User talk:De728631

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


TUSC token 211033b1711e51385fa1da3b5f03b199[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Danke![edit]

Danke für deinen Einsatz für den Upload der Bilder aus dem Stadtarchiv Kiel!!! Habitator terrae (talk) 14:29, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Gern geschehen. Ich habe eine Zeit lang in Kiel gewohnt, also kenne mich da ein bißchen aus. Und diese alten Bilder sind ja ebenso interessant wie wertvoll. De728631 (talk) 14:32, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Vorlage inlcoord[edit]

Hallo De728631, Du hast mir bei meinem Problem mit der Vorlage 53°42′15″N 9°33′56″E / Dorfstraße 12 / 53.704290; 9.565430 geholfen. Es erscheint - wie ich das wollte - nur die Adresse, nicht die Koordinaten, indem du label= eingeführt hast. Leider funktioniert das nur auf meinem PC, nicht aber auf meinen Handys. Sowohl bei Apple-Handy und Ipad, als auch beim Android-Handy erscheinen die Koodinaten und die Adresse. Lässt sich die Vorlage so erweitern, dass auch auf den Handys nur die Adresse erscheint? Gruß --Barghaan (talk) 09:38, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Barghaan, da fragst du am besten @Speravir: Der hat den Parameter programmiert und kennt sich mit den Vorlagen allgemein sehr viel besser aus, als ich. Ich könnte mir aber schon vorstellen, dass es in der Mobilversion von Wikimedia auch bei den Templates Unterschiede zur Desktop-Version gibt, aber technisch kann ich dazu leider nichts sagen. De728631 (talk) 18:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Tut mir leid, Barghaan, aber das überfordert auch mich. Mir fällt da nur Jarekt ein, den man (in Englisch) dazu mal fragen könnte, mich dann besser auch anpingen. — Speravir – 21:58, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Ich habe nun Jarekt auf seiner Nutzerdisk. darauf angesprochen. — Speravir – 18:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Ich hänge es mal hier als Nachtrag an: Barghaan, wie mir erst nach Jarekts Ansprache dämmerte, lag das Problem gar nicht an der Vorlage, sondern an fehlenden CSS-Regeln für die Mobilansicht – es waren übrigens alle Angaben von Geokoordinaten von der Dopplung betroffen – Steinsplitter hat dann nach meiner entsprechenden Anfrage im Admin-Noticeboard repariert. — Speravir – 18:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Bengt Nyman[edit]

Hi De728631, Category:Ships by BN is supposed to be a user subcategory of Category:Photographs by Bengt Nyman. Maybe you can help me fix it. Bengt Nyman (talk) 14:53, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Bengt, it is already a subcategory but because "Category:Photographs by Bengt Nyman" is "hidden", the name at the bottom of the page is in small font unlike the regular categories. I just added a "hiddencat" template too for Ships by BN, so everything should be fine now. De728631 (talk) 14:58, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi again. Unfortunately you have messed up hundreds of my files by removing Category:Photographs by Bengt Nyman. I want Photographs by Bengt Nyman as well as the subcategory under it to show under user categories. Please restore all. Bengt Nyman (talk) 15:11, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
I'm sorry but that practice should not be followed at all because it constitutes overcategorisation. Per our policies, files shall always be in the most specific category in a category tree, and not in one category (Ships by BN) and its parent category (Photographs by Bengt Nyman) at the same time. De728631 (talk) 15:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Yes, that applies to general file categories, but need not be applied to hidden user categories which are for the benefit of the user organizing his work. Please leave my hidden user categories alone. Bengt Nyman (talk) 22:40, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
I have to disagree. Commons:Categories applies to all types of categories including user categories. They are explicitely mentioned in the "Major categories" section. Strictly speaking, it is even discouraged to create specific subcategories like "Ships by BN" (see Commons:User-specific galleries, templates and categories#Categories") but in your case I do find it useful and acceptable just because of the large number of ship photographs you use to provide. So, while user-specific categories should not be a part of the regular category tree, it is my understanding that they still need to be organised according to the same rules to avoid confusion by other users. You're welcome though to seek more opinions at the Village Pump or other venues. De728631 (talk) 14:21, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Pre-uploads[edit]

Hi. Thanks for approving the deletions of the "pre-uploaded" files (I received permission to pre-upload historically important files and then immediately nominate them for deletion from another administrator, User:JuTa.). You marked them as deleted, and thank you, but for some reason, the ones marked as deleted are still on Commons, for example File:Мирослав Гермашевский, 1978.jpg from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Мирослав Гермашевский, 1978.jpg. Could you please double-check? Does the file appear deleted on your computer? I've restarted my computer and everthing but it is still there, and for copyright reasons I don't want it to remain there for long after being marked deleted. I appreciate your help since who knows if the everything from the online version of the Museum Catalog of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation or even webarchive will still be there in 2071. (By the way, is there any chance you would be willing to be pinged daily with a list of pre-uploads for deletion? I understand that some admins are quite busy.) Thank you, --PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:59, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi PlanespotterA320, these do not appear on my computer so I guess they're still in your cache. Try clearing the cache of your browser and the visit the pages again. De728631 (talk) 00:24, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Nevermind. I recently added a speedydelete tag, and most of them are gone now.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Elska Magazine and "‪Copyright violations‬"[edit]

Hi there, I keep getting these deletions but I own the copyright of these photos and have repeatedly sent in permissions to use them, such as [Ticket#: 2018070910007118] and [Ticket#: 2018070910007047]. I assume that everything will be ok once these tickets are dealt with. Or is there something wrong with them? I don't get responses to any of the several tickets I've lodged besides the "confirmation of receipt" emails. Liamcampbell (talk) 14:13, 10 July 2018 (UTC)Liamcampbell

@Liamcampbell: Thank you for your response. Please do not reupload these images because they would only be deleted again for procedural reasons. They will eventually be restored automatically once your email tickets have been dealt with. Unfortunately our email department has a huge backlog of some 3 months since it's entirely run by volunteers. De728631 (talk) 14:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

File:JointDeclaration_2018.jpg[edit]

User:Varavour mass uploaded many photos taken by Yemane Gebremeskel with false copyright information stating that the photos are in the public domain as their author is dead. This is a lie. I have tried to nominate File:JointDeclaration_2018.jpg for deletion since the photo is not in the public domain of Eritrea. The photo's author, Yemane Gebremeskel, is still alive. File:JointDeclaration_2018.jpg is under some protection and will need an administrator to nominate for deletion. Thank you. Turtlewong (talk) 02:57, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Flickrreview[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:An_Actual_Vertical_Yellow_Bike.jpg&diff=310475612&oldid=308113663

This didn't work out I think. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:26, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: Yes, it did. This Flickr user was blacklisted for uploading works at Flickr that were clearly not his own. However, this file has the user's name in the exif. The bad author template does not mean that the file needs to get deleted automatically. Rather it is a not for reviewers to be extra careful when assessing the image and licence. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images: "It is not impossible that a Flickr user could have uploaded some images they took that they did have rights to, and some images from another source that they did not." In this case I don't have any doubt that it is an original work by this guy from Flickr. However, if you think it needs more scrutiny, please feel free to nominate the file for deletion. De728631 (talk) 13:18, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Um, that's not what I meant.. Take a look at the page. You chose the wrong template. I support unblacklisting that Flickr user btw, I'm about to add my view to Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/09/Category:Photographs by Alan Levine. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:27, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Ah, now I got it! Stupid template names... Thanks for pointing this out. De728631 (talk) 13:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
By the way, Alan Levine aka cogdog is already blacklisted at Commons:Questionable Flickr images. De728631 (talk) 13:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposal drafts[edit]

Thanks so much for your edits to the VP proposal drafts. They look so much better. Sorry I typed in Wikipedia vs. Commons for the policy... my fingers kept doing that when I was searching for policy info, too. Anyway, thanks, they look so much more pretty now, too!!!CaroleHenson (talk) 19:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome. I thought if they looked just like the current templates the chances might get a better acceptance. De728631 (talk) 00:27, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Quentin Roosevelt[edit]

Ich fürchte das war nur eine Arbeitshypothese zum Abgleich mit diesen dreien [1][2][3]. Ich hätte es später wieder rausgenommen, denn für eine sichere Identifizierung reicht es m.M.n. nicht. Alexpl (talk) 15:12, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Alles klar. Du kannst es gerne rückgängig machen, wenn du dir nicht sicher bist. Ich wüsste nämlich auch nicht eindeutig, wer von den Herrschaften das sein sollte. Der 2. von links ganz vorne sieht ihm schon ähnlich, aber das wäre auch nur geraten. De728631 (talk) 15:15, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Done. Alexpl (talk) 15:41, 12 July 2018 (UTC)


Astérix photo[edit]

Dear De728631, just a ping for your information regarding Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Albert_Uderzo_(de_tekenaar_van_Asterix)_tekent_Asterix,_Bestanddeelnr_924-5895.jpg (an image which you just —rightfully— deleted). Best regards, Ariadacapo (talk) 15:28, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Yup, I just commented there. De728631 (talk) 15:30, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

[edit]

Das Bild habe ich von aus dem Press Kit von der Homepage: https://www.valnir.net/press/sheet.php?p=valnir_rok

— Preceding unsigned comment added by DerAlienpunk (talk • contribs) 15:40, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
DerAlienpunk, das mag ja sein, aber dort gibt es keine freie Lizenz, wie du sie hier angeben hast. Du kannst nicht einfach eine Creative Commons-Lizenz erfinden und das Logo als eigenes Werk ausgeben ("self"), wenn du nicht der Urheber bist. Außerdem müssen hier bei Commons alle Uploads frei für jedermann nutzbar sein, und nicht nur für die Presse. De728631 (talk) 15:51, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Village pump/Archive 1[edit]

I accidentally created Commons:Village pump/Archive 1 because I clicked on the wrong button, could you kindly delete that? Otherwise if it's the best place to archive such topics as opposed to the "regular archive" then feel free to let it be. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 00:05, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Just did this. De728631 (talk) 00:05, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, have a nice day/evening. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 00:06, 17 July 2018 (UTC)