User talk:Bildoj

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Bonvenon en la Vikimedia Komunejo, Bildoj!

--SieBot (talk) 14:05, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Septoria-tritici.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:31, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello Bildoj!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 09:35, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

File tagging File:Hsmith05.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hsmith05.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hsmith05.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yekrats (talk) 20:21, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Vi povas depreni la bildon. Kore.Bildoj (talk) 17:31, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:Elytrigia_atherica.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Elytrigia_atherica.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Elytrigia_atherica.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

MGA73 (talk) 08:48, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Stroma2.PNG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Pompage illicite et intensif de photos[edit]

Argilly ferme2.jpg

Ce site http://www.infotourisme.net/tourisme/argilly a récupéré ta photo sans indiquer les mentions nécessaires : type de licence + ton nom. Je viens d'ajouter sur leur page ce qui est nécessaire ... mais l'affichage n'est pas automatique, et les responsables refusaient jusqu'à avant-hier de citer WP, Commons et les auteurs ! Gonflé, hein ! Voir http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Le_Bistro/16_mars_2011#Suivi_de_l.27affaire_Infotourisme.net et le Bistro des jours précédents, ainsi que User:Markus3/Photos réemployées . Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 11:40, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Merci pour l'info et pour les efforts. --Bildoj (talk) 16:12, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Cordyceps.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Cordyceps.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Podzemnik (talk) 11:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Elimoklavino.jpg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Elimoklavino.jpg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Ed (Edgar181) 17:58, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


File:Elimoklavino.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Elimoklavino.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 21:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Elimoklavino2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Elimoklavino2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 21:51, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


File:Setosphaeria turcina.jpg[edit]

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | português | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Setosphaeria turcina.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request. Lymantria (talk) 09:11, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Réutilisation de photo sans mentions de l'auteur[edit]

Bonjour,

Pour info une vidéo sur Youtube réutilise File:Stroma Claviceps purpurea.JPG sans mention de l'auteur ni de la license.

J'ai laissé un commentaire dans ce sens. Mirgolth (talk) 13:14, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour, c'est exact, merci de votre attention. --Bildoj (talk) 17:42, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

File:GADDUM.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GADDUM.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 10:25, 27 November 2012 (UTC)


Hallo Bildoj, da ich mir bei der Abschätzung ob erlaubtes oder nicht erlaubtes Derivat selbst nicht sicher genug war, habe ich den in Rechtsfragen sehr erfahrenen Benutzer:Clindberg um seine Einschätzung gegeben, die er nun abgegeben hat. Dein GADDUM-Bild wird deshalb gelöscht werden. Du kannst es gerne auf eigenes Risiko auf Flickr o.ä. hochladen. Um bei deinen anderen Portraitbildern abzuschätzen, ob auch hier ein Problem besteht oder nicht, möchte ich dich bitten, eine Online-Quelle für das jeweils als "Vorlage" benutzte Foto oder Gemälde anzugeben, also für File:LUTRELL.svg, File:Pierre Delaire.png und File:ARTHUR STOLL.png. Es wird nicht automatisch zu einer Löschung kommen, sondern für jedes einzelne Bild ein Vergleich erfolgen. --Túrelio (talk) 20:32, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, Danke für deine Sorge: Du hast an einem erfahrenen Benutzer gefragt. Die Hauptsache ist: Der Fotograph darf nicht das Gesicht beschlagnahmen,(nobody gets a copyright on a face). Ja gab es hier ein Fehler, wegen die Bewegung ähnlich war. Sonst arbeite ich am meisten mir Papier Dokumente. Ich arbeite hier nur, um zu Artikeln von Wikipedia zu illustrieren, so brauche ich nicht mit Flickr zu publizieren. Ich versuche "Commons" nützen, weil man hier zwischen alle wikipedien Ausgabe teilnimmt. Gruß! --Bildoj (talk) 08:42, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Caloplaca2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:03, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Hêtre[edit]

Hélas je n'en sais pas plus sur cet échantillon pour compléter sa description ! --Ercé (talk) 19:03, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Pyronema.jpg et autres[edit]

Bonjour Bildoj ! Je suppose que tu n’es pas Richard Wettstein, décédé en 1931, donc tu n’es pas l’auteur des images tirées de Handbuch der Systematischen Botanik . Pourtant, tu prétendais que c’était ton travail personnel. As-tu scanné toi-même l’image ? ou as-tu repris une image déjà scannée ailleurs ?

Merci de vérifier toutes les images que tu as importées, et de mettre les mentions correctes expliquant pourquoi l’image est dans le domaine public, ou si elle est retouchée par toi, et d’indiquer les auteurs réels des images lorsque ce n’est pas toi, et s’il s’agit de scan, il faut indiquer la source si ce n’est pas toi, ou indiquer que c’est toi si c‘est le cas.

Pour Wettstein, il y a un truc complexe en plus : le livre a été publié en 1924, soit après 1923, donc il n’est pas sûr que cela soit dans le domaine public aux États-Unis. TED 00:41, 30 June 2013 (UTC) 

Copyright status: File:Tilletia caries.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tilletia caries.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 22:00, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Campagne L'été des villes[edit]

Bonjour, je vous invite de participer à la campagne L'été des villes et villages en France. Des photo's télechargées entre le 21 juillet et le 21 septembre 2015 peut-on marquer avec la ligne

{{L'été des villes}} [[Category:Uploaded via Campaign:ÉtédesVilles]]    

ainsi elles compteront pour la campagne et seront montrées ICI . On peut également utiliser la uploadwizard de la campagne, qui ajoute cette ligne automatiquement. Amicalement.--Havang(nl) (talk) 10:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Venturia inaequalis (ascospores)[edit]

Hello, merci pour l'information. Quels sont ces conditons ? Puis-je obtenir un lien vers la licence (pas trouvé de suite) ? --Scoopfinder(d) 11:12, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
On obtient le texte de la licence en cliquant sur l'icône copyleft lire.--Bildoj (talk) 13:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


Bonjour, Demandez-moi si vous avez besoin d'aide. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour, merci de votre proposition, Scoopfinder a commencé à regarder la licence, voir ci-dessus, Il n'est pas nėcessaire de multiplier les bannières. Bien cordialement. --Bildoj (talk) 18:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


La licence n'est pas suffisante, car elle ne permet pas l'utilisation commercial (il faut un accord spécial à re-négocier). Cela est incompatible avec Commons. Désolé... --Scoopfinder(d) 18:53, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Bigre encore une troisième bannière énorme et bariolée, c'est pour le moins stigmatisant. J'ai un peu l'habitude de travailler ici, je comprends le problème mais je me permet d'exprimer mon désaccord. On ne peut pas écrire qu'il y violation des droits d'auteurs ni que le document n'est pas publié sous une licence libre, ni qu'il manque une preuve de permission. Le problème c'est que "les restrictions de forme" pour la commercialisation peuvent être considérées comme posant un problème avec les règles de Wikipédia commons mais c'est une question d'évaluation. Pour les CC il y a des habitudes qui sont peut-être discutables. Pour les licences personnelles, il faut aussi voir au cas par cas. J'aurais tendance à penser que lorsque l'on fait une interprétation trop strictement restrictive, on décourage surtout les contributeurs. Voilà, c'est une opinion. Ici le problème n'est pas incontournable, si vous maintenez la décision d'une suppression rapide, il sera toujours possible d'utiliser un croquis. Cordialement. --Bildoj (talk) 21:11, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Paraphyses.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Paraphyses.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Paraphyses.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Masur (talk) 18:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Paraphyses.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Paraphyses.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Masur (talk) 19:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Glarea lozoyensis.png[edit]

Pay attention to licensing Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Glarea lozoyensis.png seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file description page.


Deutsch | English | español | français | polski | português | svenska | +/−

Masur (talk) 06:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

C'est une photo pour laquelle, j'avais obtenu l'accord explicite et écrit de l'auteur. Elle était la seule du genre à pouvoir illustrer le thème. Une discussion a été entammé, elle a à peine durée deux jours. Le seul intervenant, c'était prononcé pour la conservation, je ne suis pas sûr d'avoir envie de relancer de lourdes démarches ici, 7 ans après l'apport sur le common, surtout que pour la validation d'une OTRS avec un formulaire francophone, cela peut prendre 6 mois (avec des relances) et qu'entretemps le document a ėté allégrement supprimé faisant parfois perdre tout son sens à l'article qu'il illustrait. Cela est décourageant pour celui qui télécharge et écrit l'article mais aussi pour l'auteur de l'image qui a accepté de participer, voit appairaitre l'image puis puis sans pouvoir comprendre la voit supprimée, cela ne peut qu'engendrer une certaine frustration. --Bildoj (talk) 08:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
  • This file is not licensed under CC-PD; please change its license to the proper one ([1]) - CC-BY-2.0. And please be careful next time - as even freely licensed media needs to be tagged with the appropiate license, that often aren't interchangeable. Masur (talk) 16:10, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Preĝejo Sankta Marteno.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Preĝejo Sankta Marteno.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Preĝejo Sankta Marteno.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 06:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)


File tagging File:Ulrich matthias 2003.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ulrich matthias 2003.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ulrich matthias 2003.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:04, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:TomRSV.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:TomRSV.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:TomRSV.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

LX (talk, contribs) 22:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)