User talk:Diego Grez-Cañete/Archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MisterWiki!

Contents

TUSC token 75169d7b5f7ed4289c4a3dc9b7fb91be[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Malbork zamek zblizenie.jpg[edit]

I cannot remember (or find out) who asked me about this image few weeks ago, but if it was you, the watermark is used by the author on all his images. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:08, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

No, I didn't asked you about it, but I will work removing the watermarks, they can't be used. --MisterWiki (talk) 20:23, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Translate to Spanish[edit]

Hi! Here are a list of some things I've noticed that need translations from English to Spanish. This is from a private list I made and it has been awhile since I actually looked at the links, so they might have had translations. If I recall correctly, these were some of the easiest things that needed to be translate. If you don't get to do them all, that's okay. Thanks for all your work!

Killiondude (talk) 08:20, 25 December 2009 (UTC)


Blocked[edit]

You were blocked becuase

  • You were sockpuppeting (this account and User:LoveModernTallking) to evade block as Diegogrez.
  • You also were uploading images with false claims, with bogus credits and using false justifications (chilean law 17336 nowhere states gov works fall into PD) and webpage you give as source gives a clear (C) notice . -- Drini 23:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.

Request reason: "Please look at my rationale at en:User talk:Diego Grez. Also, I've sent the permission to Drini to use Pichilemu.cl images. My apologies about uploading copyrighted content earlier with User:Diegogrez. Thank you."
Decline reason: "With this kind of history I'm not convinced about anything you claim. I'd suggest you slow down and think about what you're doing and how it affects others, rather than trying to rush. --O (висчвын) 03:19, 07 January 2010 (GMT)"

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | +/−

As I posted yesterday on meta:

For the record.
He uploaded images from pichilemu.cl, which clearly states © Ilustre Municipalidad de Pichilemu 2008.
I asked him to justify the PD tag and he said that under Chilean law , Goverment works fall into PD.
I asked him which article on the law mentioned it and he replied "I don't even remember, you go read it"
I went to check the law and there was no trace of such statement.
When I confronted him he said "ok, but on such website, only text is copyrighted, not images".
Again, I asked him for proof and he answered "I will ask tomorrow for a confirmation".
Therefore, he's been uploading files under false license claims. Given he's sockpuppeting and evading a block given for uploading copyvios, I proceeded to delete the image.
He may get a permission if he asks tomorrow, but the 'fact is that he uploaded without permission, lied about the justification, lied again when confronted and besides evading a block for copyvios. es:Drini 02:00, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Reasons for this block are not the same as enwiki ones, so the rationale arguing unblock there won't apply here. -- Drini 16:23, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

See also

Again, he was blocked more than a year ago due to issues like this. He's using sockpuppets to avoid block [checkuser proved] and yet he continues uploading with false claims and copyvios (and when confronted his answer after getting cornered is "I will get permission").

-- Drini 16:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)


Today he sent me an email claiming http://pastebin.com/pastebin.php?dl=f462413e5 is a proof that he got a PD release that allowed him to upload. Given the trail of false claims, I wouldn't put much weigh on a pastebin for enough proof. -- Drini 17:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Also, even if you get the permission /now/ you were still using a sockpuppet to upload files with false license claims. -- Drini 19:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

I just want to go in the right way. This sockpuppet was used to upload fair images of my own. I know I uploaded images from a fan website, and they got deleted, but the most (or all) of the images I uploaded are completely mine, and their copyright belongs to me. I published them here in a way to be useful. I know I previously uploaded copyvios in my old account, but I was too young and my actions were sometimes stupid, and I deserve a second opportunity. --MisterWiki (talk) 19:21, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

all the images I deleted and linked ABOVE the gallery were copyvios. I asked you to explain yesterday and you instead talked rudely and lied.
The others (your personals) I know you own the copyright, but I believe many of them are out of Project Scope.
And there's still the issue of avoiding your block with a sockpuppet. -- Drini 19:33, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

I didn't uploaded this image http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Roberto_Matta.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 , and http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:MisterWiki%27s_studios.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1 is a derivative work, not a copyvio. --MisterWiki (talk) 19:36, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Also, I don't want my old accounts back. I just want to continue with this one. I don't want to cause problems anymore. You can do it, and I know you can watch the things I do meanwhile. Thanks. --MisterWiki (talk) 19:37, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I fxed the log. You didn't upload the Matta one therefore it's not listed on the urls above. But it's still a copyvio so I deleted it.
I deleted the Studios one since you didn't credit autorship but if you can help me finding it, I will restore it. -- Drini 19:53, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
This is the source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WikinewsHQ.jpg --MisterWiki (talk) 20:20, 6 January 2010 (UTC)


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.

Request reason: "Sorry. I know I have done idiotic things in the past, but I will not do that again. I know I have sockpuppeted but I don't deserve this block. I have permission for pichilemu.cl photos. Give me another chance, I'm not gonna let you down. If I upload another copyvio, block me forever if you want, but give me a chance."
Decline reason: "Closing request made the day after the previous one was declined. There aren't any esentially different arguments than the previous one and this new one has been open for a whole week without any sysop reviewing it again -- Drini 15:20, 13 January 2010 (UTC)."

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | +/−

You've had plenty of chances under several accounts. Why this time is different? you always promise, so "I promise" is meaningless. Also, your unblock was reviewed just yesterday (and the new plea is essentially the same declined earlier), please don't abuse the unblock template system. -- Drini 20:31, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token f3981b281d2e82bd15e934a1e6be3a44[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


File tagging File:Bullying_en_IRFE,_7°_Básico_B,_2007.ogg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bullying_en_IRFE,_7°_Básico_B,_2007.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

High Contrast (talk) 16:21, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Test edit[edit]

Testing for IRC. --MisterWiki (talk) 19:09, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Unblocking[edit]

I have talked with Drini, and I think the following agreement amply deals with the issues:

  1. . You need to upload only things that clearly have good licences: Either you took them yourself, or the website releases them in no uncertain terms (or you've run them by Commons talk:Licensing and got the go ahead). This restriction lasts 3 months, though I'd suggest to any other admins that, barring egregious behaviour related to this, a reasonable number of warnings should be given before any blocks.

There are also two bits of advice:

  1. . Try to keep to encyclopedic or newsworthy images. This is subjective, of course, but be reasonable.
  2. . While the whole point of Commons is to allow usage in many wikis, make sure that your image is really useful before spreading it widely. Using COM:VIC would be an excellent way to judge how useful images you want to spread about are, before getting carried away.

If you agree to this, or wish to discuss modifications, reply here =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:30, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

I accept them completely. --Diego Grez (talk) 23:33, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Then you are unblocked. So far as I'm aware, you aren't involved at all with historic media - and that's a copyright minefield, so a little caution is best there until you're fairly experienced - so I haven't added an exception there. If you do go there, I'll happily help out with copyright advice. In any case, remember: When in doubt, ask first =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Also, just to be clear, I'm happy for the restrictions to be loosened or even removed early in light of good upload behaviour and suggestions at Commons talk:Licensing by you. This sort of thing is meant to help you get back in without any further problems; if you want it re-reviewed in the light of your work here, I'm happy for me or another admin to do so. =) Give it a month first, though; need a decent sample to review =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token 8349079a180d7717c6b5cc4d4e274842[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:UC campeón interamericano.JPG[edit]

original picture: http://www.flickr.com/photos/14292732@N05/4546231832/
license flickr: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.es
original video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0209wEBsH0#
license video: "Se permite el uso bajo Licencia Creative Commons 2.0 Atribución a Marcelo Ríos en Wikimedia Commons y Cristián Berríos en Flickr.com"
link license video: (video information) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0209wEBsH0#
Why you deleted the picture? Marcelo Ríos 12 April 2010 (UTC)

It is a copyvio. Your YouTube video was taken from TV and is impossible that it is yours... --Diego Grez (previously MisterWiki) let's talk 23:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Given your comment while removing the note above I like to give you a little more help: Commons:Free media resources/Map lists that source, but it clearly says, that it only GFDL relief maps with map Layers (except the labeling layer and the contour layer). The site http://www.maps-for-free.com/ offers Maps view (not free), Satellite view (not free), Terrain view (not free), Relief view (free, GFDL), OSM (free, Open Street map). You can use the Relief view with all layers except the labeling and the contour layer. You can not use the map, satellite or terrain view. Feel free to remove this note once you read it. Thanks, --Martin H. (talk) 16:41, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Ah. OK. /me slaps himself. --Diego Grez (previously MisterWiki) let's talk 16:58, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


pleas stop...[edit]

.... to make first a regular deletion request and than an speedy deletion request - that is counter productive. This person "Cristian berrios" may be not notable, but he is obviously not a fake. Perhaps you have to have some trust in the wisdom of the crouds. Cholo Aleman (talk) 17:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Hey. I'm just doing my job reverting and taking out the vandalism and disruption he provoked, now that he won't come back. --Diego Grez (previously MisterWiki) let's talk 20:37, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Posted to my english wikipedia page FYI...[edit]

FYI [1] I am not involved just wanted to give you the heads up. I have not looked into the situation. RP459 (talk) 17:22, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Hmm. That guy never stops. Thanks for reporting me that IP. I have reported it to stewards. --Diego Grez return fire 17:28, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller ![edit]

Hi Diego Grez !

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller ! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As might know already, the patrolling functionality has been enabled for all edits, no longer just for page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edit made by anonymous users on Commons.

We could use you help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by checking an Anonymous edits checklist and patrol a day-part. There is a short video tutorial which addresses some things you may not know.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage, my talkpage or on IRC. –Krinkletalk 02:04, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! :D I'll have a look again on some of these :P --Diego Grez let's talk 02:05, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Ehrenfeld Gedenktafel Edelweißpiraten.jpg[edit]

You've reverted a correction of an IP in File:Ehrenfeld Gedenktafel Edelweißpiraten.jpg. If I am not completely tired and exhausted of the censorship project discussion I'd think that this correction was indeed a correction. It is the transscription of the text on the image (see the image). Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:43, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I didn't notice that. Sorry. --Diego Grez return fire 02:56, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

... for you last undo action. :) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 01:25, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

 :-) --Diego Grez return fire 01:26, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

I've regranted Patroller rights for now. It does seem as though you are working towards resolving the issues with your accounts and the work you have done here seems ok. I would urge you to get the issue of previous accounts dealt with though. If you do not resolve the situation on Meta maybe you could cross link/redirect previous accounts where you can. This would prevent misunderstandings in the future. To me the travelling account is fine however you should cross link it so that it is obvious it is you. I'll review rollback in due course - regards --Herby talk thyme 13:14, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you ! :D --Diego Grez return fire 15:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Pardonnable French[edit]

Why did you do this revert? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:26, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Wait. A minute. --Diego Grez return fire 18:27, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Hmm. Seems ok. --Diego Grez return fire 18:28, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

File talk:0069-Turm Port de Sóller.JPG[edit]

Hi Diego, I've suspended your speedy on File talk:0069-Turm Port de Sóller.JPG as it looked to be an accusation of a copyviolation to me and deserved to be further investigated.KTo288 (talk) 05:20, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Sure. --Diego Grez return fire 17:25, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

References[edit]

References are needed because they provide source of spelling for people suspecting misspelling in some cases such as Ϝ & Λ in:

Please do not remove them, especially because people have short memory. Names are searchable inside UnicodeData.txt. 83.10.103.143 17:45, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Rollback revoked[edit]

Hello,

I just revoked your rollback because you used it more than once in cases where it isn't allowed:

  1. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Flag_of_Miercurea-Ciuc.gif&diff=prev&oldid=39692204 you use rollback, and after that you do a edit to make a comment. Undo with Comment should be done.
  1. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Twinkling_Eiffel_Tower_at_Midnight_May_2008.jpg&diff=next&oldid=39400784 you rollback a deletion request without any comment.
  1. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Weeping_Parisian_from_NARA_Ww2-81.jpg&diff=next&oldid=39678384
  1. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Pedelec.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=39678279 you rollback without checking talkpage

And I could continue.

I don't think it wise to keep your rollback, so I revoked it. Huib talk 18:40, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

This is example how thy rollback destroys legitimate edits:

  1. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greek_alphabet&action=historysubmit&diff=39677357&oldid=39395098
  2. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category%3AGreek_letters&action=historysubmit&diff=39677436&oldid=39395699

83.10.103.143 19:04, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

@IP that's not rollback.
I rollbacked the deletion request because it was already kept before. I thought it was unnecessary, and looked like vandalism. I didn't rollbacked anything on [2], and is undo!, not rollback. I did the first one because it was easier than look at the diff, /me was lazy that time, but the other ones are certainly ok. As Blurpeace said, "I'm not fucking up". --Diego Grez return fire 22:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Using rollback on a Deletion request is so wrong that only that is already enough to revoke. Huib talk 17:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

File mover[edit]

The functionality of the template {{rename}} has recently changed. You might need to clear your cache to see the changes. If successful you should then be able to use the new "Quick adding" link in the template to instruct CommonsDelinker to replace the old name with the new name in all wikis. Please use that every time you rename a file. If further questions arise, feel free to write on my talk page --DieBuche (talk) 10:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Category:Mythological paintings[edit]

Hello, why did you delete my rename request for this category? Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 17:23, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Look at the talk page! :) Well, there is no consensus to move the category (at the moment). The move template stayed there for more than 14 days, that is the time to take a decision. There is a oppose vote, and I just closed the request as not done. --Diego Grez return fire 17:27, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
ok, no problem. Next time I will post a message on the village pump asking for people to vote. That probably means I will again request a name change for this category some time in the future. Is that ok? Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 19:33, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Okay :) But there's no real need, it is supposed that consensus needs to be achieved in the talk page, something that didn't happened. --Diego Grez return fire 20:26, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Re[edit]

ok. --Memo18 (talk) 20:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg[edit]

Hi Diego Grez!

I created an optimized version of the graphic linked above. It’s only 161 KB and valid SVG 1.1. If you’re interested I could send you the graphic or you could unlock the file and I’ll upload the updated version then.

Kindest regards, Richard

File:Wikipedia Rollback.svg and File:Wikipedia Reviewer.svg and maybe others?[edit]

When you updated these to include the new logo, you adjusted the size/surrounding white-space which changes how they display everywhere (and alters the proportions for the reviewer logo). Any chance you could correct that? Cheers! VernoWhitney (talk) 18:33, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Sure. Diego Grez return fire 18:40, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
✓ Done Diego Grez return fire 19:01, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Outstanding. Thanks! VernoWhitney (talk) 19:02, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Your opposition[edit]

Greetings. You didn't really provide much details in your opposition to that indef. I'm curious if you really believe that Ottava will not simply to continue to behave badly, cause disruption, and be blocked over and over again... and if so, why you believe that? I'm not trying to put the screws to you— if I come to believe my lengthening to to indefinite was not _necessary_ to prevent further bad behaviour I will gladly undo it myself. Thanks for your thoughts. --Gmaxwell (talk) 23:44, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi Gmaxwell, sorry for not being clear. I think Ottava gets overheated from time to time and the block should be short, in my opinion, to let him clean up his mind. Diego Grez return fire 23:53, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Have you seen any evidence of his mind clearing? I have never seen an example of him apologizing for, or saying he regretted an action which resulted in him being blocked. I don't believe that he has ever actually taken a break during a temporary block, instead temporary blocks have simply caused him to spend all his time complaining about the people who blocked him. I don't think blocks are working. --Gmaxwell (talk) 23:58, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Hmm, well, firstly, I shall not have involved on that discussion, secondly, I will remove my opposition and let things go. Diego Grez return fire 00:05, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
OKAY. I'm always interested in hearing your thoughts. Thanks for your consideration. --Gmaxwell (talk) 00:10, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Your Wikiversity Talk Page[edit]

Diego, are you aware that your Wikiversity talk page is protected? Moulton 11:46, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Inclusión en Template:Documentation[edit]

Hola, me disculpas por hablar español, ya tengo una forma sencilla, podrías observar si puede funcionar:

{{LangSwitch
|en={{documentation/en|1={{{1}}}|heading={{{heading}}}}}
|es={{documentation/es|1={{{1}}}|heading={{{heading}}}}}
}}

No quiero ser malo con usted, he probado en la zonas de pruebas y sale correctamente, ¿podría usarlo en esta plantilla? Si no fue así, avísame, gracias--Diego Sanguinetti (talk) 23:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC) P.D. Aquí una prueba, donde se puede cambiar según el idioma elegido:

Documentation icon Documentationviewedithistorypurge

This documentation is transcluded from Template:en.

Esta bien, pero ¿cómo lo revisarían si está correctamente adecuado para su funcionamiento? Espero que esto funcione. Saludos--Diego Sanguinetti (talk) 17:36, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Hola, es una lástima que no funcionó, porque lo revirtieron. Podrías avisar para que sea cierto a esos malos revisores; porque es un problema que exista el egoísmo inglés, disculpa por decirlo, es que no tiene sentido hacer de nuevo.--Diego Sanguinetti (talk) 18:11, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Re: Hi[edit]

See: http://www.macaubus.org/special.htm

File:IEs4Linux_logo.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:IEs4Linux_logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Svgalbertian (talk) 19:23, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Diego Grez-Cañete!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:40, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

File:IEs4Linux_logo.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:IEs4Linux_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Svgalbertian (talk) 03:01, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Mentorship[edit]

See Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Would anyone object.... ZooFari 18:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Watermark[edit]

Dziękuję za uwagę. Na nowych zdjęciach nie wstawiam i nie zamierzam wstawiać. Topory (talk) 11:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

English: Thank you for your attention. For new photos not intercede and do not intend to insert. (Automatic translation) Topory (talk) 11:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

iTunes logos[edit]

Thanks for the heads-up about the copyright involving the iTunes logo, but being that the image in question is using for nonprofit educational purposes (I wasn't the original creator of it, by the way, I just changed the wrong "iTunes X" to the correct "iTunes 10") to show how the icons evolved over time, and so I don't feel it needs to be deleted. Besides, the current icon is already being used on the iTunes article on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ITunes_Logo.png Ramblagir (talk) 11:05, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Yes, the icon on Wikipedia, as you can see below the description is copyrighted. That means, you can't use a free license on them, and subsequently upload them to Commons. Next time, upload these icons as Fair Use on Wikipedia, not here. Diego Grez return fire 13:49, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Map_of_Pichilemu_(Spanish).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Map_of_Pichilemu_(Spanish).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Esteban (talk) 04:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Your tagging as copyvio[edit]

Please be more careful than this. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

  • It's a copyright violations, a derivative work of the Flash animation in the La Tercera newspaper. Diego Grez return fire 17:25, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
    • As it says with emphasis in {{speedydelete}}, tagging as a copyvio is for obvious cases. This is by no means an obvious case, I fail to see any infringement. The information is free. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:39, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: File:MSJ.en.svg copyright violation allegation[edit]

I visited the La Tercera site and looked at the images there. There is absolutely nothing there that looks like the Wikimedia image. Moreover, the La Tercera site doesn't use any SVG images as far as I can determine. Please explain why you think the Wikimedia image is a copyright violation. Be specific. Quicksilver@ 00:15, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Rescue_of_Chilean_miners_-_Rescue_worker_Patricio_Sepúlveda_inside_capsule.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rescue_of_Chilean_miners_-_Rescue_worker_Patricio_Sepúlveda_inside_capsule.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Aude (talk | contribs) 20:21, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Daniel_Herrera_-_Chilean_miner.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Daniel_Herrera_-_Chilean_miner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Aude (talk | contribs) 20:24, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Victor_Segovia_-_Chilean_miner.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Victor_Segovia_-_Chilean_miner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Aude (talk | contribs) 20:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Franklin_Lobos.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Franklin_Lobos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Aude (talk | contribs) 20:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

File:31 Minutos.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:31 Minutos.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Superzerocool (talk) 12:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Loughner_family_home.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Loughner_family_home.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

File:EnWiki_redirect_-_Pichilemo.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:EnWiki_redirect_-_Pichilemo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 14:21, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia's_server_down.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wikipedia's_server_down.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 15:22, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Bullying_en_IRFE,_7°_Básico_B,_2007.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bullying_en_IRFE,_7°_Básico_B,_2007.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wknight94 talk 02:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Tsunami images[edit]

Hi Diego- I am one of the editors who has repeatedly removed some of your images from the 2011 Tohoku tsunami page over the last few weeks. However today I had the pleasure of looking through your related commons gallery and I found a great image which I added to the tsunami page.

I want to explain to you a little bit of why certain of your uploaded images had such problems, and why others are very valuable additions to wp. First of all I want to to thank you because real people out in the world taking pictures with the express intent of uploading them, is exactly what wp needs more of. For whatever reason there is a certain bias against images on wp and its very important for the image editors to assert themselves when necessary. I got started with pics on WP the same way, by trying to find images that no one else was uploading or seemed to care about.

This is why I want you to keep editing and uploading, but to have a better understanding of what images meet the manual of style guidelines for use in the encyclopedia. The number one issue the first few pics you tried to add, was they were NOT UNIQUE enough- a grainy images of waves in a dark ocean, is not a good portrayal of a tsunami let alone a specific tsunami. Similarly, while the image of police on the beach was more unique, its still something that happens on a regular basis (like baywatch lol).

The GOAL of images in WP, is to add value to the text, without needing to read the caption. Again this is a goal and not what actually happens, but the motivation is the same. If you have to use a lot of words to explain how the picture is related to the page, then its probably not a good choice. The objective is to see the image and get added meaning from the VISUAL effect separate from the text. Neither of those first two images really met such a standard, and believe me your images are not the only ones that have been removed form the 2011 tsunami pages for such reasons.

However your image of boats moved into the streets to avoid the tsunami, is the pic I added back to the page, because its VERY unique and has a high degree of visual effect. You do not see a large group of boats lined up in a city street, very often if at all. You don't need much text to explain the image either. So its a much better choice in comparison to the MOS.

So please keep doing what you do, but try to find those pictures which "are worth 1000 words" to use the old cliche- find unique and striking images which add new value to the wp project. Thanks again. 66.220.113.98 18:32, 26 April 2011 (UTC)


File:Samsung N145 Plus.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content. Fair use laws vary from country to country, and uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules.

Also, fair use is only applicable in a few limited contexts. The use of a media file in one context may be considered fair use, while the use of the same file in another context may constitute copyright violation. In particular, fair use does not extend to the collection and distribution of media files in a media database such as Commons. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions.

Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally to projects which allow this.


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português do Brasil | русский | svenska | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--guerreritoboy (talk) 01:42, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Icon-windows_os.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Icon-windows_os.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

95.24.249.250 16:58, 7 August 2011 (UTC)


File:Facundo Rojas Ramírez - 2010.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Facundo Rojas Ramírez - 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Superzerocool (talk) 13:00, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Renán Ávalos.jpg[edit]

And File:Juan Aguilar with President Piñera.jpg as well.LX (talk, contribs) 14:49, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Images by Diego Grez‎[edit]

I hope you are aware that you can not revoke a pd-self and replace it with a cc-by or cc-by-sa license? You have to revert such edits or at least you have to add the pd-self back to the file descriptions. I saw that you made many of such edits. Therefore Im here to inform you and ask you to act, I will not discuss this. If you need a discussion please go to COM:VP/C. --Martin H. (talk) 10:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Wikinews images new look.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wikinews images new look.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.133.39 13:13, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Martin H. (talk) 18:00, 16 March 2013 (UTC)



Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Diego Grez-Cañete!

-- 14:19, 14 November 2011 (UTC)


File tagging File:Jean Philippe Cretton.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jean Philippe Cretton.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Vanja / Вања (talk) 10:26, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

File:I. Municipalidad de Pichilemu (1987).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:I. Municipalidad de Pichilemu (1987).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hchc2009 (talk) 18:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Cristina Barra.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cristina Barra.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Diannaa (talk) 23:38, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Evelyn Matthei[edit]


Huzzah![edit]

Congratulations on recovering your account. :) Green Giant (talk) 10:53, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! I'm glad it finally happened! :P Diego Grez return fire 16:32, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Admin[edit]

Hi Diego. Thanks for your email about being an admin. I don't think that a request for adminship would have much success. I don't see you working in any admin-related fields. You should be more active in DR, UDR, Help desk, copyvios, etc pp. Sorry, but I think you deserve an honest answer from me. Regards, --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Hedwig. Since it was a private e-mail, I'd have preferred you to respond it through the same way. Anyways, thanks for your input, I appreciate that you were honest. Diego Grez return fire 21:02, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
I don't use email much. Talk page is just faster and you don't have to hide that you are interested in doing more serious stuff. There's no shame in that, we all appreciate your concern about this project. Thanks! :) If you want to, I can delete/hide this thread for you. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:22, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Don't worry ;-) Regards, Diego Grez return fire 22:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

File:WindowsME.png[edit]

Actually you're wrong deleting this file. Everything you find in low resolution is considered "fair use". This picture is found on English Wiki. There is a question, why don't all files from all wikis transfer to commons? That way we would not need copy-paste everything. --Munjanes (talk) 20:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Because on Commons we don't accept fair use media. Read some policies, like Commons:Fair use. That screenshot is not allowed here. English Wikipedia has its own policies which permit that content. --Diego Grez return fire 20:05, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Chile Ilustrado[edit]

El propio libro Chile Ilustrado de 1872 dice que fué publicado en Valparaíso, para que retiras la categoría?--Alexxxos (talk) 03:36, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Porque fue publicado en París, sale en la portada... --Diego Grez return fire 03:42, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for telling Cat-a-lot to restore images put into Category:Taken with Samsung GT-S7560 back to Category:Taken with Samsung GT-S7560M! Geo Swan (talk) 00:16, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

[3][edit]

This unDR may interest you. Fry1989 eh? 16:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

File:¡Aporta culiao! (Institutón 2007).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:¡Aporta culiao! (Institutón 2007).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warko (talk) 00:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Letelier Removido (3047396635).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Letelier Removido (3047396635).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warko (talk) 17:43, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

File:La BOMBA (2472889396).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:La BOMBA (2472889396).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warko (talk) 17:43, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Parraguez vs Tejo (2232808257).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Parraguez vs Tejo (2232808257).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warko (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Aldo Scapini (1366118155).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aldo Scapini (1366118155).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warko (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Agenda Pascualina (2472889560).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Agenda Pascualina (2472889560).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warko (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Benito (1332988545).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Benito (1332988545).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warko (talk) 17:45, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Be polite[edit]

Please, don't be rude, saying "let's not get stupid" [4] it is against the Etiquette in Wikimedia projects. I'm not going to do anything this time, I only expect an apology from you. Best. --Warko (talk) 17:00, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Warko, you are a smart guy. You know that "let's not get stupid" does not equal "Warko is stupid". Diego Grez return fire 01:52, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Comment[edit]

Please take a look at my last comment. Try to compare the files with the photo of the painting hanging on a wall. Thanks, --Lecen (talk) 04:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Steinsplitter (talk) 20:07, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Padena[edit]

Hey, I ask you a very reasonable explanation about the speedy deletion of that emblem. I didn't had time to defend the file from deletion, and you simply marked it as copyvio withouth any reliable source. I warn you that it's a very disruptive behavior by your part. You should have to nominate the file for deletion, not simply mark it as copyvio. I repeat: I wait a very reasonable explanation for your behaviour. --Sfs90 (talk) 22:09, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

By the way, cropping an image does not make you the copyright holder. I am still the copyright holder to Cretton's photo, and I decide how people should credit me. You are advised not to revert. Diego Grez return fire 23:53, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
(edit conflict with below) Diego, gravitas.
If you are going to warn someone, don't do it on your own talk page. I see some stuff going on here. In particular, you tagged a file for suspected copyvio. The deletion was not your decision, it was an admins. Unless there is some pattern, even if you were wrong, that's normal and not a problem. The person to request undeletion from would not be you, and your reason for your tagging "copyvio suspicion" is obvious. That doesn't mean it's right, that is a much more complicated judgment. If the user wants to know, asking politely would be in order, I'd think. However, more to the point would be asking the admin who deleted. Instead Sfs90 tells you what you should do. And instead of asking for undeletion from the admin or formally at the page for that, he re-uploaded the file.
Not good, because, for one thing, it hides the history.
He might have some grounds for thinking you are harassing him, because you have nominated about seven of his files for deletion. This is not an accusation of harassment, but that some users might take it that way.
I highly recommend you not mix issues. Responding here with regard to the revert warring on File:Jean_Philippe_Cretton_crop.jpg is a Very Bad Idea. You have been revert warring there.
So has he. Neither one of you is using the Talk page, nor specifically discussing the issue, seeking consensus, nor seeking help. And the basic issue I would put in Category:Really stupid stuff to fight over. (On both sides). Ah, I see that's a red link. No wonder so many people don't realize it, the behavior has not been categorized! It's amazing how many people risk being blocked, or actually get blocked, over these things.
So why am I warning you and not him? Because I've known you, for years, and don't want to see you blow it. It doesn't matter if you are right or not. I thought at first that this might be a naive user, re-uploading instead of requesting undeletion, not following deletion policy. He is not. He has almost 3200 edits on Commons and 36,000 edits on es.wiki; he was just blocked there for two days. He has been warned here for copyright violation here and more, including a "final warning." It looks to me like he just cast a retaliatory vote in a DR for your files. I assume he will also see this comment.
Diego, would you like me to intervene here? My goal would be to end the bickering so that both of you can be successful in whatever is legitimate. I'd rather see, if possible, you supporting each other, as you could. Otherwise, one or both of you may end up damaged. --Abd (talk) 02:40, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Why are you mixing the topics? I'm still waiting a response about your rude attitude deleting a file that isn't a copyvio. You owe me a very reasonable explanation about that. Making false accusations it's something I would not accept. And about your supposed surnames, I said all about that in the edit summary (independent of how many surnames do you have, your username is Diego Grez and that it's all I have to say; the file was uploaded by me [independent that you uploaded the original file], and I recognize that you have the rights about that, but I decide how to credit you, and I decided to credit you under your username; it's not an obligation to credit you under your two surnames [or what? do you also want to state your second name, address, your on-line "newspaper" that doesn't have 98 years, and/or anything else?]). Kind regards :) --Sfs90 (talk) 02:27, 28 March 2015 (UTC) PS: I'm waiting an apologize for your attitude towards the file of Padena emblem. Yu have to recognize that you made a mistake requesting a speedy deletion without any argument.
I'm not giving an answer to an impolite user who deliberately ignores warnings. --Diego Grez return fire 02:38, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Okay, Diego, he did at least start to address the issues. I'm not (yet) going to, myself, address the actual issues in dispute. I could, I have opinions, but, at this point, my opinions don't matter. What would matter to me is the possibility that the two of you can find a way to cooperate, because if you don't, we all lose. I don't know anything about Sfs90, I do about you. Learning to handle and turn conflict into cooperation is a major wiki skill. Are you interested? --Abd (talk) 02:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
If Diego Grez ignore my requests, well, that says a lot about his attitude... To Abd, I recognize that I made a mistake re-uploading the file instead of asking an undeletion request (I still don't know how to do it exactly because I never had to request an undeletion in the past). Ignoring warnings? Diego, you only undo edits and doesn't contribute to the discussion about that; I state my point right on this talk page and in the edit summaries of the cropped file. I repeat: your rude attitude doesn't contribute at all. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 02:51, 28 March 2015 (UTC) PS: Diego, writing edit summaries like "jaaaaaaaaaaaa" (sic), with a clear sarcastic tone, doesn't contribute to the good relations here. Think about that.
Sfs90, if you keep this up, you will be blocked. That is not a warning, because if I were ready to warn you, I would do so on your talk page. You have already done enough, such that if attention is brought to your history, it is likely to happen. I am not saying you are "wrong," and I'm sure you can be a productive contributor, and that you have been already. Diego's attitude cannot get you into trouble, only your attitude can do that. I'd like to help you. If you want help, you will need to start listening more than telling.
You were already warned about re-uploading, so this is what Diego was talking about, and he was offended by how you approached him. You have been offended, as well, perhaps. I have not concluded you are bad or wrong, though you obviously made a mistake. Now, you can sit around being offended, respond as offended, and get yourself blocked. Or you can ask for help, learn to handle conflict, learn about, for example, what to do if your file is deleted, and what I'd really like to see is for Diego to help you, since I believe he knows how. But you will have to change your attitude! Will you consider that?
Would you be more explicit about that? Please say explicitly what's the (supposed) problem with my attitude. I ask this with a very good faith. Diego made several mistakes in the past (you can see them in their history) and I see little recognition about their mistakes. That's why I see little intentions from him to have a change on his attitude. I have all the good disposition to discuss that. He offended me in several occasions in the past and I don't see any remorse by his part. I couldn't trust in Diego Grez intentions if when I said that he's making a mistake, he begins with the sarcastic and offensive comments. It's sad that he doesn't changed his attitude towards the months/years. As you said that you know him more, you should know that. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 04:11, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
It would take me time to cover and explain your "attitude," and it's late, and this is Diego's talk page, he has not consented to further discussion here. I will start with one thing. I told you you could be blocked and you tell me about Diego's attitude. Can you see that there is a problem there? What does his attitude have to do with your behavior? So if you are blocked you can blame him? "He made me do it!" What? Believe me, I've seen this, it's not uncommon. "How could I let him insult me without responding the same way?" You have asked me to explain, so I will, on your talk page. I've also presented an opportunity to Diego here, I hope he takes it. Later. --Abd (talk) 04:21, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
I'm not going to discuss anymore. This is going to nowhere. And don't put words in my mouth; I didn't said or thought any of the things you said, especially the things you put between quotation marks. It's a pity that you are making incorrect assumptions, because my attitude was with the most of the good faiths; if that was misunderstood, my apologies. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 04:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Sfs90, I put no words in your mouth. Those quotations were not of you but of a hypothetical reason for your behavior. A civil answer would be "No, that's not what I'm thinking." You have now been warned by another for edit warring (as was Diego). Above, you asked me to explain. Do you still want that? If so, ask me on my talk page. In any case, good luck. Diego, if you would like some observations from me, you may ask me on my Talk page, or email me. Good luck to you as well, but I'll tell you one secret of life: we create our good luck. --Abd (talk) 15:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Please do not edit war[edit]

Deutsch | English | Français | Magyar | Italiano | Português | Sicilianu | +/−


Nuvola apps important yellow.svg You currently appear to be participating in an edit war (at File:Jean_Philippe_Cretton_crop.jpg). Users are expected to collaborate with others, and once it is known that there is a disagreement should discuss the issues on the relevant talk page rather than repeatedly undoing other users' contributions. If necessary you can ask for more input at Commons:Dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to ask for temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing – even if you are right about the content issue.


File:Bloqueando el paso (2717731399).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bloqueando el paso (2717731399).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warko (talk) 02:40, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Niza Catalán, presidenta del CCAA LARE 2012.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Niza Catalán, presidenta del CCAA LARE 2012.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

And also:

Um... so I have to send an email to OTRS for these files to be kept? --Diego Grez return fire 15:30, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Yes, unless you can provide a link to a statement on the source site that confirms the license. All I saw was "Todos los derechos reservados." LX (talk, contribs) 19:35, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
@LX: Okay, done. --Diego Grez return fire 19:44, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! I've removed the problem tags, added links to the permission statement and tagged them for license review instead. Cheers, LX (talk, contribs) 19:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Javiera Peys González.jpg[edit]

Hi! Thanks for uploading the various Charly's School files. However, I can't find this specific image, File:Javiera Peys González.jpg, anywhere on their site. I can see several references to Javiera Peys Gonzales on various pages: http://www.diarioelmarino.cl/tema/javiera-peys-gonzalez/ - but can't see that specific image. Can you provide a link? --GRuban (talk) 13:12, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Actually, I can't find any of those files on that website. Are they there? --GRuban (talk) 13:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
They are part of the newspaper archives, they have not been actually uploaded to the website. But if you want, I can provide the original picture via OTRS... --Diego Grez return fire 16:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, please do that if you could. See, I'm a license reviewer, as in Commons:License review. Apparently, from the comment above, User:LX tagged these images for license review, which means someone like me, who knows a few things about images licensed on websites, would look at them. But if they're not actually on the website, then I can't really review them. If you could mail them to OTRS, that would probably be best. Thank you for your work and contributions, and sorry for the confusion. --GRuban (talk) 20:00, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Re:Wookieepedia image[edit]

All you had to do was leave me a message, all caps was unnecessary. TrueCRaysball | #RaysUp 04:45, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

CR90: Hey, sorry about that, I didn't see it was all caps until the revert was done. --Diego Grez return fire 04:50, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Memoriapichilemina.cl, 20 de agosto de 2014.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Memoriapichilemina.cl, 20 de agosto de 2014.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

NBS (talk) 17:52, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Niza Catalán, presidenta del CCAA LARE 2012.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Niza Catalán, presidenta del CCAA LARE 2012.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

-- Tuválkin 01:06, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Niza Catalán, presidenta del CCAA LARE 2012.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Niza Catalán, presidenta del CCAA LARE 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-- Tuválkin 01:14, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Niza Catalán, presidenta del CCAA LARE 2012.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Niza Catalán, presidenta del CCAA LARE 2012.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

-- Tuválkin 12:07, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

  • As you probably know, the nomination was withdrawn, and this could have been avoided with a simple "own work" claim in the upload. I suspect that, burned in the past by prior publication, you tried to avoid that by citing a web site where your work had been used, but that's a good example of over-reaction. If it's own work, claim it as such. Simple. If it's been published before, then, and someone finds it on the web, OTRS might be necessary to verify your claim , that's all. That photo does not appear to be on the web, anywhere but here. So it would have been done, finished, with an "own work" claim, no fuss at all necessary.
  • She's beautiful, don't you think? There are other photos of her on the web, but this is, by far, the best. Congratulations on all your photos! Be proud! --Abd (talk) 14:11, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletions[edit]

Please provide reasons for suggested speedy deletions. You were in luck this time because I recognized the game, but please do not in future put "naked" speedies... you need to provide a reason and a LINK to the website where the image can be found. In this case a link to Agar.io or their website would have worked. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Ellin! Thought it was not necessary, since most (if not all) of the images mentioned they were taken from Agar.io in their descriptions. I'll try to mention the sources more explicitly when asking for files' deletions. Regards, --Diego Grez return fire 17:14, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Face-wink.svg The idea with a speedy "reason" is to put in the template the whole proof leaving as little as possible to the imagination of the admin and also leaving the best possible trail of evidence for the future. Should someone object to the process, it is of greatest benefit to have the most possible information. If that happens, the closing admin goes back and reads a template... the template might say something like Speedy, reason = "taken from ____.com website, page marked (c) at source". That is very clear even to someone else what the cause was without having to "restore" the file (which is a different process) to actually see/read everything that was possible to be seen when the image/file was fully visible. So you will sometimes see people say things like "Left hand side of image copied from ____ website, derivative work" or "Notice overprinting (c) _____ name lower right corner shows true source" or "Metadata says (c) by _____ photographer 2015". Yes all those are visible to anyone at the time the file/template is also visible, but once the file is removed, only the outlines remain and at that point, it is really helpful to have a slightly verbose speedy reason. Plus it helps to jog the memory of closing admins who can sometimes zap dozens or hundreds of files in short periods of time. I hope this helps!! I really appreciate your help with speedies and deletions and want you to understand the process better so it's not so totally mysterious! Thanks again. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Seems fair :-) Thanks for your explanation and help, Ellin! --Diego Grez return fire 03:04, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Concejo Municipal de Pichilemu, 2012-2016.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Concejo Municipal de Pichilemu, 2012-2016.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Explanations : the image source is not available by the link provided. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:07, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
This one was solved, the source was fixed and license found at source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Hugo Toro Galaz.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Hugo Toro Galaz.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:40, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Explanation : the source link must target the original image. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:41, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
This one was also solved, the source was fixed and license found at source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Marta Urzúa Púa.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Marta Urzúa Púa.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:00, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Christian Ferrer: It is in use here. http://www.diarioelmarino.cl/2015/03/09/la-representacion-femenina-en-los-concejos-municipales-de-cardenal-caro/ The one I uploaded here is of greater quality, even. q--Diego Grez return fire 22:09, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done ok image is reviewed. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)


Congratulations, Dear license reviewer[edit]

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Diego Grez-Cañete, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{user license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 05:30, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Cual es tu problema?[edit]

O mejor dicho, cuál es el problema con los archivos que he subido?

Como te habrás dado cuenta, ya estamos discutiendo ese asunto en Village Pump (tanto Copyright como Proposals), y las opiniones de muchos usuarios (incluyendo administradores) son dispares, y es importante llegar a un concenso sobre cómo aplicar de minimis o no a las capturas.

Pero venir y marcar para borrado cada archivo mio que encuentres (¿y de otros no?) en lugar de haberme dejado un mensaje en mi página de discusión, es claramente disruptivo... y parece que, por nuestras diferencias, te has empeñado en aplicar al extremo la Política de borrado sólo con mis capturas, y no con capturas de otros usuarios. Si lo que digo es cierto, te pido amablemente que te abstengas de marcar cada archivo para borrado, especialmente mientras se están llevando a cabo dos discusiones paralelas a cerca del licenciamiento de las capturas y de minimis. De lo contrario, me veré obligado a reportarte en el COM:ANU. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Pero si el problema es tuyo... debes marcar correctamente las licencias de tus archivos. Ve y repórtame, el que está haciendo drama no soy yo. Y no es un ataque, es una realidad. --Diego Grez return fire 16:50, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Dos preguntas:
  • Qué hay de este archivo? Por qué no cuestionas al que subió esa captura como lo has estado haciendo con tanto empeño conmigo?
  • Qué significa de minimis y cómo los distintos distritos y los proyectos de Wikimedia lo aplican?
Si vas a forzar la aplicación la Política de borrado de la forma en lo que lo haces, hazlo equitativamente, en lugar de acusarme que estoy violando los derechos de autor como si estuviera presumiendo mala fe. De lo contrario me tomaré tus acciones como troleo y de mala fe, razón suficiente para reportarte en el COM:ANU. No estoy discrepando tu opinión y punto de vista, pero sí cuestiono tus ediciones (como otros, principalmente admins, ya lo han hecho anteriormente), por eso estamos discutiendo eso en el Village Pump. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
PD: Por si lo notaste, estuve agregando el licenciamiento faltante, pero ahora estoy muy ocupado trabajando en {{Wikimedia-screenshot/sandbox}}. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
PD2: Esto es motivo suficiente para reportarte en COM:ANU, pero aún no lo voy a hacer. Por lo que te advierto nuevamente que te abstengas de aplicar las Políticas al extremo y a tu manera sobre mis archivos, si no lo vas a hacer de forma equitativa con capturas de otros usuarios, o cuanto menos arreglar dichos problemas por ti mismo, tal como yo lo estoy haciendo (incluso con capturas que no son mias como la de Microsoft Edge y Wikipedia en ruso). Vamos! eres un usuario antiguo y experimentado, por favor compórtate como tal. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
No veo que hay de malo con que te esté ayudando a que aprendas a subir las imagenes correctamente... pero bueno. --Diego Grez return fire 22:46, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Ese último comentario se oye como si no tuviera experiencia subiendo imágenes (algo así como un insulto). Si pretendes ayudar imponiento tu punto de vista violando COM:POINT de manera no neutral y equitativa... bueno, te lo advertí. --Amitie 10g (talk) 05:46, 25 October 2015 (UTC)


File:Aniversario IRFE 2013 IMG 0491 (10230841403).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aniversario IRFE 2013 IMG 0491 (10230841403).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wilfredor (talk) 19:28, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Programa de Gobierno de Michelle Bachelet - 2013.pdf[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Programa de Gobierno de Michelle Bachelet - 2013.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:20, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Whoops! Just fixed the issue, I had not noticed it. Regards, küñall (nütramyen) 13:38, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bachelet en su juventud, junto a su padre.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bachelet en su juventud, junto a su padre.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ximena Rincón González, ministra Segpres.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ximena Rincón González, ministra Segpres.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Fixed all (all have a common direct source: http://michellebachelet.cl/ministros/). License can be checked at the "Política de privacidad" section. küñall (nütramyen) 19:53, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Pałacyk Rydla w Ostrowcu Świętokrzyskim.jpg[edit]

Hi, Why did you choose to move my picture to such indistinct name? Do you expect there ever will be only one picture of this building on commons? BR, -- Jakubhal 05:43, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi there. Of course there won't, but it's better that it does away with that numbering. Also, "Pałacyk Rydla w Ostrowcu Świętokrzyskim" is far better than "Ostrowiec palacykRydla". küñall (nütramyen) 05:48, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I appreciate your thought, but don't agree that name looking better should be a reason for moving files. The rules says, Files should NOT be renamed only because the new name looks a bit better.
The dates in my files names are for the reason, to distinguish them from other pictures depicting the same object. -- Jakubhal 05:58, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
It did not look just a bit better, it did change a lot from its first name. I understand your concern, however, and have changed again the name to point out the picture's date. Regards, küñall (nütramyen) 06:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Ok, thank you very much. Regards, -- Jakubhal 06:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Unnecessarily File Rename[edit]

The style of my file naming very well acccepted [example] format that contains place, date and the camera generated serial number with a neutral, informative and good looking. Very recent (File:South City Mall - Anwar Shah Road - Kolkata 2013-02-08 4473.JPG) was renamed by you! Renaming in this case is very much unjustified. I do not like to change unnecessarily file name as you did. I request to revert the file name. Thanks. -- Biswarup Ganguly (talk) 06:27, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Gangulybiswarup. Perhaps the new name could do better with the date it was taken, but the serial number was unnecessary. That's why it was moved. Regards, küñall (nütramyen) 20:03, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
The camera generated serial number is extremely necessary to a large photograph handler, as thousands of photographs have to manage every day for different purpose by me, it keeps my track, otherwise the effort will be messed up. Thanks. -- Biswarup Ganguly (talk) 01:34, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Demography graphic of Pichilemu.png[edit]

HI. Thx for great image and src code. What programming language it is ? Regards --Adam majewski (talk) 18:22, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi there Adam. It is actually wiki-code, it works here in Wikimedia wikis because of an extension (I don't recall specifically its name, but it's on Special:Version). That's it! küñall (nütramyen) 02:51, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
EasyTimeline, OK , Thx. --Adam majewski (talk) 15:16, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Fotos antiguas de Valparaíso (Old Valparaíso Pictures)[edit]

Amigo Diego, yo no soy el autor de esas fotos, ni tampoco busco atribuirme su autoría (sería demasiado idiota de mi parte atribuirme la autoría de una foto o un daguerrotipo tomado 80 o 150 años atrás, ¿no le parece a usted?). Creía que sería demasiado obvio para quienes vieran las imágenes entender ese hecho, por ello no las he editado, ademas de que como usted amigo Diego entenderá, saber quienes sacaron fotos tan antiguas es un proceso demasiado complejo, de hecho, en el mejor de los casos sabremos la autoría de una fracción de dichas imágenes (como las galerías en las que dejo claro quienes son los fotográfos en Valparaíso Old Pictures). Deje sin editar la autoría o fecha de gran mayoría de las imágenes para que alguien que sepa del tema haga las correcciones correspondientes, ademas de la obviedad anteriormente dicha. Saludos.--Alexxxos (talk) 14:49, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Bueno, en el caso de que no sepas quién fue el autor de las imágenes, debes usar "Unknown". Lo mismo para las fechas. Porque con tu nombre en las descripciones, das a entender aquello (aunque cualquier persona con dos dedos de frente se de cuenta de lo contrario). küñall (nütramyen) 14:53, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

¿que te pasa Diego?[edit]

Oye Diego, ¿para que vaciaste tantas categorías en las que yo había trabajado anteriormente?. Ni siquiera te diste el tiempo de discutir el terma en la pagina de DISCUSIÓN que tiene cada categoría, no olvides que no estas solo en el mundo y que debes tener un mínimo de respeto por el trabajo ajeno. Investigare como denunciarte por lo que deshiciste sin avisarle a nadie--Alexxxos (talk) 15:44, 14 May 2014 (UTC).

No era necesario avisarte. Creaste demasiadas categorías duplicadas, que cumplen la misma función que la categoría madre. (Ej. Calle Blanco (Fotos Antiguas) perfectamente debían estar en la categoría Calle Blanco). Si te fijas en la categorización que hay en Category:Valparaíso, está la tendalada. Yo solo organizé como se debía tus archivos. No lo tomes a mal. küñall (nütramyen) 15:48, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Por cierto, no soy el único que te ha hecho saber la innecesariedad de las categorías que creaste, y que aparte, no tienen la capitalización correcta, de ser válidas (ej. "Fotos Antiguas" debió haber sido "fotos antiguas") küñall (nütramyen) 15:50, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
No puede llamarse "categoría duplicada" una que almacena fotos antiguas de una calle a una que alberga fotos actuales, aún siendo la misma calle, o una que tiene postales antiguas panorámicas a otra que tiene fotos panorámicas ¿como puede ser lo mismo? o, ¿para ti una postal y una foto son lo mismo?. Al crear las categorías buscaba ordenar, organizar la imágenes para tener un mejor acceso a las mismas, mientras que tu, sin aviso previo alguno te dedicaste a desordenar, destruir meses de trabajo solo por que se te dio la gana. Entiende que te equivocaste y lo mejor que puedes hacer es revertir tu error.--Alexxxos (talk) 16:39, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Diario VI Región, 2 Septiembre 2009.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Diario VI Región, 2 Septiembre 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Alexxxos[edit]

Hi,

I don't think this is useful. There may be some problem with some files, but nominating all files uploaded by a user is a bit abusive. Could you close this please and nominate files which have a problem, in specifying what is the problem? Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:58, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Template:Diario VI Región[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Template:Diario VI Región has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FlávR (talk) 03:19, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Gangnam Style Roja CPS.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gangnam Style Roja CPS.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, FlávR (talk) 03:41, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

PD-Chile[edit]

Hi! The pics you tagged as (c)vios are PD-Chile. See here :) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Retrato oficial Michelle Bachelet 2014-2018, segundo período.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Retrato oficial Michelle Bachelet 2014-2018, segundo período.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Retrato oficial Michelle Bachelet 2014-2018, segundo período.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ralgis (talk) 07:03, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Retrato oficial Michelle Bachelet 2006-2010, primer período.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Retrato oficial Michelle Bachelet 2006-2010, primer período.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Retrato oficial Michelle Bachelet 2006-2010, primer período.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Yakoo (talk) 03:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Salvador Allende Gossens.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Salvador Allende Gossens.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

LX (talk, contribs) 10:01, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Rodrigo Peñailillo Briceño.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rodrigo Peñailillo Briceño.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Vanjagenije (talk) 00:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Cambio de nombre a categoría[edit]

Hola, te escribo para ver si puedes cambiarle el nombre a esta categoría sobre Valparaíso a Category:Valparaíso in Art, para hacerla mas general, específica e internacional. Saludos.--Alexxxos (talk) 05:24, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Category:Aurora de Chile[edit]

Hola, I am consolidating Category PDF Files, which I created in 2009, it is very crowded. I connected your Category Aurora (which is mainly PDF files) to Category:PDF files in Spanish and Category:Digitized newspapers as a main sub Category. I will be deleting the duplicate files in PDF files in Spanish and Digitized Newspapers so that it looks cleaner and the above sub categories are there to see. Comprendez? Gracias WayneRay (talk) 19:02, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

@WayneRay: Well done, regards. --Diego Grez return fire 19:43, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Steinsplitter (talk) 20:07, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Authorities CPS 2012.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Authorities CPS 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Steinsplitter (talk) 20:10, 14 March 2015 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 09:12, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Gran incendio de Valparaíso de 2014.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gran incendio de Valparaíso de 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 13:09, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Gran incendio de Valparaíso, 12 de abril de 2014.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gran incendio de Valparaíso, 12 de abril de 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 15:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC)