User talk:Denniss

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user talk page is for discussion with user Denniss.

If you ask me at this page, I will answer here. If I ask you at another page, I will answer there!

Quill-Nuvola.svg
Please sign your message: ~~~~
Add a new section at the end of page, please!


Discussion page archives

Your Picture of Gabriel Garcia Marquez[edit]

Hello, I just want to inform you that I have used your good photo in my video/ vlog. I make vlog as a hobby. You can watch in youtube taGTMzMiEX8 and the article in stenote blogspot in Sep 2014 Folder. Thank you kindly for sharing your photo.

Best Regards, S. Toha 45.135.186.35 03:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ANA Boeing 747-481 (JA8962) in Pokémon livery.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:ANA Boeing 747-481 (JA8962) in Pokémon livery.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eatcha (talk) 16:44, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Russian Federation (orthographic projection).svg[edit]

You protected the image File:Russian Federation (orthographic projection).svg in 2014 for good reason. I was hoping to upload a version updated with the South Sudan border added (and no other changes). Is there a way to do that? Hogweard (talk) 15:55, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request[edit]

Hello.

As an administrator, can you add the border of South Sudan in the protected (because of the previous edit wars due to Crimea) File:Russian Federation (orthographic projection).svg? This map is widely used, and that is why the current de-jure border with South Sudan needs to be shown.

Yours sincerely, Maphobbyist (talk) 12:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have uploaded a fresh version: Russian Federation (orthographic projection)2.svg, with the border added. Ideally, the image on this version would replace the existing one, allowing the new upload to be deleted as redundant.Hogweard (talk) 15:54, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello. Denniss.
Can you please make just this little change by adding the de-jure border of South Sudan (which is not in dispute, unlike Crimea) in this map, without removing the protection? That is all. So many Wikipedia articles are using this map. That is why, it urgently needs to be updated. Please send a reply. Otherwise, I will make the request to other administrators.
Yours sincerely, Maphobbyist (talk) 12:15, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I reply is appreciated, so I can move ahead on this. Maphobbyist (talk) 00:51, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag-map of Russia.svg[edit]

Hello. Why do you reverted this file to version without Crimea? Crimea is a part of Russian Federation since 2014. Please delete the protect of this file or upload a version with Crimea. Or if you want, version where Crimea will be mark as a disputed region. Thank you! Kirill SH (talk) 18:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You may upload such a version if the occupation/annexation of Crimea is internationally recognized (by the UN for example). I don't see that coming for the next 100 years. You still have the option to upload a modifed file ander a new name. --Denniss (talk) 18:22, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Csd[edit]

Hello @Denniss: Happy New Year, I hope you're doing well. I noticed you tagged File:Semi-Erect Uncircumcised Penis.jpg for speedy, but you didn't informed the user about their file being considered for deletion which is considered not good. I did inform the user on your behalf. Thanks, stay safe. --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comment deletion of other users[edit]

Hi, do you commonly delete people's talk page comments without even the courtesy of an edit summary? I suspect you know that's not on. - Randwicked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Randwicked (talk • contribs) 09:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Just to reinforce this. You do not get to censor other editors like this. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kilmarnock incidents image[edit]

Hello. You have nominated the above image for deletion, citing an article in The Sun online newspaper as a reason for deletion request. As you can see clearly, this article has used this image and acknowledged the photographer who in this case has licensed it to be used by the article. This image was taken and then heavily circulated across the media, following its upload to Wikimedia. Goodreg3 (talk) 12:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • @Denniss: I believe your nomination of File:Crosshouse Hospital incident, 2021.jpg for speedy? deletion was incorrect. I did a due diligence check on this file when first added to English Wikipedia and found Goodreg3's claim to be own work to be credible (not confirmed but highly credible). The URL given in the summary as evidence [1] is currerntly being forwarded for me to a page proclaiming account on hold for non-payment of invoices. @Túrelio I believe you incorrectly deleted this file without due diligence and should undelete. 81.148.7.74 00:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As the URL has now come back online I can see there is a possibility this was not an "own work" (My "memory" recalls this was an "own work" copyright claim). As such this may have needed an e.g. OTRS confirmation. I'd suggest Goodreg3 to enquire at the help desk for advice. I assume the claim of "own work" for File:Scene of Kilmarnock stabbings, Feb 2021.jpg remains valid. 81.148.7.74 18:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • @Goodreg3 a quick scan of your contributions to Commons seems to indicate a basic understanding of copyright with a mixture of own work and images not own work but from other sources such as flickr and you seem to have made good faith attempts for correct licensing ... can you confirm you are not disputing the deletion of the two other images nominated by Denniss in the same cohort ... namely File:Johnny Orlando.jpg and Rolf Sartorius.png ... I assume you accept these were not your own work and did not claim as such and that you have hopefully inadvertently in good faith fallen foul of copyright issues. 81.148.7.74 00:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:BlankMap-World-v2.png[edit]

Could you add a verified source please? The correct process if no source is supplied then the defined process is to escalate to a deletion request, the tag should not be removed without it. If you are not interested in doing the verification, we have to escalate to a deletion request to resolve it. Thanks -- (talk) 14:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It looks like someone else has added more information today. -- (talk) 17:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Moved from talk page[edit]

file moving[edit]

please never ever delete redirects of files after moving, especially for files present here for years. These deletetions are only supposed to be done for newly uploaded files. Thank you. --Denniss (talk) 11:55, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I had a big discussion about a week ago, about this, and have left redirects for almost all files (except the new ones (newly uploads)). So I place this on your talk page, I almost left Commons, because a lot of file movers did it or still do it and I don't wanna talk about it anymore. They made a sort of example out of me, while I did most things right. Why you're coming now? I had only one complaint in 2020 (when I moved 10.000+ files) and this year this is the third and I already changed some things. I was following the rules, but with some files or users I didn't leave a redirect (sometimes on request), but that is the past. If it happens again, it must be a mistake or something. Thanks for your attention. So there is no need to remind me of that now. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:31, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nothing personally, I just had some redirects popping-up in a maintenance cat pointing to another redirect deleted by you while moving. If you stumble abouve filemovers that always delete redirects you may want to point them at the official guideline Commons:File_renaming#Leaving_redirects --Denniss (talk) 13:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Protection for File:Flag of Finland 1918 (state).svg[edit]

Hello, would it be possible to change the protection status for File:Flag of Finland 1918 (state).svg? I've found a better source image for the style of the flag and have made an updated vector version of the file but can't update the file due to its current protection status. Thank you in advance. --Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 10:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]


COM:AN/U[edit]

বাংলা  Deutsch  English  español  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Nederlands  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Tagalog  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−


Gtk-dialog-info.svg
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Denniss have an obvious problem. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
—Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:4452:48D:E600:C43C:D7DE:792B:991 (talk) 06:24, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Rollback on File:Facebook like thumb.png[edit]

Hello Denniss, please let me know the reason behind your recent rollback on File:Facebook like thumb.png as my edit wasn't clear-cut vandalism. I edited the file as per Protected edit request 25 Dec 2021. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 14:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ISO 639 Icon hak.svg.png[edit]


File:ISO 639 Icon hak.svg.png has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: nonsense redirect)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Sarang.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 08:48, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sake barrels.jpg[edit]


File:Sake barrels.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: G2)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Tholme.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:15, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please look at images in Category:High-resolution TIFF images from the National Archives and Records Administration[edit]

Hello Denniss, You just erroneously reverted two edits in this category as "nonsense selflinks".

If you look at the other files in the above referenced category, you will see this is standard practice to present both images in each file for clarity. Please revert yourself or I will fix it myself. Thank you. Krok6kola (talk) 12:45, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

They were uploaded this way but that's in error. As the header clearly say it's for other versions of the image. --Denniss (talk) 13:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Archivo borrado[edit]

Buenos días, disculpe la molestia, no entiendo por qué fue borrado mi archivo: Rhythm.jpg|alt=Óleo sobre tela.|Ritmo De hecho llevo varios días pidiendo por favor en Commons que me ayuden a editar la imagen porque la subí con mi nombre Tere Castillo, antes de crear mi usuario Tere CP y no hay manera de que alguien me ayude o me responda. ¿Cómo hago para restablecerla? ¿La tengo que volver a subir, ahora como Tere CP? Necesito ayuda, gracias. {{Tere CP (talk) 12:34, 14 April 2022 (UTC) 12:31, 14 April 2022|Tere CP}}Reply[reply]

User:Thrakkx[edit]

Did you notice that Thrakkx's actions on en:Finn Wolfhard article on Wikipedia for en:WP:BLP reasons, because you reverted as an addition of biographical details from short description right here. --2001:4451:82BF:2E00:65F0:67E4:4308:6F6 07:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Images[edit]

Hi Dennis, I am writing to please ask to stop flagging my images as copyright. I mistakenly put it as 'own work' as in in Own the rights rather than I did it myself. I've re uploaded the image with the proper photographer and the right information, but you flagged it again as copyright? I have entered the right information now, I just didn't know how to properly upload images before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaxLousada (talk • contribs) 11:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Australian White Ensign[edit]

I wish to draw your attention to the fact that in your edit to the Naval Ensign of Australia in 2017, you did not include the Commonwealth star in your contribution. The file has been reverted to the latest versions which contains the same. MxYamato (talk) 17:56, 26 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sd.Kfz 234-2 front-diagonal view.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sd.Kfz 234-2 front-diagonal view.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2001:4451:8216:1700:8198:F528:D57C:9EE 14:41, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:A large blank world map with oceans marked in blue.PNG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:A large blank world map with oceans marked in blue.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

203.54.229.138 06:37, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request for license review[edit]

Quantified Human by Alan Warburton

Hello, I do not think we have collaborated in the past. I found your name on Special:ListUsers/image-reviewer, and I am looking for someone to do a license review as described at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#AI_artwork_-_license_review_requested. The situation is that I want to upload some AI-generated artwork where copyright is not typical. Also I think this will be a recurring issue for Commons review in the future, and I wanted to get any kind of comment on this from people who do license review. I am messaging you because I I browsed your contribution history and saw that you recently participated in copyright review. I messaged two other people in the same way for this issue.

If you are interested and available to comment, then please do so at the village pump or on the image talk page. I am hoping that review takes 5 minutes at most. If you are not comfortable reviewing this image, then commenting that would also be helpful so that I know to escalate the issue to other kinds of review. Thanks. Bluerasberry (talk) 19:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]