User talk:DanTD/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This is a Wikimedia Commons user page.

If you find this page on any site other than Wikimedia Commons, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DanTD/Archive_2.


azərbaycanca | български | বাংলা | čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Nederlands | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | shqip | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wikimedia Commons

Waldo[edit]

Category:Waldo (Amtrak station) --Ebyabe (talk) 00:18, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Deprecated License[edit]

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


It has been found that Image:Brightonbeachstation.jpg has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted! Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 02:38, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Freeport, NY[edit]

Thanks for the Freeport Memorial Library photo, which I've added to Freeport, New York. If you are near there again, could you possibly get an image of the Woodcleft Canal, municipal buidling, and possibly of the Freeport Historical Museum and/or other old houses in Freeport? Also, there is an interesting ruin of an old waterworks just north of the railroad near the Baldwin border. (No pressure, just a suggestion. And thanks again for a good photo.) - Jmabel ! talk 07:11, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Elmhurst Metra Station, 1994[edit]

I used the Flickr upload bot, which didn't have any problems with copyright since the file was licensed as CC-BY on Flickr. I didn't realize there were any copyright issues. --TheCatalyst31 (talk) 22:20, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Photo adjustment[edit]

My computer came preloaded with Microsoft Digital Image. This gives automatic adjustemts for camera phone and color levels, as well as slightly more advanced functions. I have also downloaded freeware IrfanView which has similar tools. Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:16, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

I have tried to adjust some of your list. It is better for the photographer to do the cleanup, because I often don't know what the picture should look like. Is the station paint really that pink? In most cases the final result does not justify the effort required.

My attempts that I have uploaded are:

I think they have all been improved, but the results are still not very good. Sorry. Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:19, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes. The Manhasset and Bayside station images are good examples of how I am unsure about the color adjustment. If they don't look right, please revert them. Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:59, 6 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Park Street Subway Stop.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Park Street Subway Stop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Gryffindor (talk) 06:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


File:Prince_Georges_Plaza_Metro.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Prince_Georges_Plaza_Metro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:15, 8 May 2010 (UTC)


Category:Rockand, Massachusetts[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Rockand, Massachusetts has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Faolin42 (talk) 22:53, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

I submitted a deletion request for Category:Rockand, Massachusetts. I've created Category:Rockland, Massachusetts to replace it. Faolin42 (talk) 22:53, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Just realized the Rockand deletion request notification should have gone to Marcbela, so I've notified Marcbela too... Faolin42 (talk) 23:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

I don't remember having anything to do with this category, but you seem to have a good reason to delete this one too. Go ahead. ----DanTD (talk) 01:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Category:Winchedon, Massachusetts[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Winchedon, Massachusetts has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Faolin42 (talk) 22:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

I submitted a deletion request for Category:Winchedon, Massachusetts. I've created Category:Winchendon, Massachusetts to replace it.

I only put the categories in to keep it in tact. But if it's a typo, and it was replaced, then go ahead and delete it. The same with the previous category. ----DanTD (talk) 00:34, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Rocky Mount NC ACL Office Car-3.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:55, 4 July 2010 (UTC)


File:Rocky Mount NC ACL Office Car-2.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:57, 4 July 2010 (UTC)


File:Rocky Mount NC ACL Stainless Whopper Hopper-1.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:01, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Uhm, I don't know. For sure it's not a problem caused by my bot, probably by the uploading tool. I'm sorry not to help you a lot but I know how much as you do about it :( Sorry again, --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 17:11, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I agree, the problem is that I don't know who's the developer of the uploading tool :( --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 10:07, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Where did cc-by-sa-3.0 come from[edit]

Hi!

You transfered an image from en-wiki that was PD but on Commons it was suddenly PD and cc-by-sa-3.0. Where did that come from? I asume it was a mistake and removed it [1] now. --MGA73 (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

I just couldn't find the ordinary PD tag, that's all. ----DanTD (talk) 16:14, 13 July 2010 (UTC) (moved from User talk:MGA73)
OK. In that case it is better to ask than to add an other license. However if you use a lool like http://toolserver.org/~magnus/commonshelper.php it should help you choose the right license. --MGA73 (talk) 16:28, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
I don't see where that tool provides any license. ----DanTD (talk) 20:32, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Deprecated License[edit]

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Chicago Trump International Hotel; Under Construction - 2006.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 03:18, 2 August 2010 (UTC)


File:NB US 19-98 at Withlacoochee River-FDOT Bridge Number.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Subway Restaurant @ Inverness Masonic Temple-1.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:19, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. The upload tool deleted the license when it forced me to change the name. ----DanTD (talk) 14:25, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Railroad signal categories[edit]

I haven't found any other photos in Commons, besides yours, for the Category:Position light signals. There are a few photos on English Wikipedia (such as w:File:NS Buffalo-Line-Signal-304-3042-APPROACH.jpg) that could be moved to Commons. (I moved a photo, once, and found it to be a cumbersome process.) There are, of course, some great photos of PRR signals on various railfan sites, but they are copyrighted. Caseyjonz (talk) 02:01, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Category:Mamie Langdale Bridge[edit]

All these years I've driven over it, I never knew it had a name. Neat! I love that bridge. :) --Ebyabe (talk) 20:36, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Hempstead[edit]

Shouldn't Category:Hempstead, New York, really be Category:Town of Hempstead, New York? Almost always, when people just say "Hempstead" they mean the village. The same probably applies for all Long Island townships. - Jmabel ! talk 16:29, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

You're right, it should. The same goes for the Towns of Babylon, Islip, Riverhead, Southold, Southampton, and East Hampton. If enough images of the Hamlet of Brookhaven, New York are added, I think the Category: Brookhaven, New York should be renamed Category:Town of Brookhaven, New York too. I'm also considering a separate category for the Town of Oyster Bay, as opposed to the hamlet. When I created the category for Babylon, it was strictly for the Village of Babylon, but other people started adding images from the Town of Babylon. Plus, when there were duplicate categories for East Hampton, I tried to remake one for the town and one for the village, which unfortunatley, wasn't so successful. ----DanTD (talk) 16:47, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

File:1960 Plymouth - SCPD-2.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:01, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. The upload bot broke the license. ----DanTD (talk) 02:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Adding categories and descriptions to all the photos I've uploaded is done, with your much appreciated help. Now I can go on another roadtrip! *lol* --Ebyabe (talk) 23:26, 20 December 2010 (UTC)