User talk:Chmee2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Link to Archive of this user talk.

File:Roque Cinchado with Teide in 2014 (1).JPG[edit]

I still think it is volcanic degassing, because the rocks at the summit are geothermally altered (colour difference to the other parts of the mountain) exactly under the starting point of the clouds (high temperature area) - and Teide is an active volcano, so degassing would not be out of the question. See eg. also Leirhnjúkur area in Iceland ( File:Leirhnjúkur 19.05.2008 13-07-56.jpg ).Reykholt (talk) 16:25, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Reykholt, thanks for your comment. I am sure that it is not. We climbed the pictured top of the volcano later (exactly fallowing the path where suggested degassing occurred) and they were no signs for volcanic activity (in last years). Also, no smells for volcanic gasses and the final, we actually saw how the normal clouds were approaching to the summit of the volcano and than spreading around summit.
PS: I am professional volcanologist (alright, focusing about volcanoes on Mars, but still...) and I will be really, really, really, really exited if this was lava degassing. Unfortunately, I was not lucky enough to see active volcano on Tenerife (or elsewhere) :( Even on Iceland with Eyjafjallajökull I was there half year earlier :(( Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 19:35, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
I see. When you say, you saw Teide otherwise yourself, that is fine with me.
Otherwise, it's a question of definitions. In my understanding, a volcano is not only active, when it is erupting, but also when there are eg. gasses or hot springs like in Landmannalaugar where you also were (Torfajökull's last eruptions were in the 15th century, Krafla's in the 1980s) or even all volcanoes which have had eruptions in the Holocene. (See also GVP: "How many active volcanoes are there in the world? --- The answer to this common question depends upon use of the word "active." At least 20 volcanoes will probably be erupting as you read these words (Italy's Stromboli, for example, has been erupting for more than a thousand years); roughly 60 erupted each year through the 1990s; 154 in the full decade 1990-1999; about 550 have had historically documented eruptions; about 1300 (and perhaps more than 1500) have erupted in the Holocene (past 10,000 years); and some estimates of young seafloor volcanoes exceed a million. Because dormant intervals between major eruptions at a single volcano may last hundreds to thousands of years, dwarfing the relatively short historical record in many regions, it is misleading to restrict usage of "active volcano" to recorded human memories: we prefer to add another identifying word (e.g. "historically active" or "Holocene volcano", - http://volcano.si.edu/faq.cfm#q3 ). Krýsuvík volcanic system has eg. had its last eruptions in the 13th century, but is regarded as "active" by Thor Thordarson in "Classic Geology in Europe 3. Iceland" (p.14).
Following these definitions, you have been hiking on active volcanoes. Teide had its last eruptions in 1909 and Torfajökull (Landmannalaugar) is also on the list of Thor Thordarson. And on its list is also included Tindfjöll/Tindfjallajökull in south Iceland, you saw it most certainly, it is north of Eyjafjallajökull. This is a volcanic system, which erupted last even not in the Holocene, but around 50.000 years ago, but it has active geothermal areas at its feet.
BTW: I saw two volcanic eruptions in Iceland and wrote a not so small part of the article on Eyjafjallajökull and the other on its 2010 eruptions in the German Wikipedia.Reykholt (talk) 21:35, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Of course, you are right in this. I might chose better term "active volcanic phase of eruption" instead of "active volcano". But my point was, that I was never lucky enough to see how the lava is leaving the subsurface or how is it fragmented as a result of magma degassing or water/magma interaction. Still hope that I will have some luck in some of my next trips :) Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 10:46, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Angel on Písek Stone Bridge in winter 2013 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angel on Písek Stone Bridge in winter 2013 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 21:54, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nature reserve Niva Olšového potoka in summer 2014 (14).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nature reserve Niva Olšového potoka in summer 2014 (14).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rana temporaria in nature park Trhoň in 2014 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rana temporaria in nature park Trhoň in 2014 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 21:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Rana temporaria in nature park Trhoň in 2014 (2).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Rana temporaria in nature park Trhoň in 2014 (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rana temporaria in nature park Trhoň in 2014 (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stropharia aeruginosa in nature park Jesenicko in 2014.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stropharia aeruginosa in nature park Jesenicko in 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Hubertl 20:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Natural monument Krtské skály in 2014 (11).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natural monument Krtské skály in 2014 (11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:49, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Horní rybník, part of nature reserve Rybníčky u Podbořánek in 2014 (4).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horní rybník, part of nature reserve Rybníčky u Podbořánek in 2014 (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Pleclown 16:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Přejmenování[edit]

Navrhuji přejmenovat tento soubor. Jeho název je matoucí. Brání něco jeho přejmenování? K čemu je obdobný soubor na interní, který má dovětek „malý“?--Juandev (talk) 13:55, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Ahoj, nebrání. Klidně to nech přejmenovat, díky. S pozdravem --Chmee2 (talk) 15:47, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kostel sv. Jana Křtitele a Panny Marie Karmelské - Smolotely (11).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kostel sv. Jana Křtitele a Panny Marie Karmelské - Smolotely (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Zbislav (Zhoř) Okres Písek 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zbislav (Zhoř) Okres Písek 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 16:18, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Kinds of Skyr.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kinds of Skyr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 18:04, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Senecio leucanthemifolius on the beach close to Órzola on Lanzarote, June 2013 (4).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Senecio leucanthemifolius on the beach close to Órzola on Lanzarote, June 2013 (4).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Senecio leucanthemifolius on the beach close to Órzola on Lanzarote, June 2013 (4).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 22:15, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 13:30, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Polytrichum commune in natural monument Knez u Hrazan (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polytrichum commune in natural monument Knez u Hrazan (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kosova Hora - okres Příbram. (005).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kosova Hora - okres Příbram. (005).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI -- Spurzem 18:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Kópasker (lighthouse).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kópasker (lighthouse).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 22:28, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Naturschutzgebiet Kaiserbachtal am Wilden Kaiser in Kirchdorf[edit]

Hi Chmee2, you created the Category:Naturschutzgebiet Kaiserbachtal am Wilden Kaiser in Kirchdorf. Where did you get this information from? According to the Liste der Naturschutzgebiete in Tirol and the official site http://www.tiroler-schutzgebiete.at there is no Naturschutzgebiet (or any other protected area) of this name or at this location. The area is part of Naturschutzgebiet Kaisergebirge. Best wishes, --Luftschiffhafen (talk) 23:33, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi Luftschiffhafen, I got the information from the entrance gate (sorry for low res image, but I deleted the one which I took on site to remember the name) and than from here (and also from here). I tried to googled the name and when I found the name on several sites, I thought it will be the proper one. However, I also noticed that the name is missing in the list of protected areas in Tirol, but I ended with the conclusion, that the list is not up to date :) If I made a mistake, I am sorry. It is not really easy to find out how the protection looks like in Austria. Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 18:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Sorry for the late reply, I keep losing track on Commons... I don't know where the sources you mentioned get their information from, and strictly speaking it is not completely wrong. The Kaiserbachtal is indeed a protected area, just that is is part of the much larger Naturschutzgebiet Kaisergebirge. The lists on the German Wikipedia should be pretty up to date, but of course there can always be mistakes and omissions... --Luftschiffhafen (talk) 22:07, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Category:Media_with_erroneous_locations[edit]

Hi Chmee2, could you please use {{Object location}} or {{Location}} for your coordinates? --Arnd (talk) 09:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi Arnd, yes for sure I can. I made a mistake when I copy/paste the text from Geolocator tool. Sorry for that. Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 15:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
No worries. Thank you for fixing it. --Arnd (talk) 16:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

File:Euromaidan in Prague 2014-03-02 (39).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Euromaidan in Prague 2014-03-02 (39).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


File:Bramboráček (1).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Bramboráček (1).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kmarty (talk) 12:11, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Bramboráček (2).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Bramboráček (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kmarty (talk) 12:11, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Bramboráček (3).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Bramboráček (3).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kmarty (talk) 12:11, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Bramboráček (4).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Bramboráček (4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kmarty (talk) 12:11, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Bramboráček (5).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Bramboráček (5).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kmarty (talk) 12:11, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Bramboráček (6).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Bramboráček (6).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kmarty (talk) 12:11, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Bramboráček (7).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Bramboráček (7).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kmarty (talk) 12:11, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Noctilucent clouds over Slovakia in 21st of June, 2019 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noctilucent clouds over Slovakia in 21st of June, 2019 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:19, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Noctilucent clouds over Slovakia in 21st of June, 2019 (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noctilucent clouds over Slovakia in 21st of June, 2019 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Chenspec 07:26, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Category:Charles_University_in_Prague[edit]

Category discussion warning

Charles University in Prague has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josh (talk) 20:46, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers[edit]

Commons File mover.svg

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020![edit]

Czech Wiki Photo

Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,

každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.

Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.

Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Euromaidan in Prague 2014-03-02 (29).JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Euromaidan in Prague 2014-03-02 (29).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted banner
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Dear A1Cafel, I am bit surprised that the file was deleted so quickly. Please, can you send me the restored file privately as I would like to see how this particular image violated the copyright of the banner? Thanks in advance and best regards Chmee2 (talk) 15:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
I'm not an admin, and I cannot restore file. You can request temporarily undeletion at COM:UDR--A1Cafel (talk) 16:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)