User talk:Charlie fong

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Charlie fong!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:吉林大学校徽.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:吉林大学校徽.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sterkebaktalk 18:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Charlie fong!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Charlie fong个人集纳.jpg is uncategorized since 20 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:宁陕境内的西汉高速.jpg is uncategorized since 11 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:LIN Zhao.jpg is uncategorized since 12 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Gym of Beiwai.JPG was uncategorized on 29 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jilinuniversity laboratory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Composition is not ideal - could do without cutting off the nearside of the circular area (fountain?), or going half through a tree on the right, but overall I'm compelled to promote it as it's technically very good. Mattbuck 00:26, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi Charlie fong, on this image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E6%9C%AA%E5%90%8D%E6%B9%96%E7%95%94.jpg, I noticed that you uploaded a new version and updated the older one. Since they are both different images and not just simply updating on the resolution, is there anyway you can keep both images? Move the new version into a file of its own (move it to a different file), so both images can be on Wikimedia? Thanks!--HéctorTabaré (talk) 07:58, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice.Then I just want to use the better one to replace the older, ignored those what you told me.I'll upload both.--Charlie fong (talk) 08:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have anymore pictures of the Peking University campus? Or pictures of temples (like Tai Miao) and historical sites in Beijing? If so, you are more than welcome to upload it.--HéctorTabaré (talk) 08:12, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some,not a lot,most of the have been uploaded,and you know,the weather of Beijing,especially air condition,is not good.But I'll picture more if I have enough time.--Charlie fong (talk) 08:28, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing, could you try to upload images in Pinyin (or English) instead of directly Chinese characters. It might be more convenient for users to use the images in other international Wiki pages, since it could be easier to identify for non-Chinese speakers.--HéctorTabaré (talk) 08:19, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh,I will,thanks--Charlie fong (talk) 08:28, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you upload some images of historical/old buildings in the Peking University, like gardens and museums, not just landscapes? Thanks, that'll be appreicated.--HéctorTabaré (talk) 08:58, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry,I have to say,I just pictured those the day before yestoday and returned the DC to my friend.But I'm still willing to take some new in my spare time. --Charlie fong (talk) 09:17, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie fong :

你好,我非常欣賞你的相片,其中的(Panorama of Macau Peninsula2021),

沒有其他同主題相片能相提並論,我希望能在我的3D模型場境中加入你這張相片局部畫面作為背景,

但由於公司政策不容許使用無版權照片,(C.C版權政策公司不懂)我又不想放棄使用其他不理想的相片,由於沒其他聯絡方式,厚顏在此留言希望得到你的同意,謝謝 Arion wong (talk) 13:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jinhuaguan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Well done, just that ad to the left is a pity. -- H005 16:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yongdinggate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition and otherwise also good IMO. --Cayambe 10:20, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 天安门夜景.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me --Cesco77 11:00, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hall of Prayer for Good Harvest.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI IMO. --kallerna 11:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Space_race1.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Space_race1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Space_race1.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 14:41, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charlie_fong个人集纳.jpg

File:Charlie_fong个人集纳.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:16, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:胡风_人民日报.jpg

File:胡风_人民日报.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sysywjel (talk) 01:18, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:外滩.jpg

File:外滩.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

58.176.42.242 03:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erhai north Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and impressive view. --Sfu 19:19, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shudulake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could do with a little more contrast and black but good. --Colin 19:24, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

恭喜

Charlie fong，恭喜：

经过评审组评审，您的作品：File:Stonebrigeinliongrovegarden.jpg获得了2013年维基爱古迹中国区的第十二名。第十二名的奖品是200元的亚马逊礼品卡。请将您的寄送地址、姓名及联系方式以邮件的方式发送至wlm-cn@lists.wikimedia.org便邮递奖品，谢谢。

您的作品将参与维基爱古迹国际比赛，并还有机会获得国际比赛优胜奖。其中本届比赛的国际大奖为“资助参加2014年维基媒体年会（Wikimania），包括不超过2000欧元的旅费及住宿”。具体内容及规则请留意国际版网站：www.wikilovesmonuments.org/awards/。

再次感谢您参加2013年度维基爱古迹摄影大赛。期待看到您更多的优秀作品出现在维基百科上。

维基爱古迹中国区 2013年11月5日

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Charlie fong,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Charlie fong,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

恭喜

恭喜：维基爱古迹的作品评定工作已完成，阁下的作品已被评定为第12名。请阁下速速回复邮件，否则奖品将无法寄送于阁下。

维基爱古迹中国区 2013年12月19日

提示

2013维基爱古迹获奖用户的奖品发送将于2014年1月6日结束。请阁下速速回复以便寄送，否则将视为阁下放弃领取奖品。

维基爱古迹中国区 2014年1月4日

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guantingreservoirandbridges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Ok for a aerial photo imo. --ArildV 04:19, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Xiong'an District

Hello.The English link leads to an article connected with the category Category:Xiong'an New Area.Please link the category to the appropriate item or make it redirect if there is another category on this topic.Thank you ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mingxianling2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juyongguanfromnorth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tencent binghai building202012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support good quality, however a description in English and geocoding would be fine. --Palauenc05 17:18, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! China Resources Headquarters by the side of shenzhen bay2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Geotag would be useful --Podzemnik 05:32, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Commercial area of futian to east2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent. --Kallerna 15:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MFG No1 Shenzhen Bay in Weilanhaian District2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Sky is a bit noisy, but solid quality, overall. -- Ikan Kekek 10:03, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peng Rui One Shenzhen Bay2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The photograph is QI for me, but please fix the red linked category. Please create it if possible. --XRay 04:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. Added a ew category --Andrew J.Kurbiko 11:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tennis Center in Hangzhou Olympic Sports Expo Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:08, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MingTombsReservoir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:53, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! East Pacific Center Towers2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. I'm liking your documentation of the modern skyscrapers of Shenzhen. I have a feeling one of them will be an FP and will continue looking for that. Several have been close, I think. -- Ikan Kekek 01:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CMB Tower in Shenzhen2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please add an English description --Michielverbeek 18:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capitaland Raffles City Mall in Nanshan Shenzhen2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and composition, very nice light. -- Ikan Kekek 10:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sea World in Shekou Shenzhen2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality in my opinion. Although, could benefit from a slight vertical perspective correction in this case. --Ximonic 16:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huaqiangbei&Shennan Cross2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:53, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SEG Plaza in Shenzhen2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tomer T 21:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The west panorama of Shenzhen2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KK100 exterior southeast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama of Macau Peninsula2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 20:51, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yongning Yanqing Beijing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good high-quality pictures

Just wanted to say that you should do more of these. China is beautiful.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by H9armando (talk • contribs) 23:12, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will, thanks Charlie fong (talk) 02:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		鉴于没有北京市相关的星章，先拿这个凑数也无妨。--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 16:47, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ^_^ Charlie fong (talk) 02:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ming Tombs Reservoir After Snow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:57, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ming Changling Tomb After Snow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:14, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haitang Bay in Sanya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good composition and colours. Detail is borderline. --Tagooty 04:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The panorama of Futian Shenzhen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:28, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HXD1 Heading East Along the Daqin Railway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thirteen tombs entance dagong gate201909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tailing Village Changping2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 17:17, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! China University Of Petroleum in Changping.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:53, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--Pi bot (talk) 07:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spirit Way Pass Through Emperor Pavilion in Thirteen Tombs of Ming Dynasty.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good enough. --多多123 17:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shōtengai of Nakano Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good. -- Ikan Kekek 17:40, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shennanroad Zhuzilin Junction East2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:52, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pagoda of Fogong Temple at Dust.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:52, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 Chome Nakano Tokyo（east）2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ezarate 23:08, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shekou fishing harbor2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skyline of Shekou, Shenzhen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shekou Nanhai Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 10:53, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:China012basedistributionmap.png

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:China012basedistributionmap.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 11:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fall foliage in Sanzen-in.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:33, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naka-Karuizawa & Mount Asama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:26, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]