User talk:Bryan/archive/2006/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Image Tagging Image:Sonnefjord Norway.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sonnefjord Norway.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

You had tagged the image with {{bad name}}, but it was a completely different image than the one you pointed to. If this one exists with another name, please insert the correct one in the tag, and it will be taken care of. Cnyborg 23:21, 24 October 2006 (UTC)


Image:Bodensee panorama.jpg[edit]

I was looking at your picture in the featured candidates and I think this would be an amazing picture if it was taken in HDR. --Digon3 14:47, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Could you please upload the original unedited Bodensee panorama? I can try to make a HDR out of it (I have the software) but the edits in the edited version is too obvious with the lighting increased. --Digon3 15:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Send me the 4 pictures (as long as they are unedited), I'll make the panorama and hopefully HDR --Digon3 19:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Not quite what I was hoping for, but it will do for now. I'll keep working on it and update it. (Next time take the picture after the sun has gone done :) Here it is Tell me what you think --Digon3 16:20, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
I worked on it some more. The problem is the lighter the town becomes, the more noise is visible. It looks very good otherwise and is an amazing picture. Too bad it is so far away. --Digon3 17:45, 5 November 2006 (UTC)


I've added various pixels when modificating it, and changed the colors. --Anchoa Futurista 11:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

What if i asked for permission? --NeoAnchovy 11:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, i will properly contact 4Chan, but could you give me a few days? they would probably reply one or two days later. --NeoAnchovy 11:50, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. --NeoAnchovy 11:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
There's a problem, i don't know how to contact them, so it may take a few days... --NeoAnchovy 14:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Bild:Frederic Leighton-Orfeo ed Euridice-1864.jpg, Betreff: Wikipedia Commons Talk[edit]

Vielen Dank für Ihren Hinweis zu dem Bild von Leighton. Als Kunsthistorikerin bin ich zwar weiterhin skeptisch gegenüber dieser Auslegung der Copyright-Gesetze, aber ich werde diese Angelegenheit nicht mehr weiter verfolgen. Bedenken Sie aber, das nicht das Gemälde an sich geschützt werden muss, sondern seine Aufnahme. Es ist unredlich, diese Aufnahme, die übrigens farblich ziemlich gut gelungen ist, ohne Quelle zu verwenden. Da bin ich mir ganz sicher, weil ich in Fachpublikationen auch Copyright-Bestimmungen respektieren muss. Wenn ich zum Bsp. ein Gemälde aus dem 16. Jh. als Abbildung verwende, muss ich dafür dem Inhaber der Bildrechte Gebühren erstatten. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, 14:26, 4 November 2006 (UTC) User Nutu, ro.wikipedia

Image:Dreiländerhalle 001.jpg[edit]

Hallo, I created that picture today („Bild selbst erstellt“) and probably forgot to realease it under Creative Commons. What can I do? --Konrad Lackerbeck 19:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Changing of Author[edit]

Hello! I am the same user. I have two usernames, Forrest Gump on the French Wikipedia and The American Eagle of LA on the English Wikipedia. Forrest Gump 21:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


Hi, I figured I'd get a message about this picture. It's on English wikipedia and I was about to upload it on Swedish WP (I'm Swedish) but the template on Swedish WP said that pictures with this type of license were better off uploaded at commons, so I did... You tell me where to go from here because I have no more info about this pic since this the info below the pick here is all that was on English WP. /Greverod 20:33, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

About Pink Floyd - Ummagumma[edit]


I don't understand why you erased this picture ... It's from

See you,

It's tagged as fair use, which is not allowed on Commons. See Commons:Licensing#Material_under_the_fair_use_clause_is_not_allowed_on_the_Commons. Cnyborg 15:48, 14 November 2006 (UTC)



About wiztheora:

Yes, the script can be adapted to work on Windows, and it would be great someone adapt it. However I think procedures are very different in Windows. I'm not sure it's possible to install it as a comand line tool. I'm also not sure if it can be installed using a "tar" command.

In terms of development I prefer to concentrate myself on Linux and Mac OS X, because the script can run without modifications, so coding will be much faster. --OsvaldoGago 20:29, 15 November 2006 (UTC)


At first, my language is Croatian. Please look at [1], where I placed my correspondence with Marin Soljačić, or you can establish the truth of my assertion writing to Mr. Soljačić on
Als erstes, meine Schprache ist Kroatisch. Bitte schaue Dir dies an [2], wo ich meine Korrespondenz mit Marin Soljačić plaziert habe und wo Du die Wahrheit meiner Angaben überprüfen kannst, oder Du schreibst direkt an Herrn Soljačić ( :-)) --Roberta F. 13:38, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Es ist doch logisch, dass wir Kroaten untereinender auf Kroatisch kommunizieren! Ich habe keine Lust und auch keine Zeit mehr weiter darüber zu diskutieren und das Bild kann sofort gelöscht werden. --Roberta F. 00:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

About image tagging Image:Avenida Salamanca.png[edit]

Hi, I'm JMadrid (Javitomad at Spanish Wikipedia ) and I created the image "Avenida Salamanca.png" from the original design (which has copyright) and now that is a personal creation made by me an with no copyright at all, so I hope you to not to delete my image. Please, think twice. look at the differences:

JMadrid (Javitomad)

  • PS:I have also a question: Why do you think you know a Female Basketball Spanish team is important and it will have copyright. personaly, I don't think so.


About Avenida_Salamanca.png[edit]

Finally I only wannna know why do you think you know Avenida Team; I only wanna tell you this is not a famous team, it's just a Fem. BAsket team, and that, in Spain isn't important. So, please, next time, don't bother. JMadrid


I have granted bot status. Cary "Bastiqe" Bass demandez 19:09, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

About Image:Marin Soljacic.jpg[edit]

Hi. I saw your correspondence with User:Roberta F. about this image. Since I'm not the one who uploaded the image, would you accept my translation of the mails to English? --Branislav Jovanovic 13:55, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

I translated the mails, you can read the translations at Image_talk:Marin_Soljacic.jpg#English translation. --Branislav Jovanovic 14:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Pir Vilayat Khan[edit]

Hallo, ik zag dat je twijfelt aan het copyright. Ik weet niet precies hoe nu te handelen. Deze foto is vaak terug te vinden op diverse sites op het internet die bedoelt zijn om de persoon in kwestie een gezicht te geven. Ik ben het niet helemaal eens met het feit dat dit een beschermde foto is. Graag je reactie en een mogelijke oplossing.

Ra-men-hotep 14:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Ok.. bedankt voor je hulp. Ik ga wel achter toestemming aan.

Ra-men-hotep 14:55, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Falconara Marittima-Stemma.png[edit]

I have put the link to the authorization in italian wikipedia. From 2004 the author of the images in permit to use the coat of arms under licence GFDL. Now, I hope it's ok. If there are other problems, I hope of being able to resolve them. Sorry for my basic English. --β16 - (talk) 18:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Fermin Muguruza eta Sorkun.jpg[edit]

Hi. I have uploaded the image from flickr[3]. The author is libertinus[4], and the license is "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0" (not 2.5 as appears in the commons page, but I don't know how to change it). Sorry for my basic English. Salud: Juanfran Are you talkin' to me? 18:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Foto Melanie Grande.jpg[edit]

Lieber Bryan, danke für deine Mail. Es tut mir leid, aber ich habe doch meine Berechtigung an diesem Bild angegeben, oder mache ich das falsch? Bei mir sieht das so aus: Template:Atttribution Ich bin Praktikantin mein Loewe Verlag, der diesen Autor Kai Meyer verlegt. Im Zuge dessen erstelle ich momentan die Wikipediaseiten über unsere Autoren. Das Bild darf jeder verwenden, der den Photographen angibt - und der ist ja eindeutig unter dem Bild lesbar. Sowohl auf Commons als auch auf Wikipedia. Was mache ich also falsch? Vielen Dank für deine Hilfe, Caro (--Carohild 09:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC))

Lieber Bryan! Danke für Deine Hilfe, ich glaube, ich habe es jetzt richtig gemacht. Vielleicht kannst Du ja mal schauen, ob das Bild jetzt richtig beschriftet ist. Vielen Dank und liebe Grüße, Caro (--Carohild 07:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC))

Flickr licenses[edit]

This is kind of a general issue, but thought you might be a good person to talk to. Considering flickr licenses are at cc-2.0 right now, wouldn't it make sense to put cc-2.0 licenses as an option in the upload forms? --Chinasaur 17:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikimedia interactions[edit]

Thanks, I usually try to back down before I get too steamed up, but geeze, it took so long to figure out how to categorize the pictures in the first place, then I spend all day sorting them and being really careful about the categories, find some other pictures I couldn't find before because they weren't categorized, categorize them for usability, and bam! I stepped on someone's territory--they weren't even pictures he had uploaded. And I find out when I come back to upload a box of pictures of California's flora, after I've updated my browser so I can do it quickly, totally organized with the categories and everything, and I find out that I can't do it because there might be more than 400 pictures in the category I chose.

It's bery hard not to go ballistic when every thing I try to do gives me a ferocious headache and makes me regret ever coming here. I think that Wikimedia Commons needs to change, to become more user friendly, before I attempt to do something here again. I'm going to upload my pictures to CalFlora instead, and continue selling them to people rather than give them away. I really support the idea of free resources behind Wikimedia Commons, but it's just too hard to use. I'm an artist and a naturalist, not a Wikimedia expert. If I become the last, I won't have any of the first to upload.

I'm unwilling to take the chance that nothing else will happen. Wikimedia has to change first. I just hope they won't drive too many more people away before that happens. KP Botany 22:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:IMG_2616.JPG[edit]

Hi Bryan: this picture is a error plesse delete it. Thenk you new. Regards --Txo (discusión) Mi discusión en castellano 00:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging[edit]

The PD license is on the map itself. I didn't make the image but found it at Electionworld 17:36, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Obrint Pas nel DMR.jpg[edit]

I hereby assert that I am the creator of this contribution and/or it does not violate any third party rights. I agree to publish this text under the GNU Free Documentation License. Please don't submit encyclopedic articles here but in Wikipedia. VityUvieu 19:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)








This user is trying to send a image, mixing up "free use" and "divulgation". I have made a very long explanation to him about it, including instructions related to Commons:ORTS/pt but or this user don't have readed that page or no one have processed the ticket at OTRS-permissions. Lugusto҉ 19:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

2006 VFR image[edit]

Bryan, regarding the image it is PD-self. I responded on my talk page but am adding a note here. I'm not sure why this image was tagged? --Sirimiri 21:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)


OK, I understand. I have asked the photo author's permission (Andrew Drummond himself) per e-mail. If he grants me e-mail permission to use this photo, is that sufficient? What should I do with such a permission? --Smeira 02:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

All right, I'll send him this declaration and ask him if he would like to send it to wikimedia. We'll see then. Thanks for the information, I have a better idea of what can and cannot be done now. --Smeira 00:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Now I have another question, and I'd like advice on that. I have recently received some old postcards, originally sent by the most important Volapükist of the Netherlands, Arie de Jong. These postcards were sent to a Swedish Volapükist in the beginning of the 50's, a couple of years before Arie de Jong's death in 1952. The Swedish Volapükist in question also died some ten years afterwards. His wife donated his Volapük materials, among which also the postcards, to the Interlingua association of Sweden (in Stockholm, I think), who promptly put them for sale on their Interlingua web site. Because these postcards are historical material (they contain some new texts in Volapük that have never been published, and also some informations on their author's life and thoughts), I would like to scan them and place them here. The question is, is that possible, or would I be somehow violating copyright laws? (I note these were not private materials, but personal correspondence that was donated by the original receiver's wife to an institution that sold them, after the death of the receiver in the late 1960's.) --Smeira 16:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 4th.[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery

Volume 2, Issue 49 4 December 2006

About the Signpost

Arbitration Committee elections open The Seigenthaler incident: One year later
Wikimedia celebrates Commons milestone, plans fundraiser Wikipedia wins award in one country, reported blocked in another
News and notes: Steward elections continue, milestones Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ral315 05:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


My username on meta is Bryan, my master IRC nickname is Bryan, and I would like the cloak wikimedia-commons/Bryan. -- Bryan (talk to me) 22:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Old Russian Photo (Image: 5137-1.jpg.)[edit]

--Malplaquet 19:24, 9 December 2006 (UTC)In re: the downloaded image in question: Image: 5137-1.jpg. "Parade Guards of...May 1896"

It,and other like it also recently downloaded, came from a web site called "Russian Empire in Photographs", specifically

As with all the rest, the title of this image is the original site title, not my own. Given the age of these photos, and the fact that nowhere in the site was there copyright claim(s) to any of these photographs, I felt they could, in fact, be transfered to Wikimedia Commons without any violations.


Picture about Toma de Valdivia[edit]

My good friend, the picture about Toma de Valdivia is a picture who I took on september in Naval Museum of Valparaíso. Also the painter of this paint died on 1891, but I don't know change the copyright information Can you help me? Sorry but I don't speak english very good. Thank you for you cooperation. --Valo3 21:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your help...--Valo3 23:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Image Tagging Image:Cobrachen ea-6b-1.jpg[edit]

I changed the permission but not sure how to change it from the drop down. Do I need to delete the no license tag also? Thank you very much.--Cobrachen 15:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Ihave made the changes with copyright tag. Thank you very much.--Cobrachen 15:41, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Flickr reviewing[edit]

Thanks for your warning. Regards. --Dodo 14:16, 11 December 2006 (UTC)



It's great that wiztheora works on Windows.

I'm thinking about continuing the development of the wiztheora. Well not for me. AFAIK it has everything I need for now. Video is still a small part of the commons, maybe that will change. High quality movies are harder to produce. --OsvaldoGago 23:42, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


Hi there, I've a confusion about logo licensing. I uploaded a logo (IUB-image.gif) with GFDL license. Later on it had been tagged. But I did not find any license named logo while uploading logo. In wikipedia there is a license for logo. What can be the correct license for logo in commons? Because there are limited licenses in commons. Reply soon NAHID 13:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 11th.[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery

Volume 2, Issue 50 11 December 2006

About the Signpost

From the editor: New feature
Board of Trustees expanded as three new members are appointed Wikimedia Foundation releases financial audit
Arbitration Committee elections continue, extra seat available Female-only wiki mailing list draws fire
Trolling organization's article deleted WikiWorld comic: "Redshirt"
News and notes: Fundraiser plans, milestones Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ral315 05:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

My RFA: Thanks[edit]

Thank you for your support on my RFA. Now that I have been promoted, I promise to be as hardworking and fair with the admin tools as I have been with the other areas here on Commons. See you around and happy editing. Zzyzx11 15:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)


I found some sort of image from web somewere changed the composition and re-made forms .So can I use it or no?

Thnxx for youre concern,--VanemTao 16:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Images Anselmocisneros[edit]

This pictures come from wikipedia german. All the images come from wikipedia: Japan, Poland, Italy, Portugal ... The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anselmo (talk • contribs) at 21:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Farm in kufr jammal.JPG[edit]

This image already has a {{PD-self}}. It was taken by my personal camera. --Jak 22:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

re:Images from en[edit]

Ok --Biyan-to 05:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)


Hi, thanks for noticing me about the problem. I tried to supply the missing information on the image page, but I don't know if I should just remove the "no source" tag by myself. Does it have to wait until some admin takes care of the situation? Regards, AtilimGunesBaydin 17:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

about tag[edit]

With del tag, the uploader is always aware. This is the first step.--Patricia.fidi 22:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Bryan, this the step requiring when we insert a del tag. The first line in the template ask to aware the uploader, to place after that in deletion request and... I've always aware the uploader or author instead if he have no user page. What you say IS the first line of the del template...--Patricia.fidi 22:56, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
they have to use a correct description template with a link to their user page !--Patricia.fidi 23:15, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Bryan, you know that you were speaking about uploaders who don't have insert their link in description template or a user page (name become red). And this is not for us to search in the historic where is the uploader. A correct description is needed. Before to ask to people who insert deletion tag to search the uploader, you should ask to uploader to insert correctly their name to create their user page. I'm telling you : I will not search in historic the name of the uploader if he doesn't know how to add a description template. I've always aware people when their is the link to their user page in the description template but if you don't want to understand and continue to think my job is not enough well-done : don't come again on my page and flame me. Have a good time.--Patricia.fidi 12:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

About several images tagged[edit]

Hello. I've uploaded the following files to the article called 'Blues' located on the spanish wikipedia (

Stevie.jpg and Escala.png

These files are **exactly** the same files that are located on the english article (, a wikipedia's featured article. The names of the files can be different but the contents are exactly the same.

If i'm honest, the spanish 'Blues' article was my first one on Wikipedia and it was a whole translation of the english one due to the poor quality and quantity of the spanish one. I've tried to copy the copyright information and details but due to being my first uploads i think that i did something wrong because i recall to see some copyright warnings on the wikipedia pages of the source files but i think "it's a featured article, it can't has any kind of copyright problem after all".

Sorry for all, it seems that I haven't started on the right path :).

--DYN DaTa 04:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)



There are different definitions for the nonmetal elements. We don't use in Commons the one with halogens as nonmetals. See this diff, Non metal in the English Wikipedia and Commons talk:WikiProject Chemistry/Categories. If we want to use a different definition, we'll have to create extra category and subcategories for Nonmetals with a non-ambiguous title. --Juiced lemon 15:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Come on, an old version of a wikipedia article (that is wrong, by the way, and happily has been fixed since) is most definitely not a respectable source, especially when it contradicts every printed book that I have been able to check. Itub 16:16, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Added one minute later: by the way, the diff you linked to has the halogens both before and after the diff! Itub 16:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


There are thousands and thousands of images from Flickr on Commons. Do you want to delete all them? And if the images from Flickr are copyviols, why exist a template for images on Flickr? Sorry for my bad English ;) --Eddie619 15:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Why does he violate the copyright laws? --Eddie619 15:52, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Possibly. But it's not sure, no? --Eddie619 16:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks for your answers. I hope that those images are really uploaded by Static. Bye! --Eddie619 16:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

About the Baja Picture[edit]

I took the picture from the English Wikipedia, to use it on the Portuguese Wikipedia. I have a poor english, so I put the description in Portuguese (and, if I recall, I did choose the "Free content from English Wikipedia" as well). To avoid any trouble, I put the original description of the picture, as well as the name of the photographer and a link to the original page on the EngWiki. Please check it too see if I have done it right. Sds Rafael Ruivo Jack O'Neill 17:23, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

  • If you have the spare time, can youcheck my other images? I'm a newbie, maybe I forgot something like source or so...
    Jack O'Neill 17:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 18th.[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery

Volume 2, Issue 51 18 December 2006

About the Signpost

From the editor: Holiday publication
Elections conclude, arbitrators to be chosen Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser opens
WikiWorld comic: "Dr. Seuss" News and notes: Steward elections conclude, milestones
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ral315 21:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Flickr (2)[edit]

On COM:DEL Carl Lindberg says that the versions of the images on are more recent than the images uploaded by Static on Flickr. So it's impossible that Static have taken the images from ObsessedWithWrestling, so it's not copyviol. No? --Eddie619 13:37, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

FlickreviewR bugs[edit]

  1. Image:Cumberland_Pinnacle_Rock.jpg - It tagged it incorrectly, the licenses match.
  2. Template:Flickrreview - It is not conforming to step 3, but it could be.

Judging by the number of of flickr images that I've seen which are obvious copyright violations but tagged consistently on flickr, I think it's still important to have a human sanity check the images. But we can do that later as a separate process. Since I can't expect the bot to catch such things, I won't complain about that... but it really should leave a nice note on flickr thanking the user for their image. It would be ideal to even tell them where it's used, although check-usage is just a tad slow and a tad down. Instead it could at least check enwiki and give them the url of an article where it is used there, or the commons url if it's not use on enwiki. Are you using pywikipedia bot? If so I'd be glad to help you impliment this stuff. --Gmaxwell 15:39, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Your request[edit]


I have answered to your request in Commons talk:WikiProject Chemistry/Categories. I don't want to build on sand. --Juiced lemon 23:29, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

tagging the OLPC-image[edit]

Hello Bryan, your tag of a possible copyright infringement is wrong. This picture is from the olpc-homepage. The complete homepage is copyrighted under the CreativeCommons ShareAlike 2.5. licence. This picture is made by OLPC. The owner of the Laptop-Design is OLPC too. This picture is not licenced under a different licence. Consequently this picture is licensed, as I said, under the CreativeCommons ShareAlike 2.5. licence. So, there is no infringement.

Therefore I will remove your tag. If you have additional objections please contact me.

p.s: the source of this picture is the OLPC-Homepage. Therefore it isn't a derivative work, it is a copy of the original image.

The preceding unsigned comment was added by Betbuster (talk • contribs) at 16:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


Image:Ac.vomrath.jpg this image come from en.wikipedia, hw can you delete it ? Image:Adolf Eichmann.jpg this one too . Its currently name is Adod Eichmann so i renamed correctly.It come frm en.Wikipedia. In any cases, i put the link to the pages where these images are . --Cloclob 12:45, 24 December 2006 (UTC)