More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.
|File:Digikam-screenshot-3.2.0-linux.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
Could you please explain what is wrong about that file? I uploaded it from flickr where it is under a CC-by2.0 and added all information about the author/photographer. So what is the problem? --Clarv (talk) 13:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Wait... Is the problem that the software is under the free license GPL and the picture is under the CC-by2.0 (that would be OK), but that both licenses cannot be mixed? Sorry, that is ridiculous.
- Point of information: The flickr-user is the digiKam project lead developper and coordinator. Out of my view he has the right to make screenshots of the gpl-licensed software and publish under another license. --Clarv (talk) 13:37, 11 June 2013 (UTC)