User talk:DenesFeri

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, DenesFeri!

Eriophyes triradiatus[edit]

Hi Uleli,

If you have time and want to, than please create this category: Eriophyes triradiatus. Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 08:04, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, the accepted name for this species seems to be Stenacis triradiatus, so I created that name instead, with a redirect from the name Eriophyes triradiatus. Uleli (talk) 16:34, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Thank you! but according to the enwiki the Eriophyes is the valid name. DenesFeri (talk) 08:23, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Look: [1] DenesFeri (talk) 08:26, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Please ask a zoologist about the correct and current name. A brief internet sulf indicate that the current status is Stenacis triradiatus, but I can't value these. I am into plants.
Uleli (talk) 19:17, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

OK, I will ask one; and thank you! DenesFeri (talk) 08:41, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello Denesferi Dr Enrico de Lillo, Universita degli Studi di Bari, Italia is the group specialist for Fauna Europaea has Stenacis triradiatusas the corrrect placement. Use this name. How are you? Best regards Robert aka Notafly (talk) 13:40, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Not Ophidiaster ophidianus?[edit]

Hi FredD,

Are you sure that this File:Ophidiaster ophidianus1.jpg is not Ophidiaster ophidianus? And why? And what else could it be? regards. DenesFeri (talk) 08:34, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, it is definitely not an Ophidiaster ophidianus, and obviously not even a species of the Ophidiasteridae family. Ophidiaster ophidianus has rounded and flexible arms, and neither triangular nor pointed - it shares somehow the same appearance as the Linckia species, with a different color and longer arms. Your specimen looks very much like the "sandstars" of the Paxillosida order, with its distinct flat surface and digging ossicles (it may be an Astropecten, but I don't master this genus enough to be definitive). As it appears to be a souvenir, I think it has been dyed (like on this picture).
Here are my reasons : why did you think it was an Ophidiaster ophidianus ? Regards, FredD (talk) 08:51, 21 May 2014 (UTC)


Hi Denes - what is your evidence for File:Phoenix theophrasti - Malta.jpg being Phoenix theophrasti? It looks more like P. canariensis; also, its size means it is likely older than the description of P. theophrasti as a new species (1967). I have moved it to Cat:Unidentified Phoenix for the time being. - MPF (talk) 20:55, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! - MPF (talk) 12:01, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Polistes nimpha killing an Apis mellifera-20140819-1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Polistes nimpha killing an Apis mellifera-20140819-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 10:12, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Images from Wilhelm Leche[edit]

Hi, Images from Wilhelm Leche should be {{PD-old-70}} + {{PD-1923}}. Could you please fix that? Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:31, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I will try. cheers. DenesFeri (talk) 13:23, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Cerceris rybyensis killing an halictid bee-20140819-3.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Cerceris rybyensis killing an halictid bee-20140819-3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS ( This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cerceris rybyensis killing an halictid bee-20140819-3.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

russavia (talk) 08:25, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Old uploads, and future uploads[edit]

MDann has offered to help with the old files. I will look into the handling of future files. Please note an open issue in the permission of File:Cerceris rybyensis killing an halictid bee-20140819-1.jpg--Sphilbrick (talk) 15:23, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Aceria macrorhynchus or Aceria macrochela?[edit]

Dear DenesFeri,

After reading nl:Esdoornnerfhoekmijt (which is the Dutch name for Aceria macrochela) I wondered if two images you uploaded in 2011 are correctly classified. I have linked them below:

The Dutch article mentions the following characteristics of Aceria macrochela:

  • The galls form:
    • where the veins split, and
    • at the base of the leaves.
  • The mites parasite Acers and preferably Acer campestre, (field maple, magyar: mezei juhar)

The galls in your pictures happen to have formed on field maple leaves and their distribution on the leaf matches the description above. Moreover, the color and form and dimensions of the galls on your photos differ markedly from the other pictures in Category:Aceria macrorhynchus.

Non-scientific sources often misclassify galls, so I am not absolutely sure. Even so one can't fail to spot the strange dichotomy in Category:Aceria macrorhynchus. Hopefully you will be able to resolve this issue. I think re-categorization is necessary.

Kind regards, 13:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


Well, I don't know. But I will recategorize them.

Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 10:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)