User talk:Deror avi

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
BarnstarGreen.png The Green Barnstar
For enriching the commons with over 5,000 images! Gridge (talk) 19:56, 29 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 16:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:21, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clip "At Wikimania 2019 closing party"[edit]

Dear Deror Avi, Hope that this message finds you well! My name is Jascha, I am a documentary filmmaker based in Berlin. I would love to use your video "At Wikimania 2019 closing party" (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AAt_Wikimania_2019_closing_party_-_videos_MVI_4914.webm) in a documentary on the 20th birthday of Wikipedia I am currently working on. The documentary will be shown on ARTE in Germany and France. ARTE is a public broadcaster which is renown for it's sophisticated documentaries on cultural and political themes. In the final credits of the film, all beholders of footage/images will be credited. Do you prefer us to use your nick name in Wikipedia or shall we note your proper name? For more information, feel free to contact me at: jascha.hannover@florianfilm.de Thank you and all best, Jascha


Belem,_Interior_of_Mosteiro_dos_Jer%C3%B3nimos_P1000022[edit]

Dear Deror avi, I am a Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Belem,_Interior_of_Mosteiro_dos_Jer%C3%B3nimos_P1000022.JPG. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Do you prefer us to use your nick name in Wikipedia or we can note your proper name if you prefer.

Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com hippofish 10:34, 18 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 10:34, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The rule is that any image can be used with the attribution given - i.e. in my case "Deror Avi". Deror avi (talk) 07:08, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Media of the day[edit]

Hi, thought you might like to know that your video, File:Atar Hatvila - Qaser Al Yahud P1020088.ogv, has been tagged for Media of the Day for 2 July 2017. Seagull123 (talk) 23:15, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pikiwiki related discussion at COM:AN[edit]

As the point of contact for the Pikiwiki project, I'd appreciate if you would consider contributing your thoughts to a discussion at COM:AN. —RP88 (talk) 22:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 23:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania[edit]

Wikimania 2017 by Deryck day 0 - 07 Deror.jpg

Hello Deror. It was nice to see you at Wikimania again and good to see you alive and kicking after your medical situation last year. I look forward to your good work over the coming year! Deryck Chan (talk) 13:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Blood_Swept_Lands_and_Seas_of_Red[edit]

Category discussion warning

Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Nilfanion (talk) 23:28, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore this, please comment on the DR instead.--Nilfanion (talk) 23:48, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Nilfanion (talk) 23:44, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Israeli Coat of arms deletion - lawyer needed[edit]

Hello! I see you were involved in the old IL copyright dispute and your help is needed, because this seems like a similar issue. I barely know IL law or wikimedia conventions but what is being proposed seems very wrong to me. Here's what's going on:

The village Daliyat el Karmel has a new coat of arms since 2013. I grabbed it from their site and uploaded it to Wikimedia with the template:FoP-Israel tag. However, it is claimed this is not enough and the file is nominated for deletion. Your opinion would be appreciated. The discussion is ongoing here:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#People_and_bots_trying_to_delete_my_uploaded_Coats_of_Arms — Preceding unsigned comment added by SafwatHalaby (talk • contribs) 07:53, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File in question: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Daliyat_al_Karmel_2013_Coat_Of_Arms.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by SafwatHalaby (talk • contribs) 07:54, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks in advance! -- SafwatHalaby (talk) 07:53, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It has been suggested (first link above) that other similar coats of arms with similar status should be deleted as well. -- SafwatHalaby (talk) 08:10, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Urgent - coat of arms[edit]

There's a deletion request for all Israeli coat of arms.

It started when I tried updating the coat of arms of Daliyat el Carmel (it was remade in 2013). I uploaded it under the FoP-Israel template. The file was marked for deletion. I then argued the file should be fine because other coats of arms were accepted in Wikimedia under similar permissions, but it's been claimed that potentially all Israeli coats of arms are not acceptable here and a deletion request is currently open. This may eventually cascade to other files uploaded under FoP.

I am not familiar with IL law but I suspect this might be absurd. I need people who have dealt with this before and who are familiar with IL law to clarify this matter. I've contacted you and User:Drork because both of you were heavily involved in the previous disputes.

Here are the links.

  1. 1 - the initial village pump discussion which spawned the deletion request: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#People_and_bots_trying_to_delete_my_uploaded_Coats_of_Arms
  1. 2 - The current discussion in the page deletion request: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Coats_of_arms_of_local_councils_in_Israel#Locating_people_experienced_with_IL_law

-- SafwatHalaby (talk) 18:28, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition.svg
Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

It is a world event.
The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th.
Here you can find more details.

This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).

Twitter Logo Mini.svg #WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

Linkedin icon.svg Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 06:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

QUESTION[edit]

Hi!! I want to know the conditions and license to use the photos of wikimedia commons in one commercial book. What is the credits I have to put? Is there any legal problem with copyright? I`m sorry about my ignorance. Thank you very much in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by PEDROVICE (talk • contribs) 12:14, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evening in Tsaritsyno P1070285.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Evening in Tsaritsyno P1070285.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Екатерина Борисова (talk) 17:49, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Pikiwikisrael[edit]

Hi Deror avi, i kindly ask you to check the my last comments on the mentioned talk page. --Arnd (talk) 06:12, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your pictures of the Museum of Islamic Art in Jerusalem for a YouTube video about the museum[edit]

Hi Deror, just to let you know I'm planning a video about the Museum of Islamic Art in Jerusalem for my Turista in Israele [1] youtube channel. I will use some of my own picture but would like to use yours as well (far better than mine :D). I will properly attribute your pictures and I will let you see the video prior of public publication. Hope you'll like it.

--EdoM (talk) 12:33, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Deror avi (talk) 14:50, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

Commons File mover.svg

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:30, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Disneyland Tomorrowland IMG 3984.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Disneyland Tomorrowland IMG 3984.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Shibboleth[edit]

Hi Deror avi, would you mind renaming the category to Category:Shibboleth (artwork), there is also the Shibboleth, where this fits in. Thank you for your time. :-) Lotje (talk) 08:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you do it? Deror avi (talk) 20:40, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Disneyland Frontierland IMG 3936.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Disneyland Frontierland IMG 3936.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:21, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:09, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Deror avi,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Siege of Leningrad IMG 3272.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Siege of Leningrad IMG 3272.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kursant504 (talk) 16:42, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Siege of Leningrad IMG 3271.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Siege of Leningrad IMG 3271.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kursant504 (talk) 06:58, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Photos with Deryck at Wikimania 2019[edit]

Hello Deror. It's been nice to catch up with you on camera this week! This message is nearly 2 years late, but I've finally finished uploading and tagging all my Wikimania 2019 photos to Commons. Here are yours:

Have a lovely week :) Deryck Chan (talk) 16:46, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Israel FOP[edit]

During this deletion request, closed as keep, you said "Israeli law does allow freedom of panorama for any work of art (including literary works, maps, drawings)". I trust you to know Israeli law because you are an Israeli lawyer. COM:FOP Israel currently suggests that FOP only applies to "an architectural work, a work of sculpture or work of applied art" and that "an artistic work created for artistic purpose is by no means applied art". This would seem to exclude literary works. If COM:FOP Israel is wrong or misleading, could you try to correct it so that it reflects the current law? Many thanks,  Mysterymanblue  23:00, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]