User talk:Derzsi Elekes Andor

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Derzsi Elekes Andor!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Derzsi Elekes Andor!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Izabella főhercegnő díszmagyarban.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Izabella főhercegnő díszmagyarban.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 15:46, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Kategóriák[edit]

Szia! Segítettem kicsit a képkategorizálás körül, kérlek vess rá egy pillantást és igyekezz majd elsajátítani, mivel errefelé minidig mindent a lehető legszűkebben kategorizálnak.

Például Miklósa Erikánál "Budapest" helyett "Erika Miklósa" (van saját kategóriája) illetve ha esetleg nincs saját kategóriája egy személynek/együttesnek/épületnek/utcának, akkor mondjuk "writer" helyett "Writers from Hungary" vagy "Budapest" helyett "Streets in Budapest District V" ha épp egy ötödik kerületi utcát fotóztál le. Viszont nem kell minden Budapesten ellőtt képedhez odabiggyeszteni a "Budapest" címkét meg az egyéb helyszínt jelölő kategóriákat, csak ha az konkrétan a város egy részét ábrázolja (pl Streets in Budapest district V) ÉS (fontos) nincs saját kategóriája. Aminek van saját kategóriája, azt értelemszerűen oda kell rakni. Kicsit pepecs munka meg rá is kell jönni, hogyan lehet "szörfölni" a kategóriák közt és megtalálni a legmegfelelőbbet, de érdemes elsajátítani, mert akkor nem másoknak kell azt megtenniük helyetted. Üdv, --VinceB (talk) 12:07, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Ó és ugyan vagy magyar nyelvű kezelői felület, de az oldal nyelve angol, tehát a személynevek, mint kategóriák is az angol módi szerint kell, hogy írva legyenek. Tehát Széles Gábor helyett "Gábor Széles" és így tovább. VISZONT az ékezet maradjon meg, erre figyelj, ne töröld őket. --VinceB (talk) 12:10, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Én is arra kérlek, hogy pontosan kategorizálj. Több budapesti képnél a Hungary kategóriába tetted a dolgokat, így másoknak csinálsz munkát. Kérlek olvasd át a a fenti leírtakat. Ha kérdésed van, akkor fordulj hozzánk bizalommal. Zastava S. Jugoslavije.png Szajci pošta 13:50, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

1977 photos[edit]

Good day! Pardon, I do not speak Hungarian, I hope you understand some English. Thank you for your many wonderful photos! I see some photos of my city, New Orleans. I recognize the locations. But the names of some photos are not right. New Orleans is in the state of Louisiana, not Florida. Do you mind if I change the name of some of the photos? For example, File:Florida 1977 (5).jpg can be called "File:Bourbon Street, French Quarter, New Orleans 1977.jpg". OK? Thank you again. If you have more photos from the United States in 1977 I would enjoy seeing them. I might help in identifying some locations. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Hí, thanks for your remarks. I don't mind, if you correct the names of the photos. I was not sure related to the exact site, it was such a long time ago, that I visited the US. "File:Bourbon Street, French Quarter, New Orleans 1977.jpg" name is OK. As I remember, I enjoyed the musicians on the streets, strip bars and the easy going people there. This kind of names are good - the exact location if you can identify it. Yours: Derzsi Elekes Andor

Blocked to have some time to read COM:OVERCAT[edit]

Hi, I just blocked you for 2 hours, so you have some time to read COM:OVERCAT. Commons uses specific categories, no tagging system, so all the redundant upper level categories just give us a lot of additional cleaning work. --Foroa (talk) 12:18, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

I red the overcat, try to make sense of it. Sorry - only at the end of the day. Thanks for your understanding. dea

Thanks for the television[edit]

Hi Many thanks for the old Hungarian TV photo - it was ideal for my collage for Superlocrian Trio - hope you like the result :-) Superlocrian Trio Really good. yours: dea

File:Pirano - 1927.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pirano - 1927.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 08:29, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Arthur_Koestler,_Budapest,_Városligeti_fasor_2_szám_(1).JPG[edit]

Hi there. I have just been tidying up some files and came across this one, at which I noticed the description - could you please be kind enough to drop by at some point and shorten it down to a readable level, and also split the description up properly please? You have a wall of Hungarian text in a section which is meant to be in English, and the whole description at its size should be a Wikipedia article :) Your help to tidy this would be most welcome. Thank you :) BarkingFish (talk) 21:54, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

TUSC token d60caab68f4c66dceee995fc994a72ed[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Ernst Roepke[edit]

Hello, have you some Informtionen about the publicher "Ernst Roepke". To better categorize your uploads. for example File:Luzern_(1).jpg -- SBT (talk) 22:02, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

@SBT Sorry I'd just red the text on the pichtures: Ernst Roepke, Wiesbaden Schutz Merke + there is a coat of arms. I guess, he was a german photographer, working in the town of Wiesbaden, his company had to be Schutz Merke and the coat of arms was probably his or his company's one. A german user could say more about Wiesbaden photographers. yours: derzsi elekes andor
Its a little bit different. Ernst Roepke is the name of the Wiesbaden based company, the word "Schutz Marke" (or Schutzmarke) simply means "trademark". Today companies use ®, in the past they wrote Schutzmarke behind the company name. --Martin H. (talk) 19:27, 29 January 2013 (UTC) OK, you must be right. So we don't see, who was the photographer. hi: dea

Copyfraud[edit]

I don't think that you own any copyrights on the scans you uploaded, and hence I think all your licenses are fraudulent and wrong. Either the images are old enough to be in the Public Domain (and should be licensed as such), or you are not allowed to upload them. If you should indeed own any copyright, please make clear WHY on the pages, and send an e-mail to our OTRS team. If you don't, please change the licenses to correct Public Domain tags, or, if none apply, request a deletion. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 16:16, 29 April 2013 (UTC) Which photo. Please specify a photo, to deal with. Dea

File:Autonomy of Székely Land - Day of Székely Freedom 2013.03.10 (10).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Autonomy of Székely Land - Day of Székely Freedom 2013.03.10 (10).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Cezarika1 (talk) 05:59, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Giacomo Brogi's pictures[edit]

Hi Derzsi Elekes Andor. In january you uploades 20 old photographs of "Napoli e Dintorni" by Giacomo Brogi. I wish to update the Catalogue of Giacomo Brogi's pictures, but I see there that all pictures with number more than 8000 are of Carlo Brogi. Can you tell me please your reasons that you attribute these photographs to Giacomo and not to Carlo? Thank you very much. Cheers, --DenghiùComm (talk) 05:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi DenghiúComm. When I uploaded these photos, I had the information as follows. If I remember well, in the case of the photo "File:Nápoly (2).jpg" http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:N%C3%A1poly_%282%29.jpg I could find on the internet this photo, published somewhere else, somebody else, in a partly differing manner. The photo was not published in the same leporello, it was published as a photo without being in a leporallo, but the same photo. For some reason, maybe the information on the other photo on the internet - I identified this other photo as the photo of Giacomo Brogi. So I thought, my other photos belong to Giacomo Brogi too. I accept, this procedure is not really exact,you might have more information to decide on this question. In the meantime I donated these photos to the Photo Archive of the Hungarian National Museum, so I have no more information. I accept, if you correct all of these historical photos of Giacomo and Carlo Brogi - uploaded by me - to the real author. Yours: dea
Deart Derszi, the fact that two pictures are taken in the same place does not mean they are by the same author. For instance, the same road you mention in your answer to Denghiù was photographed by Sommer, as you can see here. Please do not add images to a photographer's category if you are not sure about attribution. These images about Naples that you added as Giorgio Brogi's work are in fact by the firm "R. & J. D." that is to say, Römmler & Jonas, Dresden, which was a COMPETITOR of Brogi, and which you find in several other products such as this, this or this. I therefore created a new category for your booklet, giving it to the proper author. My best wishes and thank you for your contribution. Giovanni Dall'Orto --User:G.dallorto (talk) 20:35, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
And I created new categories for the other of your booklets, that of Rome and that of Zagreb. Bye! --DenghiùComm (talk) 13:50, 2 September 2013 (UTC) Thanks for the help. --Derzsi Elekes Andor (talk) 16:31, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Szöveg[edit]

Kedves Andor! Egy kicsit megszerkesztettem a File:Autonomy of Székely Land - Day of Székely Freedom 2013.03.10 (9).JPG leírását, mert nagyon zsúfolt volt a szöveg és átláthatatlan. Nézd meg, jó-e és ha tetszik (remélem), jó lenne, ha a többi képed leírásánál is alkalmaznád. Üdv, Fauvirt (talk) 08:29, 9 September 2013 (UTC) Egész formásra szerkesztetted, gratulálok a jó munkához ! dea

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 21:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

File:No taxiland - 1990.10.26.tif[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:No taxiland - 1990.10.26.tif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teemeah (talk) 19:32, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Ez a kép sajnos nem lehet szabad licenc alatt. A szkennelés nem tesz téged jogtulajdonossá. Az "ismeretlen" fényképészek művei úgynevezett árva művek, tulajdonosuk a magyar állam, az első közléstől számított 70 évig! Teemeah (talk) 19:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 20:47, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

@JuTa I cannot accept your deletion request and reasoning regarding the following photos: File:Wahorn András kiállításának megnyitója - Nagyharsány, 2014.08.06 (3).JPG File:Wahorn András kiállításának megnyitója - Nagyharsány, 2014.08.06 (5).JPG File:Wahorn András kiállításának megnyitója - Nagyharsány, 2014.08.06 (6).JPG File:Wahorn András kiállításának megnyitója - Nagyharsány, 2014.08.06 (7).JPG File:Wahorn András kiállításának megnyitója - Nagyharsány, 2014.08.06 (8).JPG File:Wahorn András kiállításának megnyitója - Nagyharsány, 2014.08.06 (9).JPG You can see on theese photos the artist, the painter of the paintings, Wahorn András. He introduced his paintings to the audience. The photos are about the artist and the audience. The paintings in the backround are not whole ones. If you delete the photos it will be the painter, not me who is hurted. Yours sincerely Derzsi Elekes Andor (@JuTa Nem értek egyet a törlési kérelemmel ezeknél a fényképeknél: File:Wahorn András kiállításának megnyitója - Nagyharsány, 2014.08.06 (3).JPG File:Wahorn András kiállításának megnyitója - Nagyharsány, 2014.08.06 (5).JPG File:Wahorn András kiállításának megnyitója - Nagyharsány, 2014.08.06 (6).JPG File:Wahorn András kiállításának megnyitója - Nagyharsány, 2014.08.06 (7).JPG File:Wahorn András kiállításának megnyitója - Nagyharsány, 2014.08.06 (8).JPG File:Wahorn András kiállításának megnyitója - Nagyharsány, 2014.08.06 (9).JPG Ezeken a fényképeken a művész látható, a festő Wahorn András. A fényképek a művészről és a közönségéről szólnak. A festő bemutatta a festményeit a közönségnek. Maga az esemény - a művész tárlatvezetést (vermisszázs) tart nem mutatható be oly módon, hogy ne legyen semmi háttér. A háttérben levő képek nem teljesek és nem jellemzőek, a képek nem tekinthetők a festmények ábrázolásának. Ha a képek törlésre kerülnek, az nem számomra, hanem a festő számára lesz káros. Üdv: Derzsi Elekes Andor)

Sources of scanned images[edit]

Hello,

I am hoping you can properly state the source of the images you've scanned and uploaded. File:Victor Emmanuel III of Italy and Horthy Miklós Governor of Hungary at the Royal Castle, Budapest – May, 1937.tif, for instance, states that the photographer is unknown, but you don't state where you got the photo from, or how you know what's in the photo. You have uploaded other photos with a similar lack of source. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:55, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

In another image, File:Dózsa út, Kolozsvár - 1950 -es évek vége (1).jpg, you state that the photographer is unknown, but you've placed a PD-Old template, indicating that the photographer died 70 years ago. This is hard to believe since the photo was allegedly taken in the 1950s, less than 70 years ago. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:05, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

@Themightyquill Hi, I bought this photo (File:Victor Emmanuel III of Italy and Horthy Miklós Governor of Hungary at the Royal Castle, Budapest – May, 1937.tif) from an expert, who stated its subject. Otherwise we are sure about the visit of the Italian king its time, and the carved stone work below the Royal Castle (Hunyadi János street) can be recognised. If somebody uploads something on the commons, with this fact he stated, that he has the right to do so. To have this right you have to 1. own a photo as an object or to have the right to use it as an object 2. if the photo was taken by somebody else, it must not be under copyright (70 yrs past) and 3. You must have the copyright of the scanning author (me). yours: dea

It's not that I don't think you have the right to upload most of these photos (most of your uploads are fantastic), it's just that your descriptions don't always seem clear if you own the photograph and/or the rights to the photograph. I'm not sure that buying a print gives you publishing rights that you can release. Also, this doesn't solve the issue with the second photo, whose author can't have died 70 years ago, does it? - Themightyquill (talk) 22:31, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Correct. Basicly I own the items I upload. (After a while I donate them to Museums). If I own a photo, postcard or the like thats PD old, I have the right to upload it on commons.wikimedia. This is the meaning of PD-old in my understanding. (+you must apply to the rights of the "scanning" author, but that's not a problem, as it's me). If it were not so, images could not be published until the end of times. yours: Derzsi Elekes Andor

Antall[edit]

Helló! Nagyon jók a képeid Szófiából és Isztambulból, megdöbbentő, de én is ezeken a napokon voltam az említett két városban. :) Kígyós-oszlop, Theodosius obeliszk, Óváros, minden. :) Kicsi a világ.

A korábbi képeidet elnézve te már a rendszerváltás körül is aktív voltál. Azt szeretném megkérdezni, hogy nincs-e esetleg képed Antall József miniszterelnökről? --Norden1990 (talk) 12:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Sajnos nincs. Abban az időben sokkal kevesebbet (szinte semmit) fényképeztem. Amikor Isztambulban voltunk, volt egy fényképész találkozó is, amelynek résztvevői is járták a várost. üdv: dea

Köszi. :( Már évek óta próbálok egy használható képet találni róla. --Norden1990 (talk) 19:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Bad categorizations[edit]

I suggest you to be more careful when categorizing images. For instance, you put File:Theodosius obeliszk - Isztambul, 2014.10.23 (1).JPG in 3 very generic category (Category:Sultanahmet (neighbourhood), Category:Theodosius I and Category:Karnak) and 2 inexistent categories (Category:Obelisc (Istanbul) and Category:Hyppodrome) when the right category is simply Category:Obelisk of Theodosius. You also put a lot of images in Category:Istanbul, which is a very generic category, at the same time you put them in other more specific categories.

Regards. --Stegop (talk) 03:36, 29 November 2014 (UTC) Agree. Best regards: dea

COM:AN[edit]

Please see Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Derzsi Elekes Andor. Regards, FASTILY 20:23, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Please do not advertise on Commons[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | हिन्दी | македонски | português | svenska | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg
Wikimedia Commons has an educational purpose, and is not the place to post promotional links or to advertise. Creating articles, userpages, templates, etc. with promotional text is not permitted, nor is the posting of links anywhere on the Commons in an attempt to advertise a website, product, company, person, or organization. Uploading of company logos, press images, and the like in order to advertise or use them only in promotional material on other wikis is also prohibited, and such images will be deleted if they are found to violate our policies.

Recreation of deleted content or continuing to post links and promotional text after warnings may result in a block. Thank you for understanding.

Yann (talk) 20:28, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Bosznia.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to licensing Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Bosznia.JPG seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file description page.


Deutsch | English | español | français | polski | svenska | +/−


The reason given by the user who added this tag is: Looks to me as if it was taken from an old book or something similar from the 1890-ies. I assume it's a rather a PD, than "own work".

Greetings, Kleeblatt187 (talk) 21:03, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

OK. It can be PD if you like so. I took a photo in 2014 of this old map. yours: dea

Deleted files as below[edit]

   (Törlési napló); 21:58 . . Fastily (vitalap | szerkesztései) törölte a következő lapot: File:Temesvár Jenő herceg tér, térzenével - 1916 (1).tif ‎(No source since 27 December 2014: you may re-upload the file, but please cite the file's source)
   (Törlési napló); 21:58 . . Fastily (vitalap | szerkesztései) törölte a következő lapot: File:Rathaus, Wiesbaden - 1893.tif ‎(No source since 27 December 2014: you may re-upload the file, but please cite the file's source)
   (Törlési napló); 21:58 . . Fastily (vitalap | szerkesztései) törölte a következő lapot: File:Kurhaus, Karlsbad - 1913 (1).tif ‎(No source since 27 December 2014: you may re-upload the file, but please cite the file's source)

@Fastily You deleted theese files, stating that there is no source. The source is Metapolisz Images. When I upload something thats not my photo, stating the source is Metapolisz Images, that means, I own theese postcards (photos), so I have the right to upload them being older than 70 ys old. As I am not a collector, the cards - after being scanned - are usually donated to Hungarian Museums, basicly the Hungarian National Museum and the Budapest Collection of Kiscell. The number (1) means, that this photo is the pichture side of the card. The (2) marked back side and maybe other belonging are published in the Metapolisz DVD line, so further work on the subject is possible. That's all. yours: Derzsi Elekes Andor

Metapolisz Images[edit]

Open in logosphere from 2006 as a source for those who want to publish free images to the public of the World, on the World. German: Frei verwendbarer Teil der Logosphäre für diejenige, die Photos, Bilder für die ganze Gemeinschaft der Welt publizieren wollen. Existiert seit 2006. A logoszféra 2006-tól létező tere azok számára, akik szabad képeket tesznek közzé a Világról, a Világ közösségének. dea

Az Unitárius Egyház Főjegyzői[edit]

   Dési György 1591
   Székesfejérvári Mátyás 1594 – 1606
   Ajtai Balás 1630
   Kolosi István 1640 – 1648
   Ajtai Balás 1652 – 1657
   Désfalvi Miklós 1657 – 1661
   N. S. Koncz Boldizsár 1661 – 1663
   Kövendi Nagy Mihály 1663 – 1667
   Ajtai Mihály 1667 – 1668
   Pauli István 1668 – 1669
   Kövendi Mihály 1671
   B. Bedő Pál 1687
   Ajtai Mihály 1689
   Pálfi Sigmond 1707 – 1724
   Szentábrahámi L. Mihály 1724. április 7 – 1737
   Kövendi János 1754
   S. Szentkirályi Agh István 1758-ig
   Pálfi Beniámin 1768
   Kovácsi Tamás 1771 alatta aljegyző Abrudbányai Nagy Mihály
   Lázár István 1776
   Pákei Jósef 1786
   Nagy Sigmond 1802
   Fűzi János 1812
   Molnos Dávid 1832
   O-tordai Székely Miklós 1836
   Ar. Rákosi Székely Sándor 1838

File:Európai Parlamenti eredményváró - 2014.05 (2).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Európai Parlamenti eredményváró - 2014.05 (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 23:57, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

File:László Szőgyény-Marich (1806–1893) - cropped.jpg[edit]

Deletion request: I uploaded this image and I am the scanning author too. I gave an other name to the image. After cropping this image can be used of course under CC. But you do n o t have the right to alter the name given by me. Especially alter the Hungarian name of a Hungarian to somewhat else. Original file: File:Magyarszőgyényi és szolgaegyházi Szőgyény László (1806-1893).pdf A repro-t 2012. december 3 -án szkenneltem. Magyarszőgyényi és szolgaegyházi Szőgyény László (1806-1893). Metszet, mérete: 21,8 cm x 25 cm. A metszet alatt nyomtatott szöveg: "Das Parlament" Verlag von A. Eckstein, Wien. IV. Wienstrasse 29 Druck v. L. Schilling Wien. A metszet eredetileg 35 x 55 cm -es háttéren, mely A3-as méretre csökkentve. Források: Szögyény-Marich László az idősebb, Vasárnapi Újság 1893 évi 48. szám http://epa.oszk.hu/00000/00030/02073/pdf/02073.pdf Yours: Derzsi Elekes Andor

File:Bergendy István.jpg[edit]

Szia! Válasz a törlési lapon. Mivel én nem tudok angolul (sem), magyarul írtam. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 07:37, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Many photos! A subcategory for the day-category, please?[edit]

Hello Derzsi Elekes Andor! I've just seen your uploaded photos, tagged with day- "Category:2015-02-..". Better to start a subcategory for the event? or even a photo-report like one you can see in December 2014? Start together February 2015? --195.226.81.108 16:25, 17 February 2015 (UTC) Please give the URL of the photo you are speaking of. yours: --Derzsi Elekes Andor (talk) 10:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

For example your photo File:II. Budapesti Székely Bál - 2015.02.14 (1).JPG in the not existing Category:II. Budapesti Székely Bál. Better to start this category with all your photos and add this subcategory to Category:2015-02-14? --195.226.81.108 16:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC) OK, accepted. Yours: --Derzsi Elekes Andor (talk) 16:29, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Csíki sör a II. Budapesti Székely Bálon (1).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Csíki sör a II. Budapesti Székely Bálon (1).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ɱ (talk) 00:29, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

A törlési allap szövege: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Csíki sör a II. Budapesti Székely Bálon (1).JPG A Wikimedia Commons wikiből < Commons:Deletion requests §File:Csíki sör a II. Budapesti Székely Bálon (1).JPG[szerkesztés] The label designs are copyrighted, making this a derivative work of a non-free subject. ɱ (talk) 00:29, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Csíki sör

Csíki sör A csíki sört ábrázoló fényképet töltöttem fel a commons.wikimedia.org-ra. (File:Csíki sör a II. Budapesti Székely Bálon (1).JPG). Ez a hely tárolja azokat a fényképeket, amelyeket a wikipédia online lexikon felhasznál az egyes wikipédia szócikkekhez. A sört ábrázoló fényképet a wikipédia számos helyen használja. Így szerepel ez a fénykép az angol wikipédián http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_in_Romania http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_beverages a magyar wikipédián http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cs%C3%ADkszentsimon http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%B6r http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufakt%C3%BAra Ma ezt a fényképet törlésre javasolták, azzal az indokkal, hogy a fénykép feltétele az Internetre copyrightot sért. A törlési javaslatot tartalmazó lap az interneten: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Cs%C3%ADki_s%C3%B6r_a_II._A Budapesti_Sz%C3%A9kely_B%C3%A1lon_(1).JPG A törlési javaslat teljesen alaptalan. Kétségtelen, hogy a sört ábrázoló fényképen rajta van a sörösüveg és a sörösüvegen rajta van a sörcimke. Ez azonban jogos felhasználásnak minősül. A wikipédia elismert, globális jelentőségű tudástár. Küldetése a világ mibenlétét tudásalapon megragadhatóvá tenni, szócikkekben leírni. Az ilyen leírásokhoz fényképek szükségesek, melyek az adott jelenséget bemutatják. Ennek betiltására nincs lehetőség. Nem elfogadható az a gyakorlat sem, hogy miközben a wikipédia tele van sörösüvegeket ábrázoló képekkel, ahol senki sem vizsgál semmiféle copyright kérdést, a világ egyetlen betiltott sörösüveg képe pont a Csíki sört ábrázoló kép legyen. A fényképet és annak wikipédián feltüntetett szövegét mely az és copyright-om alatti feltette a Flick-re, ahol a továbbiakban elérhető https://www.flickr.com/photos/59061037@N02/16172318463/ illetve elérhető a facebookon is https://www.facebook.com/elekes.andor Budapest, 2015.03.12 Derzsi Elekes Andor Talán nem haszontalan tanulmányozni ebben a törlési vitában a valóságot, esetleg némi jelentőséget tulajdonitani neki. Hagyjuk most a hivatkozást arra, hogy hány sörösüveget fényképeztek már a világ minden tájáról most és évtizedek óta. Hagyjuk azt is, hogy ezen más sörösüvegek másfélék-e, mivel egy más sörüzemekről van szó és az is más, hogy a sörösüvegek alatt legtöbbször nem beton van. Úgyhogy eszerint a gondolkodásmód szerint nem összehasonlítható esetek. Viszont megjelentek már fényképek más magyar sörösüvegekről, melyek ugyancsak betonon vannak, ugyancsak magyar vonatkozásúak és szintén van rajtuk sörös címke. Ha a Csíki sört törölni kell a wikipédiából, akkor ezeket a magyar söröket is nyilván törölni kell (az elemi logika szabályai szerint): File:Borsodi – 2015.03.11.JPG File:Kőbányai – 2015.03.11.JPG File:Soproni.JPG File:Arany Ászok.JPG A vita alakulásától függően természetesen be fogom adni ezekre a képekre a törlési kérelmet, ha az lenne a döntés, hogy a Csíki sört törölni kell. --Derzsi Elekes Andor (vitalap) 11:03, 12 March 2015 (UTC) Csíki Sör Manufaktúra 537285, Csíkszentsimon (Sansimion) 575, Székelyföld, Hargita megye Email: igazi@csikisor.com

Tisztelt Csíki Sör Manufaktúra ! A wikipédia fényképtárába töltöttem fel a mellékelten megküldött fényképet, ami egy Igazi Csíki sört ábrázol, rajta értelemszerűen a sörcímkével. A fényképet felhasználták az angol wikipédiában a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_beverages https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_in_Romania illetve a magyar wikipédiában https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufakt%C3%BAra https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cs%C3%ADkszentsimon https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%B6r helyeken. A fényképet egy amerikai szerkesztő törlésre jelölte, azzal az indokkal, hogy a fényképen szereplő sörcímke copyright által védett így felhasználási engedély hiányában törölni kell a képet a wikipédiáról. Ha ennek a kérelemnek helyt adnak, akkor törlik a fényképeket 2015. március 16 körül a wikipédiáról. A mellékelt doc. file végén levő szövegű e-mail elküldésével a permissions-commons@wikimedia.org címre engedélyt adhatnak a fénykép felhasználására. Ebben az esetben nem törlik a képeket a wikipédiáról. Kérem szíveskedjenek döntésükről értesíteni. Budapesten, 2015. március 13-án 10.53

Üdvözlettel: Elekes Andor--Derzsi Elekes Andor (vitalap) 11:46, 13 March 2015 (UTC) --Derzsi Elekes Andor (talk) 11:48, 13 March 2015 (UTC) Today, on the 13th of March, 2015 Csíki Manufaktúra Corporation gave permission as required by User:Ɱ and sent an e-mail containing this statement to wikipedia. Please close the proceedings. dea