User talk:BrCaLeTo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, BrCaLeTo!

-- 23:40, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−


Hello, BrCaLeTo!
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Alm piedrahita.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Alm piedrahita.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Alm piedrahita.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 21:11, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Rafael Navas.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rafael Navas.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Rafael Navas.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 21:12, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Luis Ernesto Ordoñez.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Luis Ernesto Ordoñez.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Luis Ernesto Ordoñez.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 21:12, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Gabriel París.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gabriel París.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Gabriel París.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 21:12, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Gustavo Rojas Pinilla 1.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gustavo Rojas Pinilla 1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Gustavo Rojas Pinilla 1.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 21:12, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:6851420.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:6851420.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:6851420.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 21:12, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

File:14417121.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:14417121.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin H. (talk) 21:13, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Flota Rionegro.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  norsk bokmål  română  lietuvių  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  اردو  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flota Rionegro.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Flota Rionegro.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 21:13, 2 November 2011 (UTC

Borrado[edit]

File:Flag of Une (Cundinamarca).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Flag of Une (Cundinamarca).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrCaLeTo (talk) 19:14, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Borrado 2[edit]

File:Flag of La Palma (Cundinamarca).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Flag of La Palma (Cundinamarca).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrCaLeTo (talk) 19:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrolled and filemover[edit]

Hi BrCaLeTo. I've given you the Autopatrol right and made you a Filemover. INeverCry 22:39, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Borrado 3[edit]

File:Escudo de Puente Nacional (Santander) (propuestado).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Escudo de Puente Nacional (Santander) (propuestado).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrCaLeTo (talk) 20:18, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Borrado 4[edit]

File:Escudo de Puerto Wilches (Santander) (propuestado).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Escudo de Puerto Wilches (Santander) (propuestado).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrCaLeTo (talk) 20:24, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Borrado 5[edit]

File:Escudo de Aguachica (Cesar) (propuestado).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Escudo de Aguachica (Cesar) (propuestado).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrCaLeTo (talk) 20:30, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Escudos[edit]

Vi que hiciste nuevos escudos, y te felicito por tomar la tarea, pero respecto a ello tengo 3 sugerencias:

1. Terminalos, no los dejes a medias (como cintas sin texto, o elementos faltantes en los cuarteles).

2. No te dediques a copiar, adaptalos pa que se parezcan al menos a los modelos que aparecen en las paginas municipales, y borra lo que no necesites.

3. Da atribución a los escudos de los cuales has tomado elementos, no es obligatorio pero al menos es forma de agradecer a quien los hizo antes que tu.

--Shadowxfox (talk) 05:18, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Con todo respeto, no se si usted se hace el que no entiende los mensajes o el de oidos sordos, pero le he dicho que por favor cuando haga un escudo terminelo, cuando lo deja a medias empaña la labor de los que ya hemos realizado de estos emblemas con mucho esfuerzo por que queden bien, acorde con lo oficial y con la heraldica, y al hacer un trabajo mediocre todos quedamos bajo la misma cobija. Si es que se le hace dificil esta labor entonces pida el favor a otros usuario que ya hayan subido escudos, como Ivanics o yo. --Shadowxfox (talk) 03:39, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Es hora de que empiece a aprender a dibujar y no soloa copiar.--Shadowxfox (talk) 20:06, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Flag of Dolores (Tolima.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Flag of Dolores (Tolima.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hosmich (talk) 13:32, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

SVG flags of municipalities of Colombia[edit]

I am interested in vector graphics, mainly in vector flags and CoAs on Commons. I was willing to vectorize bitmap flags, as you can see here. I was interested in twin flags too, but I discovered that many striped "twins" can be searched in these and similar categories. I started to add flags of country subdivisions to these "striped categories" and after that I decided to add flags of municipalities of Colombia too. It was a pleasure at first, but then I felt a "duty" to categorize all flags from here not only by stripes, but by other devices too. I did it for all departments except Magdalena, Norte de Santander, Santander, Boyacá, Cundinamarca and Antioquia. I don't want to waste time, so I ask you:

Many flags of municipalities have more files from different uploaders, differing in naming convention. I am from Slovakia, but you could talk with fellow Colombians about this issue. I like your naming convention, but your flags are made in Inkscape and thus contain some waste code. BTW the colors and proportions are not always the same and I have no information about official designs. It can be as different as this. This seems to be another source of designs, but certainly does exist something official, as this for Slovakia. If you (or fellow Colombian) find it, will you fix the duplicated flags and stabilize the naming convention? (Valle del Cauca looks like keystone of this problem.) You could at least supersede the duplicates by superior files with preservation of your descriptions in Spanish. This job can be distributed by departments and/or alphabet order. Major uploaders are you, User:Shadowxfox, User:Ninane, User:Joey-das-WBF and User:Jed, but you can collaborate with anyone, including me. If you distribute the work (adding categories for stripes and devices, checking the official colors and proportions, eventually deleting inferior files), please inform me. I am fresh engineer looking for a job, so I have time to help, but it can change soon. Have a good luck! Hosmich (talk) 09:13, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Flag of Santa Rosa de Cabal (Risaralda).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Flag of Santa Rosa de Cabal (Risaralda).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lepsyleon (talk) 14:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Flag of Valledupar (Cesar).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Flag of Valledupar (Cesar).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lepsyleon (talk) 15:17, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Flag of Supatá (Cundinamarca).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Flag of Supatá (Cundinamarca).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lepsyleon (talk) 15:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Pedido de un escudo[edit]

Hola, puede hacer que el escudo del municipio de Nova Viçosa? És un municipio da Bahia en Brasil. Tozeos (talk) 12:54, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Muito obrigado por realizar meu pedido. Você com certeza está fazendo um grande trabalho entre nossos países. Obrigado por enriquecer ainda mais a a página wiki do meu município natal. Tozeos (talk) 22:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

·×ald·es 01:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Olá[edit]

Por Favor entre em contato jocelioandrade@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by ANDRADE, J. S. (talk • contribs) 14:40, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

ANDRADE, J. S. (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Buenas noches! podría mirar eso https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Her%C3%A1ldica_municipal_de_Espa%C3%B1a

Y eso https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coroa_mural#Espanha

Que tienes a hablar?enseña a mí mejor!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ANDRADE, J. S. (talk • contribs) 01:50, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Facebook ou Sap você tem?[edit]

Meu e-mail: jocelioandrade@gmail.com

Parabéns quero conhecer mais a Heráldica de Domínio da Colômbia!

Abraços!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ANDRADE, J. S. (talk • contribs) 23:17, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Pedido de ayuda / Pedido de ajuda[edit]

Flag of Campinas.svg
Brasão da Cidade de Campinas.png
Español

Amigo, todo bien? En primer lugar me gustaría felicitar por su belissimo trabajo. Sin duda es esencial para el proyecto de Wikipedia. Tengo una petición en particular, trabajo a largo plazo con artículos relacionados con la ciudad de Campinas en São Paulo, pero la bandera y el escudo de armas de la ciudad están mal, siendo que el escudo está en formato PNG y la bandera no creo que esté Con los estándares oficiales de la ciudad (principalmente el diseño del fénix). Usted podría ayudarme y rehacer estos dos en formato SVG? Gracias por su atención! Abrazos

Português

Amigo, tudo bem?! Em primeiro lugar gostaria de parabenizar pelo seu belissímo trabalho! Sem dúvida ele é essencial para o projeto da Wikipedia. Eu tenho um pedido em particular, trabalho a muito tempo com artigos relacionados a cidade de Campinas em São Paulo, porém a bandeira e o brasão de armas da cidade estão ruins, sendo que o brasão está no formato PNG e a bandeira não creio que esteja com os padrões oficiais da cidade (principalmente o desenho da fênix). Você poderia me ajudar e refazer esses dois em formato SVG? Desde já agradeço pela sua atenção! Abraços

Raphael Figueira (talk) 18:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Pau dos Ferros[edit]

Olá BrCaLeTo, boa tarde. Inicialmente parabéns pelos seus trabalhos carregando bandeiras em SVG. Gostaria de saber qual software você utiliza para fazer essas bandeiras e se você se dispõe a carregar o brasão e a bandeira de Pau dos Ferros (cidade onde moro) em SVG. Uma observação que gostaria de fazer é que ao invés de 0409 o correto é 04/09 com a barra separando o dia e mês em que a cidade foi emancipada, como já em todos os exemplares confeccionados aqui. Desculpa aqui o incômodo, é que tenho certa vergonha de pedir as coisas por achar às vezes que estou "cobrando". Marquinhos talk 16:40, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Escudo de Tumbes.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Escudo de Tumbes.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Profesionalperuano (talk) 13:23, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

147.75.127.75 14:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Julian1200 (talk) 20:30, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Julian1200 (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Julian1200 (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Julian1200 (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Julian1200 (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Julian1200 (talk) 15:48, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Brasão de Americana - SP.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Brasão de Americana - SP.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:11, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Brasão de Bauru - SP.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Brasão de Bauru - SP.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:23, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Brasão de Teresina - PI.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Brasão de Teresina - PI.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:31, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Brasão de Buritama - SP.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Brasão de Buritama - SP.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 03:08, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Escudo Gutiérréz Cundinamarca[edit]

El escudo realizado del municipio de Gutiérrez-Cundinamarca es una buena aproximación digital al escudo real. Sin embargo presenta algunas variaciones de que podrían mejorarse respecto al dibujo del escudo:

1). Montaña, cascadas, Un azadón, un ave de la clase Noche (Yellow-backed oriole), y una Sariguella, no un león. Escudo original: http://gutierrezcundinamarca.micolombiadigital.gov.co/sites/gutierrezcundinamarca/content/files/000022/1067_escudo.pdf

2) y la construcción de un bosque de arboles de siete cueros Arboles de siete euros: http://gutierrezcundinamarca.micolombiadigital.gov.co/sites/gutierrezcundinamarca/content/files/000022/1066_siete-cueros.pdf —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.28.92.193 (talk) 20:10, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Important message for file movers[edit]

Commons File mover.svg

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Escudo del El Carmen de Bolivar[edit]

El escudo realizado por usted no es similar al oficial:

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Henblo (talk • contribs) 21:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JulianJtm (talk) 21:45, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Escudo de Cachipay.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JulianJtm (talk) 21:48, 14 January 2020 (UTC)