User talk:Docfeelgood3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to the Commons, Docfeelgood3!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:P504000222.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 00:57, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.[reply]


Please give images good descriptions[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  occitan  polski  português  sicilianu  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  עברית  العربية  +/−


I noticed you've uploaded one or more images and I thought I should turn your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing! — Manecke 19:16, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Versuch.png[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Versuch.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Motopark 16:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−


Hello Docfeelgood3!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 22:41, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File:Schutztor RHK.jpg[edit]

Hallo Docfeelgood3, da es nicht aus der Bildbeschreibung hervorgeht und ich noch nicht an dieser Stelle war, frage ich mal: Wo am Rhein-Herne-Kanal ist dieses Tor? -- Ies (talk) 19:06, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ies, zwischen Rhein-Herne-Kanal und der Ruhr:
Object location51° 27′ 07.27″ N, 6° 47′ 00.64″ E Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMapinfo
- Dr. Feelgood (talk) 07:59, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Wirich_IV_von_Daun.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wirich_IV_von_Daun.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Wirich_IV_von_Daun.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
Elya (talk) 08:15, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Philipp_von_Daun.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Philipp_von_Daun.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Philipp_von_Daun.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
Elya (talk) 08:15, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Versuch.svg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Versuch.svg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Versuch.svg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
Santosga (talk) 18:19, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:St-Laurentius-Winter-2012.jpg vs. File:StLaurentius_Mintard.jpg[edit]

Hallo Docfeelgood3,

du hast im Jahr 2008 ein Foto der St._Laurentius_(Mintard) St. Laurentius-Kirche eingestellt. Ich habe vor einigen Tagen ein neues Foto erstellt. Ich wollte deins nun aber nicht einfach austauschen, da es ja nicht schlecht oder unscharf ist. Ich finde aber, dass mein Foto etwas höher auflösend ist und einige Details (z.B. die Ihr) besser abbildet. Was meinst du?

Das Foto File:Mintard_St_Laurentius_Kirche.jpg finde ich aus fotografischer Sicht einigermaßen grauenhaft und würde es am liebsten aus dem Artikel entfernen. BTW: Weißt du zufällig, welche Funktion dieses Gebäude auf dem Kirchengelände hat: File:St-Laurentius-Kapelle-Klein-Winter-2012.jpg. Ist das eine kleien Kapelle?

Danke schonmal!

--Tuxyso (talk) 09:59, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe das Bild im St. Laurentius- und im Mintard - Artikel ausgetauscht. Falls du ganz anderer Meinung bist, kannst du es ja (am besten mit einer kurzen Info in der Zusammenfassung) zurücktauschen. Vielleicht kann man für den Winter auch mein Bild lassen und für den Sommer dann wieder deins reinnehmen. :) --Tuxyso (talk) 07:12, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:StLaurentius_Mintard.jpg[edit]

Ich habe dein Foto etwas entzerrt und Verzeichnung korrigiert. Ich hoffe es gefällt. Ansonsten einfach revertieren, dann erstelle ich ein abgeleitetes Werk und anderem Dateinamen. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:43, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gefällt mir… Sieht gut aus! - Dr. Feelgood (talk) 08:18, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wunderbar. Dein ursprüngliches Foto "darf" sich inzwischen auch Quality Image nennen, s. Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#March_17.2C_2013. Ich habe dein ursprüngliches Foto auch wieder in den Mintard-Artikel eingesetzt. Ein Schnee-Bild (direkt bei Laurentius) genügt vermutlich. Ich war gestern bei dem tollen Fotowetter auch noch mal unterwegs und musste mal wieder an der schönen Kirche halten:

St-Laurentius-2013.jpg Mintard-St-Laurentius-Strassenbild-2013.jpg

Aktuell (falls du es noch nicht mitbekommen hast) läuft eine Illustrationsdiskussion zum Artikel Mülheim an der Ruhr. Vielleicht kannst du dich dort auch mit deinem Sachverstand beteiligen, da glaube ich auch Fotos von dir diskutiert werden. Ansonsten: Gut Licht! --Tuxyso (talk) 08:58, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aquarius-2013.jpg[edit]

Guten Abend! Ich habe heute mal ein neues Foto vom Aquarius aufgenommen (s.u.). Das aktuelle Foto auf [1] stammt von dir hat allerdings eine recht schlechte Auflösung und ist ziemlich unscharf. Hälst du einen Austausch durch mein neues Foto für sinnvoll, oder würde das die Idee der Nebeneinanderstellung von Aquarius bei Tag und Aquarius bei Nacht stören. Bitte um eine ehrliche Einschätzung. --Tuxyso (talk) 22:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Morgen! Ich halte einen Austausch auch für sinnvoll, da sich ja auch der Eingangsbereich des Museums mit der Zeit verändert hat. - Dr. Feelgood (talk) 07:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Schön, dass du so schnell antwortest. Ich habe den Austausch gerade mal ausgeführt. Die beiden Fotos sehen in Kombination gar nicht mal schlecht aus, da man jetzt eine schöne symmetrische Darstellung hat. Weiterhin: Gut Licht! BTW: Kennst du dich eigentlich mit dem Schloss Styrum aus? Ich habe dort die Treppe an der Süd- bzw. Terassenseite eingestellt. Ist meine Bildunterschrift dazu sachlich richtig? Ist das die "Neobarocke Freitreppe", von der im Text die Rede ist? --Tuxyso (talk) 07:30, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ja stimmt! Bis Ende des 19. JHs war das auch der Haupteingang und der Jetzige der zum Garten! - Dr. Feelgood (talk) 07:44, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank für die schnelle Rückmeldung. "Freitreppe an der Südseite" ist dann also sachlich richtig. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ev. Kirche in Dümpten[edit]

Guten Abend! Ich habe heute ein neues Foto der ev. Kirche in Dümpten aufgenommen, s. File:Ev-Kirche-Muelheim-Duempten-2013.jpg. Ich habe dein älteres Foto (File:Evangelische_Kirche_in_Mülheim-Dümpten.jpg), überall durch das neue Foto ersetzt, ich hoffe das geht in Ordnung für dich. Meiner Meinung nach ist mein neues Foto eine deutliche Verbesserung (s. Versionslog). Ich wümsche noch eine schöne Restwoche. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:12, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Morgen! Ja klar… Ich hatte das Foto eh nur als Provisorium aufgenommen! - Dr. Feelgood (talk) 07:11, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung. Die Lichtverhältnisse an der Kirche sind relativ unangenehm, da man häufig mit Gegenlicht zu kämpfen hat (s. deine ursprüngliche Aufnahme). Ich habe das Licht auch nur über ein HDR in den Griff bekommen. Einen guten Wochenstart wünsche ich! Beste Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 07:13, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]