User talk:Christer T Johansson

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:C T Johansson)
Jump to: navigation, search

Arkiv: → 2012 → 2014 → 2015 → 2016


Buddleja incana[edit]

I have deleted the photo of the flower you have identified as Buddleja incana, as it does not resemble the species at all. Please see this link for a photo of the inflorescence, supplied by Eliane Meyer Norman, author of Buddlejaceae, Flora Neotropica: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-HK5EMrwvgk4/TxKK0gHsm7I/AAAAAAAAAE4/eTM9RfO5-r8/s1600/Buddleja_incana.JPG Regards, harvey (talk) 21:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

So renaming it is not an option any more? 83.233.110.101 05:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)


really nice work on the Jardín Botánico de Quito[edit]

just a bunch of fantastic pictures, great job


really nice pictures, great effort, nice camera, thanks for the excellent work for Quito

have a nice day



David Adam Kess (talk) 19th of March, around noon time 2016


one last thing, i made this link and tagged a few of your pictures if it is o.k.

and to better organize Flowers_of_Ecuador

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Flowers_of_Ecuador

un buen dia

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Eriosyce villosa-IMG 1063.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eriosyce villosa-IMG 1063.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Turbinicarpus beguinii-IMG 1068.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turbinicarpus beguinii-IMG 1068.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Eriosyce napina ssp. riparia JA40-IMG 1066.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eriosyce napina ssp. riparia JA40-IMG 1066.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 May 2016 (UTC)