User talk:CarlosVdeHabsburgo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:45, 29 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Zarzuela.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 05:40, 29 October 2012 (UTC)


File:OBJ2834128 1--478x473.JPG[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 01:20, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


File:LogoDiarioSevilla.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:39, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


File:Carriazo.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 02:00, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


File:Mapa de la Española.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:38, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Anacaona.png[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


Dialog-warning.svg
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Anacaona.png, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Morning (talk) 15:12, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Exposición Iberoamericana Alfonso XIII.JPG[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Exposición Iberoamericana Alfonso XIII.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Exposición Iberoamericana Alfonso XIII.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 21:57, 18 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Madison square garden giralda.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Madison square garden giralda.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Madison square garden giralda.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 22:04, 18 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Exposición Iberoamericana de Sevilla (1929) poster.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Exposición Iberoamericana de Sevilla (1929) poster.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Exposición Iberoamericana de Sevilla (1929) poster.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 22:05, 18 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Regres1.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Regres1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 22:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Exposición Iberoamericana de Sevilla (1929) poster.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Exposición Iberoamericana de Sevilla (1929) poster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 07:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Revista de Historia Clío.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Revista de Historia Clío.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Rosenzweig τ 14:55, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Revista El Jueves.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Revista El Jueves.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Rosenzweig τ 14:55, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Mapa de La Española realizado por Colón.jpg[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mapa de La Española realizado por Colón.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 19:49, 19 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Alejandro Blanco.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Alejandro Blanco.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 05:27, 8 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Jose Antonio Viera.jpg[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


Dialog-warning.svg
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Jose Antonio Viera.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 08:01, 9 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Debate del estado de la ciudad en el Ayuntamiento de Sevilla.jpg[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


Dialog-warning.svg
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Debate del estado de la ciudad en el Ayuntamiento de Sevilla.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Lymantria (talk) 05:27, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Capitán Alatriste.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Capitán Alatriste.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

80.28.217.151 09:39, 25 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Monumento a Juan Sebastián Elcano.jpg[edit]

Could you please add the license again? It was lost due to a server issue. --McZusatz (talk) 14:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Monumento a Juan Sebastián Elcano.jpg[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Monumento a Juan Sebastián Elcano.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

McZusatz (talk) 14:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 7 February 2014. Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

File:Carroza Isla Mágica.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Carroza Isla Mágica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 13:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pregunta[edit]

¿Por qué no subes la imagen de Isabel II de niña en otro archivo distinto? La imagen que estaba antes era una fotografía sacada en el museo romántico (en teoría además más libre de derechos que la que has subido porque si en España se quiere reutilizar fuera de Commons la foto que has subido se aplicaría la ley de 25 años después de realizarse la foto, cuestión que con la fotografía que había antes no existía porque los derechos los he cedido yo; lee Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs para informarte). No del inventorio del museo del prado.--Asqueladd (talk) 17:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No me vengas con gilipolleces. La foto con sus brillos y dificultades y su falta de valor artístico vale perfectamente para ilustrar a Isabel II de niña hasta que se suba otra mejor. Y me parece bien, pero el re-use de commons de imágenes en dominio público es una cosa seria. Separa las fotografías que suban los autores de las que te encuentres por internet que no se sabe bien si vas a poder usarla fuera de commons por mucha falta de casuística problemática al respecto con el Museo del Prado (que por cierto el re-uso fuera de commons podría no tener esas características de "proyectos no culturales y sin ánimo de lucro"). He visto que has subido la fotografía (que deberías licenciar con ""PD-art"")y que la has sustituido en el artículo. Me parece perfecto y no tengo más que decir. Suerte a ti también con tus ediciones.--Asqueladd (talk) 19:47, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Albertojuanse (talk) 09:15, 21 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo de Repsol.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Logo de Repsol.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:19, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ascensión de Jesucristo.jpg[edit]

When you nominate a file to rename, you should correct mistakes in description, too. I would not do this: I don't speak Spanish. Change the description, please. Wieralee (talk) 16:32, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Muchas gracias[edit]

Muchas gracias por las fotos de Bormujos y de Castilleja del Campo. Son las primeras en ambos casos. B25es (talk) 10:44, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Algunas cosas de Sevilla[edit]

Venía a pedirle un favor especial, aunque antes de nada le felicito por sus estupendas contribuciones.

  • He visto que ha subido muchísimas fotos del Tesoro de la catedral de Sevilla, que por cierto son extraordinarias. ¿Tiene por casualidad o puede hacerlas fotos del sagrario del altar mayor, que fue realizado por el orfebre Francisco de Alfaro en el siglo XVI, y del frontal de plata del altar mayor, que es obra del siglo XVIII?.
  • Y ahora un ultimo favor. ¿Tiene por casualidad fotos de las estatuas romanas que hay en la Casa de Pilatos? Sobre todo estoy interesado en las cuatro grandes estatuas femeninas que hay en las cuatro esquinas del patio principal, de las que dos son de la diosa Atenea, y otra es de no sé qué emperatriz romana.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 14:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gracias por su amabilidad. La verdad es que en asuntos de Sevilla capital usted es uno de los reyes. Yo soy de Córdoba y si alguna vez necesita algo no dude en pedírmelo.

Los asuntos de orfebrería están pésimamente en Wikipedia, y no hay ni siquiera artículos de las custodias procesionales de Toledo o Sevilla, que son de las mejores del país. Hay muchos editores que se dedican a temas de arte (pintura, escultura, arquitectura etc.) pero hasta ahora por desgracia no hay ningún especialista por así decir en temas de orfebrería. Y por cierto, una vez más le felicito por las soberbias fotos del tesoro catedralicio sevillano. Tanto es así que ahora, en temas de orfebrería, sólo hacen falta subir fotos de algunas obras en concreto, como esas que le he mencionado:

  • El frontal del altar mayor.
  • El sagrario del altar mayor de Francisco de Alfaro.
  • La llamada Custodia chica, que es en la que procesionan la imagen de la Santa Espina en el Corpus Christi)

Esta tarde estuve categorizando un poco las fotos de la Casa de Pilatos, y de hecho creé dentro de ella una categoría para las esculturas romanas, porque aparte de las cuatro estatuas femeninas del patio hay docenas de bustos romanos y otras esculturas colocadas sobre todo en el patio principal.

Le voy a contar una anécdota graciosísima. Sevila (que al fin y al cabo no hay más que una), fue la única ciudad en España que tuvo una custodia procesional de oro puro de más de cien kilos de peso. Fue construida a finales del siglo XVIII en estilo neoclásico, y era la única del país, como ya le digo, labrada enteramente en oro puro. Sin embargo, el cabildo catedralicio sevillano decidió fundirla para responder a la llamada de petición de fondos que el rey Carlos IV hizo para luchar contra los franceses. No recuerdo en qué año la fundieron pero debió ser en 1794.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 18:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Acabo de ver los artículos de los dos monasteries. Mi más sincera enhorabuena. Intentaré encontrar en Internet alguna imagen o grabado en blanco y negro de ellos. Desde luego, los franceses hicieron mucho daño en todas partes, pero en Sevilla se lucieron.--Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 19:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hagamos una catedral que nos tengan por locos[edit]

Encantado de saludarle. Sólo quería comentarle que estoy subiendo a Commons todas las fotos que puedo de la catedral de Sevilla, aunque por desgracia el 99% son de baja resolución, y aunque para los artículos de Wikipedia sirven perfectamente, no estaría de más subir versiones de mayor resolución si se pudiera.

A donde voy a parar es que si ve alguna imagen subida por mi que usted tenga con una resolución mayor, suba una nueva versión sin contemplaciones. La mayoría de las fotos que estoy subiendo son preciosas, pero como le digo no son por desgracia de 4 ó cinco megas de tamaño, sino de 260 pixeles, por ejemplo.

La mayoría de las pinturas, gracias a Dios, del Museo de Bellas Artes de Sevilla, o por lo menos las mejores, ya están en Commons, aunque por desgracia no se puede decir lo mismo de las de la catedral, que es la otra gran pinacoteca de la ciudad. Hay una página llamada CUBIERTAS DE LA CATEDRAL en la que han puesto algunos de los cuadros de la catedral, pero los muy capullos, con perdón, las han puesto muy oscuras y son casi inaprovechables a menos que se retoquen. Ya sé que no se deben hacer preguntas personales pero, ¿Es usted de Sevilla? Lo digo porque sus contribuciones casi siempre están relacionadas con esa ciudad. Yo soy cordobés, pero estoy libre del prejuicio de algunos cordobeses que no pueden ver a los sevillanos ni en pintura, aunque en el fondo es pura envidia, porque si los cordobeses tienen una cosa, los sevillanos la tienen cinco veces más grande. Quedo a su disposición.--Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 18:46, 21 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gracias. Dios quiera que en un par de semanas o tres termine con lo de la cathedral de Sevilla, que tiene tela marinera. E insisto en lo dicho. Si en algún momento, cuando sea, dispone usted de una versión mejor o de mayor resolución de cualquier imagen que yo haya subido, suba una nueva version de la misma, porque así se ahorran archivos innecesarios.--Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 21:24, 21 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ayuntamiento de Sevilla[edit]

Quería pedirle un favor. He estado arreglando un poco las categorías del interior del [Category:Ayuntamiento de Sevilla]], pero aún hay que categorizar correctamente todas las del exterior (las de la fachada principal y las de la fachada de la Plaza de San Francisco). Y acudo a usted porque como es el autor de la mayoría de las imagines, que por cierto son excelentes, pues le será más fácil que a mi, porque hay muchisimas fotos de esculturas o relieves en la fachada que no sé de qué lado son. Un saludo y a su disposición. Mi más sincera enhorabuena por sus magníficas contribuciones y por todas las fotos que ha subido.--Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 16:31, 26 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Muchas gracias[edit]

Santico municipios en castellano.png

B25es (talk) 16:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Museo Naval de Sevilla[edit]

Como es usted un experto en asuntos sevillanos, quería consultarle una cosa. El Museo Naval de Sevilla ha cambiado de nombre, y parece que en la actualidad se llama Museo Marítimo Torre del Oro, y de hecho así lo llaman en los ficheros de autoridades de la Biblioteca Nacional de España y de la Biblioteca del Congreso.

Si tiene información fidedigna al respecto, me gustaría que trasladara en Wikipedia el artículo al nombre que tenga en la actualidad.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 16:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gracias por su consejo. Deje su opinión al respecto si es tan amable en la página de discusión como usted mismo ha propuesto.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 10:30, 21 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

San Francisco de Sevilla[edit]

Quería pedirle un favor. Aunque ya no exista como tal, he creado una categoría en Commons para el convento de San Francisco de Sevilla, pero el problema es que lo he tenido que meter en Category:Buildings in Seville porque no he podido encontrar ninguna categoría destinada a los edificios o monumentos desaparecidos de Sevilla, y a lo mejor es que no hay ninguna, como sí las hay en otras ciudades. Écheme una mano si puede.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 13:07, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hola. Para crear una categoría primero es preciso saber si es necesario hacerlo. En Commons andamos sobrados de categorías. Crear una categoría para un edificio medieval desaparecido no se si hace falta. ¿Qué cantidad de personas van a ir por Commons buscándola?. Eso es bueno tenerlo en cuenta. Además lo de los edificios desaparecidos es una categoría que, según he consultado, es habitual en Wikipedia (como este caso de París), pero no en Wikimedia Commons. Un saludo Tiberioclaudio99.CarlosVdeHabsburgo (talk) 13:50, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Lamento tener que discrepar con usted, pero resulta que esa categoría sí es bastante necesaria, y además utilísima para las grandes ciudades. Y de hecho acabo de descubrir que ya existe una para Sevilla que antes no supe encontrar, y también para la mayoría de las capitales andaluzas.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 13:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: Categoría de edificios de pueblos[edit]

Hola. Estoy de acuerdo en la base de tu planteamiento pero creo que en este ejemplo concreto parte de un concepto equivocado. En Andalucía tenemos la costumbre de llamar pueblo a casi todo lo que no sea una capital de provincia y esto no es así. Con unos 45.000 habitantes, Mairena del Aljarafe sería considerada una ciudad en casi todo el mundo. Es verdad que aún no tenemos muchas imágenes de Mairena, pero hay suficientes para mantener la categoría de "eddificios de Mairena". Si te fijas en el caso de los municipios de la provincia de Sevilla, esta subcategoría sólo ha sido creada para los municipios más pobaldos, es decir, no para los pueblos, excepto en los casos en los que haya muchas imágenes de alguno de estos. Por el contrario en la provincia de Almería (y otras del resto de Espana) alguien se ha dedicado a crear esta subcategoría para pequenos municipios de los cuales apenas tenemos imágenes. Es difícil pararlo pero he intentado hacerlo cuando me he topado con ello. Saludos, tyk (talk) 19:01, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, por lo que a mi respecta no tengo intención de seguir expandiendo esas categorías. Trabajé en ellas para los mayores municipios de Andalucía y lo considero terminado. Saludos y buen trabajo, tyk (talk) 19:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Plaza / edificios[edit]

Hola. Los edificios tienen item en Wikidata (Q28969535), que tiene... una serie de arquitectos asociados, un identificador en IAPH, otro en Docomomo, fecha de construcción, etc (que corresponden a los edificios y no a la plaza donde están situados), en resumen, una serie de características almacenadas que permiten localizar allá estos edificios por infinidad de búsquedas, y es importante que exista, también, una categoría en Commons asociada, con material multimedia. Por favor, no mezcle lo que esté separado. Si no lo quiere separar usted, me parece perfecto porque cada uno gasta su tiempo en lo que le da la gana en un proyecto de estas características, pero si otra persona se molesta en hacerlo, no empiece a deshacer su trabajo marcando categorías para borrado, por favor. Un cordial saludo. Strakhov (talk) 16:34, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pregunta sobre una fotografía[edit]

Hola buenas tardes. Quisiera realizarle una pregunta ¿puede esta foto de twitter que se ha compartido varias veces ser subida a Wikipedia? Me gustaría que ilustrara el artículo [Super Chicha]. La foto pertenece a este usuario, pero ha sido compartida varias veces como por ejemplo este otro usuario. Si efectivamente se puee subir, ¿puede usted subirla? es que no no tengo cuenta y no se nada de Wikipedia. Muchos saludos y gracias de antemano.--87.223.227.177 19:16, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Las fotos deben ser subidas por su autor a Wikimedia Commons con una licencia libre. También pueden ser subidas desde otras plataformas de fotografías, como Flickr, siempre que la foto sea subida con licencia libre. Una foto cualquiera está sujeta a los derechos de autor de su propietario.--CarlosVdeHabsburgo (talk) 20:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Alfonso xiianibal g2010001.jpg[edit]

Hola Carlos, en relación con esta fotografía, efectivamente se corresponde con una de las casas que construyó Aníbal González para Laureano Montoto, pero se trata realmente de dos casas gemelas, muy próximas pero en distintas calles. Esta (residencia de estudiantes) está situada en la calle Almirante Ulloa y la otra al volver la esquina en Alfonso XII. El archivo es el que está mal titulado pues dice Alfonso xii.

Un saludo y un reconocimiento por la amplia colección de fotos de Sevilla que estás subiendo. --Anual (talk) 15:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz 14:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Polígono de San Pablo 02.jpg[edit]

Hi CarlosVdeHabsburgo, is the depicted image/painting/mural permanently installed or is this a sort of temporary poster? --Túrelio (talk) 15:37, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Túrelio It's permanent. It's placed on the facade of an apartment building in the public street. The murals of that neighborhood were created in 2010 [1].--CarlosVdeHabsburgo (talk) 15:44, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks. I've added the FoP template. Otherwise the photo might not have been legal. --Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Castillos hinchables.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Castillos hinchables.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 16:28, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Casa de la Moneda[edit]

Hola Alteza. Tengo dudas de se esto es correcto. El artículo de wikipedia.es se llama Real_Casa_de_la_Moneda_(Sevilla), por lo que "de Sevilla" no parece formar parte del nombre ya que la desambiguación aparece entre paréntesis. Saludos, tyk (talk) 08:38, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ya. Es cierto. Debería cambiar también el título del artículo de la Wikipedia en Español a Real Casa de la Moneda de Sevilla. El nombre en inglés no estaba armonizado con los nombres de otras cecas que también tienen categoría en commons. En la ficha sí he puesto Royal Mint of Seville porque permite usar varios idiomas, pero si solo se puede poner un título me pareció normal que estuviera en español por ser una cosa propia y no algo genérico. Hay nombres que a veces no se traducen. Es como la Sainte-Chapelle, que traducido significa Santa Capilla, pero uno cuando habla en español dice Sainte-Chapelle sin traducir y se sabe que está se hablando de esa capilla concreta de París.--CarlosVdeHabsburgo (talk) 12:37, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok, tyk (talk) 13:24, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Casa consistorial.png[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Logo de Dia.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Logo de Dia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JessydeVilly (talk) 13:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dudas sobre fechas[edit]

Estos archivos están fechados en Abril-2019 (los dos primeros) y Marzo-2019. La fecha coincide con la subida de estos a Commons, pero en los datos exif aparece la fecha 23-02-2019 al igual que otros muchos archivos de la Category:Interior of the Church of Santa María de África, Ceuta (como por ejemplo File:Virgen del Calvario (Nuestra Señora de África).jpg). Te agradecería si me pudiese aclarar si la fecha correcta es la que figura en la sección "Resumen" o en los datos exif para poder corregirlo (provisionalmente los he clasificado según la primera). Gracias y un saludo. --JT Curses (talk) 02:04, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

En efecto JT Curses. Son de febrero. Gracias por la apreciación. Las fotos se iban subiendo con la fecha de creación del archivo y, al procesar la imagen, esta se cambió por la fecha que aparece.--CarlosVdeHabsburgo (talk) 12:40, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Gracias y un saludo.--JT Curses (talk) 22:03, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Recintos fortificados de Melilla.jpg[edit]

Hola CarlosVdeHabsburgo: Lamento decirte que el archivo que subiste, File:Recintos fortificados de Melilla.jpg, es un duplicado de File:Melilla 1849.jpg, más antiguo y por lo tanto, lo he marcado para eliminarlo y sustituirlo por una redirección el primero. AtentamenteMONUMENTA Talk 15:14, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, GMGtalk 19:20, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:36, 6 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Militar de la Armada Española.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Militar de la Armada Española.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Draceane talkcontrib. 20:13, 16 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Silvio Zavala.JPG[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Silvio Zavala.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Elisardojm (talk) 08:20, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Elisardojm That photo was made by me and the license is below.--CarlosVdeHabsburgo (talk) 17:08, 16 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Si no dudo que tu hayas hecho la foto, el problema es que (tu foto) es una obra derivada de una escultura que entiendo que tiene derechos de autor. Esa obra no está en Dominio Público o tienes permiso del autor de la misma para liberar esos derechos mediante OTRS, entonces no puedes liberar tu foto. Y que conste que la legislación no la he creado yo, ya me gustaría cambiarle un montón de cosas. Tienes información sobre este tema en Commons:Trabajos derivados, es muy ilustrativo el esquema de la derecha, lamentablemente está en inglés, pero si tienes cualquier duda puedes preguntarme.
En resumen, que si esa escultura está en Dominio Público puedes subir la foto a Commons (esto debes demostrarlo de alguna forma, encontrando el autor, la fecha de publicación, etc.), pero si no, necesitas tener el permiso del autor y registrarlo en el sistema OTRS. Si estás en esta última situación te pido que restaures el aviso que he puesto en el fichero para que revise el tema un administrador. Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 20:31, 16 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Vendimiando, Jerez (2).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Vendimiando, Jerez (2).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photograph includes 3D elements, license is incorrect
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

(talk) 19:49, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Vendimiando, Jerez (2).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vendimiando, Jerez (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(talk) 20:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Europe à Coeur.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Europe à Coeur.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Estación de Plaza de Armas[edit]

Hola. Respecto a esto, el enclavamiento llegó a pertenecer al complejo ferroviario de Plaza de Armas, aunque ahora no forme parte. CFA1877 (talk) 16:20, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tocina[edit]

Buenas CarlosVdeHabsburgo. Estaba viendo imagen tuya y me preguntaba si por casualidad tenías imágenes de la estación/apeadero de Tocina. Así mismo, como veo que anduviste por el municipio, no sé si tendrás de la localidad de Los Rosales y su complejo ferroviario. Actualmente es que no hay ni una sola imagen. Gracias de antemano. Saludos CFA1877 (talk) 17:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

CFA1877 Lamento decirte que no tengo ninguna foto de la estación de Tocina ni tampoco de la localidad de Los Rosales. Un cordial saludo.--CarlosVdeHabsburgo (talk) 19:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Vale, gracias igualmente. Por cierto, aprovecho para comentarte que es una maravilla descubrir que siempre hay fotos tuyas de la provincia de Sevilla para cubrir huecos pendientes de artículos o categorización del IAPH. Saludos. CFA1877 (talk) 19:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
CFA1877 Qué bien. Me alegro de que mi humilde labor sea de utilidad. Recibe un cordial saludo.--CarlosVdeHabsburgo (talk) 21:22, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Estaciones de Sevilla[edit]

Buenas tardes CarlosVdeHabsburgo. Dado que te mueves bastante por el ámbito hispalense, te escribo porque quería preguntarte si (a lo mejor) tuvieras imágenes de las siguientes estaciones de Sevilla ciudad: 1, 2, 3, 4. Saludos. CFA1877 (talk) 17:07, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hola CFA1877. Pues no tengo fotos de ninguna de esas estaciones pero he mirado en el buscador de Wikimedia Commons y he encontrado una de la Estación Palacio de Congresos de otro autor y la he puesto en su artículo correspondiente. Un saludo.--CarlosVdeHabsburgo (talk) 10:00, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]