User talk:Bulwersator/archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bulwersator!

File:NGC 5363.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:19, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Rely_Tampons.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rely_Tampons.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:29, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Southern_toc_logo.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Southern_toc_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 16:31, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Emc seal.gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Emc seal.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Emc seal.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:54, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


File:Satellite image of the Ayeyarwady delta.jpg[edit]

Thanks for letting me know, I have searched the original source for the image: http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view.php?id=52762. There is a problem because the image is obtained by the SeaWiFS sensor and according to the terms of use: All SeaWiFS, OrbView and IKONOS imagery are controlled by the GeoEye group (http://www.geoeye.com), and permission for use must be requested of them directly. The file should be deleted.Cameta (talk) 20:04, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Dates on files transferred from Wikipedia[edit]

Would you mind using internationalised dates (using {{ISOdate}}) for images transferred from Wikipedia, like File:Tata Consultancy Services Vadapalani 2.JPG (which I've added this to), rather than Polish? —innotata 21:52, 23 December 2011 (UTC)


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Bulwersator. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Undeletion requests[edit]

Thank you for taking my suggestions for filing the undeletion requests for the various coat of arms for Germany. I made a sub-section for you at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Otto_Hupp_Undeletion_Requests so make your request as normal, but use a third level header (===) instead of a two level header (==). Thanks again. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 19:50, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

What is there now will work very good. I am going to ask for help from other admins to look at the requests. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 20:00, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 17:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

You're now a filemover[edit]

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

Commons File mover.svg

Hi Bulwersator/archive, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, like InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

--Trijnstel (talk) 18:54, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Czy twój jest plik, czy zdjęcie[edit]

I jedno i drugie. Ja osobiście zrobiłem zdjęcie i ja je obrobiłem cyfrowo. Ale temat już chyba upadł, chodziło o rodzaj licencji, że nie dzieło, ale dokument.Ziuk1867 (talk) 11:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

HotCat and auto-save[edit]

If you want a HotCat that always auto-saves, you don't need to copy the whole gadget. Instead, you could just enable the gadget and replace your copy in User:Bulwersator/common.js by the code shown at Help:Gadget-HotCat#Intercepting the page edit HotCat will make. That gives you the best of both worlds: you'll automatically have any fixes that are made to the gadget, and it'll always auto-save for you. Lupo 20:49, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Village_pump#Hotcat_and_Category:Media_needing_category_review[edit]

Hi, are you using HotCat in multi-cat-mode or in singe-cat-mode? -- RE rillke questions? 19:19, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Not important.
User:Rillke/checkCat.js for your special needs.
  1. Adds a cats are ok - link to the category-section
  2. Removes the "check categories template" from the file-page when categorizing with HotCat.
-- RE rillke questions? 20:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

For commenting on one my my IFD. Please see the larger context here. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks very much for the informations! I know HotCat, good idea, i didn't think to use it in commons too ;-). For the licence, now i uploaded a pic but i have problem with the license, I could edit later beacuse with the tag "Free screenshot|template=GPL" I had this message: This does not seem to be valid wikitext, or does not contain a license. The preview is ok, but i cannot save it.. --Kirk39 (talk) 01:04, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Revert[edit]

Oh, what do you mean by [this]? The image is changed so much than I cannot claim myself its author. I made the photo about anti-governmental activity. As soon as it was made a chauvinist anti-people image, I cannot stay its author.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 00:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

I am not the author. In my image there was a political slogan about government. Now they make this image a chauvinist one with an anti-Semitic slogan, so I cannot stay its author. The sense of my photo was different. As soon as the sense of photo is completely changed, this is a derivative.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 08:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Deprecated License[edit]

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Van Jacobson2.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 16:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Avelino Cadilla[edit]

Hello Bulwersator, I saw you told me there was a deletion request for one of the files I have uploaded (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Avelino Cadilla n. 1153 - 1941.jpg); I have answered there. As I have written in the deletion request, I think the file should not be deleted, since it is actually a photograph and not a drawing. I really hope that the file will not be deleted, since I used the correct license. :-) --Triple 8 (msg) 11:39, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, have a nice day! :-) --Triple 8 (msg) 15:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Logo czegośtam[edit]

[1] Masur (talk) 19:48, 7 March 2012 (UTC)


File rename[edit]

Hi Bulwersator,

I noticed that you renamed File:Maria Wittekówna.jpg. I was wondering which reason from Commons:File_renaming#What_files_should_be_renamed.3F this is based on. Would you clarify? Any file renames at Commons should be in line with this guideline. In case of doubt, editing the file description is preferable. --  Docu  at 12:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)


<moved>

"Maria Wittekowna" and "Maria Wittekówna" looks similar, but there are completely different names (ó is the same sound as u and completely different than o), so it is a "5. correct obvious errors in file names". It may be a bit more complicated as ó is sometimes unavailable, in situations like this ó is usually replaced with o. Bulwersator (talk) 23:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

<moved>
You renamed it from
File:Maria Wittekówna.jpg
to
File:Maria Wittekówna - grób.jpg
It seems it was already spelled correctly. Please don't rename without a valid reason. --  Docu  at 07:09, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

CheckCategories auto-removal script now included in HotCat[edit]

Hello Bulwersator, thanks for testing User:Rillke/checkCat.js. This script is now available by default with HotCat. Please remove this line from your User:Bulwersator/common.js. When now categorizing with HotCat and a {{check categories}} is found, script will prompt what to do. To restore the old behavior without prompting, simply click on Don't ask again and then on Remove {{check categories}} when editing using HotCat without prompting, wait until the yellow box disappears and confirm. That's all.

Kind regards RE rillke questions? 12:30, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Little Girl + glasses.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Little Girl + glasses.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sarah (talk) 15:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Template:PD-Afghanistan[edit]

Please do not remove code without prior discussion. You just removed all categorization effect from all images which is a significant collateral damage.

All images tagged with PD-Afghanistan needs to undergo a review as we realized recently that Afghanistan has a copyright law. Images not old enough per Afghanistan are the only ones that "fail". These images will undergo a second review and will not be speedy deleted unless it is clear they aren't salvageable.

Documentation is clear on the template itself.

-- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 02:51, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Dinosaurs on pl.wiki[edit]

Fastily never edited pl.wiki; he is not editing much at all these days, and mass-reverts by a newcomer never look good to the regular editors. Thus if I were you, I would just go and revert CommonsDelinker as soon as possible, not waiting for help (or ask for help on pl.wiki, not here). Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 05:25, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

  • It is trivial to create page "This user is an administrator on Wikimedia Commons. (verify)" and revert bot with edit summary "restoring undeleted images" Bulwersator (talk) 11:13, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

File:RocktheUniverse2010Sign.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:RocktheUniverse2010Sign.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 05:47, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Deprecated License[edit]

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Słupsk railway station.JPG, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 22:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Sbllogo.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sbllogo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:31, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Surrey Arms (pre 1965)[edit]

I wondered if you felt up to creating a version of the Arms of the County of Surrey in England before 1965.

"Per pale Azure and Sable a Fess per pale Ermine and Or in chief a representation of the Crown of King Edgar proper and a Sprig of Oak fructed Argent."

An image can be found here [2] Aetheling1125 (talk) 09:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Highflyingplanec.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Highflyingplanec.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Highflyingplanec.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:22, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

DR of logos[edit]

Hello,

Your nominations of every logos without any research about ToO is not helpful. Admins have enough without extra useless DRs. Thanks, Yann (talk) 03:21, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Thunderbird logo2.jpg[edit]

Are you really certain that your nomination at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thunderbird logo2.jpg is correct? According to Category:Mozilla Firefox logos, old Firefox logos are unfree whereas new Firefox logos are free (as {{MTL}}{{Trademarked}}). The same does, I believe, also apply to Thunderbird logos (new logos being free and old logos being unfree), and I don't see any discussion about Thunderbird version numbers in the deletion request. It is a bit confusing, and I've made mistakes myself by nominating wrong versions of the Firefox logo for deletion. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:35, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Gay Pride Parade Long Beach California.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gay Pride Parade Long Beach California.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 14:43, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lovell-ja.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lovell-ja.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:41, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Ghana COA.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ghana COA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 20:07, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Deletion requests[edit]

Hi, Bulwersator. I recommend you to request deletion with normal DR. Because most of them were also published in Cumhuriyet and other newspapers after 1924. I think the uploader might scanned re-printed images. Anyway it's beneficial for every user to determine the date of first publication. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 11:39, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

File:BC Electric Building plaque.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BC Electric Building plaque.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Armenia chess olympiad.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Armenia chess olympiad.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:11, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Harkness House, 1908.jpg[edit]

FYI: I reverted your {{subst:npd}} here. Please use a standard deletion request instead of speedy deletion if you feel that the previous deletion request was wrong. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:59, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Category:SEPTA_Railroad_stations[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:SEPTA_Railroad_stations has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Mackensen (talk) 00:42, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 02:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Apollo12 cf.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Apollo12 cf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:39, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Caroline Moore.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Caroline Moore.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Andrew Gray (talk) 10:52, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:55, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year