User talk:Bjung

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bjung!

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:55, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Moving a lot of files from lb-wiki[edit]

Hi! You have moved a lot of files from lb-wiki to Commons and your work looks really good. I'm also moving a lot of files (with my bot). If you have some time and want to help you could look at Category:Files moved from lb.wikipedia to Commons requiring review. I start with own work and will do some of the cleanup with my bot after the transfer. --MGA73 (talk) 18:59, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'll have that category in mind (and in my bookmarks) in the future. Good work requires time. — Bjung (talk) 23:26, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it does. And I think it is perfect that you take your time and do high quality edits :-) --MGA73 (talk) 17:11, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki links and categories[edit]

Hi. Interwiki links are put above categories because categories are changed using a script (which at least before put them at the bottom), while interwiki links are changed manually. --AVRS (talk) 11:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

your question: why not use the interwikis menu?[edit]

Hi, as I understand that interwiki menus on Commons are supposed to contain categories, not articles.

Such I use {{On Wikipedia}} which is described as: For linking to multiple Wikipedia articles. This should not be used in place of or in duplication of interwiki links (in the sidebar). In categories, take the local Wikipedia's equivalent categories for the sidebar, and the related main articles for this box. --Jwh (talk) 21:03, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply][edit]

Bonjour Bjung êtes vous intéressé? Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 11:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Parc attractif Reine Fabiola has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Dinosaur918 (talk) 20:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making your own rules![edit]

If you tell me (here) what is not intended, you should not do it yourself (here)! And don't agree with another user who also makes their own rules, like (here)! Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 10:04, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha! I didn't *move* to an inexistant category, I *added* one. It doesn't make the category disappear. Big difference. Stop your knitpicking and nonsense! — Bjung (talk) 16:52, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So what are you doing? Patrolling me trying to find a fault or what? Good luck! — Bjung (talk) 17:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The truth is, your mod here was not only faulty, but doubly so; *moving* to an inexistant category with a *bad name* is worse yet because there's no chance that category will be created in the future. That's not my own rules, that's just good common sense! — Bjung (talk) 17:23, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good advice for you is to stop demanding what someone else should do and use your common sense by not knitting because that is indeed what you are doing now! And once again, stop making your own rules! Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 22:56, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What a load of nonsense, talk to my hand! Explaining basic concepts or good common sense to you is a waste of time. You're too obsessed with "rules". Now you can go whine elsewhere! — Bjung (talk) 01:09, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Laughing at your own mistake by saying you added a category. This action is wrong because "Category:Deaths in Den Haag" is unnecessary as there is a category "Category:Deaths in The Hague"! Speaking of nonsense, that is really nonsense! And if you don't want to get a comment, Then don't post a comment like that (here)! Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 23:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]