User talk:Darwinius

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

English | Español | Magyar | +/−

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Darwinius!

Arq 1 * Arq 2 * Arq 2013

Then in the 1st of December 2015, all of a sudden, all the messages have vanished into thin air.

New thing started in Dec 2015

Contents

Renaming AML photos[edit]

Olá! Vejo que estás a dar uma volta nas fotos que carregaste do Arquivo Municipal de Lisboa. Boa idea no geral, mesmo se com algumas pontas soltas (deixar um "{" pendurado no início de cada descrição não bom, p.ex.). Mas acrescentar a ref.ª AML (de tipo ABC1234) ao nome do ficheiro vai contra COM:FR; pôr isso no nome do ficheiro ao carrgegar uma foto nova, ainda vá, mas criar novos filenames assim para fotos já carregadas é até explicitamente desaconselhado nessa diretriz.

E, além disso, essa é a referência de um arquivo, não do criador ou da editora original — podemos ter uma imagem destas substitída por um scan de um original que nunca esteve no A.M.L. Esta referência, que de resto se encontra na descrição da imagem, mesmo quando não está no filename, nem sequer é muito útil para identificar cada foto, já que é coisa recente (nota as várias «cotas antigas» dadas para cada ítem) e ninguém garante que amanhã não mude outra vez — já hoje, os vários urls de cada foto incluem outros códigos como DocumentoID.

-- Tuválkin 06:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Olá Tuvalkin, esse "{" no início da descrição deve ter ido por engano, onde é que eu coloquei isso?
A referência no início do ficheiro não só não é aleatória - É o nome da colecção (e, portanto, regra geral é o nome do criador como JBN e BAR, que são Joshua Benoliel e Barcia, não tem a ver com o arquivo) seguido de um número de sequência da própria colecção - como é muito útil para evitar nomes idiotas ou despropositados, ou do tipo (1), (2), etc, quando há uma série de fotos sobre o mesmo tema. Além disso, quando se olha para uma foto com uma ref daquele género no início, fica óbvio que se trata duma foto originária do AML, o que também é bastante útil, e organiza as fotos dentro de cada pasta numa sequência lógica. Isto não só não vai contra COM:FR, por estar de acordo com o ponto "To harmonize the file names of a set of images", como, ao menos para mim, é tão prático e útil que devia ser obrigatório ao se tratar de fotos provenientes de arquivos como é este caso. Além disso, os nomes originais (que, de resto, são dados pelo AML e, esses sim, variam sem grande lógica, como eu já notei ao comparar as descrições actuais com as de 2011) são em geral preservados, excepto nos casos em que são exageradamente compridos, aí eu trunco-os. Isso não sei se é norma ou não, mas se não é devia ser, pois nomes muito compridos em ficheiros são sempre a origem de uma série de problemas, além de ficarem feios e serem chatos de colocar nos artigos, ocupando eles próprios um número desmesurado e desnecessário de caracteres.
Quanto às cotas antigas e actuais, isso não tem qualquer importância, basta usar um só sistema e ficar por ele. Eu nem estou a usar o sistema actual, mas um anterior que é mais prático para este caso. Se o AML depois o alterar novamente é irrelevante para o caso.
Finalmente, a substituição destas imagens por scans que não são do AML nunca acontecerá, ou a acontecer, deve ser sempre revertida. Isto são os positivos do AML; se outra pessoa chegar com outro positivo, mesmo que de melhor qualidade, ou que não esteja estragado como vários destes estão, deve ser sempre carregado num ficheiro à parte.
Abraço, --- Darwin Ahoy! 07:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
E ainda há mais uma coisa - O uso deste sistema permite que facilmente se perceba se uma imagem do AML já existe ou não aqui, o que é da maior utilidade, e é muitíssimo mais difícil de fazer e perceber quando não se usa um sistema deste género. Na realidade, não vejo qualquer desvantagem no uso dum sistema deste género, muito pelo contrário. Por outro lado, já vi esse COM:FR ser levado demasiado à letra em casos francamente estúpidos em que o carregador inicial (regra geral uma certa pessoa) carrega coisas como "Lisboa 697yoyhkhlhlg". E quando se muda para "Lisboa - Basílica da Estrela 2011", por exemplo, cai o Carmo e a Trindade porque é "Lisboa" que está na imagem... Mas pronto, nesses casos já nem ligo porque não tem grande importância. agora aqui a renomeação para um título uniforme dentro da mesma colecção dá de facto muito jeito.--- Darwin Ahoy! 07:57, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Não respondi a isto por concordar em absoluto, mas por prever que discutir mais nesta direção iria trazer(-me) mais chatices do que estou disposto a aturar. Claro que concordo com muito do que escreveste acima, mas o aspeto fundamental é que o princípio básico de COM:FR não está a ser nem bem entendido nem honrado — por ti e por muitos outros administradores (já para não falar de renomeadores e utilizadores de base). Mas recuso-me a ser o único a bater-me por uma causa (aparentemente) perdida. -- Tuválkin 21:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Mas podes explicar melhor isso? É que realmente não vejo nada maléfico em renomear as fotos das colecções do AML (e uma boa parte delas até fui eu que carreguei, e na altura já deviam ter ido assim) com um identificador único, que ainda por cima faz sentido - isto é, ajuda a perceber o que é a foto, ao dizer de que colecção é - e ajuda na organização dentro das categorias. Eu não procuro discussões chatas e improdutivas, mas gostava de entender o que é que está mal neste raciocínio. Até porque posso muito bem estar enganado, não é? --- Darwin Ahoy! 21:47, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Casa quinhentista[edit]

Olá! Estas duas fotos mostram a mesma casa que estes duas aquarelas do Roque Gameiro:

A localização não é Largo Rodrigues de Freitas 38°42′52″N 9°07′51″W / 38.71440°N 9.13089°W / 38.71440; -9.13089, mas Largo do Menino Deus 38°42′50″N 9°07′53″W / 38.713871944444°N 9.1313311111111°W / 38.713871944444; -9.1313311111111, que é mesmo ao lado. -- Tuválkin 05:54, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Pois é verdade, e pelos vistos a casa ainda existe! A informação da AML está incorrecta pelos vistos, muito obrigado pela correcção. --- Darwin Ahoy! 06:07, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Boa! -- Tuválkin 08:36, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

"Altarpieces" vs. "Altar pieces"[edit]

I agree that the former is preferable, but then rather than just change the parent category on, say Category:Altar pieces in the United States I would think you would move it, as well. - Jmabel ! talk

Hi Jmabel, there are zillions of child categories named "Altar pieces", I can't rename them all, at least in a short time. And most of the items inside do not refer to "Altarpieces", but to reredos. It was - and still is - a huge mess here between altarpieces, reredos and "retablos", all meaning precise different things, but being used interchangeably without any logic, the mess extending to (or emanating from) a number of different wikipedias. I consulted with a national expert on ecclesiastic history, and she said the authority for the ecclesiastic definitions was the Thesaurus, a very expensive book of which, thankfully, there is a version online at http://151.13.7.25/thesaurus/home/index.jsp which clarifies a lot of things. Anyway, worst than it was, its impossible to get, and now at least the top categories are correctly named and placed. The others will be corrected as time permits, by me or anyone else... All the best, --- Darwin Ahoy! 20:42, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
For an uncontroversial renaming of a category, User:CommonsDelinker/commands (or, if you are not an admin, User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands) is pretty quick; you'd mostly just need to make the list of categories to be renamed. Reredos and retablo are more specific than altarpiece, and I agree that it would be nice to subcat them where possible, but there is nothing wrong with calling them altarpieces. - Jmabel ! talk 00:08, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
No, no, reredos is not a specific type of altarpieces. At best, the opposite could be true. Reredos means the frame or architectural structure behind the altar, generally providing a context for the altarpieces. In sensu lato it means everything behind the altar, which could be a single altarpiece or statue or an extremely elaborated and complex architectonic structure. Check the definition here. Retablos is the Spanish word for reredos, meaning precisely retro tablum, whatever is behind the table, the altar. That word is used across the countries which languages derived mostly from Latin. In English, however, and specifically in Wiki-en, it is not used with the Spanish definition, but with a different one only used in Latin America for a specific type of folk art which derived from the true reredos, but are not reredos anymore. What seems to have went wrong here is that at eons ago someone assumed that retable ou reredos is the same as altarpiece, which is wrong and nonsense, but unfortunately was replicated ad eternum through the child categories. Recently, apparently, more knowledgeable people began using and creating the Reredos category, creating a third level of confusion, adding to the "altar pieces" and retablos. It was that mess that I attempted to resolve using the proper definitions from an authoritative source, which were actually, in general, what already was in the wiki-en definitions. The problem now is the Spanish and French regions and divisions, which have hundreds of categories named "altar piece", while the contents of them are actually reredos, not altarpieces at all. That's a huge mess to resolve, but that thing can be done by a bot, and I don't plan to lose more time doing it manually. I've already gone through all the non-obvious cases, what remains can be easily automatized.--- Darwin Ahoy! 10:43, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Adding user to Flickr Blacklist[edit]

Please use blacklist tool at Commons talk:Questionable Flickr images and explain addition. Thank you. --Denniss (talk) 13:28, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the heads-up, done.--- Darwin Ahoy! 13:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Pedro Calungsod[edit]

Pedro Calungsod was born in 1654, not in the 1950s. Elizium23 (talk) 16:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Indeed he was! I don't know how I saw a 9 instead of a 6... Must replace my lenses.
Anyway, the painting looks rather new, and is all over the web, so I believe it was correctly deleted. However, if you have some evidence that it can be here on Commons, I can restore it. Cheers, --- Darwin Ahoy! 19:28, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Imagens Wiki[edit]

Darwin, muito, mas muito obrigado mesmo, estava desistindo de editar, haja vista que os administradores envolvidos, simplesmente deletaram tudo, sem ouvir meus argumentos. Muitas outras imagens deletadas (desta lista https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Meloaraujo ) tiveram também as autorizações enviadas, em alguns casos reenviadas, com confirmação de administradores do Commons. Aparentemente fui acusado de criar e-mail´s falsos para justificar os carregamentos, mas a logica mais simples, seria colocar as imagens como sendo minhas. Muitas imagens como foram deletadas de maneira sumaria, não consegui rastrear os autores, haja vista que participo de muitas listas de discussão sobre ferrovias na internet e essas imagens foram cadastradas tem muitos anos, algumas de 2009. Posso te listas as imagens com autorizações reenviadas. Meloaraujo (talk) 00:34, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Darwin, quando fui informado, me passaram que o processo ocorreria em cerca de 30 dias, em uma semana deletaram todas, mesmo com o cadastramento de que estariam sendo tratadas...
as imagens abaixo, tiveram a autorização enviada pelos autores:
File:GM GL8 3632 ALL.JPG - Milton Ribeiro
file:GE_15T_502_ABPF_DSC01961.JPG - ABPF Bruno Sanches
File:GE 15T 502 ABPF DSC03190.JPG - ABPF Bruno Sanches
File:GE 15T 502 ABPF DSC02018.JPG - ABPF Bruno Sanches
File:EMD DDM45 822 EFVM.jpg - Deyler Tose Marchezini
File:GE BB40-9W 1165 EFVM.jpg - Deyler Tose Marchezini
File:GMD B12 FTC SALV-ABPF 6001.jpg - Diego Seger Luciano
File:GM G22 4305 ALL.jpg - Daniel Trevisan
amanhã te passo o outros, Meloaraujo (talk) 00:57, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Todas estas imagens tiveram autorização enviada, recebi copia dos e-mail´s. Amanhã listo outras... Meloaraujo (talk) 01:27, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Então, acredito que 95% ou mais das imagens deletadas, estavam em artigos, em PT, em muitos casos como unica imagem, das imagens, algumas em artigos em EN ou outras linguás, algumas também nesta condição, como unica imagem. Da lista acima todas tiveram e-mail enviado pelos autores das imagens, para o ORTS com copia para mim. Vou te passar mais tarde outras, imagens com autorizações enviadas, para que possa buscar e restaurar. Algumas vou pedir o restauro para rastrear os autores e solicitar envio ou reenvio das autorizações. Bom Natal... isso para mim foi um presente, pois como percebeu, o processo de eliminação foi no minimo sumario,... Meloaraujo (talk) 15:10, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Complementando, credito que todas as imagens deletadas estavam em artigos, agora não sei qual o processo para restauração das mesmas, assim como das legendas. Meloaraujo (talk) 15:11, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Darwin, valeu, vou tentar te passar outros arquivos, como os listados acima que já possuíam envio de permissão, outros agora com os arquivos restaurados vou solicitar aos autores. Peço pelo menos uns 2 meses de prazo, estou saindo de ferias, e com muitos compromissos. Prometo tratar todas as pendencias...
File:GM G22 4305 ALL.jpg - Daniel Trevisan - enviado em 16/11
File:GE 15T 502 ABPF DSC03190.JPG - Bruno Sanches ABPPF - 09/11
File:GE 15T 502 ABPF DSC01961.JPG - Bruno Sanches ABPPF - 09/11
File:TUDH_Bom_Sinal_Maceio-AL_27.06.2012_-_ELIAS_VIEIRA.png - Elias Vieira - 10/11
file:GM GL8 3632 ALL.JPG - Milton Ribeiro - 18/11
File:GE 100T nº5 COSIPA.jpg por Juliano Friveda Serra enviada em 14/11
File:U6B_1_COSIPA.jpg estava neste endereço https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:U6B_1_COSIPA.jpg a autorização enviada por Juliano Friveda Serra enviada em 14/11
File:EMD DDM45 822 EFVM.jpg - Deyler Tose Marchezini- 19/11
File:GE BB40-9W 1165 EFVM.jpg - Deyler Tose Marchezini - 19/11
Meloaraujo (talk) 22:30, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
opa estava esquecendo, obrigado por salvar a imagem da EFParaná de 1879... bem velha,,, hheehhehhe Meloaraujo (talk) 00:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Darwin, algumas atualizações.
File:GE 15T 502 ABPF DSC03190.JPG - Bruno Sanches ABPPF - 10/01 o site, com autorização - http://abpfsuldeminas.com/ge-15-ton/
File:GE 15T 502 ABPF DSC01961.JPG - Bruno Sanches ABPPF - 10/01 o site, com autorização - http://abpfsuldeminas.com/ge-15-ton/
File:GE 80T 3103 RFFSA EFSJ L.jpg - Alfredo Rodrigues - 10/01
File:GM SD40-2 5231-3 RFFSA.JPG - Jorge A. Ferreira Jr. - 11/01
File:GM SD40-2 5234-8 MRS.JPG - Jorge A. Ferreira Jr. - 11/01
Os arquivos abaixo tiveram autorização enviada, conforme os autores me repassaram...
File:EMD DDM45 822 EFVM.jpg - Deyler Tose Marchezini- 19/11 ou pouco posterior
File:GE BB40-9W 1165 EFVM.jpg - Deyler Tose Marchezini - 19/11 ou pouco posterior
File:GE U23C MRS 3212-6.jpg - Alexandre Almeida - 10/11 ou pouco posterior
File:GE U23C RFFSA 3920.jpg - Alexandre Almeida - 10/11 ou pouco posterior
File:EVSA GT26CU-2 FCA 936.jpg - Alexandre Almeida- 10/11 ou pouco posterior
devo ficar meio sem comunicação ao longo da semana, mas volto com férreas, estas minhas :-}. Meloaraujo (talk) 10:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-52[edit]

18:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:37, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Is their a restorer bot that restores the file to WP? Per this one [1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Doc James, by default you can just revert the edition which removed the file from the WP article. But I'm still dealing with this file, there seems to be something missing in that ticket.--- Darwin Ahoy! 13:34, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
The email from the Gates Foundation says "We do have approval to share both pieces under a CC BY SA license." Not sure if you got that one. I can email it to you if you email me. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-02[edit]

16:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-03[edit]

17:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

thank you[edit]

Thanks for restoring the Schisler/McMunn logo! Klinglerc (talk) 14:15, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

@Klinglerc: You're welcome, it is always a pleasure to help others contributing to the improvement of Commons and the WMF projects.--- Darwin Ahoy! 15:54, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-04[edit]

16:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Netmadeira Webcam Faial - 2013-06-29 15-20.png[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Netmadeira Webcam Faial - 2013-06-29 15-20.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

BMacZero (talk) 23:34, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Netmadeira Webcam Faial - 2013-06-29 15-20.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Netmadeira Webcam Faial - 2013-06-29 15-20.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Netmadeira Webcam Faial - 2013-06-29 15-20.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 00:22, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-05[edit]

21:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Classified_aqueducts_in_Portugal[edit]

Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:09, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Cemeteries_in_Funchal[edit]

Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


Fotos ferroviárias[edit]

Darwin, algumas atualizações. Os arquivos abaixo tiveram autorização enviada, conforme os autores me repassaram...

File:GE 15T 502 ABPF DSC03190.JPG - Bruno Sanches ABPPF - 10/01 o site, com autorização - http://abpfsuldeminas.com/ge-15-ton/
File:GE 15T 502 ABPF DSC01961.JPG - Bruno Sanches ABPPF - 10/01 o site, com autorização - http://abpfsuldeminas.com/ge-15-ton/
File:EMD DDM45 822 EFVM.jpg - Deyler Tose Marchezini- 19/11 ou pouco posterior, enviou via outlook, se for o caso peço que reenvie.
File:GE BB40-9W 1165 EFVM.jpg - Deyler Tose Marchezini - 19/11 ou pouco posterior, enviou via outlook, se for o caso peço que reenvie.
File:GE U23C RFFSA 3920.jpg - Alexandre Almeida - 10/11 ou pouco posterior
File:GE V8 6381 FEPASA.jpg - Ricardo Frontera - 21/01 pelo mesmo e-mail que ele enviou no passado muitas outras autorizações, este arquivo ( File:GE U20C 3846 FERROBAN.jpg ) teve o ORTS implantado.
File:GE V8 6382 FEPASA.jpg - Ricardo Frontera - 21/01 pelo mesmo e-mail que ele enviou no passado muitas outras autorizações, este arquivo ( File:GE U20C 3846 FERROBAN.jpg ) teve o ORTS implantado.
Fiquei meio ausente, ferias, voltei e carreguei algumas fotos, estas minhas ( http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/Meloaraujo&ilshowall=1 ), ainda tem mais alguma coisa para carregar, mas falta tempo... Meloaraujo (talk) 21:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
tem mais esta File:WBB BOX 320 CP - Via.JPG, esta foto é da mesma serie desta File:WBB_BOX_320_CP.JPG, tem mais de 70 anos... e o fotografo é desconhecido, possivelmente um funcionário da CPEF..Meloaraujo (talk) 22:58, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you... 💐[edit]

... for your quick help with the photo I uploaded. --Andrea014 (talk) 11:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

@Andrea014: You are very welcome, it was a pleasure to help. :) --- Darwin Ahoy! 13:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-06[edit]

18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-07[edit]

16:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-08[edit]

18:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

TicketNumber=2016022110006635[edit]

Good evening Mr. Darwinius

My name is Sean Hurwitz. Recently, a user created an article about me and contacted me in order to supply her with a picture. I supplied her (AmyPFiztgerald) with this picture of me which was taken by Candace Horgan (as you can see in the details). Candace gave me her permission to use it in any way I want over the net. I have that in an email which I believe you saw.

My question is, what can I do to make sure the pic gets used correctly? I've even asked candace herself to upload it, which she said she'd be happy to do. So, we created an account for her...but since it isn't verified, she can't upload anything yet. haha

We have taken the picture down for now out of respect for OTRS rules and regulations.

Help? I just want to know how to do this correctly. Amy went through a lot to get it all done, and she really wants a photo up there, as do I :-)

Please advise Your help is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely, Sean Hurwitz

Hello Sean, I apologize for taking so long to answer your request. I see Jenmedia below is also dealing with the same situation. You just have to send the permission you have from Candace Horgan to OTRS in order for the upload to be accepted here.
As for your question - "what can I do to make sure the pic gets used correctly?" can you clarify what do you mean by "used correctly"?--- Darwin Ahoy! 17:06, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Regrading Amrita rao Uploading pic[edit]

I upload this pic https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jjs_show.jpg ticket link (https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2016021810025568) and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EMRALD_GEMFIELDS_OPTION_copy.jpg Ticket link (https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2016021810025871) I gave written permission letter..can you please provide me soft copy of what type of permission or licensee you want hemalove (talk) 13:08, 27 february 2016 (UTC)

Sean Hurwitz (under review; verification; to rectify image lic.)[edit]

Hi there, am currently checking over this new entry material and image to rectify any errors and the image licensing tag (am also verifying data/cite acceptable per bio of living person guidelines - I am not the original article writer). Was hoping you could check my recent update regarding the image lic. tag and steer me if wrong? The photographer is not a logged in Wikipedia user here; yet has released image; form / authorization has been submitted; I believe another user uploaded a duplicate image file in error subsequent to original; just trying to verify my actions (or next action). Again, am monitoring and trying to rectify (make sure all checks out) here. Again, I am not the original user/contrib who uploaded. Thank you.

The relevant bio/page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Hurwitz

File:Sean_Hurwitz_Smash_Mouth_Red_Rocks.jpg

Jenmedia (talk) 10:35, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

@Jenmedia: I apologize for taking so long to review and answer this. I see that upload needs a permission, have you sent it to OTRS already? --- Darwin Ahoy! 17:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


Additional submission email has been provided, sent to OTRS; one of which is referenced herein (new ticket). Just trying to confirm the status, acceptability for such and help resolve issues. There was some previous activity and history on this image including prior (or perhaps duplicate) uploads and permission correspondence... Not sure why I'm unable to view access such now. At any rate... additional email / attempt has been sent to OTRS via [Ticket#: 2016030910025467]. Any insight you can provide is appreciated. Thanks for your time. Jenmedia (talk) 22:19, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Ronaldo Correia de Brito[edit]

Olá, Darwinius, editei algumas informações na página wikipedia do autor Ronaldo Correia de Brito e você desfez por eu ter removido as informações com fontes sem explicar o porquê. O problema é que fiz as alterações a pedido do próprio autor de forma a retirar o conteúdo publicitário ou apologético, colocar fontes e reciclar o estilo. Você sabe se é possível refazer as minhas alterações? Você poderia me ajudar? Obrigada.— Preceding unsigned comment added by BillyPilgrim2 (talk • contribs)

@BillyPilgrim2: Veja, você removeu informação referenciada dali. Claro que o posso ajudar, mas você não preferia que tratássemos deste assunto na pt-wiki, em vez de ser aqui no Commons? --- Darwin Ahoy! 19:57, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-11[edit]

18:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

okay, compreendo, farei o que estiver ao meu alcanse e não conseguir, não dasanimo...

Unblock[edit]

Hello, See reply on my talkpage. The vandalism from the range which you unblocked recently is back, now it is up to you to take appropriate actions. Thanks :-). --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Imagens[edit]

Estão pondo minhas fotos para eliminação. Foto da igreja antiga de Brumado, Praça Armindo Azevedo em Brumado, e outras fotos antigas, porém as imagens são livre para uso em qualquer página, ou trabalho, desde que cite a fonte e a fonte já está citada, mas eu não sei como tirar aquele formulário onde diz :"Eu, titular de tal imagem e blablablá...."; quando vou carregar as imagen não dá uma opção de mostrar de imediato onde está a permissão e quando procuro uma opção dizendo que está em algum sítio da net, vem um monte de porém muito complicado. As imagens são permitidas.

Tech News: 2016-12[edit]

16:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-13[edit]

19:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-14[edit]

22:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-15[edit]

20:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

File:TheScott logo.jpeg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:TheScott logo.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 15:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-16[edit]

20:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-17[edit]

21:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-18[edit]

20:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-19[edit]

23:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-20[edit]

16:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Please help![edit]

Hello! It would be very helpful if you'd give us your opinion here. Thank you! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-21[edit]

18:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-22[edit]

16:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Canário-rasteiro.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sicalis citrina (Stripe-tailed Yellow-finch), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Tech News: 2016-23[edit]

20:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Bacurauzinho.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chordeiles pusillus (Least nighthawk).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

17-Callicore sorana.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callicore sorana ("80") ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Beija-flor-de-gravata-verde (Augastes scutatus).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Augastes scutatus (Hyacinth visorbearer).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Caranguejo no Parque Nacional da Lagoa do Peixe.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neohelice granulata (Burrowing crab).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Bico-de-pimenta.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saltator atricollis (Black-throated saltator).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Caxinguele (Sciurus aestuans).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sciurus aestuans (Brazilian squirrel).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Tech News: 2016-24[edit]

18:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Canário-rasteiro (cropped).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Canário-rasteiro (cropped).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Canário-rasteiro.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Dúvida sobre copyright[edit]

Olá, Darwinius. Tire-me uma dúvida, por favor: pode haver algum direito sobre uma imagem que eu fiz de uma pessoa que agora já está morta ? Tirei fotos em 2001 e o sujeito morreu em 2012. Que eu saiba, a única pessoa que poderia reclamar direitos de imagem seria a própria pessoa que aparece na foto. Como ela faleceu, concluí que não há problemas com relação a isso. Estou correto ? Posso publicar essa imagens como trabalho próprio e licenciá-las sob Creative Commons ? Só para constar, o sujeito deu consentimento implicitamente, já que até fez pose para a foto. Clausgroi (talk) 15:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Passeio de Buggy no Parque das Dunas de Genipabu, RN - 2.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Passeio de Buggy no Parque das Dunas de Genipabu, RN - 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Passeio de Buggy no Parque das Dunas de Genipabu, RN - 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-25[edit]

19:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-26[edit]

15:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Seal of Sikkim color.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Seal of Sikkim color.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SpacemanSpiff 08:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-27[edit]

19:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 14:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-28[edit]

15:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-29[edit]

12:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)