User talk:Carolus

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Ik ben nie zo zot als die engelsen.Carolus 13:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Global account[edit]

Hi Carolus! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Hoogeerwaarde Kanunnik Vanhoutten 2009.jpg[edit]

Dag Carolus, verwijzend naar uw opmerking eerder op mijn OP, graag uw advies omtrent de naamgeving van deze file uploaded door U. Gezien het aantal personen en om verwarring te vermijden, stel ik voor ofwel de beschrijving te vervolledigen, ofwel de naam van de file te wijzigen en en passant de schrijfwijze te corrigeren. Face-smile.svg Lotje (talk) 13:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Wat stel je concreet voor? Carolus (talk) 19:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Weet U toevallig wie de derde "eminentie" is? Zo ja, zou ik zijn naam ook vermelden, dus: File.Koen Vanhoutte (L) met Robert Sarah (M) en (R).jpg Lotje (talk) 08:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

De man in kwestie is vicaris, maar zijn naam noch functie zijn in deze context niet relevant. En voor de duidelijkheid zijn dit geen eminenties, maar kanunniken maw Hoogeerwaarde. Ik ga niet al de foto's van kanunniken aanpassen, dat is niet zinvol, en ook niet mijn bedoeling van deze foto's. Carolus (talk) 17:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Dan laten we het best voor wat het is. Toch bedankt voor de uitleg. Lotje (talk) 17:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Question about a painting[edit]

(Sorry, I am bad in english) - Hello : you have download this painting File:Portrait_of_King_Louis_XIV_and_his_Brother,_Duc_D'Orleans.jpg, it is now multi-edited on web. Do you remember where you have found this painting in 2006 ? Have you some more information ? I am looking for the painter and the museum or collection and I find nothing by myself. Best Regards; - 20:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

This user can talk in France also, as far as I know :-) - --Richardkw (talk) (talk) 21:53, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
It might have been an auction catalogue; don't remember, but probably is in a private collection. regards.Carolus (talk) 22:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Russian lace[edit]

Hi, I am Russian, I've seen Russian lace. This pictures should be in category "lace", 'cos their description in the museum exhibition contains Russian word "кружево" (lace). I belive the museum workers who created the description, printed it on the paper and added it under the glass near the object, knows better than you if there is lace in this object or not. Or you know better? --Shakko (talk) 14:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)


Hallo Carolus, ich nehme an dass du deutsch verstehst, dann lese aber bitte auch die Beschreibung, bevor du Kategorien änderst. Niederösterreihc ist nunmal nicht in Germany ;-) --gruß K@rl (talk) 08:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)


Dag Carolus, weet u toevallig de naam van deze kanunnik? Lotje (talk) 14:14, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Done.Carolus (talk) 15:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)


Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Coton_velvet has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 06:38, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Permission to use the images of Mechlin and Valenciennes lace[edit]

Hi Carolus I am trying to contact a photographer who has taken the photo's of Mechlin and Valenciennes lace which was uploaded to Wikipedia.

I would like to use the image in an educational textile text book and am requesting permission to do so - although the licence has said the image can be used my publisher is insisting that I have specific written permission from the owner. I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Regards Bev Ashford

That is very kind. Can u tell which images you would like to use, so i can give more information. KR. Carolus (talk) 20:17, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

these are two links to the images I would like to include and

On the text page the images are accredited with your name and the link to the page on Wikipedia. Further accreditation is in the accreditation section listed under the wiki licence.

Many thanks for your time, it is much appreciated. Bev's Book (talk) 14:11, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Bev's Book