User talk:ChristianT/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1

Salut. Merci pour votre message. Désolé pour mon niveau de français. Je comprends bien que c'est un dessin, non pas une photographie. J'ai ajouté {{Low quality}} afin d'avertir les autres que nous devrions essayer de trouver une reproduction de plus haute résolution de ce dessin. Ce n'est pas une critique de la version actuelle sur Commons. Connaissez-vous le nom de l'artiste, ou lorsque cette image provient (un musée? une bibliothèque?)? --Skeezix1000 (talk) 12:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le-griffon.jpg

Bonjour. Hello. There is no problem with obtaining images through secondary sources, as long as it is clear that the images in question are either public domain or freely-licensed in accordance with Commons requirements. If you know for sure that en:File:Building-le-griffon.jpg is from Hennepin's 1679 book, then the image is public domain and it generally doesn't matter if the image was copied from a contemporary book, newspaper or website. If you transfer that image to Commons, however, I would add information about Hennepin's 1679 book to the description, and perhaps reference what you believe to be the likely secondary source. Bonne chance. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 19:40, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2012

Je te souhaite une très bonne année 2012 à toi aussi. La rencontre était en effet fort sympathique. Je vais me tenir au courant des prochaines mais je ne promets rien. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:34, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 02:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello, what happened is that the bot FlickreviewR tried to review the image, but it couldn't. It pulled up a Size_Not_Found error, which means: No exif comparison was possible or failed, and the image is not available in the same size on Flickr. I recommend you talk with the bot operator to see how it exactly works, as I do not run the bot. Thanks. Techman224Talk 15:10, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Rachel Homan au Tournoi des Cœurs Scotties 2013.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

— mantis [religiosa] — 05:05, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, le problème est la licence, non-commerciale uniquement. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 06:28, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]