User talk:Christo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Christo!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:17, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Bratislava metro map.svg[edit]

Català | Deutsch | English | فارسی | Русский | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bratislava metro map.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Nick (talk) 19:21, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

So in the case of:

I am the uploader of the original pixelgraphic pictures. In the case of:

I am the author of the page http://metros.hu/mutargy/palya.html In the case of:

This is the original: http://people.reed.edu/~reyn/bratislava.gif By me. In the case of others: where did you find pictures which they are derivated from? --Christo (talk) 20:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | svenska | +/−


Hello Christo,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Antant ígéretek.svg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't really understand what is the problem. I've made these graphics between 2004-2007. I have the sources in fla format. And I've uploaded some of their jpg versions many years ago. For example, jpg version of Antant ígéretek.svg is here: https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%A1jl:Igeret.png Do you know why I uploaded the svg version? Because at this file (which was also my work, and you deleted the svg version of it just now) somebody mentioned that wikipedia prefers the svg version: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fotcimer.jpg For example in the case of this coat of arms, I've made a photo of that temple, and I've created this graphic using that photo, which photo is not on the internet. So I don't know then, which source should I give. And in the case of my old maps why do you accept the jpg version if you delete the svg version? I guess svg version is better, because that is editable by others. --Christo (talk) 18:13, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Budapest, Experience Demoshow 2015, 48.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Budapest, Experience Demoshow 2015, 48.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 19:46, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

As I know, demoscenes are free content. Not opensource, but free. --Christo (talk) 19:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | svenska | +/−


Hello Christo,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Budapest, Experience Demoshow 2015, 48.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

They may be freely accessible, and free of charge, but you are not permitted to license them under a freely distributable license.
Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 22:47, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Copyright violations[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | Azərbaycanca | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Sicilianu | Simple English | Српски / srpski | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Commons-emblem-hand.svg Hello Christo.

It has come to our attention that you have uploaded several files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. Continuing to upload copyright violations will result in your account being blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

INeverCry 23:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)