User talk:Coloringbuddymike

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Coloringbuddymike!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:40, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

discussion about ur contribs.[edit]

Hello. An admin has posted discussion about your contributions here. Please check the link. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 14:54, 23 February 2013 (UTC).

Please read COM:OVERCAT[edit]

Hi, thanks for your contributions but Commons does not have a tagging category system. Please read COM:OVERCAT. --Foroa (talk) 16:17, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Kategorys Fingerspelling and American Sign Language for Coloring-Book-Characters[edit]

I've seen you placed Files like File:Valentines-day-hearts-m-alphabet-at-coloring-pages-for-kids-boys-dotcom.svg in the categorys Category:American Sign Language, Category:Fingerspelling and Category:British Sign Language. Imo this is clearly not their purpose. If this was erroneous I ask you to remove the misplaced category-linkings or otherwise to explain your intention in placing those coloring-book-pages in those categorys. Thanks in advance --Nenntmichruhigip (talk) 05:50, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

There was a request to remove the overcategorization at Commons:Village pump#hearts in sign language categories today. I hope you don't mind me having removed the surplus categories from your files. Please stick to the recommendations on categorization linked in the previous section for future uploads.
Anyway, thanks for your great contributions! --Patrick87 (talk) 00:16, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Valentines-day-hearts-b-alphabet-at-coloring-pages-for-kids-boys-dotcom.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Valentines-day-hearts-b-alphabet-at-coloring-pages-for-kids-boys-dotcom.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.80.171.242 11:58, 14 March 2016 (UTC)