This user is an administrator.
This user has a bot.
Email this user.

User talk:Billinghurst

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Je suis Charlie
"Da mihi basium"
System-users.svg This user has an alternate account named SDrewthbot.


This-is-kali.png[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Billinghurst. You have new messages at [[User talk:|'s talk page]].
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hi! I'm the author of This-is-kali.png image. Sorry about it being out of scope. I'm a security researcher and need a page like this to test a bug in a site. It would be helpful to temporary undelete the page so I can continue with my work. I have no malicious intentions, and I will delete this as soon as my employers can confirm the bug. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Securitytester337 (talk • contribs) 14:08, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

EDIT: there is no need to undelete this anymore, I finish what I needed to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Securitytester337 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Permission question[edit]

I notice that you tagged this image: File:Yess + Love = Bliss by Dorothy Tanner.jpg

As missing evidence of permission.

It had been tagged by: FlickreviewR 2 As having an acceptable license in Flickr. What am I missing? (ticket:2018030610171926) --Sphilbrick (talk) 15:00, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

@Sphilbrick: Two copyright aspects, the photography by Billard and the underlying Tanner aspects. Flickr will cover the Billard aspects, we need the evidence of the Tanner aspect.

On the image it is mentioned that there was a statement and though that was not shown as recorded in our system, so I labelled it as needing OTRS. [You have just said that it has an OTRS, so that seems an easy completion if it relates to the underlying artwork.] So my issue is not the copyright of the image at Flickr, it is more the copyright of the original item, whatever it is and whether the communications specifically covers both aspects.  — billinghurst sDrewth 19:35, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I agree and I'm following up regarding the copyright of the underlying art object. --Sphilbrick (talk) 18:21, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
I got follow-up from Dorothy Tanner.--Sphilbrick (talk) 19:57, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Magic!  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:05, 7 March 2018 (UTC)