User talk:David Liuzzo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Soft redirect page

Contents

Rankkronen[edit]

Hallo! Ich gratuliere Dir eine grossartige Arbeit bei Vektorbilder mit Kronen. Wirklich sehr gute und schöne Kunstwerke!. Ich habe leider kleine Fehlern gefunden. Dieselbe Fehlern habe ich selbst auch gemacht, bei meine Kronen die ich habe schon vor einige Jahere für Wikipedia gemacht. Es geht um untere Teil der Kronen - an dieses Ring sollen in britische Rankkronen keine echte Edelsteine sein. So schrieb mir ein Benutzer aus ennglische Wikipedia: UK Coronets, Coronet of an English Baron. Ich habe in Quellen geprüft, dieser Benutzer hat Recht. Verzehung für meine fehlerhafte Deutsch!. Mit best Grüße, Steifer (talk) 17:24, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Ich werde das gerne ändern, allerdings sollte mehr als ein Hinweis eines Benutzers vorhanden sein. Kannst Du mir die Quellen nennen, die das belegen? --David Liuzzo (talk) 05:45, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

French Royal crown[edit]

hello david.. i am seeking your permission to use your picture of the french heraldic kings crown i found on wiki.. also, is your picture a copy of an actual crown or did you design it??? thank you very much, i hope to hear from you soon... joeanne mace..

Well, it's a heraldic crown as the french kings have used it in later centuries after royal crowns on the continent began to use 8 half-arches. There is no definitive standard. You can see the design(s) in french heraldry books. It resembles a little bet the crown of Louis XV. Check also: File:Grand Royal Coat of Arms of France.svg File:Lodewijk_XV.jpg --David Liuzzo (talk) 15:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Greek crown[edit]

I agree, I thought about this for quite a while, but since the article doesn't mention for or against the Danish version, and since there was only one Royal crown ever made for Greece: the Wittelsbach one. Therefore it would be strange for there to be this imaginary crown, if there is a specific source that mentions that Ströhl's fictitious crown was valid then I would certainly change it, but since the Danish explanation makes the most sense, I'm gonna stick with it for the moment, But my mind is always open to new evidence, if anyone can find it. Sodacan (talk) 02:25, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks again, I will do that tomorrow, my eyes and hands hurt too much now. Sodacan (talk) 03:12, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Actually read the this document (using google translate), and it does state quite clearly that the Danish crown is used in all the Coat of arms and Royal standards. Even though the crown depicted in the document does not resemble the Danish crown very much (confusingly), but the intention is clear, that they were "trying" to represent the Danish crown, so for me at least the issue is settled. Since Greece did not have a crown in 1899, Strohl might have had the same problem as we did (insufficient information) and just created one out of no where, alas we will never know. Anyways thanks, and your request is still on, you see, I started the Greek arms months ago (last year in fact) and just had some strength to finish them now. Sodacan (talk) 19:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

SVG crowns[edit]

Hi. Please stop overwriting other people's work, especially when they are promoted images. Upload your version as separate images. --Eusebius (talk) 05:43, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Those images aren't hardly in any use at all wikimedia projects. Commons is no space for data storage, you should know that as an administrator. The fact that they are "promoted images" can't be used as an argument since the impressing low number of two people supported it ages ago, when no other images neither PNG nor SVG were available. --David Liuzzo (talk) 06:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
You are uploading different versions of the same crowns. You are welcome to upload them, not to overwrite existing files with your own version to take their place. They ARE used, even if the contrary wouldn't give you the right to overwrite them. This is just plain vandalism and people get blocked for that. This is a warning. --Eusebius (talk) 07:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
I can use the Use-Tool by myself, they are not used. A warning? You are misusing your administrator position because you stick to your images out of personal reasons. If you keep reverting the changes I'll request a deletion of your outdated files and upload the new SVG versions seperatly. --David Liuzzo (talk) 07:22, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm misusing nothing. Please feel free to report my actions and/or nominate the files for deletion, but good luck about that. Again, you're very welcome to upload your own versions as separate files, to use them on the WMF projects, and to nominate a VI set to replace the existing one if you wish (but some of your illustrations have factual errors). --Eusebius (talk) 07:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
If they had factual errors, feel free to tell them for public benefit and to give others the possibility to change them. --David Liuzzo (talk) 07:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Hum, I was thinking about the colour of the hats for some of the crowns, but I think we have discussed this in the past and it appeared that different sources showed different colours. But I (and the heraldic project on fr.WP) couldn't find any reference for a Dauphin crown with a hat (red or blue). --Eusebius (talk) 07:35, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Well, take a look at File:Crown of Dauphin Louis Antoine (1824).png showing the actual crown Louis Antoine worn at the coronation of Charles X in 1824. (Must have been destroyed at a later date). Nevertheless, that one clearly shows a hat.--David Liuzzo (talk) 07:38, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Yes, interesting, thanks. For creating the pictures of the set we chose to limit ourselves to the Ancien Régime (this one is from the Restauration, a bit later), but a Dauphin crown with hat is certainly historically ok then. --Eusebius (talk) 07:51, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
I have uploaded my own version (I was actually going to do them today... weird), surely there are room for many sets. Regards. Sodacan (talk) 08:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Crown of Louis Philippe[edit]

Hi David, I have created a new crown based on the source you gave me, hope it is alright. Thank you, you've been very helpful. Sodacan (talk) 10:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I agree, there is very little source to rely on (maybe it's because I have only been looking at English sources), but if you find anything more please let me know, I appreciate all the help. Sodacan (talk) 17:34, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the crown, I am currently in the process of updating my Napoleonic COAs, this is a great help, they should be finished soon. If you have a really detailed photo of the chain of the legion of honour that would be really good. Sodacan (talk) 01:02, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Ex omnibus floribus elegi mihi Lilium[edit]

Thanks for the info!

I will add it as soon as I can, and when I find out which font I used for the old motto! I think I might have to upload this as a new file, what do you think? surely the old file is still valid as a pre-Bourbon (Pre-Navarre) and post Restoration. Sodacan (talk) 15:21, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Administrative_divisions_of_Germany.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Administrative_divisions_of_Germany.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.172.89 19:09, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Administrative_Gliederung_Deutschlands.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Administrative_Gliederung_Deutschlands.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.172.89 19:10, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Rangkronen series[edit]

Hey, your Heraldic crowns are really good. Do you have the original SVG versions? These could be useful when we make coats of arms. Adelbrecht (talk) 16:27, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Auftrag möglich[edit]

Hallo, vielen Dank für die Bereitstellung all der tollen Karten. Ich bin auf der Suche nach einer Person die mir ein Kartenset von clickable Maps erstellt (Europa mit den administrativen Boundaries der nächst tieferen Ebene und auf denen jeweils wiederum die nächst tiefere Ebene usw..). Da die Deutschlandkarte mit Ihre Bundesländern genau das ist, was ich benötige, jedoch halt auch für andere Länder und eine oder zwei Ebenen tiefer,dachte ich, ich frage mal bei Ihnen, ob Sie das als Auftrag erledigen könnten. Über eine Kontaktaufnahme wäre ich dankbar. (www.velacon.de) Danke Axel Becker

Help[edit]

Hello! If you can convert these file (File:Флаг Российско-Американской торговой компании (1806 год).JPG) to SVG format. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 23:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, David Liuzzo!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

crowns[edit]

Hello, I would like to know if I can use two crowns created by You to produce decorative stamps. Best /Nyrbah

crowns[edit]

Hello, I would like to know if I can use two crowns created by You to produce decorative stamps. Best /Nyrbah

Silesian symbols[edit]

Hi. I have a few questions.

  1. Why have you modified an upper eagle's strip in File:Wappen Herzogtum Schlesien.jpg without clovers, and changed a crown (or mitre)?
  2. Do you know when Wappenrolle Österreich-Ungarns nach Hugo Ströhl was published? I'm looking a creation date of File:Wappen Herzogtum Schlesien.png.
  3. Do you have or know any law act which established the Flag of the Provinz Schlesien (File:Flagge Preußen - Provinz Schlesien.svg). Or maybe source that stay with date of set up this flag?
    1. And the same question for File:Flagge Preußen - Provinz Oberschlesien.svg

Thank You for the answers. Cheers JDavid (talk) 12:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Well and here the answers: 1. At first, I didn't modify anything, it's the actual depiction. The clovers are the sign by what Austrian (has clovers) and Prussian Silesia (has none, just as whole Silesia lacks them too) are differing. The crown depicted is a princely hat, typicial in the use of Heraldry of the Holy Roman Empire and to Austrian "Kronländer". 2. Actually there are different prints of the publication. But since my source would be google, I think you might search it up as that way as well. Perhaps you should consider the Reprint of the 1900 version, which just came uit 2010: [1] 3. No I don't know.

Please use my German Discussion Page in the Future. --David Liuzzo (talk)

File:Armoiries Henri VII de Luxembourg.svg[edit]

Hallo, Wenn du schon über das von mir zusammengestellte Bild laden musst, könntest du dann bitte einen gekrönten Löwen, gemäss der Blasonierung benutzen? Danke.--Caranorn (talk) 18:29, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Werde ich gerne tun, sobald ich dazu in der Lage bin, da ich bis Mitte Februar leider nicht an einen PC mit Adobe Illustrator heran. Wenn Du das nächste mal ein Wappen das den Reichsadler darstellt erstellst, dann denke bitte daran, dass dieser gemäß der Blasonierung keinerlei Kleestängel auf den Flügeln aufweist. Falls Du dich übergangen fühlst tut mir das leid, mein Gedanke war lediglich, dass es auf Commons nicht unnötig oft das selbe Wappen in zig Versionen geben muss, das erschwert die sinnvolle Einbindung in Artikel und Übersicht in den Kategorien ungemein, zumal im Endeffekt trotzdem nur eine Version tatsächlich genutzt wird. (Die Kategorien zu heraldischen Kronen sind bspw. ein völliges Chaos). Wenn Du eine grafisch ausgefeiltere Version erstellen kannst oder deine Version für die angebrachtere hältst, steht es dir ebenso frei, die aktuelle Version mit einer neuen zu überschreiben bzw. zu revertieren (in dem Fall berichtige aber bitte die Kleestengel). Ansonsten bist Du bei dieser Gelegenheit gerne auch eingeladen, diese Mustervorlagen für Löwen und Adler bei der Erstellung von neuen Wappen zu verwenden, falls sie zufällig einmal auf das passen sollten was Du nötig hast. Liebe Grüße --David Liuzzo (talk) 20:57, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Wappen Deutscher Bund.svg[edit]

hi there,

do you think you can help improve on this image? File:Wappen Deutscher Bund.svg and this one File:Wappen Deutscher Bund.PNG? Thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 02:25, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

I don't see a need for improving there. The latter one seems to have a wrong title, it's not the arms of the German Conferderation, but a designated design for the arms of the German Empire, adopted by the Paulskirchenparliament in Frankfurt 1848. See also: File:Wappen Deutsches Reich (1848).png --David Liuzzo (talk) 15:41, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Sehr schöne Arbeiten[edit]

Lieber David, ich habe Ihre schönen Aufrisse der Wappen bewundert. Sie entsprechen wirklich gut den heraldischen Regeln. Können Sie mit mir einmal in Kontakt treten? Hier meine Möglichkeit: imgdbb@web.de Genaueres möchte ich hier öffentlich nicht ausführen. Danke! Martin B.

File:Wappen Schlesien.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Schlesien.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

and File:Heraldic Eagle 03.svg. JDavid (talk) 17:47, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kaiserstandarte Version2.svg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kaiserstandarte Version2.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Béria Lima msg 23:04, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kaiserstandarte Version2.svg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kaiserstandarte Version2.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

Béria Lima msg 23:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yeah, never notified myself before :D - David Liuzzo (talk) 14:57, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Close (15th-17th centuries) and open (18th-19th Centuries) helmets in Spanish Royal Heraldry[edit]

Hello, Yes, I check it Philip II 1 Philip II 2 SEE it at page 1461 of the Gallery Austrian Dinasty monarchs used the closed helmet (a german influence) Philip "the Handsome" ref image 44526. Open helmet appears with Philip V as a copy of the French Royal Arms [2] French new dinasty, french influences. So I´ll put the open helmet in the Bourbonic Ornamented variants.

Also you can see the fact even Alfonso XII and Alfonso XIII used a variant with a closed helmet at the Armorial of the Golden Fleece SEE IT AT THE END. At the middle and late 19th century at Spain there was a interest in medieval and early modern styles (as Tudor Style in Victorian England was an interest in Catholic Monarchs and Early Austrian Monarch of Spain).

I'm going to put the references that I used in the files infoboxes but there are a lot of them!

Regards--Heralder (talk) 16:39, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Deutsches_Reich_-_Kaiserkrone_(1889).png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Deutsches_Reich_-_Kaiserkrone_(1889).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:24, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Category:David_Liuzzo's_Outdated_Abyss[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:David_Liuzzo's_Outdated_Abyss has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Greater_Coat_of_Arms_of_Belgium[edit]

Misschien kun je beter Katepanomegas hierover aanspreken, die het grootste gedeelte gemaakt heeft, dan kan ik ineens ook de correctie van deze gebruiker overnemen. Adelbrecht (talk) 11:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Wappen Bistum Breslau[edit]

Hello. I had to change the File:Wappen Bistum Breslau.png, because of the pattern of the eagle. But You had given a blue shield of CoA, and I wonder it is correct. Every source like e.x. File:Presslaw CoA.jpg (and category:Coats of arms of Wrocław diocese has a red part shield. I have also checked on the present coat of arms on the curia of Wrocław diocese and present pattern is given here. You didn't give any source of the file so I think the file is incorrect, and also we should have a patterns from the original source. JDavid (talk) 11:05, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

As you can see at first I used a red version until I looked it up. For the reliable source, look into "Die Wap­pen der Hoch­stif­te, Bis­tü­mer und Diö­ze­s­an­bi­schö­fe im Hei­li­gen Rö­mi­schen Reich 1648 -1803" 2007, Hrsg. v. Erwin Gatz u. a. Schnell & Steiner

ISBN-13: 9783795416379. Just another remark: Siebmacher isn't a reliable source at all in this case, many arms of ecclesiastical territories here are simply wrong. --David Liuzzo (talk) 20:14, 8 July 2011 (UTC)


Germany Map[edit]

Hello I would like to use your map of germany (Karte Bundesrepublik Deutschland.svg) and wish to know what conditions I have to respect in order to do so ? I am preparing a book about old brewery mugs, and there are so many in Germany... the picture would be modified in a way that in every chapter introduction, there would be a picture where the concerned state (bavaria, baden-württemberg etc...) would be highlighted in a different color (light blue instead of green) Congratulations for your work --Cpa59 (talk) 20:44, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

What errors?[edit]

What errors exactly? - Ssolbergj (talk) 14:19, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

the first French Empire arms (1804-1815)[edit]

Hello, I would tell you that with your coat with ermine is simply splendid.Wappen Deutsches Reich - Reichswappen (Grosses).svg No one had succeeded with that. I work on the armorial of the Bonaparte family I know it's a lot to ask could you please make the first French Empire arms with your mantle with ermine Grandes Armes Impériales (1804-1815)2.svg I would understand if you did not accept the request Thank you very much good day to you cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 09:03, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much, actually I can't recreate that scheme from scratch, I just worked with the original file as template, 100px, I just put enough effort in to recreate it. --David Liuzzo (talk) 08:04, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Template:Europe location[edit]

Ich hoffe, dass du nichts dagegen hast, dass ich {{LangSwitch}} in {{Copyrighted free use provided that}} eingesessen habe. Du kannst das revertieren oder deutsche Übersetzung einsetzen. BartekChom (talk) 17:43, 25 October 2011 (UTC) I guess it's okay^^ --David Liuzzo (talk) 22:24, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Yay! notifying myself[edit]

File:Wappen Deutsches Reich - Elsass-Lothringen (Klein).png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Deutsches Reich - Elsass-Lothringen (Klein).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

David Liuzzo (talk) 00:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

David Liuzzo (talk) 11:10, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Flag of Prussia 1892-1918[edit]

Hello.
Can I use your "Flag of Prussia 1892-1918" graphic for my derivative work to distribute?
I want to distribute template of custom IC card design of Prussia on the web.
Does it need to credit your name somewhere?
NononoP (talk) 01:42, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Blond (talk) 23:24, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Flag of Prussia 1892-1918.PNG[edit]

Hello.
Please give me the permission which carries out secondary use of "Flag of Prussia 1892-1918.svg" into the animation and picture which I create.
I would like to exhibit a work at the site in Japan, when completing.
I am amateur and am not commercial use.
What should we do with specification of a source?Kyu mi (talk) 21:44, 3 December 2012 (UTC)--Kyu mi (talk) 21:44, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Imperial seal of Japan.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Imperial seal of Japan.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Alkari (?), 4 January 2013, 01:51 UTC 01:51, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Wappen des Fürstbistums Basel[edit]

Wappen des Fürstbistum Basels
korrekte Farbe

Lieber David Liuzo, Könntest Du bitte bei Gelegenheit die Farbe des Wappens des Fürstbistums Basel wieder auf rot korrigieren? Die Richtung stimmt, Farbe ist muss aber rot sein. Ich habe das extra noch nachrecherchiert. Danke sidonius (talk) 19:40, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Wenn Du die Quelle hier darlegen kannst dann gerne, ich hab das ja wenn ich das seh auch mindestens einmal geändert und auch wenn ich mich daran längst nicht mehr erinnere, glaube ich, dass ich das ja damals auch aus gutem Grund getan haben mag, weil mir eine glaubhafte Quelle das so geschildert hatte, aber da kann sich ja wiederum ein Fehler eingeschlichen haben. --21:02, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Ströhl-HA-LI-Fig. 11.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ströhl-HA-LI-Fig. 11.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

149.156.172.74 16:33, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Source for Danish crown?[edit]

Could you please give some more information about the source for this picture? Is it taken from a book? /B****n (talk) 21:08, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the answer!
Greetings /B****n (talk) 22:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Graphic Designer Barnstar Hires.png The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Bonjour !

N'ayant pas trouvé d'autre moyen de communication que celui-ci, je me permets de vous écrire suite à vos créations sur la page ; http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A9raldique_fran%C3%A7aise

Je demande votre autorisation d'utiliser et dériver vos créations comme le spécifie le Wikimedia Commons. Cette utilisation se ferrait autour du jeu en ligne "lesroyaumes.com", un jeu role-play en ligne pré-renaissance.

J'espère obtenir une réponse de votre part afin de pouvoir profiter pleinement de vos productions.

Cordialement, A.

[Vous pouvez me répondre à cdrvois@outlook.com] Arcadhias (talk) 15:27, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Heraldic Lion 18[edit]

Hello, I am an indie author seeking permission to use your Heraldic Lion 18 graphic for my fantasy ebook cover. The design is amazing and fits my protagonist perfectly. I would of course credit you for the cover art on the book's title page if you would be so kind as to let me use it. I couldn't find any other way to contact you. Thank you! GP

Feel free to do so; Greetings --David Liuzzo (talk) 01:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Karte Hessen 1900[edit]

Super Karte von Hessen um 1900! Wäre es möglich, die Grundkarte (Gemeinden und Kreise um 1900 ohne Beschriftung) von Dir zu bekommen?

Die SVG ist dergestalt organisiert, dass jeder das selbst machen kann, einfach die Beschriftungsebenen löschen. --David Liuzzo (talk) 17:45, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

The outdated EU location files (with only 27 members) have been replaced by the vector version showing the present situation. The vector versions shall be used from now onwards. David Liuzzo (talk) 16:09, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Wappen Frankfurt am Main nach Klemens Stadler.svg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wappen Frankfurt am Main nach Klemens Stadler.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 22:26, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

WTF[edit]

You put a request on the graphics lab/map workshop-page. I take up the challenge in creating maps of the individual countries of the EU. I spent a lot of time in creating and uploading them....only to find out at the last minute that you already created them yourself (see: Category:Locator maps of countries of European Union (orange relief scheme)). Now there exist exact replicas of the same maps in the category. What is this? You don't put out a request for help and then doing it yourself. Do you know how much time I spent on this? There is one difference though between our maps: I made the maps W3C-valid.

I would like an explanation. Wereldburger758 (talk) 08:37, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
simple: There was no response, fot the time I waited for it, so I did it part of them myself. There are a lot more to make, that I didn't convert yet. What the hell is W3C? --David Liuzzo (talk) 14:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
You have created the maps with Adobe Illustrator and saved them as an SVG-file. Problem with files made with Adobe Illustrator is that they come with a lot of extra, unnecessary code. The code of SVG-files can be checked with the validator of the W3C-organisation. SVG-files are a standard. Like HTML and CSS are. Checking the file with this validator just means that all, unnecessary code is filtered out and that the files will be good visible in all browsers. So, it is a kind of quality check.Wereldburger758 (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Well could you replace my versions with yours then? Sorry for all the inconviniences, I didn't plan those for you. :) --David Liuzzo (talk) 22:01, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Wappen Frankfurt am Main nach Klemens Stadler.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Frankfurt am Main nach Klemens Stadler.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 19:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Ich sags nochmal ganz klar: Wenn du neue Bilder erstellst, freuen wir uns alle. Wenn du andere Bilder von anderen Usern deshalb überspielst und dich als Urheber einschreibst, ist das eine Frechheit. Im Fall dieses Wappens dann auch noch eine falsche Behauptung aufzustellen, dass die Darstellung nicht der Blasonierung entsprechen würde, entspricht meiner früheren Beobachtung deiner Person. Bitte upgrade dein Sozialverhalten. N3MO (talk) 19:32, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Bei der Gelegenheit möchte ich nochmal hinzufügen, dass es schlimm ist, wie unheraldisch du mit Wappen umgehst. Vor allem Farbverläufe gehört zu den schlimmsten heraldischen Verbrechen. Egal wie hübsch manche das finden, das ist ein Unding. N3MO (talk) 19:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Das habe ich doch gar nicht behauptet. Beobachte genauer. Natürlich entspricht es der Blasonierung. Doch eine Blasonierung IST KEINE Quelle für die Darstellung an sich, die ja deutlich nach Stadler sich vollzog und nicht frei von dir gezeichnet wurde. Gib eine genaue Quelle an! Stadler Buch XY S. 123 --David Liuzzo (talk) 15:17, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Im Übrigen entspricht das direkte Ersetzen redundanter Inhalte auch deinen eigenen Gepflogenheiten. Bspw. File talk:Banner of the Holy Roman Emperor (after 1400).svg - was ich auch dort, wo die Kategorie mit zig Varianten angefüllt ist, gut nachvollziehen kann.
Lass mich an dieser Stelle noch hinzufügen, dass eher ein Verbrechen ist, Webspace der Commons mit völlig irrelevanten Wappen zu verbrauchen, die auch, da obsolet, nirgends genutzt werden. Fühl Dich im Übrigen frei Farbverläufe zu entfernen, wo sie heraldische Farbe oder Tinktur betreffen. An meinem Sozialverhalten gibt es nichts zu upgraden, du hast die Gründe so eben gehört, an der Blasonierung liegt's nicht. Aber spare Dir besser eine Antwort, bevor Du wieder einmal für einige Tage gesperrt wirst. Eigentlich schade, in irgendeinem Nachrichtenverlauf habe ich frühere offenbar nutzbringendere Gespräche von uns gefunden. --David Liuzzo (talk) 15:32, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Update - Croatia in EU[edit]

Hi, can you update your maps please? For example File:EU location LIT.png. Croatia is in EU. Thanx, --Palu (talk) 21:48, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

They are: See File:EU_location_LIT.svg. The png should be deleted. --David Liuzzo (talk) 13:43, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Copyvio[edit]

Just wanted to drop a note and let you know that your heraldic coronets are being used in commercial endeavors without proper attribution. The artist's webpage is http://heraldicsignetring.jimdo.com and a photo he posted on fb shows your coronet being used with no attribution at https://scontent-b-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfp1/t1.0-9/10390117_10204097429422496_7243446137573529775_n.jpg.

Regards, 50.82.40.97 18:47, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Sources[edit]

Excuseme, please, can you say what's sources of coats of arms? where are these coat coming from? Books, webs, photos... --Parair (talk) 11:45, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Wappen Deutsches Reich - Reichsadler 1889.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Deutsches Reich - Reichsadler 1889.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2601:1:8280:A13:D1A7:201F:C5E7:C983 18:47, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Use of your lion[edit]

Greetings, I have a somewhat bizarre request. My farther, a historian and curator of a local history museum in a Czech town of Mladá Boleslav (Jungbunzlau), got a request from a nearby tiny village of Sezemice to create a coat of arms for them. (My farther doesn't speak much English or German, so I'm writing in his stead.) He would like to use one of your heraldic lions. Of course you would be attributed in some way, probably on the village's website (http://www.sezemice-mb.cz; in Czech only). Does he have your permission to do so? True immortality and eternal glory await you...

Of Course, I'd be interested to see the result! Greetings and Merry Christmas, -David Liuzzo (talk) 20:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Prussian Eagle[edit]

Hi, Mr. Liuzzo. I was wondering if I could have your permission to use your Prussian eagle (this one) on an edit I've made to a certain Nazi propaganda poster? I've already made the edit, and I could show you if you'd like.

I don't really plan on using it otherwise, and I'm just sharing the finished poster on an imageboard. 65.111.95.138 22:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Euhm, No. I don't produce any kind of symbol of the nationalsocialist era and I don't want to have any affiliation with it. That Prussian Eagle of monarchic times has no reason to show up on a Nazi propaganda poster. --David Liuzzo (talk) 13:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The Nazi flag (along with all associated symbols) is replaced with an Imperial one for an alternate history situation in which the German Empire won the first world war. National socialism doesn't even exist within the continuity. 65.111.95.138 22:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Wappen Bistum Trient.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Bistum Trient.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Parair (talk) 13:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

permission to use your map of Thuringia in a published book[edit]

Hello. I am asking your permission to used your map File: Germany Location of Thuringen.svg in a family history book that I will self-publish later this year. I have added titles to the map: Modern Germany, Thuringia, and Creuzburg to illustrate when my ancestors were born. The map will be printed in grayscale. The book is titled Rufus and Lily, Volume 2. Thank you very much. Karen Walker