|(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)|
Yann 19:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
- [[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
- [[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.
BotMultichillT 05:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Marimba cordoba.jpg is uncategorized since 26 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Expiatorio ceiling.jpg was uncategorized on 12 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:01, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Zócalo desde la latino.jpg was uncategorized on 27 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
I saw that you tagged a image for rename but your not on the checkpage for the bot (Commons:MediaMoveBot/CheckPage) Please go to the the talk page and put your name up for approval so that the bot can automatically rename your request instead of waiting for someone else on that list to confirm for you. Betacommand 17:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
|File:Toltec_bench2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
|Welcome to the FPC project, Cvmontuy! Here, we nominate files to become featured pictures. Please read the image guidelines carefully before reviewing and nominating. If you have any questions, you can take them to the project's talk page. And don't be deterred if your first nominations fail; this is usual. Again, welcome! --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC)|
Hi Cvmontuy, template:FPX is used to quick close nominations which stand no chance of being promoted, due to major technical shortcomings. I think the nomination was on that limit, and was asking other participants if they agree. Sorry for using Wiki slang, did not notice you are a new participant. Some participants are the opinion that the use of FPX should be very limited as it might act discouraging, others argue that receiving dozens of oppose votes might be even more discouraging. I certainly do not wish to discourage you, and my only aim was to suggest quick closure in order to move on. --Elekhh (talk) 21:10, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi! It means that the image looks a bit underexposed. I would have adjutsed the s-curve, giving it a little more light, because the image is very dark. Hola! Significa que la imagen se ve un poco sub-expuesta. Yo hubiese ajustado los niveles en la curva S, agregando un poco de luz, porque la imagen se ve muy oscura. Regards, --Paolo Costa (talk) 02:54, 24 February 2012 (UTC)