User talk:Cvmontuy

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Versa2021p1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Versa2021p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:58, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Versa2021p2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Versa2021p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. (Nice, with 80% selfie.) --XRay 06:35, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Usumacinta river floaded2020.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Usumacinta river floaded2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Eje8Sur202104.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eje8Sur202104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Please check your image. It's leaning out and IMO a little too warm. And please improve the categorization. --XRay 05:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC). ✓ Done
Would you please check again --Cvmontuy 16:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO OK. Thank you. --XRay 09:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ParroquiaSanMiguel2019P5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ParroquiaSanMiguel2019P5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:39, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Battle field with chess board.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Battle field with chess board.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:27, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Commons:Valued image candidates/ Taken with Canon EOS 500N[edit]

Dialog-warning.svg
Notice of impending
speedy deletion
Commons:Valued image candidates/ Taken with Canon EOS 500N is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD G1 (test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content): Invalid request, file is not exist

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.

If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

Deutsch  English  español  português  français  Bahasa Indonesia  +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 10:23, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

El Zacatal bridge, Ciudad del Carmen 2020.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Zacatal bridge, Ciudad del Carmen 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good enough quality for me. -- Ikan Kekek 20:27, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]