User talk:Crisco 1492
This user is, of their own volition, no longer active on Wikimedia Commons.
This is not indicative of breaking any Wikimedia policies.
A kitten for you!
Please stay with us. You bring unmatched expertise and help to the project. Kind regards,
A kitten for you!
Please don't leave. Your works are extremely valuable for the movement.
you decided to go
File:Robert J Flaherty - 1922 - Nanook Of The North (Nanuk El Esquimal).ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
The image File:Inuit Woman 1907 Crisco edit 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Inuit Woman 1907 Crisco edit 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 12:11, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Your photo and Adobe Stock
Hello, I notice that File:Western Gate, Taman Sari, Yogyakarta 2014-04-24.jpg (or a very similar photo from the same series) is (ab)used at https://stock.adobe.com/gr_en/images/the-main-gate-at-taman-sari-water-castle/71651860?asset_id=71651959  (there's even the same motorbike in the corner), attributed to a certain "edography": is that you? Did you license it to them or are they using it without your permission? Nemo 17:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the
suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the
suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Aminah Cendrakasih, c. 1959, by Tati Photo Studio.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.