This user is an administrator.
This user has a bot.
Email this user.

User talk:Billinghurst

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Je suis Charlie
"Da mihi basium"
System-users.svg This user has an alternate account named SDrewthbot.



Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 21:13, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Kosovo OSCE Legal System Monitoring Section Monthly Report - August 2008.pdf[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kosovo OSCE Legal System Monitoring Section Monthly Report - August 2008.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 21:23, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Kosovo OSCE Legal System Monitoring Section Monthly Report - December 2008.pdf[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kosovo OSCE Legal System Monitoring Section Monthly Report - December 2008.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 21:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Ombudsperson of Kosovo[edit]

Dear Billinghurst,

I checkt every file but I couldn't find other licensing taggs so I tend to close this DR as delete. Is there still stuf that needs to be done before the files can be deleted? I don't want to break pages at Wikisource. Natuur12 (talk) 20:49, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

@Natuur12:. Have you reviewed EB's comment about Template:PD-UN-doc?  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:42, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Yes I have but I doubt that this template applies. They are created by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and addressed to a representative of the UN and are therefore not created by the UN itself plus some info within the document exists of third party letters. If you think that I am wrong please let me know. Natuur12 (talk) 15:12, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
@Natuur12: I beg to differ and think that you are confusing the OCSE and the UNMIK material, which is explained within the foreword, that the ombudsperson was set up as part of UNMIK. I believe that you will find that these reports are from the ombudsperson back to establishing office. You will see that I have already deleted the OCSE material.  — billinghurst sDrewth 15:32, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
But they are lised as the author at file:SECOND ANNUAL REPORT 2001 – 2002.pdf. Secondly, if they are created by the ombudsperson they are created by a representive and not the UN itself. We also don't assume that works from UNICEF etc are PD. I won't close this DR untill we agree and if you can't agree I will ask another admin to look into this. Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
It has various levels of lack of clarity. I have no further to add to the DR request. The files are again at enWS in case the decision is to delete, but will be removed their if C decides to keep.  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:39, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Temporarily removed[edit]

Dear Administrator! You wrote: "I have temporarily removed the filemover rights". It doesn't seem to you, what "temporary removed" too long? --Matsievsky (talk) 11:35, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Your assistance please...[edit]

WRT File:20130612-DSC_9032_(9293490966)_(2).jpg.

As I noted in the deletion discussion, IMO all the images in this series are in scope. Did you nominate any other images from this series for deletion? IMO, any images from this series that were deleted for not being in scope, etc, should be restored. Geo Swan (talk) 11:36, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

If you believe that they are in scope, then please make them within scope by adding detail that describes the files and allows categorisation. As they are now, they are not.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:57, 23 July 2015 (UTC)