|(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)|
Yann 11:45, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
you have marked File:Nick Brown on Ian Clarke's Telstar.jpg, File:Nick Brown-250 Cobra replica-Mortimer(3).jpg and File:Nick Brown-360-FBAJS-1981.jpg as copyvios, but have not provided any evidence for that or link to the original source. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- The contributor who have uploaded this picture have also uploaded quantity of picture which are copyvio (seen his talk page : User talk:Imola461). So i suppose this picture are copyvio and i search a site with the original picture. I don't found the original picture for the moment but i search it.
Dédélembrouille (talk) 08:21, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Ducati "SS" - "Supersport"
Hi, Dédélembrouille. There is already Category: Motorcycles, so it makes no sense to redirect Category: Motos to leave it empty. In addition, Category: Motos (city) is incorrect because Motos is not a city but a small village, and breaks the rules in English spelling by using parentheses. Better leave it as it was and avoid confusion and empty categories. Sonsaz (talk) 13:41, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- ¿¿?? Never has targeted another file Category:Motos. Already exists Category:Motorcycles and useless leave a valid category empty, when the Commons search methods are completely different from any Wikipedia project, and create a new geographic category and grammatically incorrect. The obvious thing about all this is to leave it as is. Sonsaz (talk) 19:52, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:22, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
File source is not properly indicated: File:PaulSmartLE1000.jpg
|This media may be deleted.|
|A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PaulSmartLE1000.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter
If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.
|File:Lighting McQueen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.