User talk:Dana boomer

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Dana boomer!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

TUSC token 21034ca50046f6d205f2ce30909947cc[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 2d984617d0c829c10cb3a1968129c331[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Photograph source question[edit]

Hello Dana! sorry i havent responded on your request a little sooner. Hmm you asked me about the photograph of the Haflinger. And i have to admit - i dont remember. The picture is uploaded - as far as i can see in may 2006. I am pretty sure its a photo i found on the nl wikipedia - and somehow needed on a danish page - so i uploaded it here. The creator must have been that username on the nl wikipedia since thats stated on the commons page now. But for some reason theres no user listed under that name anymore - so i am a bit puzzled about that one. The license i am pretty sure i just transfered as it was already on the nl wikipedia - thats what i used to do at least :) But you are right - the info on the page is not enough - many standards has changed since the upload - and i would vote for deletion on it until the author decides to upload the pic him- or herself. The original photo seems to have been deleted on the nl wikipedia - probably because it was uploaded here. Regards Malene Thyssen (talk) 21:56, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Horse in field.jpg[edit]

Hi, Dana! The image File:Horse in field.jpg already had the source indicated under the GFDL banner. --Eleassar (t/p) 22:58, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, but this is where policy of assuming good faith applies. User Fir0002 was a very respected editor on :en till he retired, many of his images were promoted to featured pic there. Also, the image that I've transferred had the same filename (and the same information) in the English Wikipedia, but was later deleted.[1][2] As you're an administrator there, you should be able to verify this without asking me. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:52, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lithuanian Heavy Draught Horse.jpg[edit]

The source was given in the "Description"-Section - what's the problem? --Kersti (talk) 01:45, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

About File:Mustangs palomino valley center.jpg[edit]

Sadly I've to tell you that probably I did a big mistake. In 2005 I was a beginner and I was not aware of big significance of licencing. I can't trace where I got that image - nor a Google search helped me. The picture File:Mustangs palomino valley center.jpg is excellent and I see tha it has been used here and there. What's a pity.... I apologyze. --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 17:44, 11 February 2013 (UTC)