User talk:Crisco 1492

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Swing at Duta Beach, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Swing at Duta Beach, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Boats at Duta Beach, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boats at Duta Beach, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bridge into mangrove swamp, Duta Beach, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bridge into mangrove swamp, Duta Beach, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Boat at Duta Beach, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boat at Duta Beach, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Spire of East Java Christian Church, Mojowarno, Jombang, 2017-09-18.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Spire of East Java Christian Church, Mojowarno, Jombang, 2017-09-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Kala head, Candi Jabung, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kala head, Candi Jabung, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Relief, Candi Jabung, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Relief, Candi Jabung, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Rimbi temple statue (detail), Jombang, 2017-09-19.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rimbi temple statue (detail), Jombang, 2017-09-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rimbi temple relief, Jombang, 2017-09-19 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mangrove swamp, Duta Beach, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mangrove swamp, Duta Beach, Paiton, Probolinggo, East Java, 2017-09-14 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Australian Turkish Friendship Memorial, King's Domain, Melbourne 2017-10-28.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Australian Turkish Friendship Memorial, King's Domain, Melbourne 2017-10-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
"Widow and Children", Shrine of Remembrance, Melbourne 2017-10-28.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! "Widow and Children", Shrine of Remembrance, Melbourne 2017-10-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
"The Man with the Donkey", Shrine of Remembrance, Melbourne 2017-10-28.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! "The Man with the Donkey", Shrine of Remembrance, Melbourne 2017-10-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Equestrian Statue of Sir John Monash, Kings Domain, Melbourne 2017-10-28 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Equestrian Statue of Sir John Monash, Kings Domain, Melbourne 2017-10-28 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Statue of St Francis of Assisi, St. Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne, 2017-10-29.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue of St Francis of Assisi, St. Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne, 2017-10-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Forum Melbourne (clock tower), Melbourne 2017-10-30.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Forum Melbourne (clock tower), Melbourne 2017-10-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Statue of Daniel Mannix, St. Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne, 2017-10-29.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue of Daniel Mannix, St. Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne, 2017-10-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Shakespeare Window, State Library of Victoria, Melbourne, 2017-10-29.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Shakespeare Window, State Library of Victoria, Melbourne, 2017-10-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Bust of Sir Redmond Barry, State Library of Victoria, Melbourne, 2017-10-29.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bust of Sir Redmond Barry, State Library of Victoria, Melbourne, 2017-10-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
The Call to Arms (detail), Shrine of Remembrance, Melbourne 2017-10-28.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The Call to Arms (detail), Shrine of Remembrance, Melbourne 2017-10-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Detail of the lions and child, "Patriotism", Shrine of Remembrance, Melbourne 2017-10-28.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Detail of the lions and child, "Patriotism", Shrine of Remembrance, Melbourne 2017-10-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Statue of John Monash, Monash University (Clayton Campus), Melbourne 2017-10-30 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue of John Monash, Monash University (Clayton Campus), Melbourne 2017-10-30 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Eureka Tower (top), Melbourne 2017-10-30.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eureka Tower (top), Melbourne 2017-10-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Statue of Capt. Matthew Flinders, St Paul's Cathedral, Melbourne 2017-10-30.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue of Capt. Matthew Flinders, St Paul's Cathedral, Melbourne 2017-10-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Statue of Daniel O'Connell, St Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne, 2017-10-29.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue of Daniel O'Connell, St Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne, 2017-10-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Window, St. Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne, 2017-10-29.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Window, St. Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne, 2017-10-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
St Paul's Cathedral (window), Melbourne 2017-10-30.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Paul's Cathedral (window), Melbourne 2017-10-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Statue of John Monash, Monash University (Clayton Campus), Melbourne 2017-10-30 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue of John Monash, Monash University (Clayton Campus), Melbourne 2017-10-30 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Javanese tembang and dance fusion performance, Sonobudoyo Museum, Yogyakarta, 2017-12-05 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Javanese tembang and dance fusion performance, Sonobudoyo Museum, Yogyakarta, 2017-12-05 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Javanese tembang and dance fusion performance, Sonobudoyo Museum, Yogyakarta, 2017-12-05 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Javanese tembang and dance fusion performance, Sonobudoyo Museum, Yogyakarta, 2017-12-05 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Javanese tembang and dance fusion performance, Sonobudoyo Museum, Yogyakarta, 2017-12-05 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Javanese tembang and dance fusion performance, Sonobudoyo Museum, Yogyakarta, 2017-12-05 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Raudalkhudri (talk • contribs) 04:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Can you help me?[edit]

Hi, @Crisco 1492: sebelumnya mohon maaf saya menggunakan bahasa Indonesia, hal ini saya lakukan agar saya lebih mudah menyampaikannya. :) Baru-baru ini saya dikirimi email oleh sebuah instansi untuk mengunggah beberapa foto ke wikimedia dengan lisensi cc-by-sa 4.0. Bisakan Anda menolong saya bagaimana caranya mengunggah foto-foto tersebut agar tidak dipermasalahkan di wikimedia? (sedangkan sumber dan izin lisensinya dikirimkan oleh instansi terkait via email kepada saya dan tidak dipublikasikan) Saya membaca tentang OTRS, tapi jujur saya belum paham bagaimana mekanismenya. Saya harap Anda dapat membantu saya. Terimakasih :) Raudalkhudri (talk) 13:20, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

  • Raudalkhudri lokasinya di mana? Kalau perlu, mungkin bisa ada yang membantu langsung.
Kalau di web, coba saya jawab besok kalau sudah di depan laptop. Malam ini saya sudah tidak bula laptop lagi. Crisco 1492 mobile (talk) 13:22, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Oke, Raudalkhudri, untuk foto yang disumbangkan oleh suatu instansi, Raudal harus mengunggah foto itu ke Commons dengan lisensi yang ditentukan oleh instansi tersebut (CC-BY-SA 4.0), memberi tag {{subst:OP}}, kemudian mengirim surel ke permissions-commons@wikimedia.org dan menyatakan secara eksplisit bahwa foto itu (dikasih pranala, biar yang membalas bisa melihat) memang diberi lisensi bebas tersebut. Surel tersebut harus dikirim dari alamat instansi (apabila Raudal itu staf di sana) atau meneruskan pernyataan hak cipta eksplisit dari alamat instansi. Sebaiknya pernyataan ini dalam bahasa Inggris; ada templat di sini yang bisa digunakan. Nanti kalau sudah dianggap cukup, ada volunteer OTRS yang akan mengganti templat OP dengan templat {{PermissionOTRS}}. Satu surel boleh digunakan untuk merilis lebih dari satu foto.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:24, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Maaf saya baru membaca balasan Anda. Sebelumnya terimakasih atas jawabannya :), tapi ada beberapa yang ingin saya tanyakan kembali.
  • Pertama, saya bukan staf dari instansi yang mengirimi saya email, melainkan orang yang mengirimi saya email adalah staf dari instansi tersebut (admin website resmi sebuah instansi). Apakah berarti orang yang mengirimi saya email harus mengirim email serupa ke surel permissions-commons@wikimedia.org dengan menggunakan templat di sini?
  • Kedua, saya ingin bertanya mengenai berkas-berkas di gahetNA, apakah saya bisa mengunggah semua foto di website tersebut dengan menggunakan lisensi cc-by-sa 3.0 seperti tercantum di templat lisensi {{Nationaal Archief-license}}? atau saya hanya bisa mengunggah foto yang diberi tag Domain Publik seperti di sini? Dan tidak bisa mengunggah foto yang tidak diberi tag domain publik seperti di sini?
Sebelumnya saya ucapkan terimakasih :) Raudalkhudri (talk) 04:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Raudal nanti bisa meneruskan ke OTRS, kalau perusahaan/instansi memang sudah membuat pernyataan yang eksplisit mengenai berkas yang hendak dirilis. Nanti Raudal juga yang mengunggah ke Commons.
Maaf, pranala yang dikasih ke gahetna.nl tidak bisa dibuka. Yang sudah ada pernyataan Public Domain atau CC (seperti halnya File:Mochtar Lubis (1979).jpg) harusnya boleh masuk Commons.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:11, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — regards, Revi 16:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

If you have time[edit]

Hi Chris, hope all is well with you? If you have time and the inclination, could you have a look at this file, please? As far as I'm aware, but obviously I may be wrong, this cropped version, created by using the general cropping tool on Commons, has been correctly "attributed" as a derivation from the former file and that the original file has not been deleted? The cropped version also includes links to the original file and indicates it is derived from the first file. Was there anything else I should have done? My question is because it's being claimed there is a problem with it and that "It is WP:CC-BY-SA violation". Is there anything else I should have done? No problem if you don't wish to get involved, but are you able to suggest what I should do (if anything) or someone/somewhere else I should ask? I'm contacting you here as it is a file on Commons rather than on the en.wikipedia. Sagaciousphil (talk) 11:18, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

  • That flippin' article... there can be no CC-BY-SA violation where a work is public domain. A simple scan is not in and of itself to claim CC status, as per Commons:When to use the PD-Scan tag and Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag, both of which essentially state that an image "can have no independent copyright [if] it is simply a mechanical reproduction of an old, public-domain image, or — from the available evidence — that it is so similar to such a reproduction that no copyright protection can be expected to arise". If this is a faithful scan, even edited for levels, it is public domain.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:41, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
    Thanks. It just seems to go on and on. :-( Sagaciousphil (talk) 11:56, 12 March 2018 (UTC)