User talk:Multichill

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:BotMultichill)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Busy desk.svg
Always busy.

Bahasa Indonesia  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  română  español  português  English  français  Nederlands  polski  galego  Simple English  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Welcome to my talk page. Use it; don't send me e-mail.

I reply to messages left on my talk, on my talk page. If I left a message on your talk page, I will reply there (unless you specify otherwise).


Just for the form[edit]

schilderijen van UB Leiden[edit]

Hallo Maarten,

Ik heb vandaag uit de beeldbank van de UB Leiden (http://digitalcollections.universiteitleiden.nl) een selectie gemaakt van schilderijen die vrij downloadbaar zijn voor het project Sum of all Paintings. Het zijn 279 records met de volgende variabelen: item, label, shelfmark, materiaal (=schilderij), handle. Als je mij je email stuurt, kan ik het spreadsheet opsturen. Kan je daarmee de images toevoegen aan wikimedia commons?

Wil je ze dan, behalve in Sum of all Paintings, ook toevoegen aan een categorie "Paintings" in "Category:Collections of Leiden University Library".

Een stukje uit het bestand:

itemnr Label handle
item:1581995 Portret van Stephanus Marchant\, hoogleraar Rechtsgeleerdheid te Leiden Icones 101 http://hdl.handle.net/1887.1/item:1581995
item:1582018 Portret van Lucas Schacht\, hoogleraar Geneeskunde te Leiden Icones 103 http://hdl.handle.net/1887.1/item:1582018

Als je de link met de handle in een browser plakt, zie je een pagina van een portret met metadata. Onder de downloadknop met het pijltje zit een medium sized JPGEG. De link voor downloaden van de JPG die hoort bij het eerste item:1581995 is http://digitalcollections.universiteitleiden.nl//view/item/1581995/datastream/JPG/download.

De hoogleraren op deze portretten zijn allen waarschijnlijk als persoon al opgenomen in wikidata. Zou je die portretten ook nog aan de hoogleraren kunnen koppelen?

Ik heb wel je Wikimedia Usernaam, maar niet je email adres. Mijn mail adres is e.m.van.wijk@library.leidenuniv.nl.

Liesbeth van Wijk deelnemer Wiki Techstorm 2019 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wijkemvan (talk • contribs) 20:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quadro di Rubens[edit]

Ciao, spero sia il posto giusto dove fatto questa domanda, in caso errato scusami e indicami come dialogare con te Ti contatto per il dipinto "Circoncisione" di Rubens che, se non sbaglio, hai inserito in WikiMedia https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circoncisione_di_Gesù_-_Rubens.jpg

Quella foto l'ho fatta io nel 1998 quando facevo il fotografo di Arte e Architettura (ovviamente ho l'originale) Vorrei potermela attribuire ma non so come farlo, se non caricandola tra le mie e poi inserendola in Wikipedia

Puoi darmi indicazioni? grazie michele


PS la puoi vedere tra queste: https://www.micheleferraris.it/project/arte-architettura-genova/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by IMic70 (talk • contribs) 20:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:European pressphoto agency

....... Adding structured data: date, copyright, source & author thanks a million..............how to thank a bot...............Multichill (great code)[edit]

Vitruvian Barnstar.png The da Vinci Barnstar
........one more time....amazing code for a bot..............A barnstar for you Multichill (Structured data) great work *(how to thank a bot)*


following the breadcrumbs.............

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q8343766

Photo deletion question[edit]

Hi, I am new at this. First upload. I have received autorisation from author to use this photo. How can I make this clear and avoid deletion? Thank you

Renaming file[edit]

Hello again, could you rename this file to "Free-ranging mixed breed dog"? Thank you. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mexican_Street_Dog.jpg

follow the breadcrumbs of Php and say thanks for the work[edit]

curprev 13:22, 10 October 2020‎ BotMultichillT talk contribs‎ 2,047 bytes +1,514‎ ‎Changed an entity: Adding structured data: date & copyright undo


—Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.69.189.65 (talk) 13:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

great work, virtual slice of pizza Multichill

—Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.69.189.65 (talk) 13:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nizami 48[edit]

Hi.Please delete photo Nizami 48 building —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.135.166.226 (talk) 12:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]


follow the digital breadcrumbs to say... great job, once again :Multichill[edit]

curprev 22:03, 5 October 2020‎ BotMultichillT talk contribs‎ 3,999 bytes +2,909‎ ‎Changed an entity: Adding structured data: copyright, source, date & author undo

following the digital breadcrumbs to say... great job, once again :Multichill structured data great job

boxed water....amazing in the U.S.A.


—Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.69.189.65 (talk) 06:27, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

‎Changed an entity: Adding structured data: copyright, source, date & author ...i say thanks with a virtual slice of pizza....cheers..structured data.

a barnstar for you! :Schlurcher[edit]

Barnstar. Adding structured data: copyright & date ....:Multichill BOT wikimedia & wikidata[edit]

Barnstar. Adding structured data: copyright & date ....:Multichill BOT wikimedia & wikidata

—Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.69.189.65 (talk) 17:11, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Funny Barnstar.png The Technical Barnstar
For your amazing work on Adding structured data: copyright & date ....:Multichill BOT wikimedia & wikidata...17th of October 2021 (UTC)

PDM[edit]

When we use Creative Commons Public Domain Mark (Q7257361) in copyright license (P275), like this, it creates a constraint violation, because the property (rightfully) thinks public domain works should not have copyright licenses. And yet, I've found no where better to add PDM, if the data source is using it and we would like to reflect that. Do you have any better ideas about how we should do this? (I'm not the only one, there's over 2000 files using it in that property, including WMSE uploads). If there is not a better way, should we just allow it in the property constraints? Dominic (talk) 17:29, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Dominic: that usage is incorrect. The public domain mark is not a license so should never be used in copyright license (P275). Please remove. Multichill (talk) 23:03, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks, I would like to remove it! I was trying to figure out the ideal way to do this, so I know what to replace it with. Just having x copyright status (P6216) public domain (Q19652) seems insufficient, if a source has applied PDM themselves, and we should represent that somewhere as well. Dominic (talk) 19:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Dominic: we have many reasons why something is public domain, see Category:PD license tags.
In structured data the basic statement some file copyright status (P6216) public domain (Q19652) should have one or more determination method (P459) qualifiers. That should contain the real reason why we think it's public domein (for example due to age or US government work). I'm a bit reluctant to put the PDM reason in there because that would be {{Public domain}} all over again.
What about using statement supported by (P3680)? Something like "GLAM source added the PDM"? Multichill (talk) 18:26, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree that PDM is not the reason, as you say, just the mark. And I'm already using a different determination method anyway. Using something else as a qualifier to the P275 statement would be fine with me.
I like P3680, but it appears from the scope that the values of that property are intended to be the entity making the statement (i.e., the institution), rather than the reason for it. Maybe criterion used (P1013) is more like what you are suggesting?
Here's another idea: using identity of object in context (P4626), and then maybe we can simply use Creative Commons Public Domain Mark (Q7257361) in the value, instead of creating a new "GLAM source added the PDM" item. What would you think of that? The reference provided is still the source for the context. Dominic (talk) 15:44, 27 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tomruen test.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tomruen test.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ixfd64 (talk) 06:35, 28 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Participation in a virtual session for Wikimedians and Researchers?[edit]

Hey Multichill, we are organizing this session to bring together Wikimedians and researchers who work in a multilingual and multi-modal (e.g., text and images) setting, and I was wondering whether you could participate in the session? It's less than an hour on April 29, 2022. More information is here: [1], the workshop is described here: meta:Wiki-M3L. If you are interested, could you send me a mail to lucie.kaffee[@]gmail.com? Would love to have you there! --Frimelle (talk) 13:41, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Geograph uploads, descriptions, structured data and "mills"[edit]

First of all, thank you for uploading files from geograph.or.uk with your bot. There are a few issues, however. For one, I wish you'd include the descriptions of the files, as these often contain valuable information that helps with finer categorisation. Another are the keywords ("Depicts") in the structured data that are added to the files, or rather one of these words. It seems that whenever the word "mill" appears in the file name, the keyword "molinology" appears in the data, and in many cases this is just plain odd and often wrong - it is well known that in England "mill" is frequently used as a synonym for "factory", probably because early factories were powered by water wheels, but most of them aren't mills in the proper sense. I am not sure how this fluidity in terms should be addressed, but at any rate, it should. --Schlosser67 (talk) 07:46, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Description often contains too much irrelevant text. I had a look at it several times and always concluded that it shouldn't be included on Commons.
Mapping of tags to items is done at User:GeographBot/Tags. Looking at current usage it seems to be a mix of windmill (Q38720), watermill (Q185187) & factory (Q83405) (aka mill) which are all subclass of industrial building (Q12144897) so I changed the mapping to that. Multichill (talk) 21:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Concerning mills: Thank you, this is probably the best that can be done at the moment, considering that the geograph tags aren't well defined, either. Concerning the descriptions, I don't quite agree. There are many that are fairly irrelevant and/or wordy, so much is true, but there are more that actually add information which helps to locate and interpret the image, in particular when the image title is very generic (such as "Ordnance Survey Cut Mark" or "M6 motorway"). I have usually found the useful bit of information at the beginning of the descriptions. Maybe limit the number of characters? --Schlosser67 (talk) 11:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Perl Harbor[edit]

Please correct description of the file below: "File:US Navy 040702-N-4304S-136 Warships from several nations sit pierside at Naval Station Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.jpg" from: "Warships from several nations sit pierside at Naval" to eg: "Warships of several nations dock on either side of the Naval" The filename should be corrected as well. Regards Alice —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 37.225.78.239 (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The filename File:US Navy 040702-N-4304S-136 Warships from several nations sit pierside at Naval Station Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.jpg is good enough. We generally keep file names stable.
Description is from the navy website. Multichill (talk) 14:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

Vitruvian Barnstar Hires.png The Technical Barnstar
Your bot is fantastic, it saves us so much work. ReneeWrites (talk) 20:34, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@ReneeWrites: thank you! Always nice to see that my work is appreciated. Multichill (talk) 14:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Media_needing_categories_to_be_checked_by_a_bot[edit]

Category discussion warning

Category:Media_needing_categories_to_be_checked_by_a_bot has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


A1Cafel (talk) 10:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with beeld* heilig landstichting[edit]

Files found with Special:Search/beeld* heilig landstichting[edit]

Copyright violation. These sculptures are in an open air museum in the Netherlands, so no "public place" because there is no free admission, and therefor FOP is not applicable. And there are no VRT tickets. The photos by RCE are only licensed for the photos, not for the works of art.

JopkeB (talk) 04:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Dina Bélanger Help please.[edit]

Hello,

My request is about the category "Category:Dina Bélanger" .

I have imported 1 file yesterday, and 6 today, but now, when I click on "Wiki Commons" in the Dina Bélanger articles of the French and English wiki, only one file is displayed ( this one: File:Dina Bélanger (1897-1929) en 1922.pdf: Revision history) but not the others (for example this one: File:Dina Bélanger (1897-1929) en 1917.jpg: Revision history ).

What should I do to fix this and what is the problem? Have I made a mistake? Can you please help me?

Thanks in advance for your kind help. Contributeur2019 (talk) 13:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Since I wrote to you a few minutes ago, the problem seems to have been resolved. What happened in the meantime? Tks. Contributeur2019 (talk) 13:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have no idea. Commons:Help desk might be a more suitable place than my talk page to ask this question. I do notice that the files in Category:Dina Bélanger have questionable copyright tagging. How can it be both PD-old & CC0 with an unknown author? Multichill (talk) 14:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Tks for your reply. No need to contact C:HD as now all seems to be ok. Concerning copyright tagging you're right, no need of CCO. I will correct. Tks again and sorry for disturbing. Contributeur2019 (talk) 10:12, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Upload request[edit]

Hello Multichill. As you operate GeographBot, will you have time to make it upload the John Spence Community High School image from https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/4043149 (CC BY-SA 2.0) ? This is to illustrate the article. --Oroborvs (talk) 13:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Oroborvs: the bot will eventually upload that image, but that might take a while. You might want to try https://geograph2commons.toolforge.org/ if you don't want to wait. Multichill (talk) 13:57, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I just used this toolforge which gave me all the information but seems to take a while to upload. So I will upload it myself. Thank you for the link. --Oroborvs (talk) 14:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Skip problematic files[edit]

hi! might it be a good idea if your bot would skip files like File:Sultan Baba.jpg that are tagged with any delete/SD/nsd/npd... templates? RZuo (talk) 06:38, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@RZuo: I recall looking into that, but deletion requests sometimes take forever. The bot ends up running over the same file multiple times a day for as long as the deletion request is open. It's easier to just process it. Multichill (talk) 20:34, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Geograph from structured data[edit]

Hi Multichill, I need some help please. Can you tell me why I cannot edit an image with {{Geograph from structured data}} on it. For instance, I cropped File:Araf-Slow on the B4302 - geograph.org.uk - 2395618.jpg to File:Araf-Slow on the B4302 - geograph.org.uk - 2395618 (cropped).jpg, but I cannot add a description etc etc. Thank you. SethWhales talk 08:55, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Seth Whales: Look at the structured data tab on each file. Here you can edit it. I'm currently not aware of an easy way to copy over all data from one file to another. Multichill (talk) 20:32, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

to-be-deleted files from Beeldcollectie van het Historisch Archief Haarlemmermeer te Hoofddorp[edit]

Hi Multichill, only as a reassurance before I start deleting, with the approx. 1600 files you marked for quick deletion, such as File:12 foto's van de ouderenwoningen De Beemsterborg aan de Beemsterstraat in Hoofddorp, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 03134.JPG, the deletion is uncontroversial? --Túrelio (talk) 12:21, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Túrelio: let's double check if user:Vysotsky agrees. Multichill (talk) 20:13, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I checked 15 files, such as this one. All licenses of the images in the Beeldcollectie van het Historisch Archief Haarlemmermeer te Hoofddorp were changed at the archive since the uploads by User:Mr.Nostalgic to Commons. So I won't object against these speedy removals, except for one category (for one of these files I have sent a request to the archive a week or so ago): the municipal maps, such as this one. I expect the Municipality of Hoofddorp owns copyright of these maps, but I am not sure yet. Do you want me to challenge these 54 speedies seperately? Vysotsky (talk) 20:37, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Vysotsky: just rollback the bot edits on the files you think that can be saved. Bots don't have feelings and don't care about that. Multichill (talk) 20:43, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:LSG Apeler See und Umland (Niedersachsen).jpg[edit]

Hello Multichill, could you please have a look at the mentioned file. It shows a caution notice because of discrepancy in coordinates. I already corrected the coordinates in the description, but I don't know how to fix it properly so that the notice does not appear anymore. Thanks in advance. --Olga Ernst (talk) 09:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi again Multichill, I tried again and was successful ;-)) Regards --Olga Ernst (talk) 08:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hundreds of wrong speedy deletion tags[edit]

Hi, Your bot tagged hundreds of old images with a speedy deletion tag (e.g. File:Loods Oude Spaarneweg, Inventarisnummer NL-HlmNHA Hmr 07033.JPG). This is not OK. Could you please revert that, and create a regular DR instead. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:05, 21 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's a bit more complicated, as the Noord-Hollands Archief changed the license last year, see this discussion. We were already working on it. No prob, I was planning to look at each file anyway. Vysotsky (talk) 21:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Yann: I'm afraid you made it worse. None of the files in Category:Beeldcollectie van het Historisch Archief Haarlemmermeer te Hoofddorp have a valid CC0 release as you can read on Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Beeldcollectie van het Historisch Archief Haarlemmermeer te Hoofddorp. So basically all files should be deleted as missing permission.
Every file was placed in Category:Historisch Archief Haarlemmermeer (license check) to be able to safe some of them. I just tagged the easy ones for speedy deletion so that no human has to check these all by hand. Because you removed the speedy deletion tag you broke this system. Multichill (talk) 14:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The remaining 769 files in the Category:Historisch Archief Haarlemmermeer (license check) will be checked manually. Vysotsky (talk) 15:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It doesn't make sense. If these files are admissible for speedy deletion, you can delete them right away instead of tagging them. If you tag them for SD but don't delete them, it means another admin has to check them if the tag is OK or not. Doing that for 700+ files is not really possible seeing the manpower and time available. If a review is needed, then a DR is the way to go. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
To give an example from this collection: why would we delete a rare photograph of a departure hall of an airport in 1934 if the license is OK? (I corrected the link & the license to match the source and added a category just a minute ago). All other ways of handling these files would cost more time without the possibility to keep hundreds of these files in Commons. Vysotsky (talk) 19:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note that I don't oppose deletion, only the procedure. And strictly speaking, these are not obvious copyright violations, so not eligible for SD. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:37, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 14:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:INaturalist images missing SDC depicts may need a poke[edit]

We, birds from Sumba, do have a depicts (P180) statement.

Hello Multichill, I see that you created Category:INaturalist images missing SDC depicts. I have recently added depicts (P180) statements to many of these files, but they keep showing up in the category (although the category itself doesn't appear with the individual files anymore (example), which I find interesting. Could you perhaps take a look what's going on here? Thanks :-) Spinster (talk) 17:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Spinster: nice, it's finally populated. I was planning to at some point to run a bot on these based on the data in iNaturalist. I see you're doing just that. Great!
Probably is that SDC edits don't trigger a complete new page render. So your addition doesn't trigger a template update and no category update either. Pretty sure we have a bug open for that, but I stopped paying attention to most of these a long time ago. All my bots do a dummy edit to the page to trigger an update. You should probably have OpenRefine do the same. Multichill (talk) 19:25, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks, @Multichill, I am enlightened. We are dealing with this Phabricator ticket here. I have responded there and we now also have a GitHub issue to look at it from the OpenRefine side. As more batch tools and bots trigger this problem, IMO it's best that it's eventually fixed on the Commons side though ;-) Spinster (talk) 17:00, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Spinster: , I do a lot of category refreshing as well. My favorite way to deal with it is to run https://hub.paws.wmcloud.org open a terminal and run pwb.py touch -cat:Artworks_with_Wikidata_item:_quick_statements to refresh all the files in Category:Artworks with Wikidata item: quick statements. --Jarekt (talk) 03:08, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ahh, thanks @Jarekt, I will add that one to my ever-expanding box of tricks :D Spinster (talk) 06:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 04:09, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

iNat pictures[edit]

Hoi Multichill, vond dit ook wel grappig: [2]. De puntjes buiten het verspreidingsgebied roepen wel wat vragen op.... maar wijkt niet veel af van de data op GBIF. Nog over de bulk upload. Ik ben zeker ook zeker geen tegenstander. Er zitten dus wel wat onscherpe foto's tussen. Zou mooi zijn als we die eruit halen door de scharpness oid van een foto uit te rekenen? 4 miljoen observaties x 1 Mb = 4 Tb = best veel data. Het merendeel van het materiaal is vast prachtig. Als mensen meerdere foto's per observatie uploaden is de eerste foto doorgaans het beste. De default instelling van iNaturalist is trouwens geen vrije licentie. Er zullen vast meer gebruikers zijn die hun foto's vrij willen maken. Geen idee of dat makkelijk kan voor alle foto's. Rudolphous (talk) 06:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

cancel automatic geolocalisation[edit]

Hi,

I think it's an error to automatically geolocalise files in structured data with this bot. By doing so, ou have exposed the localisation of my private home.
I know that the information was already there, but the bot make it a lot easier to find. - Simon Villeneuve 11:16, 10 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, the error is you adding coordinates you don't want to share. You exposed your location, not the robot(s). You adding coordinates triggers the indexing. Have a look at Special:Nearby.
Just be careful, don't try to blame your mistakes on someone else and you can ask an admin to delete any revisions containing private information. So no, I'm not going to disable this bot. Multichill (talk) 15:16, 10 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

[edit]

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 18:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Victor just ask participants to submit entries with a {{CC0}} license only. That way attribution is not mandatory and the logo can be used without having to link it every time (which is quite needed for a logo anyway). Multichill (talk) 18:08, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Eugène Boudin - Fair in Brittany - 2015.19.21 - Corcoran Gallery of Art.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Eugène Boudin - Fair in Brittany - 2015.19.21 - Corcoran Gallery of Art.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 19:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for adding structured data to some of my photos :) Urban Versis 32 (talk) 19:40, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Anonym (italienisch)(Solario, Andrea)(San Valdarmo, Giovanni) (15. Jhrdt.) - Madonna mit Kind - 2141 - Führermuseum.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Anonym (italienisch)(Solario, Andrea)(San Valdarmo, Giovanni) (15. Jhrdt.) - Madonna mit Kind - 2141 - Führermuseum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 00:32, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sinai.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sinai.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Enyavar (talk) 14:09, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

BotMultichillT seemed to not honor a request to deny bot[edit]

The edit Special:Diff/672127507 appeared to ignore a {{Bots}} deny request against BotMultichillT. If I have made a mistake in the syntax in usage of the template fair enough, otherwise can you please explain the failure to respect the request. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 14:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Djm-leighpark: Dunno, you shouldn't have added it to the file anyway, see Commons:Ownership of pages and files. Multichill (talk) 16:43, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disagreement with administrative action[edit]

I strongly disagree with your administrative actions regarding the distribution of media files by year. I have already discussed this topic with another Wikimedia Commons administrator - @Butko: did this on his own initiative and as a result, it became much easier to search for media files, since, for example, more than 20 thousand of them have been downloaded from the website of the President of Russia since 2008, from the website of the Government of Moscow - about 5 thousand, etc. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 07:00, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See Commons:Bots/Work_requests#Distribution_of_media_files_by_years. Multichill (talk) 16:12, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:7-PET structure.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:7-PET structure.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Innerstream (talk) 21:31, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copied to User_talk:Meodipt#File:7-PET_structure.png. Multichill (talk) 08:58, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bulk transfer request.[edit]

Hi,

A while back Fae was kind enough to upload all the CCE volumes held at IA, to Commons (as PDF).

Since then some quality issues have been identified with some of those PDF's, mostyl to do with the readability of certain pages and fine print.

Would it be possible for someone like yourself , that's experienced in writing scripts, and listed on the Bulk uploads request page to consider running some kind of tool-forge script to re-upload the volumes based on what would essentially be an automated version of IA-Upload, deriving hi quality DJVU versions from the high quality scans IA holds?

IA category: https://archive.org/details/copyrightrecords. RSS feed : https://archive.org/services/collection-rss.php?collection=copyrightrecords

Metadata for each volume should be imported from IA's...

It would be useful to have these volumes so that commons admins can use them in responding to DR's and other related queries :)

I was also considering proposing it as MASSIVE project on Wikisource, to get these transcribed (albiet matched against the existing Project Gutenberg Transcriptions where possible, No need to re do the OCR if it's already been done...) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:44, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not really my cup of tea. We used to have Commons:Batch uploading to post these kind of things, but that seems to have become the place where batch uploading proposals go to die silently :-( Multichill (talk) 09:25, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:IRINN IRIB.png[edit]

Hello, please update the description of this file again with the robot because the fundamental changes have been made in the file and its license has also changed. Thank youCaesarIran (talk) 17:13, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

License update[edit]

Hello Multichill,
Follwing contributer's request, I plan to run a bot to update 5,000+ files' wikitext to dual CC-BY-SA + CC0 licences, example diff.
Your bot also work on these files, on the structured data license property (see the edit prior to my bot).
As Dragons Bot update the wikitexts, how should we proceed to update the structured data properties ? Will your bot automatically follow mine ? Yug (talk) 16:52, 24 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alternatively, it seems I could use Help:Gadget-ACDC to add P275 (license) : Q6938433 (CC0), in an semi-automatic way. This gadget heat up pretty fast tho. A category with 5,000 is borderline... Yug (talk) 19:19, 24 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]