User talk:Dnalor 01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Dnalor 01!

-- 11:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stiftskirche Rein - Fassade, Bernhard von Clairvaux.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stiftskirche Rein - Fassade, Bernhard von Clairvaux.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 18:05, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pfarrkirche Ilz 3.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Ilz 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Sputniktilt 21:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schulkreuz Akademisches Gymnasium Graz.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schulkreuz Akademisches Gymnasium Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK, though less noise would be preferable --A.Savin 10:51, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Grazer Synagoge - Innenraum.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grazer Synagoge - Innenraum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good, once the CAs removed (fixable imo). --JLPC 16:21, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done : feel free to reverse. --JLPC 13:23, 1 June 2014 (UTC) Thank you very much, no need to reverse! --Dnalor 01 14:57, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --P e z i 17:37, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

KZ Auschwitz-Birkenau, Bahngleise der Entladerampe, Blumen zum Gedenken.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KZ Auschwitz-Birkenau, Bahngleise der Entladerampe, Blumen zum Gedenken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
DOF is always a potential problem in that kind of pictures, but the sharp flowers with ribbon and the unsharp background produce a good composition here. -- MJJR 08:18, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Veitsch - Pfarrkirche St. Vitus, Außenansicht 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veitsch - Pfarrkirche St. Vitus, Außenansicht 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK. But I propose to remove some of the tiny blurry birdspots. --Cccefalon 15:52, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done Thank you, removed. --Dnalor 01 17:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kodak Retina (Typ 117), 1934.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kodak Retina (Typ 117), 1934.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
A dustspot and right side too tight crop. See annotations. --Cccefalon 16:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done. Thank you for the suggestion! --Dnalor 01 06:50, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Considerably better and QI. --Cccefalon 08:31, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maria Fischer, Gestapo-Bild, in Privatbesitz des Autors.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Maria Fischer, Gestapo-Bild, in Privatbesitz des Autors.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

77.184.50.248 07:42, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Acording to de:Lichtbild it becomes PD 50 years after publication or after creation.--Sanandros (talk) 15:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 17:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Seiko Grand Quartz 9940-8010 (Twinquartz), 1979.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seiko Grand Quartz 9940-8010 (Twinquartz), 1979.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. -- XtoF 18:04, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Swatch Swiss Autoquarz, 1998.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swatch Swiss Autoquarz, 1998.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:58, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bulova Ambassador Automatic.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bulova Ambassador Automatic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Can pass as QI IMO. However, for a kind of studio setting, the ISO is much too high. If possible, you schould use a tripod and take the photos with ISO100 and exposure around 1/15 --Cccefalon 12:53, 25 August 2014 (UTC) Okay, thank you very much, for the future: I'll use a tripod and do the things you told me ;-) --Dnalor 01 13:06, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Der Sündenfall (die Schlange reicht Eva die Frucht vom Baum der Erkenntnis).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Der Sündenfall (die Schlange reicht Eva die Frucht vom Baum der Erkenntnis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok. --ArildV 12:28, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Puch 250 R, Baujahr 1935, 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puch 250 R, Baujahr 1935, 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI -- Spurzem 20:03, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Seiko King Diashock 25 Jewels, 2. Modell 1967.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seiko King Diashock 25 Jewels, 2. Modell 1967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Mattbuck 20:35, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Puch 250 R, Baujahr 1935, 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puch 250 R, Baujahr 1935, 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:05, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tissot Handaufzug, 1958.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tissot Handaufzug, 1958.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. --Livioandronico2013 12:10, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kopf Erzherzog Karls. II am Kenotaph.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kopf Erzherzog Karls. II am Kenotaph.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:43, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Omega Genève Handaufzug, Cal. 613.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Omega Genève Handaufzug, Cal. 613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK. --Mattbuck 10:36, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Seiko LCD Solar Alarm Chronograph A156-5000, 1978.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seiko LCD Solar Alarm Chronograph A156-5000, 1978.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 08:01, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bau-Inschrift Taubenkobel, Graz.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bau-Inschrift Taubenkobel, Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. --JLPC 14:35, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Omega Handaufzug, Cal. 267, 1957 58.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Omega Handaufzug, Cal. 267, 1957 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK. --Mattbuck 19:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tissot Twotimer.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tissot Twotimer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
qi to me. --Ralf Roletschek 22:58, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Basilika Seckau, Bischofskapelle, Maria-Krönungsaltar, Predella, Wochentagsseite.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Bischofskapelle, Maria-Krönungsaltar, Predella, Wochentagsseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Sharpness is not at its best, but considering the object it is ok for QI IMO. --Cccefalon 18:41, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Basilika Seckau, Bischofskapelle, Grabinschrift der Seckauer Bischöfe Martin Brenner und Jakob I. Eberlein.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Bischofskapelle, Grabinschrift der Seckauer Bischöfe Martin Brenner und Jakob I. Eberlein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
ok --Cccefalon 18:43, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bucht von Calvi, Blick von Notre-Dame de La Serra.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bucht von Calvi, Blick von Notre-Dame de La Serra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support ok --A.Savin 11:10, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI -- Spurzem 06:15, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI -- Spurzem 06:15, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI -- Spurzem 06:15, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations and many thanks that you have contributed to WLM with new quality pictures. Kind regards from --Regiomontanus (talk) 19:26, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your friendly congratulations! With best regards --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 07:48, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kopf Erzherzog Karls. II am Kenotaph, 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kopf Erzherzog Karls. II am Kenotaph, 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good Quality, for me QI --Hubertl 12:36, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kenotaph 7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kenotaph 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Beautiful photo available light. Good nuanced. QI for me. --Steindy 20:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

VW Karmann-Ghia Cabrio Typ 14 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VW Karmann-Ghia Cabrio Typ 14 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 21:59, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
VW Karmann-Ghia Typ 34.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VW Karmann-Ghia Typ 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 21:59, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Volkswagen 1300, 1974 7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volkswagen 1300, 1974 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 22:17, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Volkswagen 1300, 1974 8.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volkswagen 1300, 1974 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:59, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche San Nicolao, San Nicolao, Haute Corse, Korsika.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Nicolao, San Nicolao, Haute Corse, Korsika.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, great impression! --Hubertl 12:31, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanisches Kapitell 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanisches Kapitell 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 12:44, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanisches Kapitell 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanisches Kapitell 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 13:27, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanische Skulptur.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanische Skulptur.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:20, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Corsica Ferries Mega Express Two.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corsica Ferries Mega Express Two.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK now, though I would cut a bit of the bottom. --P e z i 10:35, 16 December 2014 (UTC) Thanks for your comment, I've cropped it at the bottom! ✓ Done --Dnalor 01 10:28, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Feuerhimmel 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feuerhimmel 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Weak pro --Hubertl 09:43, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Feuerhimmel 4.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feuerhimmel 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}
Feuerhimmel 3.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feuerhimmel 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stiftskirche Spital am Pyhrn, Innenraum 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stiftskirche Spital am Pyhrn, Innenraum 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 17:59, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Stiftskirche Spital am Pyhrn, Innenraum.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stiftskirche Spital am Pyhrn, Innenraum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 17:59, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Stift Spital am Pyhrn 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Spital am Pyhrn 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Palauenc05 19:49, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Stift Spital am Pyhrn 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Spital am Pyhrn 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:49, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stift Spital am Pyhrn 5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Spital am Pyhrn 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 12:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stift Spital am Pyhrn 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Spital am Pyhrn 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Beautiful and good quality. --Steindy 10:29, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zusätzlich zu dem Mail von heute[edit]

habe ich dir eine neue Kategorie eingerichtet. Siehe hier. Das ist eine, die jeder hat, der mit QI, VI und FP arbeitet. Es ist eine sogenannte "verborgene" Kategorie. Bitte bedenke, dass das Eintragen dieser Kategorie nicht automatisch erfolgt, sondern Handarbeit ist, dh. Bilder, die positiv bewertet wurden, musst du selbst dort kategorisieren, sonst tauchen sie in dieser Liste nicht auf. Ist aber eine praktische Übersicht, auch über die Anzahl der Bilder. Bist ja knapp vor 50 inzwischen. --Hubertl (talk) 10:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen herzlichen Dank für Deine tolle Hilfe, lieber Hubertl, dass Du das alles für mich bereits gemacht hast, habe ich absolut nicht erwartet! Meine wirklich ehrliche Wertschätzung für Deine Arbeit habe ich Dir gerade vorhin in sternförmiger Weise übermittelt! LG --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 08:59, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Red cloud cover 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red cloud cover 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 00:34, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Red cloud cover 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red cloud cover 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Great moment! --Hubertl 11:49, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Double rainbow, Graz, Austria, 2010-05-30.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Double rainbow, Graz, Austria, 2010-05-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:04, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Mond Halo (Lichteffekt), Graz, Österreich, 23. Oktober 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mond Halo (Lichteffekt), Graz, Österreich, 23. Oktober 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. --Hubertl 12:47, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche San Michele de Murato - Bandgesims mit Weintrauben, Engel und Winzer.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato - Bandgesims mit Weintrauben, Engel und Winzer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 16:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kirche San Michele de Murato - Romanisches Fenster 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato - Romanisches Fenster 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:15, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kirche San Michele de Murato - Romanisches Fenster 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato - Romanisches Fenster 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 16:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kirche San Michele de Murato - Romanisches Fenster 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato - Romanisches Fenster 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 18:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kirche San Michele de Murato - Außenansicht 5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato - Außenansicht 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
High quality.--ArildV 11:04, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gedenktafel an die Quarantäne-Baracken 16, 17 und 18; Gedenkstätte KZ Mauthausen 2010.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gedenktafel an die Quarantäne-Baracken 16, 17 und 18; Gedenkstätte KZ Mauthausen 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Gedenktafel an die Quarantäne-Baracke 19, Gedenkstätte KZ Mauthausen 2010.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gedenktafel an die Quarantäne-Baracke 19, Gedenkstätte KZ Mauthausen 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanischer Bogen mit Figuren.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanischer Bogen mit Figuren.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good work. --Steindy 00:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kirche San Michele de Murato - Außenansicht 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato - Außenansicht 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:24, 08 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis) in flight in Venice.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis) in flight in Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 08:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Filemover[edit]

Deutsch  español  English  français  português  русский  українська  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Commons File mover.svg

Hallo Dnalor 01, du bist jetzt Dateiverschieber! Bitte beachte die folgenden Hinweise, wenn du Dateien verschiebst:

  • Bitte benutze den Link zum CommonsDelinker in der {{Rename}}-Vorlage um den Bot zu beauftragen, alle Verwendungen des alten Dateinamens zu ersetzen. Falls es keine solche Anfrage gab, benutze bitte den Tab Verschieben & Ersetzen.
  • Bitte nominiere keine Weiterleitungen mit {{Speedy}} zur Schnelllöschung. Andere Projekte, z.B. solche die InstantCommons verwenden, könnten die Datei verwenden obwohl dies nicht bei der Dateiverwendung angezeigt wird. Das Löschen der Weiterleitungen würde deren Dateiverlinkung zerstören.
  • Bitte beachte und befolge die Empfehlung zum Verschieben von Dateien.

--Steinsplitter (talk) 16:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche San Michele de Murato - Außenansicht 7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato - Außenansicht 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
✓ Done Noise reduction done. Okay now? --Dnalor 01 15:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Indeed --Poco a poco 18:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rupertikirche Hohenrain - Glasfenster "Hl. Rupert", Ausschnitt (Rudolf Szyszkowitz).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rupertikirche Hohenrain - Glasfenster "Hl. Rupert", Ausschnitt (Rudolf Szyszkowitz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 12:41, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rupertikirche Hohenrain - Glasfenster "Hl. Rupert" (Rudolf Szyszkowitz).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rupertikirche Hohenrain - Glasfenster "Hl. Rupert" (Rudolf Szyszkowitz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very nice, good quality. --Steindy 14:37, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pfarrkirche Graz-St. Peter 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Graz-St. Peter 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Although I do not like this crazy unnatural perspective distortions which are required in QI, very good quality. --Steindy 14:37, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Veitsch - Pfarrkirche St. Vitus, Außenansicht 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veitsch - Pfarrkirche St. Vitus, Außenansicht 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI -- Spurzem 10:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Objektive Carl Zeiss, Jena, Nr. 145077 und Nr. 145078, Tessar 4,5 F 5,5cm DRP 142294 (Baujahr vor 1910) 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Objektive Carl Zeiss, Jena, Nr. 145077 und Nr. 145078, Tessar 4,5 F 5,5cm DRP 142294 (Baujahr vor 1910) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 12:39, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Gedenktafel der Israelitischen Kultusgemeinde Wien, Gedenkstätte KZ Mauthausen 2004.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gedenktafel der Israelitischen Kultusgemeinde Wien, Gedenkstätte KZ Mauthausen 2004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 03:20, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Objektive Carl Zeiss, Jena, Nr. 145077 und Nr. 145078, Tessar 4,5 F 5,5cm DRP 142294 (Baujahr vor 1910) 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Objektive Carl Zeiss, Jena, Nr. 145077 und Nr. 145078, Tessar 4,5 F 5,5cm DRP 142294 (Baujahr vor 1910) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The DOF could be greater, but good quality. --Steindy 01:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Einfahrtsgebäude zum KZ Mauthausen 2010.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Einfahrtsgebäude zum KZ Mauthausen 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Bad weather, but good quality. --Steindy 01:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Eingangsgebäude mit Haupttor KZ Mauthausen 2010.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eingangsgebäude mit Haupttor KZ Mauthausen 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Bad weather, but good quality. --Steindy 01:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Gedenktafel zur Todesstiege, Steinbruch Wiener Graben 2010.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gedenktafel zur Todesstiege, Steinbruch Wiener Graben 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 01:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stiftskirche Rein - Fassade, Hornwerk.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stiftskirche Rein - Fassade, Hornwerk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 08:26, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stift Rein - Bibliothek.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Rein - Bibliothek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 08:26, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stift Rein - Markgraf Leopold, Stifter von Stift Rein.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Rein - Markgraf Leopold, Stifter von Stift Rein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, fine work! --Steindy 21:21, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rupertikirche Hohenrain - Hl. Rupert.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rupertikirche Hohenrain - Hl. Rupert.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stift Spital am Pyhrn 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Spital am Pyhrn 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Distinct quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stift Rein - Stiftungsurkunde, Faksimile.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Rein - Stiftungsurkunde, Faksimile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO acceptable, the edges are missing. (And the transcription.) --XRay 17:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stift Rein - Bibliothek, Wolfgang-Missale.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Rein - Bibliothek, Wolfgang-Missale.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--NoRud 16:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stift Rein - Bibliothek 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Rein - Bibliothek 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--NoRud 16:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stift Rein - Stiftshof mit Basilika.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Rein - Stiftshof mit Basilika.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 21:11, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Einfahrtsgebäude zum KZ Mauthausen 2014 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Einfahrtsgebäude zum KZ Mauthausen 2014 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 13:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Einfahrtsgebäude zum KZ Mauthausen 2014 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Einfahrtsgebäude zum KZ Mauthausen 2014 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 17:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Eingangsgebäude KZ Mauthausen 2014.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eingangsgebäude KZ Mauthausen 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 00:52, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Eingangsgebäude mit Haupttor KZ Mauthausen 2014.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eingangsgebäude mit Haupttor KZ Mauthausen 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 10:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
KZ Mauthausen, SS-Mannschaftsgebäude und Garagen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KZ Mauthausen, SS-Mannschaftsgebäude und Garagen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Joydeep 09:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stift Rein - Bibliothek, Antiphonale Cisterciense, Miniatur Erzengel Michael.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Rein - Bibliothek, Antiphonale Cisterciense, Miniatur Erzengel Michael.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Overprocessed, resulting in artefacts. Can perhaps get salvaged. --Cccefalon 17:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks for your review! New, corrected version uploaded. Okay now? --Dnalor 01 11:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Yes better but not your best one. However, I appreciate the EV and think it can pass as QI IMO --Cccefalon 16:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Blick vom Stadtturm des Alten Rathauses zum Innsbrucker Dom 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blick vom Stadtturm des Alten Rathauses zum Innsbrucker Dom 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stacheldraht-Mahnmal, Gedenkstätte KZ Mauthausen.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stacheldraht-Mahnmal, Gedenkstätte KZ Mauthausen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 09:37, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
KZ Mauthausen, Häftlingsbaracken und Lagerstraße.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KZ Mauthausen, Häftlingsbaracken und Lagerstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. QI for me --Hubertl 09:46, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Gedenktafel der Israelitischen Kultusgemeinde Wien, Gedenkstätte KZ Mauthausen 2014.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gedenktafel der Israelitischen Kultusgemeinde Wien, Gedenkstätte KZ Mauthausen 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 01:27, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Goldener Adler (Symbol), Hotel "Goldener Adler", Innsbruck, Tirol, Österreich.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goldener Adler (Symbol), Hotel "Goldener Adler", Innsbruck, Tirol, Österreich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Blick vom Stadtturm des Alten Rathauses zum Innsbrucker Dom 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blick vom Stadtturm des Alten Rathauses zum Innsbrucker Dom 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --DXR 09:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Blick über Kufstein von der Festung aus.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blick über Kufstein von der Festung aus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 11:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Festung Kufstein01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festung Kufstein01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--NoRud 10:41, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Festung Kufstein02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festung Kufstein02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:51, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gütesiegel "Meistersingerschule".jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gütesiegel "Meistersingerschule".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:50, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Akademisches Gymnasium Graz, Südfront 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Akademisches Gymnasium Graz, Südfront 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Interesting perspective. Good quality. --Steindy 17:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Akademisches Gymnasium Graz, Frontansicht.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Akademisches Gymnasium Graz, Frontansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 07:58, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Akademisches Gymnasium Graz, Gesamtansicht 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Akademisches Gymnasium Graz, Gesamtansicht 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:35, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kenotaph.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kenotaph.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Difficult to photograph. Yet remarkably good quality. --Steindy 17:38, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Basilika Seckau, Chorkapelle, Gnadenstuhl (Martin Matousch, 1908) 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Chorkapelle, Gnadenstuhl (Martin Matousch, 1908) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--NoRud 11:32, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Basilika Seckau, Chorkapelle, Gnadenstuhl (Martin Matousch, 1908) 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Chorkapelle, Gnadenstuhl (Martin Matousch, 1908) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Halavar 12:12, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Basilika Seckau, Bischofskapelle, Maria-Krönungsaltar, Predella, Anna selbdritt (1507).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Bischofskapelle, Maria-Krönungsaltar, Predella, Anna selbdritt (1507).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 13:30, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Akademisches Gymnasium Graz, Gedenktafel für die Opfer des 1. Weltkrieges.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Akademisches Gymnasium Graz, Gedenktafel für die Opfer des 1. Weltkrieges.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality,a little overexposed middle overhead on the cross.--NoRud 11:27, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Benediktinerabtei Seckau, Äußerer Klosterhof.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benediktinerabtei Seckau, Äußerer Klosterhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. I especially like that the shadow area is well characterized. --Steindy 20:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Abtei Seckau - Innerer Klosterhof 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abtei Seckau - Innerer Klosterhof 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 20:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Abtei Seckau, Innerer Klosterhof, Kreuzgang 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abtei Seckau, Innerer Klosterhof, Kreuzgang 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. I especially like that the shadow area is well characterized. --Steindy 20:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Abtei Seckau, Innerer Klosterhof, Kreuzgang 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abtei Seckau, Innerer Klosterhof, Kreuzgang 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 15:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Benediktinerabtei Seckau, Blick von den Türmen der Basilika auf den Südturm und den Westtrakt des Klosters.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benediktinerabtei Seckau, Blick von den Türmen der Basilika auf den Südturm und den Westtrakt des Klosters.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 09:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Basilika Seckau, Vorhalle, Romanischer Löwe.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Vorhalle, Romanischer Löwe.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 09:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Von Schnee und Reif bedeckter Ast eines Nadelbaumes.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Von Schnee und Reif bedeckter Ast eines Nadelbaumes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Die Riegersburg von Süden 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Die Riegersburg von Süden 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 12:53, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Die Riegersburg 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Die Riegersburg 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 12:53, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Mantelhelm Erzherzog Karls II. 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Mantelhelm Erzherzog Karls II. 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 16:19, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Reiterschwert, Dolch und Sporen Erzherzog Karls II. 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Reiterschwert, Dolch und Sporen Erzherzog Karls II. 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 00:25, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Die Riegersburg 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Die Riegersburg 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
special.--Famberhorst 19:03, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Die Riegersburg 3.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Die Riegersburg 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:18, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Funeralwaffen Erzherzog Karls II.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Funeralwaffen Erzherzog Karls II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 00:44, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Mantelhelm Erzherzog Karls II. 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Mantelhelm Erzherzog Karls II. 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 14:16, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Prankher-Helm (Replik), Benediktinerabtei Seckau.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prankher-Helm (Replik), Benediktinerabtei Seckau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 00:44, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Außenansicht der Abtei Seckau 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Außenansicht der Abtei Seckau 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Die Riegersburg von Süden 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Die Riegersburg von Süden 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pylos mit Sfaktiria.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pylos mit Sfaktiria.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ahornblätter (Acer) im Herbst.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ahornblätter (Acer) im Herbst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 14:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ilz Hauptplatz.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ilz Hauptplatz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, Vorhalle, Säulenreihe 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, Vorhalle, Säulenreihe 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good -- Spurzem 19:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, Vorhalle, Säulenreihe 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, Vorhalle, Säulenreihe 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good -- Spurzem 19:53, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, San Paolo fuori le mura.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, San Paolo fuori le mura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 21:06, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stift Rein, Gesamtansicht 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Rein, Gesamtansicht 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Steindy 00:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stift Rein, nördliche Fassade 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Rein, nördliche Fassade 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 17:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, Vorhalle, Säulenreihe 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, Vorhalle, Säulenreihe 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good -- Spurzem 11:34, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, Statue des Heiligen Paulus im Vorhof der Basilika.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, Statue des Heiligen Paulus im Vorhof der Basilika.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, Vorhalle, Säulenreihe 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rom, Sankt Paul vor den Mauern, Vorhalle, Säulenreihe 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Tsui 07:59, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche San Nicolao, San Nicolao, Haute Corse, Korsika 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Nicolao, San Nicolao, Haute Corse, Korsika 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nizza Hafen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nizza Hafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Left side of the images is blurred. See the note. Maybe a crop would be a good option. --Halavar 11:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Thanks for your review, I've done a crop. Okay now? --Dnalor 01 11:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, now it's good. --Halavar 15:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Elafonisos - Hauptort.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elafonisos - Hauptort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}
Elafonisos - Blick auf das Festland.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elafonisos - Blick auf das Festland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Praktica LLC SLR black.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Praktica LLC front view from above.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Praktica EE2 SLR.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Praktica EE2 front view from above.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Praktiflex, 1st generation 4.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
scope.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
EFKE KB21 Black & white film.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fotokemika Efke, front view of a KB21 Black & white 135 film cartridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Kodachrome II - Film for colour slides.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kodachrome, front view of a Kodachrome II 135 colour slide film cartridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Ilford PAN F Black & white film.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ilford Photo, front view of a PAN F Black & white 135 film cartridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Rom, Vatikan, Petrusgrab unterhalb des Papstaltars des Petersdoms in den Vatikanischen Grotten.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Saint Peter, picture showing the area of the lower floor of St. Peter's Basilica that lies above the site of St. Peter's tomb.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Rom, Calixtus-Katakomben, Krypta der Päpste.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Catacomb of Callistus (Rome), detail of the Crypt of the Popes, seen from the main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

ORWO Orwochrom UT21 - 135 film for colour slides.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
ORWO Orwochrom UT21, 135 film cartridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Mimosa Panchroma-Studio-Antihalo Panchromatic glass plates, 9 x 12cm, Mimosa A.-G. Dresden, Germany.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mimosa Panchroma-Studio-Antihalo 9 x 12cm, boxing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Peugeot Elyséo 125, Sondermodell 'Roland Garros' (2002).JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peugeot Elyséo 125 Roland Garros, 3/4 view .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Kodacolor II - Film for colour prints.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kodacolor II 135-20, cartridge..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Kodak Professional BW400CN - Film for black & white prints.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kodak Professional BW400CN 135 film, cartridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Leica D-Lux 6.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leica D-Lux 6, front view from above.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Leica D-Lux 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leica D-Lux 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality for a simple setting and f/18 --Hubertl 11:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

permission to use photo[edit]

Hello,

Canadian author Lillian Conti would like to include your photo, “File:Rom, Vatikan, Basilika St. Peter, Die Taube des Heiligen Geistes (Cathedra Petri, Bernini).jpg” in her forthcoming book. We’d like to request your written permission via email to do so. Please send permission to me at dario.cusmano@mail.mcgill.ca indicating how you would like credit to be given for the photo.

With thanks and best wishes, Dario Cusmano. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.58.217.115 (talk) 00:23, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done: e-mail-answer! --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 18:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rom,_Santa_Maria_in_Cosmedin,_Innenansicht_2[edit]

Dear Dnalor 01, I am a Prof. in Architectureand I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Maria_in_Cosmedin#/media/File:Rom,_Santa_Maria_in_Cosmedin,_Innenansicht_2.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com --hippofish 14:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 14:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done: I've sent an e-mail-answer to your adress! Best regards! --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 06:48, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rom, Santa Maria in Cosmedin, Reliquien des Hl. Valentin von Terni.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rom, Santa Maria in Cosmedin, Reliquien des Hl. Valentin von Terni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support A bit small but no wonder for 12 years old picture. Good quality, please add English description next time and geocode if possible --Podzemnik 11:06, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Steyr-Diesel Traktor Typ 80 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyr-Diesel Traktor Typ 80 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GQ --Palauenc05 09:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Double rainbow, Graz, Austria, 2020-04-27.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Double rainbow, Graz, Austria, 2020-04-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality to my eyes, but Dnalor_01, could you add geographic coordinates? Let me know. -- Ikan Kekek 02:38, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Thank you for your request, I've added the geographic coordinates/camera position! ;-) --Dnalor_01 08:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Great! Symbol support vote.svg Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wien 13, Hietzing, Roter Berg 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien 13, Hietzing, Roter Berg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wiener Stadttempel - Die Tafeln des Dekaloges 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Stadttempel - Die Tafeln des Dekaloges 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 22:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Puch Olympian 12 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puch Olympian 12 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 22:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pfarrkirche Zum Guten Hirten, Wien-Hietzing 03 (März 2017).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Zum Guten Hirten, Wien-Hietzing 03 (März 2017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --GT1976 19:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Christus als Guter Hirte, Pfarrkirche Zum Guten Hirten (Wien-Hietzing) 03 cropped.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christus als Guter Hirte, Pfarrkirche Zum Guten Hirten (Wien-Hietzing) 03 cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Spurzem 21:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Figuraler gekreuzigter Jesus, Vortragekreuz.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Figuraler gekreuzigter Jesus, Vortragekreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Added a few necessary categories --MB-one 13:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your category additions! :) --Dnalor 01 09:17, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pfarrkirche Graz-St. Peter 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Graz-St. Peter 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 21:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Intermeccanica Puch IMP 700 GT Coupé 1961.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
IMP 700 GT: Intermeccanica Puch IMP 700 GT Coupé (1961), seen at the Johann Puch Museum Graz (Austria).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

KZ Auschwitz-Birkenau, Bahngleise der Entladerampe, Blumen zum Gedenken.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Selection ramp Auschwitz II (Birkenau) looking towards trees, flowers of commemoration on the rail track.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Einfahrtsgebäude zum KZ Mauthausen 2014 2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Garage yard gate (KZ Mauthausen) memorial site, Entrance doorway, KZ Mauthausen memorial, Mauthausen, Upper Austria, Austria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Eingangsgebäude mit Haupttor KZ Mauthausen 2014.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jourhaus (KZ Mauthausen) memorial site, Main entrance building, KZ Mauthausen memorial, Mauthausen, Upper Austria, Austria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

KZ Mauthausen, Häftlingsbaracken und Lagerstraße.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roll call square (KZ Mauthausen) memorial site, Main concentration camp street and camp baracks, KZ Mauthausen memorial, Mauthausen, Upper Austria, Austria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Puch Olympian 12 01.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Puch Olympian 12, Puch Olympian 12 men's bike, construction year 1985, Positron 12 gear shift.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Wetterhaeuschen.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Austrian Weather house, showing fine weather (the woman is outside the house).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Stift Rein - Markgraf Leopold, Stifter von Stift Rein.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Margrave Leopold I of Styria, founder of Stift Rein (in red clothes).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Rupertikirche Hohenrain - Glasfenster "Hl. Rupert" (Rudolf Szyszkowitz).JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Rupert, stained-glass window by Rudolf Szyszkowitz, Rupertikirche Hohenrain, Graz, Austria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Rom, Vatikan, Basilika St. Peter, Die Taube des Heiligen Geistes (Cathedra Petri, Bernini).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Depiction of the Christian Holy Spirit as a dove (Gian Lorenzo Bernini, c. 1660), stained glass in the apse of Saint Peter's Basilica, Rome, Vatican .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.