User talk:Denis Barthel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

C'mon![edit]

Hey, Denis! Ich weiß ja nicht, was passiert ist, aber ich hoffe, dass du bald wieder hierher zurück kommst :) Bis dann mal, abf /talk to me/ 06:52, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Request for comment[edit]

Discussion regarding the Categories "Fossil xxx" is occurring on Wp:ToL (here). As a member of the project you input is requested in to gain a larger view of the communities opinion on how to handle the points raised. Thanks --Kevmin (talk) 18:29, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

File:CasaPoporului2004.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:CasaPoporului2004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Jmabel ! talk 19:01, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:Utricularias.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Utricularias.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:41, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

checked OTRS ticket, fixed --:bdk: 11:21, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token a25408787ceb839ce22525d443b0157a[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

User:Denis Barthel/gallery[edit]

Bitte packe die Beschreibungen auf User:Denis Barthel/gallery in <nowiki>-Tags, damit die Seite nicht in der Kategorie erscheint. Danke,--Luxo 20:56, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Titelblatt FDGÖ Bilder zur Lage der Nation KurtJotter.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Titelblatt FDGÖ Bilder zur Lage der Nation KurtJotter.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Denis,
da du vermutlich nicht selbst "Kurt Jotter" bist, benötigst du von ihm eine schriftliche Genehmigung oder andere Evidenz für die freie Lizensierung all dieser Fotos. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Und genau die liegt im OTRS. Ganz so dumm wie du vielleicht glaubst bin ich denn doch nicht. Denis Barthel (talk) 08:33, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Mit dumm hat es weniger zu tun; in der jetzigen Form sind diese Uploads schlicht unlizensiert. Wenn du, wie vorgesehen, das template {{OTRS pending}} auf die Seiten gesetzt hättest, hättest du mir eine Menge Arbeit ersparen können. Der nächste admin wird sich nicht mehr solche Mühe machen, dir deswegen nachzulaufen. --Túrelio (talk) 08:43, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Hier braucht niemand niemandem "nachlaufen", du mir notfalls auch nicht - das zur Arbeiut, die ich dir hätte ersparen sollen. Die gegebenen 7 Tage reichen ja aus zur Lizensierung, unlizensiert ist hier gar nichts, ihr bzw. du habt die beiden Sachen, Lizenz und Bilder, nur noch nicht zusammenbekommen - das sind eure/deine "trägen" Arbeitsabläufe, nicht meine.
Und was hier grade so vorgesehen und Usus ist, ist -ehrlich gestanden- für einen Gelegenheits-Uploader wie mich schon lang nicht mehr nachvollziehbar. Ich lad meinen Kram zukünftig dann wieder in de hoch, da kenn ich die Abläufe besser und werd nicht gleich abgemeiert, weil ich mich um Lizenzen bemühe, schon historische Bilder hochlade und bloss ne depperte Vorlage vergessen hab. Have fun, Denis Barthel (talk) 08:58, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

File:WarumIchFrankfurtSoSuperFand.jpg[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Denis Barthel!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

Slfi (talk) 21:18, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Utricularia_major[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Utricularia_major has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Chris.urs-o (talk) 08:17, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

File:CoseyAutograph.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:CoseyAutograph.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 14:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

File:First felix.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:First felix.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sentausa (talk) 08:32, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:PassauerStrasse1920.png[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:PassauerStrasse1920.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 21:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 19:04, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 22:40, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:38, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Agama lebretoni[edit]

Hello Goodshort,

Thank you for your determination of my reptile photos from Bioko. You have determined one of them as Agama lebretoni. This would be great, as the project currently has no photo of this species. But i admit, that I am a bit hesitating. I have considered this a while too, but after a discussion in the German Wikipedia it has been said, that no records of A. lebretoni are orange-headed. I hope you see my dilemma? I would appreciate your help in this, an explanation would be very nice. Regards, Denis Barthel (talk) 19:53, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Denis,
actually, I emailed Philipp Wagner (who described the species) about this, and here is his answer: "both should be A. lebretoni, one male in brilliant coloration the other one in a typical more subadult or dull coloration, but clearly not a female". I assumed that he knows his subject and this is why I categorized these pictures ;-). By the way, nice shots! Goodshort (talk) 21:51, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you Goodshort, I am happy, that this turns out to be the more valuable picture. Thanks for your passionate work. Denis Barthel (talk) 20:57, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Krabbe bioko IMG 1744.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Krabbe bioko IMG 1744.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 B.p. 22:08, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Moltebeere-Bilder[edit]

Hallo Denis,
ich bin auf der Suche nach Rubus-Sorten gerade über deine Moltebeeren gestolpert (File:Moltebeere Fruchtstand.jpg, File:Moltebeere Bluete.JPG und File:Moltebeere Bluehend.jpg). Dabei ist mir aufgefallen, dass du beim letzten einen Sortennamen angegeben hast, bei den anderen aber keine weitere Information steht. Weißt du, ob es sich um die selbe Pflanze handelt (ich weiß, es sind alte Bilder...).
Ganz liebe Grüße, Anna reg (talk) 21:11, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo User:Anna reg ja, das ist immer die selbe Sorte gewesen. Danke fürs drum kümmern! Gruß, Denis Barthel (talk) 21:17, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Danke für die schnelle Antwort! Dann füg ich das gleich in die Bildbeschreibung ein. Liebe Grüße, Anna reg (talk) 21:19, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:MaurizioBianchiSelfportrait.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MaurizioBianchiSelfportrait.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:MaurizioBianchiSelfportrait.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

TLSuda (talk) 13:34, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

@TLSuda: - is the permission-email of Bianchi good enough for that? Denis Barthel (talk) 19:48, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes. An email from the creator of the image (which in this case seems to be Bianchi) releasing the image under a free license would be perfect. Commons:Email_templates has an example of this which works well. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 22:19, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

File:SesamEdit.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:SesamEdit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.136.79 12:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

:Category:WikiCon 2014 Wikieulen[edit]

Hallo Denis,

um nicht ein halbes Dutzend verwandter Kategorien zu haben, habe ich mir erlaubt die von dir angelegten Category:WikiCon 2014 Wikieulen in Category:WikiCon 2014 Verleihung der "WikiEule" und die schon früher angelegte Category:WikiEule zu "sprengen". Ich hoffe du bist mir nicht böse.

Einen LA auf dieselbe zu stellen traue ich mich noch nicht. Ich begnügte mich daher damit einer Weiterleitung zu erstellen.

Liebe Grüße, WikiEulenAcademy (talk) 00:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Hallo WEA, ich habe mir erlaubt, das teilweise wieder zu aktualisieren, damit die Unterkategorien der WikiCon 2014 gleichmäßig benannt sind - hier "WikiCon 2014 WikiEule". Ich hoffe, ich habe alles erhalten und nichts beschädigt dabei. Nichts für ungut, Gruß, Denis Barthel (talk) 00:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Bitte wieder zurück und das hier ungeschehen machen. Wir haben uns schon was dabei gedacht. Category:WikiEule war nur temporär eine Unterkat der WikiCon.
Danke, --WikiEulenAcademy (talk) 00:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Soso, beim nächsten Mal, wenn "ihr" Euch geheimnisvoll was denkt, dann lasst andere rechtzeitig (=vorher) daran teilhaben. Ansonsten müsst "ihr" damit leben, das andere Benutzer sich ebenfalls "etwas gedacht" haben (wonach "ihr" im übrigen nicht gefragt habt) und das auch bewahren wollen. Aber da "ihr" ja eulenhaft weise seid, lass ich "euch" weiter enigmatisch "etwas denken" und nehme meine Finger aus der weiteren Kategorieorganisation der WikiCon, an kindischen Pöbeleien hab ich keinen Bedarf. Liebe Grüße, Denis Barthel (talk) 08:40, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Hallo Denis,
hier geht es nicht um Kategorien zur WikiCon. de:WP:WikiEule und de:WP:WikiEule 2014 sind ja mit Bedacht auch keine Unterseite von de:WP:WikiCon 2014. Auch wurden die verschiedenen Preise "AutorenEule", "PortalEule", "EhrenEule" genannt. Dieses Schema, das sich auch auf den WikiEule-Seiten und Unterseiten wiederholt, sollte auch für Kategorien bestehen bleiben. Auch die Benennung der entsprechenden Commons-Seiten (Commons:WikiEule und Commons:WikiEule/Template:WikiEule waren bereits angelegt) folgt diesem Muster. Jetzt klar?
Ich habe mich bei dir gemeldet und dir Gelegenheit zum Protest oder einem Gespräch gegeben. Wenn es Bedarf gegeben hätte, hättest du mir nur antworten müssen und wir hätten dir das gerne weiter auseinander gesetzt. Nur waren wir (allesamt) mit dem Aufbau der Eulen-Seiten und Vorlagen (in mehreren Projekten) beschäftigt und haben durch diese Aktion wertvolle Zeit verloren. (Von der Verstimmung mehrer Academy-Mitglieder, die sich nach den Sparzwängen -s. Rückmeldung zum Essen auf dem Schiff und das fehlende Anstoßen der Preisträger- und Rückmeldungen zur "Dieselverschwendung" dank solch kleiner Blödeleien, wie dem Anlegen dieses Accounts, wieder gefangen hatten, mal ganz abgesehen.)
Die Entscheidung, dass de:WP:WikiEule KEINE Unterseite oder Unterkategorie von WikiCon 2014 ist, wurde gestern Mittag getroffen, weil:
All das lässt uns darauf schließen, dass eine Wiederholung dieser Veranstaltung von der Community gewünscht und gewollt und nachgefragt wird. Dass es eben keine Eintagsfliege der WikiCon 2014 bleiben soll und dass wir uns Gedanken darüber machen sollten, wie es die nächsten Jahre weiter gehen kann. Das fängt bei der kleinen Statue selbst an und hört beim Prozedere der Nominierung und der Verleihung nicht auf. Die Category:WikiEule ist da nur ein kleines Puzzleteilchen, aber eines, das an der richtigen Stelle sitzen sollte. --WikiEulenAcademy (talk) 11:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Na geht doch. Jetzt weiss auch ich, was ihr euch "dabei gedacht" habt, das hätte halt einfacher gehen können. Gruß Denis Barthel (talk) 15:36, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Dir ist schon bewusst, dass die mitternächtliche 5-Minuten-Aktion inkl. Forderung einer ausführlichen Erklärung Stunden gekostet hat, in denen Babel und Orden hätten verteilt werden können? Das hätten wir tatsächlich einfacher haben können. Z.B. indem man sich Unter- und WP-Seiten anschaut und überlegt welchen Mehrwert eine Category:WikiCon 2014 Wikieulen zur Category:WikiCon 2014 Verleihung der "WikiEule" haben könnte (wenn die denn zur Schifffahrt als dritte WikiConCat für den einen Abend auch noch notwendig ist).
Das "Gespräch" hat sich damit erledigt. --WikiEulenAcademy (talk) 10:40, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Dd-life-cycleH.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dd-life-cycleH.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:07, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Für die Malabo-Fotografien! Aarp65 (talk) 20:54, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected file:Peter Scholl-Latour at Merhabad International Airport Tehran, Iran in August 2006 dobedit.jpg Taivo (talk) 10:52, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Cahal Pech[edit]

Hi Denis,

Please note that I have moved your recently-created Cahal Pech categories, "Plaza A" to "Cahal Pech Plaza A" etc. since many archaeological sites have a "Plaza A". I have not moved the contents to the new categories however, since it is a lot of work to move these individually. I notice you have the cat-a-lot tool - would you be able to do the honours? Many thanks, Simon Burchell (talk) 09:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Quick update - someone else has done it. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 09:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Belize[edit]

hab gesehen, dass du die Mexikoreise genutzt hast, dir auch Belize anzuschauen. War das ein Kurzaufenthalt oder bist du alles abgefahren und ev. sogar vom Südwesten per Fähre nach Puerto Barrios gereist? Oder über den Landweg nach Tikal, zwischendurch vielleicht ein paar Tage nach Key Caulker? Ich frag, weil ich nämlich Belize über diese Routen bereist habe. --Hubertl 13:29, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Nein, leider hatte ich viel zu wenig Zeit, es war nur ein Kurztrip. Ich war für drei Tage in San Ignacio und bin von dort bis Mountain Pine Ridge gekommen und hatte dann noch zwei Tage in Belize City. Für Ausflüge in den Süden oder Norden oder gar auf die Cayes hatte ich leider keine Zeit. Soll heissen: muss noch Mal hin. :) Meine Route war Berlin -> Houston -> Belize City -> San Ignacio -> Belize City -> Houston -> Mexiko City, alles mit dem Flieger. Denis Barthel (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
What a mess.... nix ist besser als die langsamsten Busse, die man erwischen kann. Aber ich war auch 6 Wochen unterwegs (inkl. Guatemala) --Hubertl 18:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Mit so viel Zeit ist das wirklich besser. Aber der Flug in der Einmotorigen mit mir als einzigem Passagier hatte auch was für sich :) siehe Category:Files_by_Denis_Barthel/Belize/Aerials. Denis Barthel (talk) 21:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Citharexylum caudatum Big Rock Falls.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Citharexylum caudatum Big Rock Falls.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hippobroma longiflora Belize.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hippobroma longiflora Belize.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cahal Pech Jul 10 2015 74.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cahal Pech Jul 10 2015 74.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Xunantunich Belize 1 19.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xunantunich Belize 1 19.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Xunantunich Belize 1 16.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xunantunich Belize 1 16.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Xunantunich Belize 1 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xunantunich Belize 1 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Xunantunich Belize 1 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xunantunich Belize 1 3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Xunantunich Belize 1 9.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xunantunich Belize 1 9.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Altun Ha Belize 22.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altun Ha Belize 22.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Altun Ha Belize 20.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altun Ha Belize 20.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Altun Ha Belize 36.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altun Ha Belize 36.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Altun Ha Belize 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altun Ha Belize 4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

AlbinarUltrawider.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AlbinarUltrawider.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Soligor Wide-Auto 28mm f28.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soligor Wide-Auto 28mm f28.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Xunantunich Belize 1 7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xunantunich Belize 1 7.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Altun Ha Belize 19.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altun Ha Belize 19.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Altun Ha Belize 27.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altun Ha Belize 27.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Altun Ha Belize 43.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altun Ha Belize 43.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Wird Zeit, dass du einmal was mit Focus bracketing machst.[edit]

Superbass will gerade ein Wochenende, eventuell noch dieses Jahr, in Köln organisieren (soferne die anderen aus dem Lokal K damit einverstanden sind), an dem ich dann einen Zweitagesworkshop halte. Mit allem Drum und dran. Wer mitmacht, der kann es dann (Fotos und Postprocessing). Wenn die Leute schöne Objekte mitbringen, dann sind Featured Pictures garantiert. Vielleicht sehen wir uns dort - so WMDE auch Auswärtigen die Anreise bezahlt. Irgendeinen großen Käfer wirst ja sicher herumliegen haben, bei dem die Augen nicht schon total trüb sind. --Hubertl 00:51, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Wow, das wäre super - meine eigenen Anläufe sind stets an der Software gescheitert. Und ich denke schon, dass WMDE das fördern würde. Käfer wären das zwar nicht gerade, aber die Motive im Fotobereich sind ja reichlich vorhanden. Ich bitte *dringend* um Nachricht, betrachte mich als angemeldet. Denis Barthel (talk) 06:26, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Ich werde dich informieren. Besser gesagt, Superbass bwz. das Lokal K als Veranstalter. --88.117.159.126 21:51, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Exakta lens 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exakta lens 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Exakta 55-135 f35-45.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exakta 55-135 f35-45.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FED I-61 52 mm f28.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FED I-61 52 mm f28.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tokina Tele-Auto 135 2 8.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tokina Tele-Auto 135 2 8.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 August 2015 (UTC)