User talk:Cdang

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Thank you for providing images to the commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another wikipedia user link his local user page.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a Copyright tag - images without a appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate Categories, so it can be found by others.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki.


It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more Information, have a look at Commons:Licensing, Commons:criteria for inclusion and the Community Portal. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you. -- Joolz 23:03, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Uploading images from other wikipedias[edit]

Hi !
If you upload images from other wikipedias pleas eupload the full size image and not only a small version/thumbnail of it ! Please copy source/creator info and use a correct license tag, then place the {{NowCommons}} template to the original image. --Denniss 13:29, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

Image:Loi de bragg.png[edit]

Hello, Cdang! I just wanted to point out that in this image the angle of incidence is not equal to the angle of reflection. :) Could you please correct it?.. -- Koveras 09:41, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Image:Schwarze auge 1 logo.svg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Schwarze auge 1 logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.
Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ElRaki 01:16, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Binbruit900.png[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 11:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

SVGs[edit]

Hi Cdang, are you sure you want the die faces to be transparent (not white), as well as the backgrounds?? --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 11:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Refraction[edit]

Hello Cdang, thank you for your nice picture "Refraction metaphore sport1.png" with the swimmer at the beach. For an international use I deleted the French words and painted a blue background for the sea. If you don't like it, just revert the image. Greetings from Germany! --Kdkeller 01:42, 23 December 2007 (UTC)


Image:LaTeX_vademecum.pdf[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:LaTeX_vademecum.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Nard 16:13, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Fixation plaque isostatique.svg[edit]

Bonjour,

Attention avec Image:Fixation plaque isostatique.svg !

S'il s'agit de vis à face d'appui plane, elles constituent une liaison par adhérence et pas par obstacle, de sorte que la plaque n'est pas positionnée, on ne peut donc pas parler d'isostatisme.

S'il s'agit de vis à tête fraisée, alors il y a un degré de liaison de trop et la liaison composée est hyperstatique.

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN 10:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Reaction support avec et sans frottement.svg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Reaction support avec et sans frottement.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 15:49, 28 April 2008 (UTC)


Image:Manivelle biele piston schematique.svg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 07:09, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 026bb11ac996f3eb2bf42080ff45c0a5[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Strukturbericht[edit]

Are you planning to add files to this gallery? If not it would seem to be out of scope and probably better suited at a wikipedia project than here at Commons. Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 11:59, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Cdang!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:44, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Loi de Bragg[edit]

File:Loi de bragg.png - Tu es sûr concernant l'angle? Le loi de Bragg (n*lambda=...) déclare, quand l'interférence constructive est possiblé. Pour l'intereférence destructive, il faut prend 'n + 0,5' au lieu de 'n'. Encore l'angle est definé comme dans ce image: File:Bragg diffraction.png. Dans toi image, l'angle 2 sigma a droite est plus grande que l'angle definé. (Maybe you should answer in English, I'm just exercising my French. Could be possible that I dont understand you :) Cordialement, Amtiss (talk) 15:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

tête revolver[edit]

Salut, y'avait longtemps !

Attention, cannelure s'écrit avec 2 "n" mais les « canelés » bordelais (pâtisseries fort appréciées dans la région) n'en prennent qu'un !

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 23:39, 13 October 2009 (UTC)


Hyperstatique ![edit]

Mip roue dentee arbre.svg

Attention : pivot glissant + appui plan, ça fait 7 degrés de liaison et un degré de mobilité, donc hyperstaticité d'ordre 2 ! Avec la clavette ... c'est beaucoup plus compliqué encore.

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 00:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC)


File:Cinema_pellicule_35mm_son_optique.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cinema_pellicule_35mm_son_optique.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Дмитрий Сутягин (talk) 12:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Road works in Ohio.jpg[edit]

Hello Cdang!

Thanks for translating the description into French. Good job! Thank you! --High Contrast (talk) 10:25, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Intersection sphère-cône[edit]

Salut,

Il y a toujours un problème sur l'intersection !

Pour être clair, je suppose qu'il y a une vue de face, une vue de gauche et une vue de dessus. La vue de face n'est pas bonne ! Il faut considérer le niveau de plan auxiliaire horizontal qui correspond aux points où l'intersection traverse le contour apparent de la sphère. Au-dessus de ce plan, on voit apparaître en trait plein le dit contour apparent, et l'intersection est logiquement représentée en trait interrompu puisqu'elle est cachée par la sphère. En revanche, en-dessous, le contour apparent de la sphère disparaît, tandis que l'intersection que tu as représentée en trait interrompu devient visible, donc trait plein !

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 09:12, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Papier log log.svg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:18, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, I've fixed the bug! :-) Sorry for the waste of time! --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 10:12, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Strukturbericht[edit]

Salut,

je viens de mettre deux nouvelles images, "SrCu2(BO3)2 room temperature phase.png" et "SrCu2(BO3)2 high temperature phase.png". Je ne les ai pas mises dans la catégorie crystal structures qui est un peu trop vague à mon goût... mais je ne connais pas la classification Strukturbericht. Comme tu avais déjà classifié l'image spinelle que j'avais ajoutée il y a quatre ans, est-ce que tu pourrais y jeter un coup d'œil?

Merci! Perditax (talk) 20:51, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Ok, merci. D'après ce que j'ai vu sur le lien que tu m'as envoyé, il n'est pas possible d'y classer les composés contenant quatres éléments. Mais il faudra que j'approfondisse ça un jour. Perditax (talk) 16:34, 4 July 2010 (UTC)


Category:Strukturbericht[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Strukturbericht has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

--Aushulz (talk) 22:02, 11 September 2010 (UTC)


File:Monde palladium.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Monde palladium.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Kungfuman (talk) 17:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

And other map. --Kungfuman (talk) 17:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Diag phase glace.png[edit]

Salut Cdang

Je voudrais utiliser ce diagramme en classe (chimie CH101) mais je ne le comprends pas exactement. Au gauche extreme il dit 0.01 GPA, ce serait 100Atm a peu pres, mais sous de tels conditions la glace ne fond pas a +10oC, non? Est-ce ce que l'echelle est en erreur? Jcwf (talk) 15:58, 11 November 2010 (UTC) nl:wikt:Gebruiker:Jcwf

File:Diag_phase_fer_carbone.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Diag_phase_fer_carbone.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wizard191 (talk) 17:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Diagramme fer carbone.svg[edit]

Hi, can you please provide your ref for this image, because my Degarmo 2003 text has some small discrepancies. Specifically 1154 deg C vs. 1153 deg C and 4.28% vs. 4.25%. Thanks! Wizard191 (talk) 02:55, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Prehenseur adaptateur culasse piston cotes.svg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Prehenseur adaptateur culasse piston cotes.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Fred the Oyster (talk) 14:53, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Photo transpalette bts cpi 2008.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:39, 16 March 2012 (UTC)


File:DT3 vue ensemble transpalette bts cpi 2008.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:20, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Enfant 18 mois difficultes respiratoires basse res.ogg[edit]

Hallo Cdang, wenn du möchtest, lade den Audiopart der Datei im Originalformat einfach temporär bei einem Filehoster hoch (z.B. http://www.file-upload.net/). Dann konvertieren wir das und fügen den Ton deinem Video hinzu. Gruß aus Marburg, --Pristurus (talk) 08:17, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Enfant 18 mois difficultes respiratoires.ogv[edit]

Hi Cdang, do you have the expressed permission of the parents of this poor child to upload/publish this video? --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

The quality of the chemical structure File:Autoprotolyse eau simplifiee.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Autoprotolyse eau simplifiee.svg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Files in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 15:24, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


File:Californie submergee simulation.svg[edit]

I really don't think that having the land area be transparent adds anything to this graphic. Are you attached to this rendering for some reason? -- AnonMoos (talk) 12:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

OK, thanks... AnonMoos (talk) 17:20, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Always Coming Home[edit]

Didn't see anything very problematic. I slightly adjusted the image parameters for clarity... AnonMoos (talk) 04:14, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Category:Multiverse_(science_fiction)[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Multiverse_(science_fiction) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:20, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Talking to myself[edit]

todo when I'm back:

User talk:Fastily

Sorry,

I wrote you november the 6th, but didn't check your own talk page. So you answered “sure”, does it mean you restored the file for a while? If so, I'm afraid I missed it.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Miroir parabolique avec et sans contre miroir.svg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Miroir parabolique avec et sans contre miroir.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leyo 23:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Shearing force and bending moment[edit]

Bonjour Cdang! (That is about the limit of my French.)

I send you my compliments for the excellent diagram you created and inserted in the Wikipedia article on bending moment - File:Poutre flexion trois points diagrammes.svg (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bending_moment)

I have one comment. The diagram shows the bending moment having a positive slope until it reaches its maximum value, and then a negative slope. That is correct and it is the usual way of depicting bending moment. One important relationship between shearing force T and bending moment M is that T is equal to the derivative of M. However, the diagram shows the shearing force having negative sign until the center of the beam, and then positive. This is opposite to the slope of M. The way shearing force is depicted does not conform to the usual convention on positive and negative shearing forces.

I request that you refine the diagram a little by changing the sign of T so it is positive from the origin to the center, and then negative from the center to the end of the beam.

Thank you for any assistance. I can be contacted on Wikipedia (English) at User talk:Dolphin51

Au revoir! Dolphin51 (talk) 05:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC)