More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.
Kanō Sanraku ..
Bonjour Binabik 155
J'ai finalement réussi cette démarche. Par contre j'ai deux autres images qui ne sont pas catégorisées, j'ai pourtant fait ce qu'il fallait faire, et je n'ai pas compris comment les reprendre. Je peux toujours téléverser un nouveau dossier, mais...ce n'est peut-être ce qu'il ne faut pas faire. Je n'ai encore jamais eu ce problème. Si vous savez comment faire, pouvez-vous me l'expliquer. J'ai déjà posé cette question, sans avoir de réponse. voici les images concernées:
File:Prune sur paravent.jpg
- J'ai créé Creator:Kanō Sanraku : ce modèle se met dans une page dédiée dans l'espace Creator. L'intérêt est (notamment) de pouvoir ensuite insérer dans toutes les images créés par cette personne le modèle Creator:Kanō Sanraku dans le champ Author.--Bapti ✉ 14:10, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Kegon Engi Emaki
Hi! Are you sure that all of the images in Category:Kegon_Engi_Emaki are from the National Treasure scroll at Kozan-ji? I haven't checked but stylistically they seem to be from different works. Could also be that they are from the same work, with different settings for contrast and white balance, so I am not sure. Compare for instance File:History of the Kegon Sect.jpg (which is definitely from the National Treasure scroll) and File:Kegon Engi Emaki, Gengyo nightmare.jpg. bamse (talk) 09:56, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi, if you disagree with removal of LargeImage template from the files (where it is appropriate), just revert the change, bot will not remove it again. There were already some disscusions about it, Dschwen is insisting on removing, but forutenately no so hard to revert. --Jklamo (talk) 21:01, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:52, 11 June 2015 (UTC)