User talk:Beyond My Ken

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Wordsmith and Scientology involvement[edit]

You previously commented in a community appeal by Sfarney and disagreed with characterizations of Wordsmith as being involved. Evidence has since been found shedding further light on this matter. Would you review Sfarney's latest appeal and comment on whether you believe the new evidence on Wordsmith changes your opinion on whether he is involved regarding Scientology? Not all evidence has been made public per Wikipedia's outing policy, but I can confirm the claims made in the appeal are an accurate reflection of said evidence.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 20:21, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

In general, please do not contact me in regard to previous disputes, sanctions, blocks and bans involving other editors. I am attempting to keep my involvement with Wikipedia and Commons on the level of creating, editing and uploading content, and trying to stay out of meta-discussions of all kinds. I hope in this way to avoid avoid disputes, and having my name brought to ANI every couple of weeks, therefore to make my Wikipedia experience more rewarding and less aggravating than it has been in the recent past. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:28, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Okay. I get that.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 05:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Grey Towers National Historic Site[edit]

Thanks for taking the great pictures. The mansion is open thru Halloween, and I hope to visit before then. == BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 00:05, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Glad you liked them. I wish I had had some more time there, but I was pretty rushed that day. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Warning[edit]

Hi, you must stop your uncivil behaviour against e.g. Storkk and User:Ellin Beltz now. Jcb (talk) 02:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I forgot my "Personal Prescription" #8. Rest assured, I will do my best not to "speak truth to power" to Commons admins again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Fondation Louis Vuitton 03.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fondation Louis Vuitton 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Categorisation[edit]

Cross-categorised (one is sub of the other, so cat is grand-child of itself) are:

Maybe I should create a maintenance page in Commons: namespace to list all the cats instead of categorising them in Category:Categories which are children or grand-children of themselves which had been created 3 years ago but was populated poorly by now. Have a nice day and a merry xmas! --Achim (talk) 07:33, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

There is a distinct difference between "cross-categorization" and father/child categorizing. Not allowing cross-categorization makes the category system much less useful to the user. Beyond My Ken (talk) 14:59, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

w:Cresting (architecture)[edit]

Greetings! I thought you might get a kick out of my use of your photo at w:Cresting (architecture). Cheers! BD2412 T 14:59, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Hey, thanks, I appreciate your letting me know! Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Shirleytemple young.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Shirleytemple young.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jcb (talk) 21:56, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Inappropriate?[edit]

Why? Seems very appropriate to me specifically for a building image such as this. Ww2censor (talk) 20:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)