User talk:David.Monniaux

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

archives: 1, 2

Contents

Licenses[edit]

Just release your photos into the public domain. Let's cut it with the BS creative commons license.

Releasing into the public domain does not even have a clear legal meaning in all jurisdictions. And, no, I don't intend to do so for now. David.Monniaux 09:13, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Admin news[edit]

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Admin news[edit]

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC) P.S.: Pardon if this is a repeat (bot debugging...)

Image of FR passport[edit]

Your note on my en talk page was somewhat cryptic. I wouldn't hurt you to explain a little more in future as I had to go to PUI to find your comment that the FR government didn't copyright their images. In this case, how can you own the copyright to an image of a FR Government document? If there is a special dispensation concerning copyright for French Givernment - images should this be reflected in the tag? Anyway, I'm happy to withdraw my objections to the image in these circumstances. I have cross poste dthis to your en talk page --Spartaz 19:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

In some countries, scans of public domain works are considered copyrighted by default by the person who scanned them (I believe it is the case in the UK), this is why I noted that I renounced to possible rights over that scan. I remove this tag since it seems to disturb you so much. David.Monniaux 17:03, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Demande de suppression d'images[edit]

(Re-)Bonjour David.
Puisque je vois que tu es admin ici et que tu es actif en ce moment, puis-je te demander de supprimer ces images que j'ai chargées mais qui ne sont malheureusement pas libres (il s'agit de captures d'écran de Photoshop) :

Je vais en recharger de nouvelles versions sous le même nom. Je sais qu'il y en a d'autres dans le même cas (celles de Lescar), mais je te demanderai de pas les supprimer pour le moment, le temps que je les refasse avec The GIMP et que je remanie le texte du didacticiel correspondant. Merci. Sting 01:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Problème[edit]

Bonjour,

Je viens vous exposer un petit problème. Pour illustrer un article sur l'histoire des tramways du Havre, j'ai chargé un certain nombre de cartes postales du début du siècle. Puis, quelqu'un que je croyais être un administrateur m'a apposé, sur 2 cartes postales, un message me signalant que l'image ne comportait pas ni date, ni auteur, ni source. Comme il était tchèque et qu'il ne connaît pas forcément le problème, j'ai pensé que cela était un simple malentendu. Les 2 cartes datent de 1928, je les ai récupérées auprès d'un collectionneur qui m'en a fait une copie avec l'autorisation de les reproduire, il y a une quinzaine d'années; ce que j'ai déjà fait dans un livre ( de toute manière, la législation en matière de cartes postales est des plus floues ), j'ai cité d'ailleurs la collection dont sont issus les documents( Liot ).

Mais en regardant plus attentivement, le tchèque en question Timi n'est pas plus administrateur que moi et s'amuse visiblement à polluer le site. Une photo de lui sur sa galerie lui donne 16 ou 17 ans, ce qui confirme mes soupçons ( bien que la valeur n'attende pas le nombre des années ).

J'aimerai que ce problème soit réglé. Merci d'avance

NB . En chargeant ma 1ère photographie~( sur un cours d'eau ), j'avais oublié les règles de licence mais depuis je fais particulièrement attention à cela.

antonov14 14:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)


Cartes postales[edit]

Copie de la réponse sur le même problème.

Bonjour

Merci pour votre réponse. Toutefois, si on en reste à cette problématique, on peut supprimer une bonne partie des illustrations des articles consacrées au début du XXème siècle et des bouquins par la même occasion. L'article que j'ai rédigé sur l'histoire des Tramways du Havre reprend en partie un extrait d'un livre que j'ai rédigé sur les tramways et chemins de fer d'intérêt local dans ma région, ouvrage dans lequel on trouve environ 200 cartes postales reproduites avec mention de la collection ( la mienne ou celle de personnes contactées ). De plus, au dos des cartes postales, soit on ne trouve rien ( au moins la moitié, j'en possède plus de 3 000 et c'est un échantillon représentatif ), soit on trouve le nom de l'imprimeur ( ex. Neurdein frères, Imp. Crété, succ - Paris-Corbeil, pour une carte postale du Tréport ( 76 ) !, ex. Imprimerie Lévy et frères, Paris, pour une carte postale de Eu ( 76 )! ), pas du photographe. Il arrive, dans de petites communes, de trouver le nom d'un photographe local qui fait office d'imprimeur et édite ses propres clichés, de là à savoir quand il est mort et à contacter ses descendants, autant rechercher une aiguille dans une botte de foin. Je comprends parfaitement le copyright sur des articles ou photos récentes, mais quand il est impossible de déterminer l'ayant-droit, cela m'échappe un peu.

Pour le code de la propriété intellectuelle, merci, je connais.

Je me permets de vous donner un extrait du carrefour des collectivités locales à propos des cartes postales anciennes [[1]]

Vente de copies de cartes postales anciennes datant du début du siècle et droits d'auteur Des droits d'auteur sont-ils exigibles à l'occasion de la vente par le comité des fêtes d'une commune de photocopies de cartes postales anciennes dans le cadre d'une fête locale ?

Aux termes de l'article L. 123-1 du code de la propriété intellectuelle : «L'auteur jouit, sa vie durant, du droit exclusif d'exploiter son oeuvre sous quelque forme que ce soit et d'en tirer un profit pécuniaire.

Au décès de l'auteur, ce droit persiste au bénéfice de ses ayant-droit pendant l'année civile en cours et les soixante dix années qui suivent ».

Le délai à prendre en compte pour déterminer si une oeuvre est soumise à ces dispositions court donc en principe non pas à compter de la réalisation de celle-ci ou de sa date d'achèvement, mais à compter du décès de son auteur ; ainsi en supposant que l'auteur des cartes postales soit né en 1890, qu'il ait réalisé celles-ci à l'âge de 30 ans et qu'il soit mort en 1970, ses oeuvres bénéficieraient de la protection prévue par le code de la propriété intellectuelle jusqu'en 2040. Toutefois, lorsque l'oeuvre est anonyme, ce délai est réduit à 30 ans à compter de sa réalisation ; en revanche, si l'oeuvre est collective, le délai est de 70 ans à compter de la mort du dernier des coauteurs.

A cette question de délai s'ajoute une autre question relative au respect moral du droit de l'auteur de l'oeuvre : en effet, si le droit exclusif de reproduction d'une oeuvre dure 70 ans après la mort de son auteur, le fait que les droits patrimoniaux de celle-ci soient arrivés à expiration n'autorise pas pour autant des tiers à en disposer sans restrictions : il appartient à celui ou à ceux qui les exploitent de veiller au respect du nom de l'auteur et à l'intégrité de son oeuvre. Ce dernier point pourrait éventuellement prêter à contestation s'il venait à apparaître que les reproductions mises en vente par le comité des fêtes concerné sont de qualité médiocre ou insuffisante, ou encore qu'elles n'ont pas le même format que les cartes postales originales ou le même cadrage ; cependant, les recherches de jurisprudence entreprises sur ce sujet n'ont pas permis de trouver un cas pratique semblable.

Enfin, pourrait soulever d'autres difficultés tenant au sujet même des reproductions vendues par le comité des fêtes pourrait être soulevées, s'il venait à apparaître que celles-ci représentent des immeubles : en effet, l'article 9 du code civil fonde le propriétaire d'un immeuble à interdire l'utilisation de l'image de celui-ci, même s'il est visible depuis la voie publique, parce que cette utilisation peut porter atteinte à sa personnalité ou à sa vie privée, hypothèse peu probable s'agissant de cartes postales vieilles d'environ 80 ans, ou comme l'a indiqué la première chambre civile de la Cour de cassation par un arrêt du 10 mars 1999 qui pourrait éventuellement être invoqué si certaines cartes représentaient un immeuble privé, parce que l'article 544 du code civil permet au propriétaire d'un immeuble, sur lequel il a un droit de jouissance absolue, de s'opposer à l'exploitation de l'image de celui-ci. Ce n'est donc que dans le cas où une telle autorisation aurait été délivrée que des photographies pourraient être proposées à la vente au public.

En outre, dans certaines situations, le bâtiment est protégé par le droit d'auteur si les conditions prévues par le code de la propriété intellectuelle sont réunies, en particulier l'oeuvre de l'architecte est protégée, comme celles des autres auteurs d'oeuvres de l'esprit, lorsque l'oeuvre revêt un caractère original, et on retrouve ici le problème de délai précédemment évoqué. L'autorisation de reproduire l'image d'un bâtiment, dans ces conditions, peut donc être soumise à l'autorisation de son auteur ou du concessionnaire de ses droits qui peut être le propriétaire du bâtiment. La jurisprudence admet toutefois que lorsqu'un bâtiment n'est pas l'objet principal de la reproduction, comme cela peut être le cas de la photographie ou du dessin reproduisant un paysage comportant entre autres des oeuvres protégées, l'autorisation de l'architecte ou du cessionnaire de ses droits n'est pas requise.

D'une part, puisque la moitié environ des cartes postales ne disposent pas de mention particulière, la durée est réduite à 30 ans. D'autre part, le législation s'applique à toute activité à but lucratif ( pour les activités à but non lucratif, l'ensemble reste flou et s'appuie sur la jurisprudence; sinon, un élève qui réalise un exposé ou un TPE - épreuve anticipée du bac sous forme de dossier ou autre travail de compilation sur un thème librement choisi - en classe de première, ne pourrait illuster ses propos avec un quelconque document - poussons le raisonnement jusqu'à l'absurde ).


Œuvres anonymes etc.[edit]

Merci pour vos précisions. J'ai été peut-être un peu virulent, mais la dérive actuelle du code de propriété intellectuelle dictée par les seuls intérêts économiques de quelques uns m'énervent profondément et tue, plus qu'elle ne protège, la création ou le goût de la création.

En ce qui concerne des activités éminemment non lucratives, je vous rappelle que la SACEM a récemment réclamé 150€ à une classe d'écoliers qui avait chanté en public une chanson d'Hughes Auffray afin de fêter dignement le départ en retraite de leur instituteur. En effet, il s'agissait bien d'une représentation publique d'une œuvre protégée dont les droits étaient gérées par cette société de perception et de répartition des droits, de sorte que les écoliers étaient contrefacteurs.

Un célèbre physicien, mort il y a moins de 70 ans, disait : Je ne connais que 2 choses qui n'aient pas de limites : l'univers et la bêtise humaine , visiblement, l'antenne lorientaise de la SACEM devrait s'en inspirer. L'auteur de la chanson s'est même proposé de payer l'amende de 75 € !!!!!!!!!!

Cordialement

antonov14 09:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

UN works[edit]

David, re: ton commentaire sur commons-l au sujet des droits d'auteur concernant des oeuvres des Nations Unies: au moins aux Etats-Unis, les oeuvres de la ONU sont protégés par la loi sur les droits d'auteur, voir 17 USC 104(b)(5) où ceci est mentionné explicitement. Et cela s'applique à tous les oeuvres de l'ONU, non seulement à ceux publiés initialement au siège principale à New York! En general, je pense la question ne devrait pas être "pourquoi les oeuvres de l'ONU seraient-ils protégé par les droits d'auteur?" mais plustôt "pourquoi les oeuvres de l'ONU ne seraient pas protégé par les droits d'auteur?" C-a-d, l'assomption de base doit être que tous les oeuvres sont protégé, et si quelqu'un maintient que certains oeuvres étaient dans la domaine publique, c'est à lui de le prouver. Meilleures salutations, Lupo 07:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Addendum sur Commons_talk:Licensing#United_Nations_works: dans le siege principale de l'ONU à New York s'appliquent en general les lois des Etats-Unis. Lupo 10:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry for extremely late reply[edit]

Sorry, David for this extremely late reply. I rarely open my Wikimedia commons account, as you can see. :) Thanks for the information nonetheless.

Could I send the email with permission, without my real name and real email address, and without the real names and email addresses of the persons I sent them to? I guess I am too private a person to leave my email address around. Is that ok? Thanks. Will try to come back for this as soon as my sked permits. Walter Ching 07:24, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Template:Publication officielle[edit]

Bonjour, j'ai vu que tu as rajouté à ce modèle la mention "ceci ne concerne qu'un cadre très réduit de publications à caractère législatif ou réglementaire". Il y a actuellement une demande de suppression pour ce modèle, et nous avons des interprétations différentes de ce que constitue une publication à caractère législatif. Est-ce que tu pourrais préciser l'article de loi qui t'a servi de source afin que l'on puisse clarifier la situation? Merci. --Phrood 20:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

White balance on Tokyo[edit]

Hi, I've white-balanced your beautiful Tokyo panorama with w:fr:GIMP to remove some "fog". Since I put that in w:it:Tokyo as thumb, the image are now more clear, and lights more vivid. It's ok? --Dzag 22:37, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Jean-Michel Bayle MX.jpg[edit]

Hi David,

i just realized that you've deleted the file Jean-Michel Bayle MX.jpgas per request on OTRS #2006121610019588”. I received the pic from Jean-Michel Bayle on request. What does OTRS #2006121610019588 mean?!?

--Aconcagua 18:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

caille rôtie du 31 dec[edit]

Eh beh... on ne s'embête pas : caille à midi et repas de 31 dec le soir ! :-D --Patricia.fidi 17:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Swans ducks DSC01108.JPG[edit]

Hi David, Don"t you think it's better to use description template like that ? I've past on my user page a description template for myself and my uploads.--Patricia.fidi 17:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

SOS Davsi[edit]

Salut David, il y a en ce moment un débat sur le droit de citation appliqué aux œuvres graphiques. Comme tu es « M. DAVSI », ta contribution serait intéressante. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pavo cristatus DSC04414.JPG[edit]

This bird is not a peafowl at all. It is a Himalayan or Impeyan Monal Pheasant. See Wikipedia or something for more details. 24.81.240.231 02:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Crepes_dsc07085.jpg[edit]

I was watching this picture and noticed that the description says "Copyright © 2005 David Monniaux" followed by the {{self|GFDL}}-template. It can't be copyrighted and released under GFDL at the same time. Is it copyrighted or is it released under the GFDL? / Klibbnisse 19:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

You're completely wrong! All GFDL works are copyrighted and governed by copyright laws (Read the GFDL itself, this is explicitly said).
The copyright notice just gives correct attribution to the author and a starting date for his exclusive rights before they fall in the public domain. This notice line does not grants or removes any right or obligation to the users, except indicating the default applicable law: only the licence (here the GFDL) does change this.
Note that a work published without such copyright attribution may not even be legal, even if placed in the public domain !
To be complete a legal it's not necessary to indicate the copyright symbol: the copyright law still applies, and provided that some information is given, the notice is stil lequivalent to the explicit indication of the date of publication and author identification. So when you use just the {{information}} template for example on Commons, and you fill the "Date=" and "Author=" fields, you are also putting the complete equivalent of the copyright notice line, which is just a short conventional notation understood by everyone.
Adding the "Source=" field may be necessary only in the case where you are including in your work some elements that may be attributable to someone else; this concerns derivative works or works that required another permission from someone else for allowing the author to publish his creation under his own copyright. I think this "Source" requirement made on Commons is overkill and not justified legally, so many users just fill "Source=own work" or similar... Source will be needed only for Wikipedia or similar projects when they want to assert the truth of statements.
The copyright notice is then not a restriction, unlike indications like "D.R." (Droits Réservés, All rights reserved) found in photos published in some magazines or newspapers (often for snapshots made by and sold be paparazzi): the rights are managed by the editor of the publication that can prove legally that it has obtained the necessary rights, but does not want to reveal publicly who made the initial work. The "D.R." indication is a public assertion that is engaging the publisher, saying that it is legally responsible of all consequences. On opposite, none of the WMF projects allow such indication: the author attribution is required on all WMF projects because the WMF will not accept to endorse itself the legal consequences of abuses made by its users.
By default this should not even be needed: MediaWiki tracks the registered uploader name and the date of publication in the history. However the histories get purged from time to time from old records, and could get lost or become difficult to find in a long history, so it's still best to keep this information visible directly on the information page (where it can then be verified in due time with the history as long as it is directly and easily accessible).
So using the {{information}} template or the usual copyright notice is completely equivalent, and accepted here provided that you also grants permissions for free reuse with an additional explicit licence statement. And the acceptable licences will require the information found in the short copyright notice or in the Author= and Date= fields of the {{information}} template.
Not only these indications (GFDL licence and copyright attribution info) are not incompatible, they are mutually needed! Verdy p (talk) 18:09, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Demande de déblocage ou de modification[edit]

Bonjour,

je viens de rajouter une traduction à Template:PD-USGov-NASA, cependant celui-ci est bloqué. Serait-il possible de rajouter cette traduction ?

Merci d'avance --Icons-flag-fr.png Pseudomoi (to chat on WP) 10:02, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

FP bison[edit]

Hello. Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment J'aurais préféré que tu laisses un commentaire au lieu d'enlever le vote, j'aurais fait le nécessaire après. Je vois d'ailleurs sur ta page de discussion qu'il y a d'autres personnes qui ont fait la remarque sur le copyright, il y a sûrement d'autres personnes qui s'y connaissent mieux que moi.

Pour l'image il y a du potentiel, mais un peu de PP serait nécessaire à mon avis. Aberration légère des couleurs à corriger, un peu de "noise reduction" et peut être un "unsharpening mask" à appliquer.

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Pour mon vote, je vais le remettre et annuler moi même. A voir d'ailleurs si on peut enlever le vote de quelqu'un d'autre comme tu l'as fait.

Bon courage pour l'image, et je serai sûrement supporteur de l'image avec ces modifications.

Copyrights[edit]

En effet j'y ai été un peu fort, mais le coup de l'image uploadée en 1M m'a fait bizarre. David.Monniaux 20:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Les diverses personnes qui font ces remarques, pardonne-moi d'être direct, n'y connaissent rien en droit d'auteur. Pour information, j'ai écrit les indications de droit d'auteur de commons concernant la France. :-) David.Monniaux 20:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Bravo pour les Davsi, et ça tombe bien alors, tu pourras me clarifier la question. Je m'excuse d'avance pour mon manque d'intéressement / connaissances en ce qui concerne les licences, ce n'est pas un sujet qui me passionne énormément.
Du peu que j'ai lu sur les licences, la licence Commons 2.X et Commons ShareAlike ainsi que la GFDL (GNU) permettent toutes la copie, modification ainsi que la publication commerciale des oeuvres. Avec la différence il me semble que dans une licence ou deux il faut inclure un lien vers l'oeuvre originale ou le nom de l'auteur.
Comment peut alors une oeuvre être copyrightée à l'auteur en sachant qu'il renonce à ses droits en mettant la license Comons/GFDL/GNU? J'ai vu plusieurs personnes mettre sur leur pages d'images des texte du genre Si quelqu'un voudrait utiliser cette oeuvre dans des fins commerciaux, contactez moi et je vous écrirai une lettre de permission moyennant une finance. Ca me paraît paradoxal en sachant que par la licence tout le monde à le droit d'utiliser l'image dans n'importe quel but!
Merci pour cette clarification. --Atoma 00:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Visiblement tu ne comprends pas que le fait d'indiquer un copyright n'ôte aucun droit d'utilisation (même pour un usage commercial). Cela apporte en revanche l'obligation de mentionner l'auteur et la source, et préserver la date de première publication par l'auteur original. L'auteur d'un document qui "renonce à ses droits" ne peut légalement renoncer en fait à tous ses droits car il est toujours tenu à des obligations légales qu'il doit encore respecter (cela me fait dire que la publication directement dans le "domaine public" est même illégal (au moins en France) s'il s'agit de renoncer non seulement à ses droits exclusifs mais aussi à ses obligations. Seule serait légale la publication avec une mention explicite de l'auteur et du droit qui lui est applicable.
Donc à mon avis, une mention "Copyright (année) nom de l’auteur" est même insuffisante, même pour la publication dans le "domaine public" ou avec une licence "libre" de type copyleft (GNU/GFDL/GPL), ou "ouverte" de type BSD, Art Libre, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA (mais surtout pas CC-BY-NC ici bien que ce ne soit pas illégal) : il faudrait y ajouter au minimum aussi le pays définissant quelle est la législation relative au droit d'auteur (et ses droits voisins, dérivés ainsi que ses obligations) et applicable à cet auteur. C'est la raison d'être des versions nationales des licences Creative Commons qui mentionne le droit d'origine. Pourtant sur Commons on a fait le choix délibéré de restreindre ces versions à la seule version en anglais étudiée et validée pour certains pays seulement, cela impose donc de compléter les licences génériques indiquées avec une mention de copyright plus complète mentionnant le pays d'origine.
Je suggère donc à David Monniaux ici de compléter ses propres notices de copyright en ajoutant "France" après son nom, pour que ce soit non ambigu quant au pays d'origine de la publication; par défaut sinon, le lieu de publication est celui des serveurs de la Fondation (Tampa Bay, Floride, USA?) ce qui pourrait constituer un "délit" (le terme est trop fort mais c'est le mieux adapté) de renoncement illicite à ses obligations françaises lors de l'exportation de son contenu si cette exportation ne retire rien quant aux obligations (c'est le cas: des obligations sont maintenues selon les traités en vigueur concernant le piratage et aussi justement la non-réattribution sans autorisation préalable), ou bien d'ajouter une licence française mentionnant le droit applicable à défaut d'autre indication plus explicite dans le document: raison de plus pour indiquer Copyright 2008 © David Monniaux, France. Verdy p (talk) 18:45, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Copyright (suite)[edit]

D'accord, donc si tu mets le "© Copyright bidule" c'est juste pour rappeler que c'est toi le créateur et le détenteur de copyright sur cette image, et que tu la publies selon les conditions spécifiées dans la licence choisie, c'est ça ?

Exactement. Par expérience, des tas de gens disent "Wikipédia, c'est gratuit, libre de droit, je fais ce que je veux", donc je préfère leur rappeler qu'il y a des limites.

Ca me paraît plus clair maintenant. Et pour les frais de 'lecture' d'une licence proposée par un éditeur externe, je peux comprendre. Effectivement si on passe 2h à la lire la licence ça paraît logique que ça soit facturé.

Surtout que souvent, ce qu'ils veulent ce sont des conditions propriétaire... genre ils intègrent ton œuvre dans un document non libre. Ils mettront un gros copyright dessus (faut pas compter qu'ils listent les photos GFDL etc. en disant au lecteur qu'il peut les réutiliser); Donc, je facture.

Dernière précision, c'est quelle licence (Commons ShareAlike?) qui spécifie que celui qui publie doit inclure un lien vers l'oeuvre originale et le nom de l'auteur?

CC-BY et CC-BY-SA peuvent demander cela. CC-BY-SA impose par contre que les œuvres dérivées soient libres également.

POTY 2006 competition[edit]

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are almost complete, and voting will take place between 1st and 28th Feb. All the featured pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As the creator of one or more images nominated for the election we invite you to participate in the event. Alvesgaspar 22:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Napoleon p1070178.jpg[edit]

Bonjour David Tu a fait la photo d'un tableau d'Appiani. Dans la description ce tableau est localisé au Musée Stanford, or il existe une réplique identique au museo napoleonico de la Havane [2] s'agit-il du même portrait , qui aurait été exposé temporairement à Stanford, ou est ce une réplique en exposition permanente ? J'aimerai avoir la réponse de ta part si tu la connais. Cordialement Kirtap 13:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Dog[edit]

[3] - beautiful photo! Congratulation! --Lestat 16:46, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

  • ...but this is one of my favourites on commons :-) --Lestat 17:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

multilicensing your own pictures[edit]

Hi David:

I made a little modification to the license tags of Editing Image:A380 dsc04519.jpg to include the "self3" template. I advise you to use it when uploading your own pictures because as administrator when I check for fake licenses it is more clear to see that tag and then look at the uploader's name. Regards, Barcex 20:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

permission reçue?[edit]

Salut David, j'ai demandé la permission de
Roy <enquiries@wildthingsafaris.com>
Roy J. Hinde M.Sc.,
Marketing Director,
Wild Things Safaris Ltd.
www.wildthingsafaris.com
pour pouvoir utiliser deux images. Il m'a écrit que c'était pas de problème, puis je l'ai demandé (le 27 fév) d'envoyer un mail à permissions@wikimedia.org. Maintenant je n'ai plus entendu rien, alors je me demande s'il a déjà envoyé ce mail. Est-ce que tu pourrais le vérifier? Merci beaucoup, Ibn Battuta 15:10, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi - permission to use this picture:[edit]

Palais de la Decouverte Tyrannosaurus rex p1050042.jpg

Hi, my name is Spawn Man & I'm creating a new portal. However, I wanted to know if it was alright if I used the picture show on it if I credited you with the photo credit. Would this be okay? Thanks... 124.197.40.83 07:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Selectron Tube[edit]

Hi David, Thank you for adding the great image of the Selectron to the page. 12.73.9.148 05:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Charles

Template talk:PD-old[edit]

David, si tu avait le temps, pourras-tu étudier les commentaires de User:Micheletb sur User talk:Kareha/PD-Art et y en donner ton avis? Il me semble qu'il fait deux déclarations:

  1. En outre les droits d'auteur, ils existaient des droits de propriété sur un fichier-même contentant une reproduction d'un tableau, ce qui interdisait la copie du fichier même si le tableau-même était dans la domaine publique et même si on assume que la reproduction du tableau n'était pas sujet au droits d'auteur (à la Bridgeman v. Corel). Cela me parait assez bizarre. Micheletb essaie d'expliquer ceci avec des lois contre la concurrence déloyale ("unfair competition"). (D'ailleurs, quelle est la situation en France concernant les droits d'auteur sur des photos qui reproduisent un original 2D?)
  2. Dans le cas de bases de donnés (d'images), même la copie d'éléments individuels serait interdit sauf a des fins d'usage personnel. Ceci me semble de parvenir de la directive 96/9/EC; j'ai l'impression que là Micheletb pourrait avoir raison. Mais je me demande si son interpretation est vraiment valable, car si oui, il me parait qu'en fait le producteur d'une base de donnés (d'images) puisse profiter d'un protection presque perpetuelle sur les élements incluses dans la base de donnés (il suffirait d'améliorer la base de donnés chaque 15 ans, ce qui donnerait lieu à un nouveau terme de 15 ans)... c.f. directive 96/9/EC et Legifrance: Rights of Database producers.

Qu'est-ce que t'en penses? Lupo 11:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Peut-être cela serait une bonne idée. Mais voir les expériences que la section allemande a fait avec cette approche: si j'ai bien compris, les résultats apparement n'étaient pas exactement satisfaisantes car l'expertise restait au niveau de généralités et l'auteur indiquait plutôt ce qui n'était pas permis suivant une lecture stricte de la loi (allemande) au lieu de montrer ce qui était (éventuellement) possible sous une lecture moins stricte. Tout dépend du point de vue du spécialiste et des expectations du client, c-à-d. de l'association française. Néanmoins, je pense une expertise devrait être utile pour clarifier des questions précises tels que les deux qui ont été soulevés maintenant. Lupo 17:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Message de service: la discussion a été transférée de User talk:Kareha/PD-Art vers Template talk:PD-old, suite aux râlantes (AMHA légitimes) des personnes intéressées par le modèle. A+ Michelet-密是力 17:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Sur le fond, voir mes commentaires. Je pense que le problème 2 est réel et important (il y a une loi explicite sur la question), alors que le 1 n'est que théorique, et pour l'instant relève de la masturbation intellectuelle (quand on aura réglé tout le reste, on pourra s'y intéresser, mais c'est pas la priorité). Donc laissons tomber le secondaire pour nous focaliser sur l'urgent: le pillage de la "BD-Louvre" et tout ce genre de choses. Michelet-密是力 17:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
1&2=description de Lupo.

(1)=quand un responsable de site poste un fichier sur internet, même si le contenu du fichier n'est pas (plus) soumis au droit sur la propriété littéraire et artistique, il n'est pas possible d'en faire une copie "libre" complètement autonome, parce que la copie ne peut être faite que dans le cadre de la licence (implicite?) que le propriétaire du fichier accorde en publiant ledit fichier. Tant que la copie ne provoque pas de préjudice, c'est (AMHA) OK; mais dès que l'usage fait de la copie cause un préjudice prouvé, il peut y avori responsabilité civile quasi-delictuelle (art. 1382-1384 CC).

(2)=Quand une "base de données" est en ligne, la loi sur les droits "sui generi" interdit d'en faire un pillage substantiel. Or, wikipedia n'a aucun moyen de contrôler le caractère substantiel ou non des chargements faits (par exemple, du catalogue en ligne du Louvre). Donc, globalement, ces téléchargements font courir un risque juridique direct à wikipédia: il faut les contrôler, ou les interdire.

A+, n'hésite pas en cas de question. Michelet-密是力 19:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

En résumé (je prends le train en marche): des gens prennent des bases de données d'images en ligne et les envoient sur commons, en violation du droit sui generis des bases de données accordé par le droit européen et français? David.Monniaux 19:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Pas de manière aussi nette, mais potentiellement, oui. Le cas "évident" emblématique est celui de la Joconde, prise sur le site du Louvre et mise en PD-old. Si ce type de pratique est général, il y a fort à parier que tout le PD-old "professionnel" (non pris en photo par le contributeur) est en fait une recopie du catalogue en ligne du musée d'origine, avec à la clef un problème de "sui generis" augmentant avec le temps. C'est le point (2). Le débat est un peu pollué par mon autre considération (le point 1) sur la possibilité d'un recours pour responsabilité civile, mais le risque juridique se limite dans ce cas AMHA à la responsabilité propre de wikipédia d'avori supprimé le lien entre un fichier et sa source, le rendant "apparemment" libre alors qu'il s'agissait d'une copie dont la reproduction peut causer un préjudice à la source. Michelet-密是力 06:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Photos de l'éruption du Piton de la Fournaise[edit]

Bonjour, je constate que personne n'a fait de sélection alors je me suis permis de faire mon marché :

Je trouve la première vraiment magnifique, la suivante impressionnante, et la troisième très classe ou l'on vois au premier plan la fumée avec en fond la coulée de lave. La quatrième je la vérais bien recadré en forme de carré. J'aime beaucoup la cinquième, mais j'ai un doute pour les deux dernières :) Voila, c'était mon avis très subjectif. ~ bayo or talk 21:37, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Celle-ci aussi peut-être : http://www.flickr.com/photos/frederic_caille/446913150/
Et bien évidemment celle signalée par Greudin au bistro : http://www.flickr.com/photos/frederic_caille/457344416/in/set-72157600044604775/
Attention, je viens de m'apercevoir que toutes ne sont pas de Fréderic Caillé, il y a plusieurs photographes, alors soit il faut ce contenter de celles prises par Fréderic Caillé soit avoir l'autorisation de chaque preneur de vue. Oxam Hartog 22:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Note that these images published in Flickr are not free (CC-BY-NC-SA means non-commercial, commercial use is not permitted). So not eligible for Commons, but may be used probably only on English Wikipedia according to fair use restrictions valid only in US if they are illustrative only and non essentaial to the articles they are illustrating, and not used to create a derivative work based on these images. I can't recommend them enven in this case, because even ait use may not be applicable for images taken in France, and thus protected under French legislation where fair use is not applicable. Verdy p (talk) 17:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Cartes[edit]

Votre carte des villes de France et des aéroports n'est pas complete. Il manque au moins les 2 principales ville de Corse et les 4 aérports corses. Pourquoi un tel oubli?

Les villes, si je me rappelle bien, ont été placées à partir d'une liste de n agglomérations françaises les plus peuplées. Il faut croire qu'il n'y a aucune grande ville en Corse. Quant aux aéroport, j'ai repris une liste disponible sur le 'Net. David.Monniaux 10:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Et bien ce n'est pas complet. Thionville figure bien sur la carte alors qu'a ma connaissance Ajaccio est plus peuplé et plus connu, pareil pour Annecy. Pareil pour les aéroports il me semble aussi que l'aéroport d'Ajaccio soit parmi les rares aéroports en France métropolitaine a dépasser 1 million de passagers.

Je vous renvoie à la liste de l'INSEE des principales agglomérations de 1999 (qui, par contre, ne tient pas compte de la notoriété des villes). Quant aux aéroports, ils ont été visiblement placés à l'aide d'une liste ne comportant pas celui d'Ajaccio: je n'ai donc pas les coordonnées de ce dernier. David.Monniaux 04:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:%attac.JPG[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:%attac.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--G.dallorto 12:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Manif Paris 2005-11-19 dsc06338.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Manif Paris 2005-11-19 dsc06338.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--G.dallorto 12:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

engadget[edit]

Hey, I figured you might be curious to know that your image from the French elections was used in this article at engadget. gren 23:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag[edit]

Une reprise d'une question que j'avais posé il y a quelques jours: pourrais-tu expliquer la situation concernant les droits d'auteur de reproductions photographiques d'originaux 2D en France? Si on ne sait pas assez sur la situation légale, on devrait au moins indiquer ceci et expliquer la pratique sur a Wikipédia française. est-ce que {{PD-Art}} est utilisé sur WP-fr? Lupo 07:07, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Compte inutilisable[edit]

Bonjour. J'ai ouvert un compte sur WikiCommons sous le pseudonyme d' "Inocybe". Je n'arrive plus à me connecter sous ce nom. La réponse qui m'est donnée est : Login error:Incorrect password entered. Please try again. Pourtant je suis sûr de mon mot de passse. De plus, Firefox l'avait gardé én mémoire. Il m'est d'ailleurs arrivé la même mésaventure sur WP.fr. Bien sûr comme je n'avais pas donné d'adresse mèl à laquelle on peut me renvoyer un mot de passe provisoire ; donc je suis coincé.
Comment faire pour retrouver mon identité ? Sur Wp le bureaucrate a changé mon nom de compte vers un nouveau nom : Panthéon. J'ai alors pu entrer dans la page de présentation, changer le mot de passe puis demandé à modifié ensuite Panthéon en Inocybe et tout est entré dans l'ordre. Peut-on faire la même opération sur WikiCommons ?
Cordialement 90.2.220.10 16:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Triboulet 16:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC) En l'absence de réponse j'ai créé un nouvel utilisateur Triboulet 16:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC) mais j'aimerai bien retrouver l'identité d'Inocybe

Valérie Pécresse[edit]

Salut David,

Merci pour cette nouvelle image et pour la galerie. J'ai précisé l'intro avec une traduction en anglais. Par contre, il ne faut pas utiliser le modèle Template:Information pour mettre en forme les sources/légendes/etc ?

Bonne continuation--Bapti 20:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

J'oubliais : j'ai ajouté l'image sur la Wikipédia anglophone.--Bapti 20:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Les panneaux routiers français[edit]

Est-ce que les panneaux routiers français, par exemple, Image:B14 50.gif, Image:B33 50.gif et Image:B43.gif, sont dans le domaine public ou sous le droit d'auteur ? Je voudrais une réponse française. Merci.--Jusjih 02:08, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Meet our Photographers[edit]

A discussion is going here about the possibility of creating a page named “Meet our Photographers”, where our best creators would be represented. Being one of them, you might be interested in participating. Regards, Alvesgaspar 22:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Meet our photographers[edit]

As a Wikimedian with at least 10 Featured Pictures to your name, you are cordially invited to add a profile of youself and your work to the newly-created Commons:Meet our photographers page. --MichaelMaggs 14:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Possible copyright violations[edit]

Hello. I see that you deleted WaterburyCT Skyline.jpg as a copyright violation. The editor who uploaded that image to en.Wikipedia also uploaded many others and asserted that he personally created all of them- including several town seals... which made me rather suspicious. I fixed the licensing on the town seals and went about finding where he got the other images. I managed to find most of them and get them deleted; but several, including the one you recently deleted, eluded me. I'm hoping that since you are obviously more adept at this sort of research than I am, that you might be able to clear up the copyright status of the other images that user uploaded. Thanks! Elipongo 21:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


Image:Tour Montparnasse p1050173.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Tour Montparnasse p1050173.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Petrusbarbygere 06:44, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Liberty3869.jpg[edit]

Pourriez-vous y expliquer comment ça marche avec les extensions des délais du droit d'auteur en France, s.v.p.? Merci! Lupo 08:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


Image:Louvre DSC00662.JPG[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Louvre DSC00662.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 20:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Requesting Permission to Publish Photo[edit]

Hello David Monniaux. We would like to publish this image of "February 11, 2006 Parisian protest against the publication of caricatures of Muhammad" in a Sociology textbook. Would you please contact me at jillenge@yahoo.com for details? I would like to obtain your permission to publish this photo. Thank you. -Jill

Avril Levigne[edit]

see User talk:Bastique#Arvil_Lavinge_image, and add any comments if think you can help further. Cary Bass demandez 22:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Ganesh in Paris Image[edit]

Hi David, Can you please provide some confirmation that the copyrightholder "Mai-Linh Doan" has released this photograph under {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} ? The image is currently being used on Ganesha article, which we are planning to nominate for FA status. We are therefore in the process of confirming that all the images used are satisfactorily tagged and licensed. Thanks. Abecedare 01:42, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I can. The copyright holder told me this in person. David.Monniaux 05:07, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Les bâtiments de France[edit]

Bonjour, ci joint une copie de [4]

Je pense qu'il ne faut faut pas attendre et supprimer, c'est à nous administrateurs de langue française à donner cette dynamique et de protéger les contributeurs... Supprimons ces images maintenant. Je suis prêt à le faire, les ai repérées pour la plupart, j'avais commencé à les tager copviomais faute d'un soutient communautaire je suis dans l'impasse (si j'obtiens ce soutient je supprimerai sans tager).

Et voici la copie (c'est à propos de Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Louvre DSC00662.JPG) :

La législation française, la législation italienne nous sont trés défavorables. Il existe pourtant en France une jurisprudence, de la cour de cassation (ce qui n'est pas rien) qui pourrait nous être favorable. Je pense que tu minimises l'importance architecturale de l'oeuvre de Buren et cie qui a été reconnue par la cour. L'espace qui est aujourd'hui occupé par l'entrée du musée du Louvre avec sa pyramide, ses bassins et fontaines, LXIV cavalier par Mr Le Bernin, sans doute le rond-point et en tout cas les premiers bosquets du jardin des Tulleries ne peuvent être distribués sous les termes de la GFDL. Mais je pense que cet ensemble est comme le dit la cour de cassation fondu et intriqué dans dans un lieu relevant du domaine public (La Grande Arche non merci). On a ici un bel aprés-midi d'été dans dans un lieu relevant du domaine public. Aussi je pense que nous devrions garder cette image au moins le temps de supprimer toutes les autres. Ce qui est loin d'être fait car j'avais commencé, on a l'embarra du choix, mais, depuis que l'on m'a demandé de passer par une demande de surpression dont je m'étonne qu'elle n'ait pas abouti : Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Tour Montparnasse, Paris.jpg, je suis dans l'impasse. Je m'étonne du manque de réactivité de la communauté (y compris dur irc) sur ce problème bien qu'au final je ne me fasse aucune illusion quand à la la suppression des ces photos. Pourtant cet arrêt de la cour de cassation, qui ne s'applique qu'à de rares endroits, nous est favorable et je pense qu'il l'est pour le Louvre coté Tulleries et j'irais même jusqu'à penser (même je ne prendrais pas ce risque) que celle-ci pourrait l'être. Par contre celles de l'intérieur et celles de la renversée... Jette un oeil à la catégorie Category:Louvre Pyramid. Je rève d'un moment où, lorsque les cités radieuses s'écroulent, on pourrait s'accrocher aux maigres barreaux blancs que nous offrent Buren. Le plus drôle c'est qu'aujourd'hui on ait aucune photos de la place des terraux burénisée...

Lorsque la Fondation sera mieux outillée juridiquement dans la défense du contenu qu'elle héberge et peut-être des contributeurs qui le créent, elle tranchera ces quelques incertitudes.

Pour l'instant, nous nous devons de supprimer et de garder vigilance sur les cas évidents.

Merci de votre prise de conscience. Petrusbarbygere 20:59, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Reichen Lehmkuhl p1180703.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Reichen Lehmkuhl p1180703.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

User:G.dallorto 17:17, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

A verbal "statement" is not enough, unfortunately: a written permission is requested. Please contact an administrator and have him/her help you in the process. Otherwise, all of the pictures by this author will be deleted (which I'd rather like not).
By the way, removing a deletion request without solving the problem that originated it is considered vandalism. Please do not do it again. There is plenty of time to solve the problem before the image is actually deleted, sometimes even months elapse. The request is a way to call the attention on the fact that there is a problem needing fixing, removing it is unfair.
best wishes. --User:G.dallorto 15:35, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

P.S: I called attention on your need here. --User:G.dallorto 15:48, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

As I've pointed out there, please see Commons:OTRS and Commons:Email templates. LX (talk, contribs) 23:05, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
As I now realise you're an OTRS admin, I understand if the above might appear somewhat rude, and I apologise if you perceived it as such; it was not my intention. LX (talk, contribs) 07:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Folks, you're just wasting my time. If you really want to catch copyvios, go find real ones. David.Monniaux 06:06, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

(Quote) "There is actually nowhere in Wikipedia that says that email permissions are requested from people who donate photographs (how would it work for people without email?)" (unquote). To the first question I already answered in the proper place (it's false); to the second, the way I was answered by Wikipedia adms when I made the same question: "By fax". Best wishes. --User:G.dallorto 17:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
If it may be said, David.Monniaux is a long term contributor, and we can certainly put some level of trust that he has authorization to upload these images under the license for which he uploads them. Let's go after the real copyright infringers and assume good faith on the part of our regular contributors. Cary Bass demandez 17:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

FOP en France[edit]

Salut David, j'ai récrit Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#France qui apparemment confusait pas mal de gens. J'ai ajouté de la jurisprudence. Peux-tu relire pour voir si ça va ? À mon avis c'est point sur lequel il faudrait absolument demander à Olivier de se prononcer, parce que si Dominique Perrault ou Pei ou l'ADAGP tombe sur le râble de quelqu'un à cause de ces images, ça va être sur celui de Wikimédia France… Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Images de Philippe Douste-Blazy[edit]

Salut,

Tu avais importé ces images, il y a deux ans :

Je n'arrive pas à trouver leur source : peux-tu m'aider ?--Bapti 20:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:FOLP-logo.gif[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:FOLP-logo.gif. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. OsamaK 21:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


Please give images better names[edit]

العربية | Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Sicilianu | +/−


I noticed you've uploaded some images and I thought I should turn your attention to a common error.

Please give uploaded images meaningful names. Otherwise they are difficult to track and it is hard to tell what the image is about without actually looking at it. I suggest you rename each image with an intuitive name that describes the image itself. Thanks, and happy editing! OsamaK 21:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

{{Sofixit}} David.Monniaux 10:46, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Or just leave them the way they are. We really don't care. Hope you're doing well. Cary Bass demandez 22:38, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wolf-Dietrich_von_Raitenau_P1380516.JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 13:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:Dendroaspis_angusticeps_P1380312.JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 06:13, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Ferrari 501588 fh000007.jpg[edit]

Hi David,

Your picture Ferrari 501588 fh000007.jpg is being used on the following page and is being described as a Ferrari 410 Superamerica when in fact it's a 250 SWB Berlinetta (probably alloy body).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrari_America#365_California

David

Deleted images[edit]

Hi, it looks like you deleted a couple images I uploaded. I wish to contest this, because I believe they are faithful reproductions. I would have appreciated a note on my talk page, or some kind of way to follow up on this. I appreciate the seriousness with which wikimedia takes coypright issues, but I think it would have been polite to put a note on my talk page with a more thorough explanation. Thanks, Jeff Dahl 21:22, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Villepin_ABr17112.jpeg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Villepin_ABr17112.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. PxMa 01:37, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


"Thanks for uploading Image:Villepin_ABr17112.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear."

I do not see what is unclear about what is said on commons:Image:Villepin_ABr17112.jpeg. The name of the photographer, the copyright status and the reason for it are clearly given. David.Monniaux 20:35, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

"To the uploader: You must provide a link (URL) to the original file and the authorship information if available." PxMa 20:47, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
The Agencia Brasil archive, at the time, did not offer the opportunity to link directly to stable URLs, if I remember correctly. I don't have the time to search their files now. The line requesting a link was added to the template long after the image was uploaded. David.Monniaux 11:10, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Lula_French_Republican_Guard_ABr112720.jpeg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lula_French_Republican_Guard_ABr112720.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. PxMa 23:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Same problem as above. David.Monniaux 08:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Aide "suppression d'image"[edit]

Bonjour Monniaux

Je me retourne vers un administrateur parlant français, car je ne crois pas saisir la problematique qui semble avoir lieu autour d’une composition d’image que j’ai faite.
En effet la composition suivante Image:GM BaouabaDjazair02v02.jpg risque d’être supprimée, alors que je croyais avoir donné toutes les informations requises, pourrais-tu stp me dire ce qui manque et ce que devrais changer ?

Merci :)

--Numidix 12:27, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikinews[edit]

Hello, An image submitted by you (Image:2 5 inch hard disk P1160109.jpg]) has been featured on the Wikinews (wikinews.org) front page. Thanks for submitting it on commons. --Anonymous101 18:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

ping[edit]

Your image in use, just in case you didn't know: here. cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 09:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Jussieu[edit]

(Image:Paris Jussieu Campus entrance dsc04054.jpg) L'oeuvre d'art est de Léon Gischia (article sur WP-fr:[5]). Peut-être faudrait-il ajouter à l'image, si c'est possible, la category:Léon Gischia ? L'architecte est Edouard Albert (article sur WP-fr: [6]). Peut-être faudrait-il ajouter aussi à l'image, si c'est possible, la category:Edouard Albert ? En toute sympathie, User:Michel-georges bernard ou WP-fr, Utilisateur Michel-georges bernard [7], 27 décembre 2007, 09h19

Image:Truffle img 7573 cropped.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:69strawberryblonde 20.jpg[edit]

How is this a copyvio? -Nard 20:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Complaint on OTRS. Are you the photographer? Do you have model release for this transparent shirt? David.Monniaux 07:51, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
I transferred from en.wiki, was just asking for an explanation :P Thanks. -Nard 11:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

King cake[edit]

Hello. I am interested in "king cake" or " Brioche des Rois" traditions and variations in different countries. Thank you for Image:Brioche des Rois dsc06781.jpg (it looks delcious). Could you please add information on the image page clearly saying where this is from? (Country, region, city if there is variation). Thank you. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 15:45, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Pavo cristatus DSC04414.JPG[edit]

The name of the bird is Himalayan Monal (Lophophorus impejanus).

Faux Profile[edit]

Bonjour, Je croyais que le gens n'étaient pas sensés écrire sur eux-même dans cette encyclopédie; merci de supprimer le profile de Lyès Ben Chédli. Pour la première raison qu'il l'a écrit lui même et la seconde que sa description est inventée

Désolé, mais je ne suis pas chargé de vigilance éditoriale. David.Monniaux 09:36, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Pont Grand[edit]

Hello David, are you able to take a photo from Pont Grand in Tournon-sur-Rhône? I would like to use it in an article. Best regards Hawobo 17:29, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


Image:Dsc07963.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Dsc07963.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

abf /talk to me/ 19:44, 16 April 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Kami_Recettes.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kami_Recettes.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 14:32, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

FP promotion[edit]

Chelonia mydas albino p1440273.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Chelonia mydas albino p1440273.jpg , that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Chelonia mydas albino p1440273.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

Alvesgaspar 16:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Une image absolument magnifique. Scotché. Bravo ! Erasoft24 (talk) 17:03, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Deletion request[edit]

You may be interested in Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-GallicaPic. giggy (:O) 06:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Could you please explain more fully...[edit]

I see you deleted Image:Icebreakers Krasin and Polar Star, in McMurdo Sound.jpg.

I tried to examine https://secure.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=1417829. It seems I need some kind of password to view it.

Can you explain why the discussion of the deletion of this image is not publicly available?

Can you explain why the deletion process did not include a "heads-up" to me? Geo Swan (talk) 22:21, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

This image was deleted because it was not a work from the US federal government, as claimed. This photograph was taken by a researcher, who granted NSF the right to use it for educational purposes on the NSF site. The researcher protested by email to OTRS and demanded that the licensing status be changed to "noncommercial use only". Since this is not possible on Commons, the image was deleted.
Emails stored on the OTRS system are not publicly available because 1) the Wikimedia Foundation does not have the authorization to publish them 2) some of them discuss personal or sensitive matters. In this case, 2) does not apply, but there is no way to make only certain emails visible.
Why you did not get a "heads up"? Probably because I was too busy processing the OTRS queue. Sorry for the inconvenience. :-) David.Monniaux (talk) 11:20, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

OTRS ticket for Lovefoxx image[edit]

I'm looking at Image:Lovefoxxx.jpg and it's rather small in comparison to the original that's on Flickr (seen here). As much as I'd like to redo the file under a different name and at a larger size, I can't since the Flickr image is tagged as copyrighted and there's an OTRS ticket for the permission (the ticket).

My question is this: is there anything in the ticket that states Wikipedia can only use that specific size? Can I indeed grab the original of the image and work with it? Tabercil (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Bastille Day 2002 westpoint4.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bastille Day 2002 westpoint4.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Kam Solusar (talk) 10:15, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


Image:AFP_Paris_dsc04592.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:AFP_Paris_dsc04592.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Nard the Bard 11:16, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


Arizona Canteen[edit]

The Pot you illustrated the Hopi page with looks pretty ZUNI to me.--80.137.201.157 05:54, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


Image:Mirounga_angustirostris_p1080198.ogg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Mirounga_angustirostris_p1080198.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Nard the Bard 22:16, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


Image:Milice_ecole.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Milice_ecole.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

83.85.95.146 19:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


File:INSU_Tethys_II_p1150241.jpg[edit]

File deletion warning File:INSU_Tethys_II_p1150241.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stunteltje (talk) 08:08, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Withdrew nomination. Regret inconvenience caused. --Stunteltje (talk) 10:38, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, David.Monniaux!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:42, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


File tagging File:Bastille_Day_2002_westpoint2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bastille_Day_2002_westpoint2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Kam Solusar (talk) 15:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Myosotis sylvatica Snowsylva dsc00975.jpg[edit]

Hello, David. I just found your beautiful image File:Myosotis sylvatica Snowsylva dsc00975.jpg and added it to hsb:Lěsna njezapomnička. Is it a variant or a form of Myosotis sylvatica? Greetings --Tlustulimu (talk) 15:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

It is a cultivar of Myosotis sylvatica, as far as I know, but I'm very far from being knowledgeable in such matters. David.Monniaux (talk) 08:19, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Photos de l'ESA[edit]

Bonjour,

Travaillant sur des articles d'astronautique, je m'intéresse aux photos publiés par l'ESA qui malheureusement comportent des clauses restrictives pour leur diffusion commerciale. Une demande de publication sous licence libre a été adressée en 2004 par des contributeurs allemands et a reçu une réponse négative. Korrigan m'a indiqué que tu avais peut-être également approché l'agence spatiale plus récemment. Si cette demande est un peu ancienne la donne a peut être changé avec la "notoriété" croissante de Wikipédia. Qu'en penses-tu ?--Pline (talk) 11:39, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

L'ESA, c'est compliqué. Ils ne possèdent pas le copyright sur la majeure partie de leur photothèque, si j'ai bien compris — les photos sont souvent prises par des photographes de presse privée ou par les partenaires des programmes scientifiques. J'ai un peu laissé tomber, si tous les articles sur l'espace du premier site éducatif et culturel au monde sont illustrés avec la NASA et que l'ESA a du mal à se faire mousser, c'est leur problème. David.Monniaux (talk) 21:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I also read your proposal and think it's a good idea. It's never been presented to the ESA? (En francais/in french: Bonjour. Moi aussi, j'ai lu http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/ESA_images#Proposal_by_David_Monniaux. et je pense que c'est une bonne idée. Cette idee n'a jamaie etre presentee a ESA?)
If you still have the contact info, it seems like it a good idea to share your idea with the ESA; I think it fairly likely they'd be willing to reply to an email that could go into OTRS indicating they have no objection. I see that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:GFDL_images has over 100,000 images. --Elvey (talk) 18:34, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

SOHO images from the EIT public domain!?[edit]

I also noticed that the meeting notes say that the copyright to images created by individual instruments are held by the institution that owns the instrument on the spacecraft. Which led me to find this instrument listing, where I see that the EIT (Extreme ultraviolet Imaging Telescope) is a NASA instrument, and so that leads me to suggest that that instruments' images are public domain (Template:PD-USGov-NASA). This is an important instrument; of the 10 live image sources displayed by the ESA screensaver, four are from the EIT (e.g. http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/screensaver/eit_171.jpg) Yay! Do you (as a user, not an admin) agree with my thinking on this? I'm thinking of creating Template:PD-USGov-NASA-SOHO-EIT e.g. for use with images from here. --Elvey (talk) 18:34, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Garde nationale[edit]

Bonjour David,

Pour info, File:French Republican Guard cavalry DSC03123.JPG a été réutilisé ici : [8]. Turb (talk) 17:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Jussieu dsc00882.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Jussieu dsc00882.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 10:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Pictures of the Louvre Pyramid[edit]

Salut David. Je suis en train de nettoyer les photos de category:Louvre, et donc celles de la Pyramide. Bref, deux de tes vieilles photos sont proposées à la suppression. Si tu peux passer t'exprimer... Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:47, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Général de Brigade[edit]

Bonjour David. Juste pour te signaler que une des tes photos prises lors d'un défilé du 14 juillet a été utilisée pour illustrer un article de Rue89 sur les avantages dont bénéficient les officiers généraux français.
http://www.rue89.com/2009/07/04/comment-larmee-francaise-soigne-ses-tres-chers-generaux. Cdt. TCY (talk) 22:55, 5 July 2009 (UTC).

Patriarchs[edit]

Hi, would it be possible to explain your deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cave of the Patriarchs.jpg - I am curious. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:47, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Complaint from the copyright holder to OTRS, as noted. Apparently a multiplicity of sites have made pirate copies of his work, including the site from which the photo was copied to Wikipedia. David.Monniaux (talk) 06:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 06:16, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Loire[edit]

Cher David Merci bien pour la photo de la Loire
Elle se trouve maintenant aussi incluse dans le vidéo de ma chanson Heureux qui comme Ulysse
Heureux qui comme Ulysse
J'espère qu'il vous fera plaisir
Amitiés
David
Dwsolo (talk) 16:03, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Charles VI[edit]

Hi!

You uploaded a picture of the sarcophagus of Charles VI in the Imperial Crypt in Vienna. I have a similar, but clearer one that I'd like to upload to replace yours in the Wikipedia article. Is that OK with you?

Regards, Michael (Eschbaumer (talk) 11:51, 28 October 2009 (UTC))

File:At the Library.jpg[edit]

Hi. I was just wondering why File:At the Library.jpg required sudden speedy deletion, after having been on Commons and illustrating an artilce on en:W for more than a year? Thanks, Infrogmation (talk) 14:14, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Complaint from the lady on the picture on OTRS. David.Monniaux (talk) 09:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation. Cheers, Infrogmation (talk) 19:21, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

FOP & Co[edit]

Salut David. Est-ce que tu veux supprimer File:La Defense dsc07138.jpg (photo du CNIT) sur fr: ? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 22:41, 6 November 2009 (UTC) 

Permission to use Bison_crossing_a_river.jpg[edit]

My name is Matthew Page and I work for the Foundation for Global Humanity (http://www.f4gh.org/home). We are a nonprofit organization that creates documentary videos. We loved your image and wanted to be certain it is OK to use it. This still image will be used during an interview to visually reinforce what is being discussed. Full credit with your copyright will be listed with the credits at the end of the video. I would be happy provide further details,

Regards,

Matthew Page


File tagging Image:Urne DSCN1426.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Urne DSCN1426.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Urne DSCN1426.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

GeorgHHtalk   12:48, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

demande de suppression[edit]

Bonjour David,

J'ai reçu le mail de ci-dessous de Rokhaya Diallo, personne photographiée dans le fichier File:Rokhaya Diallo.jpg. Bien qu'il s'agisse d'une photo prise lors d'une manifestation publique, il me semble normal d'accéder à la demande de l'intéressée. J'ai tronqué les adresses mail à cause des spams, mais je peux te renvoyer le mail en intégralité si tu le souhaites: merci.

Le compte Hegor est celui d'un ami proche, d'où le fait que la demande me soit adressée.

Je te remercie. Bonne année. Chris93 (talk) 17:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

date de : Ven 15.1.10, Rokhaya Diallo <rokhaya.diallo@> a écrit : De: Rokhaya Diallo <rokhaya.diallo@ > Objet: Retrait de photo À: "PIERCY Christophe" <c.piercy@ > Date: Vendredi 15 Janvier 2010, 17h40

Salut,

Est-ce que tu pourrais retirer cette photo de Wikipedia http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rokhaya_Diallo.jpg? Je te remercie.

Bien à toi,

ROkhaya


File source is not properly indicated: File:GMT_location_of_Paris.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:GMT_location_of_Paris.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

malo (talk) 01:39, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

copyvio-use of your image[edit]

FYI, see File talk:Mafate Marla solar panel dsc00633.jpg. I would recommend to take some action as all photos from Commons on this site are used without any credit.--Túrelio (talk) 10:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Localisation[edit]

HLM Paris13 dsc00988.jpg

Bonjour David, Te rappelerais-tu, par chance, dans quelle rue du 13e arr. de Paris tu as pris cette photo ? Rue Brillat-Savarin ou de la Fontaine-à-Mulard peut-etre ? Ailleurs ? Merci par avance.--LPLT (talk) 09:53, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

De-adminship warning[edit]

Deutsch | Español | Italian

Dear David.Monniaux. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Huib talk Abigor @ meta 08:07, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Pentagon_77.05629W_38.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pentagon_77.05629W_38.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Cezarika1 (talk) 08:25, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Chapon_DSC09884.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chapon_DSC09884.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 fetchcomms 02:01, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

OTRS ticket provided. Problem solved. Rama (talk) 07:31, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

File:TRAIN_FANTÔME_-_KING_KONG_-_FDL_2004_©_Christophe_Pasquet_Images.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:TRAIN_FANTÔME_-_KING_KONG_-_FDL_2004_©_Christophe_Pasquet_Images.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Sysop tools removed[edit]

Español

I am writing to let you know that as you did not signed at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2010 within the permitted 30 day period your admin rights have been removed for inactivity, as required by our policy. We very much appreciate the work you have done here, and hope you will feel free to re-apply for admin rights if at some time in the future you feel able to contribute again. -- 15 September 2010 (UTC)


Category:Orders and Decorations[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Orders and Decorations has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

-- One or more related categories that you created have been listed for a name change as part of the above discussion. Cheers, AusTerrapin (talk) 12:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:489221735_6a1194398e_o.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:489221735_6a1194398e_o.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 17:51, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Fondue_p1150668.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fondue_p1150668.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 13:58, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

File:ERYX P1220772.jpg[edit]

FYI, this photo was taken from the soldier/operator point of view (back to front), my question now is... do you have a photo of the same thing but from the third person's view (front to back)? IMHO, that would be of better use than this one. Best. --Dave1185 (talk) 17:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Contact_us[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Commons:Contact_us has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SM14 (talk) 19:55, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Rioting_after_Nicolas_Sarkozy's_election,_Place_de_la_Bastille,_Paris_-_20070508-03.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rioting_after_Nicolas_Sarkozy's_election,_Place_de_la_Bastille,_Paris_-_20070508-03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

– Kerαunoςcopiagalaxies 21:29, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Rioting_after_Nicolas_Sarkozy's_election,_Place_de_la_Bastille,_Paris_-_20070508-04.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rioting_after_Nicolas_Sarkozy's_election,_Place_de_la_Bastille,_Paris_-_20070508-04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

– Kerαunoςcopiagalaxies 21:30, 2 May 2011 (UTC)


Unidentified plants[edit]

Please use Category:Unidentified plants for images of unidentified plants like this. -- Ies (talk) 18:09, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

File:La_Defense_dsc07138.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:La_Defense_dsc07138.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Grcampbell (talk) 20:12, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Contact_us[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Commons:Contact_us has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mfwills (talk) 11:33, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Barcelona_MNAC_P1290797.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Barcelona_MNAC_P1290797.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

AzaToth 18:58, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Cananasucre[edit]

File:Bagasse dsc08999.jpg

J'pense que c'est pas de la bagasse, mais des feuilles et têtes de canne laissées au champs par les coupeurs après la récolte des tiges de canne. J'propose un changement de description et du nom du fichier. Si tu es d'accord, il est préférable que tu fasses la demande, car tu es l'uploader Lilyu - smile.svg --Lilyu (talk) 01:44, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Pour_nous_contacter[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Commons:Pour_nous_contacter has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

poke2001 (talk) 07:42, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

File:La_Defense_dsc07205.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:La_Defense_dsc07205.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Civa (talk) 15:43, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


Template:PD-JORF[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Template:PD-JORF has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 22:13, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION[edit]

Hi David!

My name is Edoardo Bit, I am an architect and also a “young researcher” of the University of Ferarra (Italy).


I am writing a book on the “green walls technologies” and I have found very interesting a photo in your page. So, I would kindly ask you if I can use it in my book.


Obviously, if you gently decide to grant me the permission, your name (or your nickname) and the link of the picture will be correctly cited in the credits of my publication.


The photo which I would use is: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salvia_officinalis_p1150380.jpg


Thank you very much! I hope you will attend my request… My e-mail is: edoardo.bit@gmail.com


Bye,

Edoardo

Photo usage[edit]

Hi, I've been working on a small game built around animal quizzes and I wanted to let you know I've used one of your pictures.

I found your picture here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cerdocyon_thous_MG_9503.jpg

And I attributed the picture like this: David.Monniaux with this link: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:David.Monniaux and also added a link to the license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en

I hope you're happy with it, please let me know if this is not the case. You can find the game here: http://apps.facebook.com/animalalbum Or through here: http://www.facebook.com/pages/AnimalAlbum/156339584490672

Kind regards, Garfunkel Jansen (talk) 09:07, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

P.S. Thanks for taking the picture and making it available.

File:Dsc07964.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dsc07964.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84user (talk) 20:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Orsay campus dsc04523.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Orsay campus dsc04523.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:08, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Contact us[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Commons:Contact us has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Informaciondvice (talk) 14:38, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Stade de France P1190107.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Stade de France P1190107.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bob247 (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Forum Halles Paris 01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Forum Halles Paris 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rd232 (talk) 16:14, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Dsc06217 rio antirio bridge jacks.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dsc06217 rio antirio bridge jacks.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Veggies (talk) 12:17, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Rio Antirio bridge carnival chariot DSC06154.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rio Antirio bridge carnival chariot DSC06154.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Veggies (talk) 12:19, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Rio Antirio dsc06353.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rio Antirio dsc06353.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Veggies (talk) 12:20, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Rio Antirio bridge illuminated at night dsc06360.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rio Antirio bridge illuminated at night dsc06360.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Veggies (talk) 12:20, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Rio Antirio dsc06358.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rio Antirio dsc06358.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Veggies (talk) 12:20, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Rio-Antirio bridge dsc06213.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rio-Antirio bridge dsc06213.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Veggies (talk) 12:21, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Dasht-e Kavir.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dasht-e Kavir.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

77.4.85.239 12:49, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

File:French passport front cover.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:French passport front cover.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Werieth (talk) 13:56, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

File:French passport front cover.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:French passport front cover.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sanandros (talk) 18:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Plagiat[edit]

http://www.wiadomosci24.pl/artykul/ubojnia_z_ukrytym_magazynem_padle_zwierzeta_spala_30_ton_265419.html

File:Lauren Jones zzcclj4.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lauren Jones zzcclj4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 22:10, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Village pump discussion concerning your work.[edit]

Hi, I've started a discussion at the village pump regarding a file you've worked on Commons:Village pump#Digital washing out of photos. would you mind popping over to add to the conversation? Regards, Liamdavies (talk) 15:38, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

File:March against digital rights management techniques and the DADVSI copyright law, Louvre, Paris.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:March against digital rights management techniques and the DADVSI copyright law, Louvre, Paris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Remi Mathis (talk) 11:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Location?[edit]

Hi David - do you have a photo location for File:Fern dsc06699.jpg, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 12:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 17:06, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 17:09, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Sacher torte[edit]

You are also welcome to defend your image on English Wiki in the article Sachertorte at Talk:Sachertorte, as I did. I chosed to used it because I think it is a better image then the one an other author want to use - and the reason why this person insists is because it is his/hers own work. Not a good enough reason to me.

Commons:Contact us[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Commons:Contact us has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Clayton Jamal Ross (talk) 20:54, 13 January 2014 (UTC)


Category:Photographs by Agencia Brasil[edit]

--ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:06, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Gnome Delta p1040423.jpg[edit]

David, hello, I have found this image on Wikimedia incorrectly labelled as a Gnome Delta, when it is actually a Gnome Monosoupape 9N, a rathyer different engine, It is not just a small difference as the monosoupape engines had exactly that single valves and the greek alphabet series engines all had two valves (one automatic valve in each piston crown and a pushrod operated exhaust valve), so are structurally and conceptually quite different).

In case my re-name request is challenged, could you join a discussion on the talk page confirming my assertions. Thanks--Petebutt (talk) 14:02, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Permission of photo usage[edit]

Dear Mr. Monniaux, I am writing to you for your kind permission to use the nice photo of Crassostrea gigas(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Crassostrea_gigas_p1040847.jpg). I want to use it in our student textbook about invasion biology. The URL and your name will appear together with the photo in the textbook.

Thank you in advance. Sincerely, Mingxing

A kitten for you![edit]

Kitten (06) by Ron.jpg

Dear Sir, Goodday..! May I ask one precious help from you... I have the necessity of your picture COW AND CALF, which is displayed in your wikimedia page. If you have the higher resolution with 300 dpi photo, kindly send me a copy. It is strictly for my personal use to make an acrylic image for wall hanging. If required, I shall even pay for you a small amount as a token of appreciation.The displayed photo is of 1368/980(Cow_with_calf_dsc06514). May God bless you..! Regards, Rajan maliankadu@yahoo.com


Rajan S.Raj (talk) 16:14, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Grenoble Charlie P1070475.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Grenoble Charlie P1070475.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:24, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Grenoble Charlie P1070476.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Grenoble Charlie P1070476.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Protestors detained after violence near G8 summit[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Protestors detained after violence near G8 summit has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 13:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Grenoble Charlie P1070480.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Grenoble Charlie P1070480.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 03:37, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Grenoble Charlie P1070531.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Grenoble Charlie P1070531.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 03:37, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

User page link[edit]

Hi David. Your user page links to http://www.di.ens.fr/~monniaux , which seems to be dead. Just wanted to make sure you knew. Storkk (talk) 18:14, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Paris Place dItalie Italie2 dsc00851.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Paris Place dItalie Italie2 dsc00851.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 18:43, 25 July 2015 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JarektBot (talk) 15:10, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Thesupermat (talk) 13:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

uploads, user category[edit]

Hello David.Monniaŭ, Images in Category:Photographs and images by Mai-Linh Đoàn Mai-Linh Đoàn or David.Monniaŭ? See author File:Girolle p1050411.jpg. Regards --Jean11 (talk) 21:00, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Farfalle[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Farfalle has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-- Tuválkin 04:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Argonaute FS S636 p1040842.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Argonaute FS S636 p1040842.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tangopaso (talk) 09:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Tangopaso (talk) 09:52, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

File:2361-Paris.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2361-Paris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Remi Mathis (talk) 22:17, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Erreur sur le nom d'un missile ?[edit]

Bonjour. Il est indiqué sur la photo File:Missile 501556 fh000023.jpg que vous avez mit en ligne qu'il s'agit d'un missile français Eryx, mais il semble bien qu'il s'agit d'un TOW américain. L'amateur d'aéroplanes (talk) 17:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)