User talk:Cap1000

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Cap1000!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:05, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vestnesis.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vestnesis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ankry (talk) 05:35, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Richard Jary.JPG[edit]


Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Richard Jary.JPG to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:19, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simple newspaper.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Simple newspaper.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Storkk (talk) 13:30, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rauank.JPG[edit]

Hello! This photo was taken by me in October, 2014 during the press conference in Astana, Kazakhstan. When Rauan appointed as a deputy governor of Kyzylorda region I gave permission to the Press Secretary of Kyzylorda Region to use this photo in their press releases. That's why this photo appeared in websites you provided. You can write them about the copyright holder of that photo in order to make sure.--Nurbek Matzhani (talk) 17:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

== File:Aborigen.jpg и другие яблони == на сайте http://garden-ufa.ru/belfler_bash.htm и фото в Википедии-Автор собственной работе он же Брай-Виталий Васильевич Брыкин посмотрите в самом низу страницы написано-"яблоневый сад в Башкирии" Ufa2011-2015 © Брыкин в. Ф. Просьба обратить внимание на то, что в указанных вами страницах http://garden-ufa.ru/belfler_bash.htm слева внизу указан автор фотографий Виталий Брыкин. Он же (Брай-Виталий) и разместил их на Викискладе, так как является их автором - это его собственные работы. Это касается всех номинированных вами фотографий яблонь. --Qweasdqwe. Других доказательств авторства не требуется. (<промежуток класс="подпись-соединиться">⧼на Talkpagelinktext⧽ с) 10:38, 11 марта 2015 года (по Гринвичу) * Позвольте, что значит не требуется? На основании каких правил Вы так решили? Если я создам себе ник, например, VHinz, это еще не означает, что я могу заливать в вики все фотографии этого [фотографа].<бр /> Согласно ПРАВИЛАМ википедии, если работы публиковались ранее, автору (правообладателю) необходимо оформить разрешение на использование его работ через системы otrs. Как это сделать, приглашаю Вас почитать тут: [[1]]. <бр /> Цитата: "Вы - автор (или компания-правообладатель). Работа публиковалась ранее?<бр /> Да: Вышлите шаблонное разрешение с электронного адреса, связанного с вашим именем (то есть с адреса, опубликованного, например, на странице с контактной информацией; если ваше имя не может быть ассоциировано с данным адресом, вопрос можно будет обсудить отдельно)."... и т.д.<бр /> Поскольку у системы otrs разрешения нет, боюсь что все номинированные яблони удалят через некоторое время. Пожалуйста, придерживайтесь правил проекта. Желаю Вам удачных загрузок на викисклад. <бр />С наилучшими пожеланиями, Cap1000 (<промежуток класс="подпись-соединиться">⧼на Talkpagelinktext⧽ с) 11:30, 11 марта 2015 года (по Гринвичу) * Непонятно, к чему такая спешка по номинированию яблочных фотографий. Вы правильно пишете о своих подозрениях. Но, судя по множеству ошибок при загрузке, ясно, что предполагаемых вами целей автор вовсе не преследовал. Видно, что у него нет опыта по размещению фотографий и ваша задача не только номинировать фото, но и подсказать номинируемому (а не мне), что надо сделать. Более того, если Вы так опасаетесь, что кто-то создал себе ник Брай-Виталий и загружает его фото, то легко убедиться в обратном - в сайте есть адрес почты В. Брыкина. Достаточно написать ему и получить от него же с этого адреса разъяснение. Вами и это не было сделано. Думаю, что автор не сможет сделать все правильно, как вы рекомендуете, поскольку текст по ссылке написан на английском языке, а вам - с наилучшими пожеланиями правильно оформлять ссылки в своем тексте. Извините за недостаточную учтивость. --Qweasdqwe (<промежуток класс="подпись-соединиться">⧼на Talkpagelinktext⧽ с) 17:40, 11 марта 2015 года (по Гринвичу) ** Еще раз здравствуйте, Qweasdqwe. Я действительно не писал, и не собираюсь писать на электронную почту автора. Попросту потому, что процедура лицензирования подобных изображений в вики иная. Вики читают миллионы пользователи со всего мира. Любой из этих пользователей волен взять хранящееся тут изображение, и использовать его в своих целях. В том числе и коммерческих. Лицензия под которой изображение публикуется тут, это позволяет. Так вот, каждый из этих миллионов потенциальных пользователей не должен писать на электронную почту лично загрузившему изображение для каких - либо уточнений. Вся необходимая информация должна быть опубликована прямо тут. Для всех. Не только для меня, не только для Вас. А для всего сообщества. Именно по этой причине автору (правообладателю) необходимо писать в системы otrs самостоятельно. Без посредников. <бр /><бр /> Что касается английского языка, пожалуйста, обратите внимание, что перейдя по ссылке системы otrs, слева есть волшебные кнопки для переключения языка. И русский язык там имеется. Более того, в системе otrs есть русскоговорящие коллеги, поэтому и писать им можно на русском языке, в этом нет каких-либо проблем. Доброго Вам дня. Cap1000 (<промежуток класс="подпись-соединиться">⧼на Talkpagelinktext⧽ с) 11:09, 12 марта 2015 года (по Гринвичу) *** Каждый пользователь действительно не должен выяснять наличие лицензий на фотографии, но добровестный и неравнодушный номинатор обязан это сделать, а не кичиться нежеланием в этом разбираться. Умиляет также нежелание общаться конкретно с В. Брыкиным на его страницах Википедии и на Викискладе. При желании это можно сделать здесь https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Bash_izumrud.jpg. С пожеланием уважительного отношения к трудам коллег. --Qweasdqwe (<промежуток класс="подпись-соединиться">⧼на Talkpagelinktext⧽ с) 18:39, 12 марта 2015 года(по Гринвичу)**** Здравствуйте! Действительно я пока не могу разобраться, как подтвердить свое авторство. Попробую. Я садовод-опытник из Уфы Виталий Брыкин в Википедии зарегистрирован, как Виталий Брай(Кин). Я автор фотографий размещенных статьях: Анис полосатый, Башкирский красавец, Орлик, Абориген, Раннее алое, Бельфлер башкирский, Пепин башкирский. А так же в статьях которые я написал сам - Сеянец Титовки, Шаропай, Персиянка. Не думал, что надо как-то доказывать свое авторство. Достаточно посмотреть мой сайт: http://garden-ufa.ru/index.htm В этой связи, когда Вы пишете, что фотография размещенная статье Башкирский изумруд взята с сайта http://supersadovod.ru/sorta/sorta-yabloni/sort-yabloni-bashkirskiy-izumrud/ это выглядит довольно странно. Так как оригинал фотографии размещенной в Википедии по объему и качеству намного превышает украденную у меня фотографию на сайте Суперсадовод(на который Вы ссылаетесь) Я довольно часто сталкиваюсь с тем, что мои фотографии воруют и ставят на разных сайтах. В России несколько лет назад вышло даже пара книг, где в качестве иллюстраций используются ворованные у меня фотографии, которые я размещал на форумах и на Яндекс.фотки https://fotki.yandex.ru/users/bogdanovka2 . Так же ставятся на разных сайтах мои статьи из журнала "Приусадебное хозяйство" и газет. Сначала я пытался как-то реагировать на это. Потом плюнул, так как это начинает занимать все больше и больше времени. Решил подключится к работе Википедии, потому, что увидел, что в описании сортов нет фотографий. Кроме того, статьи изобилуют неточностями. И мне пришлось их чуть подправить. Если подскажите, как пошагово, доказать, что фото принадлежат мне буду признателен. С уважением Виталий Брыкин * Виталий, добрый вечер! На самом деле все очень просто. Смотрите. На Вашем сайте у Вас указан адрес электронной почты bogdanovka2@yandex.ru. Вот с этого адреса Вам надо написать письмо в системе otrs. Их адрес разрешений-ру@ wikimedia.org абсолютно шаблонное Письмо. Его текст (сразу скопируйте отсюда)---><бр /><бр /><бр /> Здравствуйте! Настоящим я заявляю, что являюсь автором и единственным обладателем исключительных авторских прав на произведения: http://garden-ufa.ru/sharop.htm http://garden-ufa.ru/aborigen.htm http://garden-ufa.ru/sharop.htm http://garden-ufa.ru/belfler_bash.htm http://garden-ufa.ru/anaspol.htm http://garden-ufa.ru/orlik.htm http://garden-ufa.ru/raneealoe.htm http://garden-ufa.ru/pepin_bash.htm http://garden-ufa.ru/persijanka.htm http://garden-ufa.ru/bash.htm http://www.garden-ufa.ru/sejnectitovki.htm Я согласен опубликовать эти произведения на условиях свободной лицензии лицензии свободной документации GNU версии 1.2 (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html) или любой более новой, опубликованной Фондом свободного программного обеспечения (Фонда свободного программного обеспечения) с дополнительными условиями, принятыми в Википедии, то есть без неизменяемых секций, без текста первой обложки и без текста последней обложки, а также свободной лицензии Creative сommons атрибуции править] текущие 4.0 международных (нттр://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Выбор из этих двух лицензий остается за лицензиатом. Я понимаю, что тем самым даю право любому лицу распространять, изменять и использовать произведение в любых законных целях (в том числе связанных с извлечением коммерческой выгоды) при условии соблюдения указанных лицензий. Я уведомлен, что я сохраняю исключительные авторские права на это произведение вне условий указанных лицензий и что я всегда сохраняю право на упоминание меня как автора в соответствии с выбранными лицензиями. Я согласен с тем, что информация о моем авторстве будет сохранена в истории правок статей (если речь идет о текстовой информации) либо на сопроводительных веб-страницах (если речь идет об изображениях и иных медиафайлах). Модификации, которые сделают другие люди, не будут приписаны мне. Данное разрешение затрагивает только мои исключительные авторские права, и я оставляю за собой право предпринимать действия против использования моей работы с нарушением закона, в частности: для клеветы, унижения чести и достоинства, нарушения правил использования торговых марок, нарушения права на охрану изображения гражданина и т. д. Я понимаю, что я не могу отозвать данное разрешение, и что моя работа может размещаться в проектах Фонда Викимедиа в течение неограниченного времени либо быть удаленной оттуда. 12.03.2015 Виталий Брыкин. <бр /><бр /><бр /> Собственно это все, что надо сделать =) К ссылкам, которые я уже написал, можете добавить другие, если планируете добавлять фотографии. Дальше просто подождите ответа от них. Что происходит дальше, можете пока посмотреть примеры тут : [[2]] Как ответ получите, если будет что - либо непонятно, напишите мне тут. Я помогу. Cap1000 (<промежуток класс="подпись-соединиться">⧼на Talkpagelinktext⧽ с) 19:41, 12 марта 2015 года (по Гринвичу) ** Здравствуйте. Я хотел посоветоваться. Пока уважаемый коллега - автор фотографий занимается линзированием, его фотографии могут быть удалены, что уже и происходит. Может быть для начала надо номинатору в номинации написать, что его выводы ошибочны по номинированию, а поэтому ошибочна и сама номинация. Ведь ссылка на фотографии Виталия Брыкина в его сайте не означает, что он не является автором фотографий, как об этом пишет номинатор. Я первый раз сталкиваюсь с таким отсутствием логики при номинировании. На ошибочный вывод не обращают внимание удаляющие фотографий, а при этом теряет смысл трудов автора фотографий по их лицензированию. С уважением. И еще вопрос - получается, что любой может разместить фотографии Виталия на своем сайте на странице указав свою почту. Затем послать запрос по вашему совету и там признают фотографию Виталия как авторство другого человека. Так ли это? --Qweasdqwe (<промежуток класс="подпись-соединиться">⧼на Talkpagelinktext⧽ с) 06:18, 15 марта 2015 года (по Гринвичу)


Здравствуйте, уважаемые коллеги! Я действительно хотел внести свой вклад в Википедию, разместив в ней около 15 своих фотографий. Должен заметить, что фотографии в массе своей более высокого расширения, чем представленные на моем сайте http://garden-ufa.ru Т.е. они являются оригиналами. В настоящее время большинство загруженный мной фотографий удалены. Мне жаль потраченного времени. Успехов! Виталий Брыкин.

File:Samsung Omnia W Model no.GT-I8350.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Samsung Omnia W Model no.GT-I8350.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 09:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Antalovecka Poliana-1.jpg[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Antalovecka Poliana-1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A.Savin 21:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, lNeverCry 22:09, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Чудо волков.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Чудо волков.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Blacklake (talk) 08:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:FOUR DEVILS ROBERT DINESEN, ALFRED LIND (DK, 1911).png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:FOUR DEVILS ROBERT DINESEN, ALFRED LIND (DK, 1911).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Blacklake (talk) 08:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Четверо мужчин.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Четверо мужчин.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Blacklake (talk) 08:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black Coffee 1931.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Black Coffee 1931.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Blacklake (talk) 08:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Через замочную скважину.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Через замочную скважину.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Blacklake (talk) 08:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plainsman.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Plainsman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Blacklake (talk) 08:27, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Westerner.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Westerner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Blacklake (talk) 08:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated[edit]

Hello Cap1000, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:First choice.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:First choice.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ytoyoda (talk) 05:25, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:W starym kinie Co mój mąż robi w nocy 1934.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:W starym kinie Co mój mąż robi w nocy 1934.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.251.133.235 21:06, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 18:11, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:CDG T1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:CDG T1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wdwd (talk) 14:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Login2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Login2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ubcule (talk) 20:21, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Майя Санду.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Майя Санду.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Regards, kyykaarme (talk) 18:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statues in RKV.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Statues in RKV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 18:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Mrcl lxmna (talk) 03:04, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]