common practice. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:33, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not having hard redirects also causes issues, which I have explained numerous times. If there is no hard redirect, putting the category name in the text of the upload form directly (as opposed to using the "Categories" field), by typing in "[[Category:Category name]]" will not result in the redirected category appearing on the file, just Category name in italics (indicating a redirected category). If someone fixes this, as I have suggested numerous times, there would be no need for me to hard-code category redirects. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to do with me, just another instance of self-appointed lawyers attempting to castrate Commons. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2023 Mystery Castle 3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2023 Mystery Castle 3.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Regards, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:32 North Kellner Avenue, Superior.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Veterans of Foreign Wars, 405 Main Street mural, Superior.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Superior Youth Mural, 350 Main Street, Superior.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mural of Bellows Falls.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brooklyn Love Building 690-694 Fulton Street mural closeup.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A[edit]

.